130°

VGS Radio: Why Sony Was Summarily Defeated at Day 1 of E3

This week on VGS radio...Find out why Sony started strong and ended alienating major sections of the fanbase!

Was a few key titles enough to redeem themselves in the eyes of gamers? The team discusses this and more...

Oh and MASS EFFECT 4, MASS EFFECT 4, MASS EFFECT 4.

Read Full Story >>
soundcloud.com
Seraphemz4030d ago

These guys are idiots...

He states that that they talked about "Powers" for 40 minutes... Now, he was most likely exaggerating, but it wasn't even that long.

I think that its just that last E3 was so amazing for SONY that i think this year was hard to live up to...

Also, he said that The Order was not that good... WTF? The gameplay was amazing!

And again.. the host of this show.. is a douche..

TheHardware4030d ago (Edited 4030d ago )

Amen. The two games (there are more) that are locks for me is "the order" and "LBP3"

but meh!!, these guys need hits..so why not attack the most popular kid on the block...oh and imho nintendo won E3, going the the "n4g E3 winning standards" that is

but the real winner is me....buying a wii U..and a six pack...bring on the games!!!!!

NewMonday4030d ago

sounds like a couple of fanboys trying to cope with realty and decided to ignore it all together.

Zero-One4030d ago

Actually, I think they admitted that this year's E3 could be impossible to top the last ones. Nonetheless as far as i'm concerned, everyone shouldn't be haven't these bullshit internet fights anymore and actually enjoy their stuff for once.

PureSophistry4030d ago

As one of those idiots- I PROTEST THEE.

The Order's gameplay was on the rails shooter reminiscent of the dismal days of bad Resident Evil titles....and after playing the game...unfortunately it's just not there yet.

As I said in the show- the lack of constant game, after game announcement did NOTHING to capture the attention of the mass market.

If you look at the exclusive titles mentioned and when they are hitting the market- Microsoft delivered a BETTER conference.

Does that mean they're the better console? HELLLLS NO

I SWEAR I'M NICE IN REAL LIFE

Seraphemz4030d ago (Edited 4030d ago )

You what, after reading your reply, I take back the insult.
I still dont agree with your opinion, but i do apologize for the "idiot" and "douche" comment.

Ravenheartzero4030d ago

No one was defeated, imo all three had good showings, so many games I wanna play on all 3 platforms, good E3 for gamers so far :)

HyperBear4030d ago

Why gamers can't all think like this is beyond me. +bubs :D

IanVanCheese4030d ago

It wasn't 40 minutes but my god did it feel like it.

The Order looks amazing, but they chose a pretty poor section of the game to show off in their demo. Watching some of the devs play it now on IGN and what they are showing now is 100x better.

Sony and Microsoft had good shows, not great but good. Nintendo had a great show by their standards, but they are on a different level now due to their lack of third party.

Overall E3 was a bit of a letdown, but I agree it's only because last year everyone blew their loads.

MrSec844030d ago

Sony weren't defeated, they had far more surprises, way more announcements for exclusives, with actual real time footage of at least in-engine stuff.

IMO Sony's conference was definitely the best compared to Microsoft's even with the dull stuff from Shawn Layden's chat & the stuff about that TV show & the Ratchet & Clank movie, but R&C led into Andrew House announcing a remake of R&C 1.

TLOU looked like a PS4 game.

Also GTAV being announced at Sony's conference was a huge thing.

As far as seeing that next gen sparkle to games & actually seeing new games Sony's conference was the best one from the big 3.

toddybad4030d ago

You have to remove the 3rd party games from the MS presentation and give them all to Sony as DLC and first access (on either side) doesn't count as a selling point. DLC is crap full stop and having something a couple of weeks early doesn't detract from the opposition.
All 3rd party games will look best on PS4 as we have seen already so they win every single one of them.

Show all comments (16)
110°

Mass Effect 4's Dialogue Could Take a Page Out of Baldur's Gate 3's Book

Mass Effect 4 has the perfect chance to reintroduce dialogue skills, and Baldur's Gate 3 might be the blueprint BioWare needs.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Michiel198934d ago

I'm not so sure they can, most talent that made the old games as good as they were, has left Bioware.

RaidenBlack34d ago

They can always recruit old fellas,
And also, new devs can always learn and also new indie devs are very passionate evident from the amazing indie games heavy with these gameplay features.

Michiel198934d ago

I don't think anyone would wanna come back after the stories that were told from Anthem development. I just don't see it happening. It's a bit similar to blizz, some of the talent has come back there, but there has been a shift in the studio's culture and also what the higher ups expect/demand of them

34d ago
matt13934d ago

After andromeda and veilguard i think it’s assured that the bioware we once knew has gone, I have little hope for me4. Hopefully i’m wrong.

anast34d ago

The can't. But they wouldn't even if they could.

goken34d ago

Yeah… also if pigs decided evolve wings, they could fly…

Show all comments (10)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor39d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7239d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7239d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

39d ago
S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7238d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
drivxr39d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation39d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

39d ago
DarXyde39d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50139d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer37d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
39d ago
39d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6940d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave39d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit39d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno39d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit39d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay39d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7239d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos39d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania39d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox39d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

39d ago
Bathyj39d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

39d ago
BeHunted39d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit39d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

39d ago
drivxr39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow139d ago (Edited 39d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania39d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox39d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

39d ago
S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 38d ago
Lightning7739d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts39d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango39d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7739d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts39d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit38d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7739d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 38d ago
Show all comments (46)