290°

Microsoft Game Studios family has the same project diversity as Sony, says Lobb

Microsoft Game Studios creative director Ken Lobb has discussed the nature of the Xbox family of developers in a new interview, stating that the collective that includes 343 Industries, Black Tusk, Turn10 and more makes for a strong hand.

TomShoe3734d ago

It's not that I don't believe him, it's just that their track record pre-Xbox One doesn't lie. They were doing great during the 360's launch years, but do you remember the last Microsoft-funded, AAA new IP that was widely successful?

Alan Wake, back in 2010. Sony has come up with so much more since then.

christocolus3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

They had some diversity last gen but not quantity i.e Halo, viva pinata, kameo,crackdown, lost oddysee, blu dragon, gears, forza, alan wake, fable. I think thats something Phil is trying to correct this time around .with ryse, forza5,dr3, ki, project spark, d4, sunset overdrive,zoo tycoon, quantum break (all in the first year). Those games all cut across various genres and i think at e3 we will see even more genres i.e new action adventure games, platformers and maybe some rpgs.

wardestroyr3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

Developed by 1st Party:

Halo
Viva Pinata
Kameo
Forza
Fable
Project Spark

Developed by 2nd/3rd Party:

Crackdown
Lost Odyssey
Blu Dragon
Gears of War
Alan Wake
Ryse
Dead Rising
Killer Instinct
Sunset Overdrive
Zoo tycoon
Quantum Break
D4
State of Decay
Forza Horizon
Halo Anniversary Edition
Project Gotham Racing

Kinda puts things into perspective.

christocolus3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

That doesnt change my point. They had some diversity last gen and your list proves it.it doesnt matter if its 2nd or 1st party cos 85% of those ips are owned by MS and are exclusive to xbox.which means MS can churn out sequels when ever they feel like it. Hasnt sony done similar with insomniac, quantic dreams,fromsoftware etc how ever you wanna look at it they are exclusives.

Also MS has an internal ki team at redmond they co developed ki with double helix and playground co developed horizon with turn 10.

wardestroyr3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

@christocolus

I agree somewhat about there being diversity, but this emanates primarily from 2nd/3rd party studios.

But, Ken Lobb should not be comparing their output with Sony. It's laughable considering the lions share of SCE IP are developed internally - quite the opposite of Microsoft.

It's easy to claim diversity when blank cheques are being thrown around at external developers.

devwan3734d ago

@christoculus "That doesnt change my point"

It kind of does, because the topic at hand is "Microsoft Game Studios family has the same project diversity as Sony".

-Foxtrot3734d ago

Here we go christocolus to Microsofts rescue

Oh and he brings up Phil Spencer as the game changer savior...how surprizing

Spin, spin, spin

wardestroyr has just owned you

christocolus3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

@wardestroy

I agree with you on that fact but you should know that sony has more in house teams and MS just started expanding their studios a few years back. i think they will do alot better this time around too.

@foxtrot

Lol.really?..Next time do try to add something meaningful and constructive to the argument/conversation. your comment is petty...grow up dude.

asmith23063734d ago

Vast majority of them games were early in the 360s life cycle. They took their foot off the pedal soon as Kinect was announced.

Pogmathoin3734d ago

Foxtrot, Christoculus put time and effort into his comments, you repeat the same crap every single time you comment..... A sneeze from you would be considered a breath of fresh air...... Please, bring a 'point' to the table.

Skankinruby3734d ago

@wardestroyr
As we are apparently listing both last gen and this one as well as unreleased games I can do that too.
Resistance
Killzone
God of War
little big planet
metal gear solid 4
MAG
white knight
uncharted
mod nation
demons souls
valkyria chronicles
folklore
heavy rain
beyond two souls
the last of us
gran turismo
motorstorm
infamous
heavenly sword
knack
outlast
flower
dead nation
resogun
mlb the show
deep down
driveclub
the order 1886
don't starve
tiny brains
and we both know that list can keep going but quite frankly my thumbs are tired. There's a little 'perspective' for you

Onenyte3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

People are disagreeing like your wrong or something......

I was sceptical about Spencer ever since last E3 when he was on stage, but he is getting his voice out there and making himself heard .Sony made the SAME mistake last gen and all Sony done to correct that nistake was to create a better portfolio of games to reassure it's fan base that there will be more to come .

I belive he is going to drop some bombs that's going to give the Xbox fan base something to look forward to .

-Foxtrot3734d ago

@Christocolus

Oh sorry you dont like it when someone does it to you, yet you dont mind bashing other peoples opinions on other articles. See not nice is it

@Pogmathion

Oh come off it and he doesn't, theres only so many ways you can say "I love Phil Spencer, I believe he can do anything and will give us what we want".

He just writes longer posts to cover that and often repeats himself.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3734d ago
EZMickey3734d ago

Actually the last AAA new IP Microsoft funded that was widely successful was Titanfall.

rdgneoz33734d ago

And next year the sequel is heading to the competition. The bad part about not owning an IP.

EZMickey3734d ago

Who cares? Fanboys do. That really wasn't the point otherwise.

djplonker3734d ago

Microsoft paid for last minute exclusivity they did not fund it that would have been ea.

and

titanfall was not successful.... as the game that would close the gap between the xb1 & ps4 got beat by spiderman 2 this week.

Boody-Bandit3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

@Freddy

How can anyone suggest TItanFall was successful? None of us know how much MS paid for exclusivity, marketing and how many copies that they purchased from EA to bundle with the XBOX ONE.

It could've been in the tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars that they shelled out for that game. TF didn't move many consoles and overall it's not selling like most of big market games have in the past. MS might've lost a considerable amount of money on TF or possibly broke even. I doubt it was a success.

A success would mean them making back all the money invested and moving a substantial amount of consoles. So far that hasn't happened or MS wouldn't be so silent on the games numbers and overall impact. The question remains is whether or not TF will have legs. Time will tell.

On topic:
MS. Prove it.
You're past history in this industry says quite the opposite. Sony without question had more diversity in both quantity and quality last gen. MS fell off the map the last few years with the 360. So far I haven't seen a whole lot to think otherwise this generation from MS. But this gen just started.

E3 will be here before we know. Than we will see if this is for real or just MS, once again, with their heads in the clouds. I just hope if MS does do what they claim they will that they don't do most of it up front and than become stagnant a few years down the road like they did last gen.

malokevi3734d ago

16 unanimous disagrees for saying Titanfall was a successful IP that MS launched recently? lol. Oh boy...

Kayant3734d ago

True they did fund the competition of the project at the time EA not willing to fund the project for unknown reasons which give them the intial 13 month exclusivity before becoming a full MS exclusive around E3 but TF is not an MS IP in anyway.

EZMickey3734d ago

"In order to make the economics work and keep Titanfall alive, EA needed a first-party publisher to invest. Xbox was willing to step up and save the project, which turned out to be a wise bet." - http://fauxbuzz.com/2014/04...

To be clear, the only reason I brought this up at all was just to correct fellow user TomShoe that the last game funded by Microsoft was Alan Wake. I don't really care about exclusivity, hardware sales or any of that.

But when you lot see someone posting a comment that's against the grain, you go for the jugular just on defensive instinct alone.

Chill out.

UltraNova3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

@above

You didnt even realize that you just proved the dudes point.

Meaning from 2010 to 2014 MS didnt provide their customers with anything 1st party, just one game one month ago.

That's almost 4 years of no 1st party support.

And to make matters worse Titanfall wasnt even released on the 360 1st or at the very least simultaneously with the xbox1 as a thank you to all those 360 customers who were by all means and purposes ditched by them in favor to the new system. (further read: see xbox to xbox360 transition)

So next time be more careful before you defend MS.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 3734d ago
GarrusVakarian3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

Yeah, but this article is talking about right now. Right now, MS has a lineup that is more diverse than the latter half of the 360's entire cycle. That says a lot.

I wouldn't say they are anywhere near as diverse as Sony's studio's just yet, but they have definitely improved. Games like Project Spark, Sunset Overdrive and D4 are welcome changes from the usual "dude-bro" action games that MS are known for.

Like they say, variety is the spice of life. MS getting more diverse, and Sony remaining as diverse as they have always been is great for gamers of all kinds.

Mikefizzled3734d ago

Anything by Swery is a welcome change to most games. His style is so off the wall its amazing. Can't wait for D4.

GarrusVakarian3734d ago

@Mikefizzled

D4 doesn't look like my kind of game, but i welcome the diversity it brings to MS's line-up.

WeAreLegion3734d ago

Totally agree. They seem to be on the right track, as far as games go.

DoubleM703734d ago

Lukas you have said enough. Most of the folks on here are going on the later half of the 360 life span.

rainslacker3734d ago

I have to agree. MS is making it hard to ignore the X1 with the games line up they have. While some of the games you mention aren't MS 1st party, they obviously did what they have to to secure those games for their system.

I think that's where I diverge from this article though. MS studios isn't what I'd call diverse. I have to base this on last gen because I don't know much of what they are bringing for this gen yet. I don't currently see the diversity in their 1st party line up for the X1.

I'm hoping E3 will change that, because to me, if one wants to claim diversity in 1st party studios, they have to talk about 1st party games, not the 3rd party games that everyone here keeps mentioning.

Sony isn't out of the clear yet here either. While diverse historically, so little is known about what all their studios are up to right now. Again, a situation I'm hoping E3 will remedy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3734d ago
SuperBlur3734d ago

Alan Wake is not even exclusive to Xbox so it's been a longer then that

DoubleM703734d ago

If it didn't appear on another console it's exclusive to Xbox.

JeffGUNZ3734d ago

@ TomShoe

We have to wait and see. They did invest over a billion in their gaming division for games. So far, since X1 has been announced/launched, they have been delivering. We just need to hope it continues throughout the life span of the console and not a handful of years. So far, I am pleasantly surprised with the games MS has and will be releasing this year and hope we have some good surprises at E3 in a few weeks.

Josh1013734d ago

FreddyAintDead + 1h ago "In order to make the economics work and keep Titanfall alive, EA needed a first-party publisher to invest. Xbox was willing to step up and save the project, which turned out to be a wise bet."
^^
Actually Sony approached Respawn and EA to do a PS Vita version of Titanfall that they would fund before the game was even revealed. Sony was brushed off.

Sheikh Yerbouti3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

MS doesn't have a large 1st party line-up. Instead they rely on third parties. So what?

It doesn't necessarily mean anything negative about them as a company, developer or publisher of games. They still have to choose a prospective IP and build a relationship with those studios even if they are 3rd party. They don't want just shooters.

But fanboys are all about the sales, so maybe you think XBox is all about the shooters due to how many "Call of Titan Halos" bought, but that is a result of consumer decision, not MS internal. I'm sure MS would love for Alan Wake and Banjo to pull in Halo numbers.

Now I'd rather they have more 1st party studios if it means their games are dedicated to getting the most out of the XBOne, whatever that would mean, because I haven't been no where near as impressed with MGS as I have been with SCE regarding quality last gen. But the diversity of games is there for MS.

rainslacker3734d ago

Dunno if bringing 3rd party into the argument will help your position. Sony's third party support destroys MS on every level from Japan alone.

If MS is investing in things like COD, TF, or whatever big 3rd party game you wish to cite, how exactly does that make MS 1st party studios diverse? Looking at the 3rd party games that MS routinely supports openly, it's almost all shooters. Again, not really diverse.

That's not necessarily bad, as you point out, as that's apparently what many Xbox fans enjoy, but it doesn't help bring new people into the fold, which is what MS wants to increase revenue. They're doing better so far this gen however with some of their 3rd party showings.

Sheikh Yerbouti3733d ago (Edited 3733d ago )

Riiiight!? None of the following MGS exclusives are shooters:

Alan Wake, Banjo Nuts and Bolts, Viva Pinata, Blue Dragon, Kameo, Lost Oddysey, Ninja Blade, Fable, Kinect (fill in the blank), Too Human, Jade Empire and 99 Nights. For shooters you have Perfect Dark, Halo, Crackdown, Titanfall and Gears. CoD is multiplat...!

Sony 3rd party support can kill MGS all it wants too (quality), but saying a diverse selection of titles isn't there is an outright lie. Pull your head out of the ground.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3733d ago
-Foxtrot3734d ago

I've never seen a game like God of War from them, or Uncharted, Journey, inFAMOUS, Demons Souls, Last of Us or Heavy Rain

Alan Wake is the only one I could pick from their first party games over the years which has been different from the rest of them.

ic3fir33734d ago

What? crackdown dont count?

Gears of war

Bajoo kazooei

Forza horizon 2?
State of decay? in last years

First 3years xbox360 win in games, last 3 years ps3 win

from the beach3734d ago

I'm just looking at the lists being posted in this thread and going "..yeah, and there's an Xbox counter-example for every one of those".

It's funny how people only see what they want to see.

Magicite3734d ago

many ms exclusives come out on pc or even other platforms later on, while Playstation exclusives always stay on Playstation.

InTheLab3734d ago

Try last 5 years PS3 wins....

The 360 put up nothing but mediocrity that last 5 years...

EZMickey3734d ago

I don't want Microsoft to look at Sony's catalogue and say we need a game like that and then try to ape them. That's not even being competitive, it's just lazy.

I want both Sony and Microsoft to approach IPs with the mindset of setting a new standard somehow, which is what they've both been doing.

-Foxtrot3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

It would be lazy if they didn't try to make the genre their own. It's why Uncharted is totally different from Tomb Raider for example.

Dosen't stop them from trying

LouisianaShark3734d ago

Bloodforge could've been their God of War. I wonder if MS owns it.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Mikefizzled3734d ago

They do own the IP but 2/3 studios who formed the Climaxx Group (The developers of Bloodforge) have since closed.

wardestroyr3734d ago

It seems strangely peculiar how every statement that comes out of Microsoft lately is geared toward the 'core'' gamer.

Where was this sentiment when they were ramming TV, TV, Entertainment, Kinect, disastrous restrictions, and a general attitude of contempt for the ''core'' gamer?

Seems very disingenuous, and borderline insulting.

And to counter Ken Lobb's argument, compare 2010-2013 with Sony and Microsoft - what a sobering reality.

wodan3734d ago

they always take this route when sales are not in their favor,beside they need to do somthing to move those unit sitting on store shelve.

ZodTheRipper3734d ago

And the best thing is, this statement is not true and he knows it. You must be pretty far from reality to believe it.

candy_mafia3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

@wardestroyr

You provide an extensive list of 'diverse' games on Xbox, then you slate MS for deciding maybe 'core' is the way to go.

MS got flak for some of their decisions re; X1 and are clearly making efforts to appease their fanbase.

Rather than live on last years news of DRM and TV, why don't you just look forward to this 'core-centric' attitude MS is (seemingly) injecting into the Xbox One's catalogue?

Maybe that's not controversial enough for you?...Do you prefer all the negative stuff? ...Maybe it's you who's 'disingenuous'?

Edit

I think folks would rather get on with their lives and enjoy the upcoming games, than dwell on the past and continue to feel insulted.

wardestroyr3734d ago

I'm talking about Microsoft Games Studios output - not 2nd/3rd party.

Anyone with even a morsel of intelligence (excluding diehard Xbox fanboys with rose-tinted glasses) should be insulted by how rapid the turnaround was once sales of Xbox One started tanking.

Are you not insulted that things only changed once their poisonous vision of what the gaming industry should be backfired and was thrown back at them?

This just proves that if Xbox One was a success, nothing would have changed - what would exist is a deeply anti-consumer, $500 DRM-laden, woefully underpowered, Kinect dependent entertainment centre.

With the added dash of rotating Halo, Gears, Fable, and Forza titles.

So, no, I would rather remember their attempts at destroying the industry.

Darkstares3734d ago

"So, no, I would rather remember their attempts at destroying the industry."

That's a really immature and ignorant way to be. Should I hold Sony to the fire because of what they attempted with their rootkits for CD's way back when? Should I keep my guard up after all of these years what Nintendo did to third party publishers many years ago?

The Xbox policies changed because of feedback, that's how things improve. The Xbox never released with those policies in place and they have hired people to manage to push the Xbox in a more gaming centralized manner.

Actions speak louder than words and when E3 comes again and they show great games are you still going to have your head buried in the sand moping about their attempts to destroy the industry? If so that's your problem not mine. I will be enjoying games since that's why we buy these systems in the first place, not carry on whining about the past.

SilleGamer3734d ago

@Darkstares.

Where are you getting this idea that Microsoft completely flipped the table because of feedback?

Don Mattrick was given ''feedback'' by Geoff Keighley about gamers not wanting 24-hour DRM checkings. What was his reply - GET A 360.

Are you trying to say that all of these controversial practices weren't thoroughly focus-tested and researched to the hilt before introduction? Do you honestly think that Microsoft cared one bit about what the hardcore gamer wanted?

If so, then why wasn't the reveal last May about a powerful, cheaper, gamer-centric, and FRIENDLY, console free of tacked on gesture control, gimmicky HDMI input and nonsense about TV and watercoolers.

You know, an evolution of Xbox 360 - a brilliant console. Which sold, because, you know, it was good. Explains why the Xbox One is flailing about, changing strategies on a whim, with no real identity.

Who's next after the hardcore don't bite.

Microsoft knew exactly what they were doing, and it took their game business almost collapsing to change their ways.

And although Phil is a gamer, he was there smiling on stage and giving interviews explaining how gamers couldn't see the future when touted this unbelievably anti-consumer crap.

This whole PR charade with Microsoft is so insincere, and revolting.

Darkstares3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

SilleGamer wrote,
"Where are you getting this idea that Microsoft completely flipped the table because of feedback?"

Do you see the policies put in place they announced last year? Move on brother.

"Don Mattrick was given ''feedback'' by Geoff Keighley about gamers not wanting 24-hour DRM checkings. What was his reply - GET A 360."

And where is Don now? Where are those policies now? Move on brother.

"Are you trying to say that all of these controversial practices weren't thoroughly focus-tested and researched to the hilt before introduction? Do you honestly think that Microsoft cared one bit about what the hardcore gamer wanted?"

Who cares? Don't buy the product if you want to dwell on the past then. Me, I will enjoy what the system offers, just like what the Wii U and PS4 will offer. Sounds to me that's far more enjoyable than thinking about what might have happened if...

"If so, then why wasn't the reveal last May about a powerful, cheaper, gamer-centric, and FRIENDLY, console free of tacked on gesture control, gimmicky HDMI input and nonsense about TV and watercoolers."

Read my comment above.

"You know, an evolution of Xbox 360 - a brilliant console. Which sold, because, you know, it was good. Explains why the Xbox One is flailing about, changing strategies on a whim, with no real identity."

I care about what the system offers, what games I can play, value. All of that. Your focus seems to be elsewhere and that's your prerogative.

"Who's next after the hardcore don't bite."

Why do you care about that? I only care about what the system offers and make my decisions based solely on that.

"Microsoft knew exactly what they were doing, and it took their game business almost collapsing to change their ways."

Talk about embellishment. Their financial position going into this generation is much stronger than Sony's as far as revenue returned from gaming. Sony lost billions on the PS3 and it took many years for them to finally turn a profit on each system sold. They still haven't been able to rebound from the profits they made prior to the PS3. The PS4 is now selling amazingly well and that's good for Sony but they desperately need to start profiting. Microsoft is also doing well with the Xbox One outselling previous Xbox consoles, so how is that an almost collapse?

"And although Phil is a gamer, he was there smiling on stage and giving interviews explaining how gamers couldn't see the future when touted this unbelievably anti-consumer crap."

He had to, Don was in charge. Don is now gone and Phil is in charge. Move on brother.

"This whole PR charade with Microsoft is so insincere, and revolting."

Then ignore what they do. Ignore the system. Why must fans of the system have to keep reading garbage from those who never plan to buy one? Life's too short to keep my mind occupied with stuff that doesn't interest me.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3734d ago
Jayszen3734d ago

Yup, you are right. They are not focusing on core gamers because they want to but because they have to after the debacle last year. I don't believe Microsoft is doing anything at this time but damage control and I doubt the sincerity. Titanfall did not turn out to be the saviour Microsoft hoped for, GoW and Halo 5 are not due this year and gamers were vehement in the way they rejected Microsoft last year. All these issues have given Microsoft a kick in the ass and it remains to be seen if what they do is good for gamers or not.

Concertoine3734d ago (Edited 3734d ago )

Im confused
Everyone rightfully complains that they are diverging from the gamer, and now that theyre catering to them you find it insulting?
After making those mistakes of chasing a general audience and failing, what do you think they shouldve done? As far as im concerned, admitting they were wrong and dedicating more money to games than ever was the right idea.
Im not letting MS go with a free pass after their BS last year, but hell, credit where credit is due.

Volkama3734d ago

Do not try to understand fanboy logic. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realise the truth. There is no logic.

Then you'll see that it is not logic that bends, it is only the fanboys.

rainslacker3734d ago

I have to agree. What they're doing now is what everyone was saying they had to do. They are doing it. If it's genuine, then good for us. If it's not, time will tell, and I'll criticize them then.

I'd rather support their current pro-games focused stance, than ridicule their past failure. If us, as gamers, set a standard, then we have to support that standard if the company is trying to achieve it. Otherwise it's a no-win situation for MS. That doesn't mean we have to support the company itself, but we shouldn't criticize unless it becomes apparent it's all for show. As of right now, MS does seem to be very pro-games, and I applaud them for it.

This coming from a very pro-Sony person, as I have no real love of MS due to the reasons stated by wardestroyr.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3734d ago
from the beach3734d ago

True.

I saw a mention of Viva Pinata up there.. reminds me it needs a comeback!

candy_mafia3734d ago

I can't wait for Project Spark, that is a nice diverse game from MS...

I can see MS are really trying to match Sony's diverse portfolio of IP.

Can only be a good thing, unless you happen to be a 'hater' ;/

Show all comments (96)
340°

Microsoft Responds To Latest FTC Filing, Calls It Misleading

Microsoft was quick to fire back against the FTC’s latest claim

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Sonyslave37d ago

It a warp lol ftc is need but this case against Ms is over.
😭😭

lelo2play6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

All the whiners 😭 complaining about Gamepass, where were they when Sony increased their prices and introduced several tiers for PS Plus membership?
When Sony does it, it's perfectly acceptable. When Microsoft does it, all hell breaks loose...
Hypocrites 🤡 much!

BTW, I bet most whiners 😭 complaining don't have or even care about Gamepass. They whine simply because it's Microsoft.

isarai6d ago

We were very vocal and many people including myself cancelled their subs. Tf are you talking about? 🤣

outsider16246d ago

As isarai..said. even i cancelled it when they raised their prices. Im enjoying single player games now.

shaenoide6d ago

It's not the price increase the main problem. It's the removal of day one releases for console users while PC user are safe (for now). It's a weird message being send to console fan ( "You should have bought a PC bro !)

Reaper22_6d ago

Well said! They truly are huge hypocrites.

Einhander19726d ago

This has nothing to do with PlayStation, this is about Microsoft breaking its promises.

Bringing up PlayStation is just a petty deflection attempt to not take responsibility for their own actions.

People are unhappy because this has caused thousands of people to lose their jobs, four studio closures and xbox owners should be mad about price increases and the fact that Microsoft paywalled day one games breaking their promise to their own consumers. Now even if you don't want Call of Duty you're paying for it.

The xboners like you who keep defending this type of stuff are actually making things worse for yourselves because you keep sending the message that no matter how much Microsoft bends you over by breaking their promises you're still going to defend them.

Xbox gamers make gaming worse for everyone every time they defend this type of crap.

lelo2play6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

@Einhander1972

When ponies like you accept anything Sony does without complaining, that's the major problem here...

Sony can do anything they want, and people like you will simply take it with a smile.

Einhander19726d ago

This has nothing to do with Sony.

It just shows how weak the argument is when the best you and Microsoft can can do is deflect with whataboutism's.

This is about Microsoft buying a huge publisher then going to court and saying things they knew weren't true, then going back on their own word. They went into court and knew telling the truth wouldn't be popular with either the court or the public so they lied in court. That is what is being judged here, not anything that Sony did.

You claim we are defending a price increase, but you are defending outright lies that have caused studio closures job losses and your own price increases and new games are paywalled to a higher tier.

And what did you get? Games that you were already going to get without buying these publishers. And on top of that now regardless of if someone actually wanted the games they are forced to pay extra for them.

The scale difference between our two arguments is huge.

MetroidFREAK216d ago

I canceled my yearly subscription after the price increase :)

Outside_ofthe_Box6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

"Sony can do anything they want, and people like you will simply take it with a smile"

Isn't that what you are doing with Microsoft's price increase you hypocrite? I bet you were the first to complain about Sony's increase, but not surprisingly first to defend Microsoft's increase because you are a hypocrite.

GamerRN6d ago

They didn't "remove day one" for console users, they created a tier that doesn't get them. They basically brought back Live Gold with GamePass games instead of monthly drops.

Profchaos6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Yeah I complained when Sony increased their prices it was dramatic and they didn't even comment on why it was fine and I'll complain here to

In fact there was a huge outcry just because you missed it doesn't mean it didn't happen

StormSnooper6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

It wasn’t the same thing. Sony’s tiers didn’t take anything away from people. Two of the tiers already existed. No promise was broken. Xbox tiers are breaking promises MS has made regarding day one, while also increasing price.

Angyobangyo6d ago

People were complaining and pissed. Only you seem to think Sony gamers graciously accepted it. You sure do whine a lot don't you

Hotpot6d ago

Nope, I cancelled my PS Plus already.

Your turn, criticize MS yourself, right now.

Outside_ofthe_Box6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

^^^^
@Hotpot

"Your turn, criticize MS yourself, right now."

He's a hypocrite so he won't. He's going to simply take it with a smile on his face like the pic in his avi 😭

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
XiNatsuDragnel6d ago

No it ain't mate essentially ftc has a case here

CrimsonWing696d ago

I’m not trying to be an ass here when asking this, I just genuinely want to understand more. What’s the case that the FTC have?

XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

@crismon
Microsoft said to courts when they purchased Activision they wouldn't raise the price with gamepass but they did after they got Activision.

1Victor6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

@slave3: “It a warp lol ftc is need but this case against Ms is over.
😭😭”
Well at least PLAYSTATION GET ALL Xbox FORMER “EXCLUSIVES”.
GEAR is next on the list of lubricants before they ram the big HALO on PlayStation.
So enjoy winning that FTC battle to badly loose the war 😭😭.
Edited for typos

ThinkThink7d ago

I mean, yeah.. if any of these tier options aren't right for you, you can always just buy your games the old fashioned way.

XiNatsuDragnel6d ago

Fair but this is about lying to the courts not lovely options

ChasterMies6d ago

You can buy games the old fashioned way now. Microsoft’s end game is releasing Call of Duty exclusivity on Game Pass.

Rude-ro6d ago

For now.
I can assure you, Microsoft wants subscriptions to access their games.
Just a matter of when not if or optional.

XiNatsuDragnel7d ago

Lol still lying about not raising prices in court eh? Can we address that plz

TheNamelessOne7d ago

If the price raise was attributed to the acquisition. Nobody can make that claim, and every sub service has been raising their prices. Sony made a massive one not long ago.

lodossrage7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

The problem is Gamepass price was already raised last year, just for them to raise it again this year. That right there will help the FTC's argument

It's only gets magnified when Spencer's words don't match what the company does. He said publically gamepass wouldn't change as a result of COD. He said the price wouldn't change. Both of those things were clearly untrue. Among other things

Einhander19726d ago (Edited 6d ago )

They didn't just raise the price though, they also removed day one games from the standard tier and paywalled new games behind a more expensive tier which they also raised the price on.

And the FTC's appeal also brings up the job losses and studio closures as evidence that this deal should have been blocked.

Einhander19727d ago

Well, one thing is for sure Microsoft knows more than anyone about misleading people.

The fact is Microsoft said they wouldn't raise prices due to the merger then they did including making a new tier of game pass. They said they wouldn't fire people and they did. And they also closed studios so it's hard to argue that the effect on the consumer and the industry hasn't been negative.

This is a incredibly weak rebuttal.

XiNatsuDragnel7d ago

Exactly ftc has every right to fight this

Reaper22_6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Go and google the FTC case against Sony for misleading it's customers about the PS Vita. Then come back and discuss who knows more than anyone about misleading people.

What you claim Microsoft said is just lies. They never said they wouldn't raise prices or fire anyone. And even if they did it's their right. You statement is pretty weak and proves nothing but you have a bias just like so many other people here. You guys are just butt hurt that Microsoft won this case and it backfired in Sony's face because they threw stones and thought their own deals would not be a factor but they were. As a matter of fact it was one of the factors that helped MS win the case. Just take the L because it's a done deal. It seems the only effects from this deal is upset playstation only fans who thought the deal was never going to happen. Microsoft won. Get over it. Stop worrying about things we have no control of. Just play games you like and don't focus so much on who made it and all that petty stuff.

Doomeduk6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

You're here again Sony grrrr in a MICROSOFT article
Just chuffed you've given up the obsession with Jim Ryan with just a few more sessions and you'll be able to comment on the actual article you can do it reaper the community is right behind you
Chin up

Einhander19726d ago

https://n4g.com/user/home/l...

You don't understand.

Sony is not part of this appeal at all. Sony wasn't even a part of the original FTC case. The FTC brought this case aledging that Micrsofts buyout of ABK would have a negative impact on the industry. They claimed that it would cause job loss and and that the consumer and the industry would be negativly effected from the buy out including from price increases to game pass.

Sony was only there to provide testimony on how they expected the buyour to negativly effect thier buisness.

They did not file the suit.

This appeal is of the ruling that blocked their injunction, and the FTC is presenting evidence that the buyout has in fact had the negative impact that they said it would and which was the basis for their injunction call.

The fact that you and Microsoft need to keep bringing up Sony instead of actually defending the actions themselves shows that you don't actually have a defense at all.

7d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (57)
390°

FTC Calls Xbox Game Pass Price Hike 'Exactly The Sort Of Consumer Harm' It Tried To Stop

Despite losing its lawsuit seeking an injunction to freeze Microsoft’s purchase of Activision Blizzard in July 2023, the FTC appealed the decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While it awaits a final decision from those justices, the FTC’s been filing additional evidence to support its claims that the merger would hurt competition in gaming and hurt customers, including a letter from earlier this year after Microsoft laid off nearly 2,000 employees across the newly acquired teams.

lelo2play8d ago

FTC never heard of inflation. Did they expect Gampass to remain the same price forever?
Would be funny if Gampass remained at 10€ fifty years from now...

Einhander19728d ago

"Microsoft insists Game Pass prices ‘will not increase as a result of Activision merger"
https://www.videogameschron...

"It says a price rise “would be counter-productive as it would increase subscriber churn rates”

8d ago
lelo2play7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

"Game Pass prices will not increase as a result of the Merger"

Gamepass wouldn't increase in result of the merger... but it doesn't mean it wouldn't increase due to other reasons, like inflation, extra expenses, etc. Do you expect Gamepass to remain the same price forever?

All other online services have been increasing prices.

boing17d ago

I cancelled my Ultimate sub after the announcement, so they were right. And yet, they still did it. That is so MS.

Einhander19727d ago

Inflation is down since they made that statement.

They also call into question the 2000+ people Microsoft has fired from the developers they bought.

And again, this is contradictory to what Microsoft said they would do.

They lied in court.

Reaper22_7d ago

Lol...they never said gamepass wouldn't increase and they never said it would because of the merger. And even they did it's their right to do so. So what's your point?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
Inverno8d ago

So we blaming this on inflation now? Lol ok

lelo2play7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Sony and other streaming services (Netflix, HBO, ...) have been increasing prices and altering their services. Do you expect Gamepass to remain the same price forever?
Others can increase prices and alter their services, but Microsoft can't?

Hypocrite much!

DarXyde7d ago

Absolutely.

Ego inflation.

IRetrouk7d ago

Lelo, they upped the price last year, along with their xboxs......

waderae7d ago

I believe they call it mental gymnastics.

Profchaos7d ago

Exactly let's not forget this deal was done under the same economic climate this was predictable yet they maintained they would not be increasing prices yet now the merger is done they increased prices and split tiers to avoid further scrutiny.

This is and always has been how Microsoft do business deflect blame and increase profits

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
andy858d ago

Inflation doesn't double something in a few months.

anast8d ago

You are correct. It's actually lower. It was around 7% in 2021 and now it's around 3%, which is ideal.

REDDURT8d ago

Dude they are lying. That inflation low keeps getting silly and silly.

gold_drake7d ago

inflation aint the same thing as to lock stuff behind a paywall that was previously not. lol

Hotpot7d ago

*activate clown vision*
*everything looks exactly the same*

KwietStorm_BLM7d ago

Yeah you're right. It's just a coincidence that this happened after spending billions of dollars buying up the industry. And closing studios. And firing thousands of people. All while barely being able to give away Xboxes. It's all because of inflation. LOL

XiNatsuDragnel7d ago

Fanboyism bro this is pure fanboyism, it's bs we all know it so stop defending Microsoft.

thorstein7d ago

You said it all, my friend, you said it all.

jznrpg7d ago

But inflation has gone down in the U.S.

ChasterMies7d ago

Except $/mb of broadband, $/mb of storage, and $/compute power only gets cheaper over time. As Microsoft’s overhead has gone down, it’s prices have gone up.

1Victor7d ago

@lelo: “FTC never heard of inflation. Did they expect Gampass to remain the same price forever?
Would be funny if Gampass remained at 10€ fifty years from now...”
I see you got the industrial size chapstick truck from Microsoft and put it into use already.
Add one more backpedaling to Microsoft and Phil rhetorics

VincentVanBro7d ago

Look in the mirror. You’re a clown 🤡

shinoff21837d ago

Gamepass price was going up regardless of inflation or not and you know it. Hey atleast you guys have an excuse to ride for a little bit

7d ago
PRIMORDUS7d ago

Need I remind you of how much MS is worth? There was no need to let anyone go or any studio. MS are just cancer and should leave the industry.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
8d ago Replies(1)
GamerRN7d ago

Apparently it's ok that they raised PSN prices, but Xbox can't compete?!

The "Standard" is just a rebranded Xbox Live. Not expected but not crazy since they didn't really have a proper entry level subscription to match PSNs entry level.

IRetrouk7d ago

Xbox raised their prices last year too though, their entry level was core or gamepass console.

-Foxtrot7d ago

The whole "Bu bu but Sony" thing with the PSN doesn't take into consideration Microsofts whole argument to the FTC during the entire Activision merger court case is that they wouldn't raise prices due to the merger, nothing would change.

Sony never said shit about raising prices and the like so while we can think it's scummy the FTC won't have an issue with it because the argument wasn't towards them, they never swore against anything.

If the Activision merger never happened and Microsoft raised their prices as a standard thing, like Sony with the PSN or even how Netflix has done it with their subscription it would have been business as usual.

GamerRN2d ago

I'm so tired of the Sony defense team. Pay off me thinks a lot of these comments come from Sony shills

RhinoGamer888d ago

All the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit just got a free windows 11 upgrade!

badz1497d ago

Err...W11 upgrade was always free

GamerRN7d ago

The price hike just brings it closer in line to PSN, yet it still has greater value. The standard sub matches the lowest PSN sub.

FTC trying to seem relevant. Claiming their multi million dollar case was to stop a $3 dollar price hike is a stupid argument and embarrassing for them.

Einhander19727d ago

PS+
$80 per year cheaper
More total games
Retro Games - Added monthly
VR games - Added Monthly
Ubisoft + Classics
4 k Streaming of nearly all games including ones you own digital not on the service. (xbox 1080p series s)
Sony Pictures Catalog
Anime from Crunchyroll
Full Game Trials with Trophy Support

GamerRN7d ago

PSN absolutely does not have more total games. I have PSN Ultimate or whatever it's called.

They don't get day one exclusives.
They don't even have Last of Us 2 Remake on there yet! Or Last of Us Part 1!!
You get Ubisoft classics, so does Xbox. But w Xbox also get EA games!
VR games don't matter to me, but Xbox also gets PC games that don't matter to me.
Both have classic games.
Streaming means nothing to me, it's still a failed concept, Digital Foundry tests it often, and it's not there yet for "serious gamers". The lag is intense!
Sony pictures and anime are neat, I'll give ya that.
Full game trials are cool, but Xbox gets the full game day one, so.... 🤷

I haven't had a good game in PSN since HellDivers, this year has been dead.

Honestly, once Xbox starts dumping all these exclusives on to GamePass, it's gonna be a flood of great titles

Einhander19727d ago

It's $80 cheaper, you're paying $240 a year in hopes of getting Microsoft games, and things aren't looking great on the development side of things beyond all the stuff they started 5 years ago. There is no guarantee that some of these studios will even exist going forward.

No, game pass does not offer Ubisoft Classics, and you only need Extra unlike EA Play which requires Ultimate.

And it doesn't matter what you don't want, xbox isn't offering it for people who do. Those things add value for a lot of people.

What digital foundry found was that PS+ Streaming was vastly superior to xcloud.

Full Game Trials include 3'rd party games.

PlayStation get's "good games" all the time that aren't on xbox,GranBlue Fantasy Relink, Final Fantasy, Helldivers, Rise of the Ronin, Stellar Blade, Zenless Zone Zero, Pacific Drive ect. every week something new comes out or is announced for PlayStation that's not on xbox.

And you're bragging about day one but that keep proving to be unsustainable. That's why studios got closed, 5000+ people got fired, games got ported to PlayStation, the reward system got gutted, prices were increased multiple times and those new games got removed from game pass and paywalled to a more expensive tier.

MrNinosan7d ago

@GamerRN
I guess you don't subscribe to both services.
PS+ Premium has close to 1000 games.
GPU has less than 500.

GPU doesn't come with Ubisoft Classic.
However, the do have EA Play instead.

GamerRN3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I pay 120$ a year by using cdkeys.com for GamePass Ultimate

And I definitely have both... My main gripe is PSN extreme or whatever it's called is u don't have all the 1st party stuff I want. That being said I just started up Death Standing Directors cut (terrible game, cool story)... I really want Last of Us Part 1 and Part 2.... Other than that, I don't think I have access to Ubisoft games? Where do I access those? Are there any good ones? The menu system is very confusing trying to go to classic games, PSN collection, etc etc etc

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3d ago
TheColbertinator8d ago

The FTC should give up. Microsoft owns the US Government and then someday the world and all its useless masses.

Eonjay7d ago

When they run out of fish of course!

The_Hooligan7d ago

So long and thanks for all the fish lol

S2Killinit7d ago

Sounds strange coming from a MS die hard.

Show all comments (80)
150°

Xbox Game Pass Only Has 3 More Games Coming in July 2024

The low number of new games coming to Xbox Game Pass as part of July 2024's Wave 2 lineup couldn't have come at a worse time for Microsoft. Just recently, Microsoft raised the price of Xbox Game Pass, and not only that, but it's announced that major day one releases will be locked behind Game Pass Ultimate. These decisions have understandably upset longtime Xbox Game Pass subscribers, with analysts predicting that another price hike and perhaps an ad-based tier could potentially be introduced down the line.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
10d ago
OtterX9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

You'd think they would have packed the lineup after announcing an impending price increase in Sept.

Bathyj9d ago

That would just be throwing good money after bad at this point. Microsoft needs to just drop this failed experiment altogether, leave Xbox in the wind and become the biggest 3rd party publisher on the planet. It's the only way they will ever be successful in gaming.

darthv729d ago

They already were successful in gaming before joining the console space. And they already are the biggest 3rd party publisher on the planet. They are in this to make $$ from all fronts. So suggesting they bow out and only focus on one area is a stupid idea. They make $$ from all of them, some more than others... but they all make $$.

Bathyj9d ago

The console, and gamepass is just costing them money and splitting their focus. They would make more money simply being a publisher, not a platform holder, and SELLING their games, like publishers are supposed to.

They wouldn't be acting like they are if that wasn't true. Xbox is the red headed step child of Microsoft's gaming portfolio now. Just sell games. You've bought enough Dev's and IP now to do that.

Petebloodyonion9d ago

Rumors are circulating that Microsoft may add Modern Warfare 3 to Game Pass this month, as suggested by the current game release schedule, which lists only five games instead of the usual seven.

OtterX9d ago

That would be a smarter move on their part.

TheColbertinator9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

I welcome that. I could use fresh meat for MW3.

--Onilink--9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

They released 8 games during Wave 1 for July… and the 3 coming now are all actually quite interesting.

Flintlock: The Siege of Dawn (Cloud/PC/Xbox Series X) - July 18
Dungeons of Hinterberg (Cloud/PC/Xbox Series X) - July 18
Kunitsu-Gami: Path of the Goddess (Cloud/Consoles/PC) - July 19

I’d say releasing 11 games in 1 month for gamepass should be enough…

ChasterMies9d ago

The reason for the price increase is the same as the reason for procuring fewer games from their parties; more profit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
anast9d ago

The PS+ model was always the end goal. I'm sure they got a few before closing he net.

TwoPicklesGood9d ago

To be fair, the July releases on Game Pass are great. I'd rather have today on my ps5 then the junk we are given.