160°

How Destiny Turns into Diablo When You Hit The Level Cap

In Bungie's new online first-person shooter Destiny, everything levels up. But what happens when you hit the level cap?

During the journey to get there your character, called a Guardian, gains new abilities, and the way these are given to you as you play the game is called "investment". There's even someone in charge of investment at Bungie, and his name is Tyson Green.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XBOTTOX4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

This game will be a commercial success but a failure in the minds of gamers. MARK MY WORDS

hkgamer4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

Most likely, it's not a typical fps with a lobby system. This game will probably be something similar to monster hunter and mmorpgs.

Update:
@hexxedavenger
Well I'm just basing it on assumptions that I have made from what I have read about this game.
Kinda hard to explain, but I think buggies ambitions for this game is massive and the multiplayer pvp would either be a massive hit or a big fail. It's also interesting to see if they can keep players playing for the entire generation.

HexxedAvenger4078d ago

hmm... I like Monster Hunter and MMOs

Gr1mmyshadows4078d ago

WoW did it, so i cant see why Bungie cant. just keep adding new content on a regular basis. and im sure the lvl cap will be raised every so often, just like any other mmo

hkgamer4078d ago

@trd4l1fe
Not saying that they can't do it, just saying it's going to be interesting to see how it will all work and if it will attract regular fps gamers.

I don't think the lol cap will matter much since it seems more of a weapon/equipment based game.
It will probably have different categories for different level of equipment in future updates.
I'm hoping someone like me who is not an expert or that good at fps to be able to enjoy this game.

Gr1mmyshadows4078d ago

I very much doubt it will be a failure. Bungie know what they are doing when it comes to single player and multiplayer/PvP games.

MARK MY WORDS, this game will be a huge success. in every aspect

XBOTTOX4078d ago

like i said, commercial success because people like you will buy just to play a bungie game under the assumption that it will be amazing because its a bungie game. This is just reskinned halo and activision is ready to collect from you TRD4L1fe. If your a halo fan, youd understand why they are not working on more halo games and would know what to expect

Gr1mmyshadows4078d ago

@xbottox

im buying this game because bungie is well known for making great games. Whether im wrong about destiny is yet to be seen. and dont we all make assumptions on if a game will be good on or just from watching trailers and reading articles. Even if it were made by another dev I will still buy it cause it looks amazing but the fact that bungie made this is the cherry on top. so ill gladly throw my money at them because I know it will be a great game

OpieWinston4078d ago Show
XBOTTOX4078d ago

im sorry dude but literally nothing about destiny looks amazing. borderlands meets diablo meets halo with a new skin and a heavy casual coat over EVERYTHING. the only interesting thing about destiny is the fact you can hop around planets like the moon and mars.

I was turned off by this game at first glance BUT i completely understand the hype and anticipation for it. It honestly made me that much more excited for what 343 is going to do with the halo franchise.

Look at halo reach gameplay <--> to destiny gameplay. Look at halo reach gameplay <--> to halo 4 gameplay. Look at halo 4 <---> to destiny gameplay

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4078d ago
showtimefolks4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

the first time i heard of this game it said on IGN a borderland type game from Bungie with a proper story and ME style universe travel

i am still gonna give the game the benefit of the doubt, let's see. Also destiny is suppose to be a 10 years deal so expect 3-4 games. This is just the first so i am sure Bungie will pay attention to what works and what needs to evolve or removed

XBOTTOX:

I see what you are saying but if its commercial success that means a lot of fans will buy it. And after buying we can dislike it as much as we want but Bungie/Activision get their money. So yes you are right

No gaming outlet has the Balls to give Destiny a bad review, every single site gets a lot of advertisement money from Activision and this year that money doubles with Both COD and Destiny being released. so i expect nothing but 9's and lows being mid 8's

XtraTrstrL

no sir this is all Bungie nothing to do with activision, Its Bungie's IP they can walk away anytime they want. They went with a publisher who knows how to sell FPS(big games). Say what you will be Activision but they know big games

Bungie has 110% freedom to do the game they want, their whole contract was leaked when they signed with activision so its all on Bungie
--------------------

its like people saying EA messed up dragon age 2 or ME2-3. Fact is every single person within bioware have said EA is very hands off when it comes to Bioware games. even the DLC was Bioware's idea

let's stop blaming the publisher every time and let's put some of the blame over to developer

BUT THAN AGAIN DESTINY HASN'T RELEASED SO LET'S WAIT AND SEE, IT COULD TURN OUT TO BE THE BEST GAME OF 2014.

wait and see

GameSpawn4078d ago

"its like people saying EA messed up dragon age 2 or ME2-3. Fact is every single person within bioware have said EA is very hands off when it comes to Bioware games. even the DLC was Bioware's idea"

Yeah, I just wish EA wasn't so hands off when Amalur's developer 38 Studios got into trouble. EA took their share of success from publishing Amalur and left 38 behind to die. Amalur was f-ing good and I REALLY hope it inspires future action RPGs to follow its model.

Back on topic:

Destiny is shaping up to be a very promising game. This being a new IP means the reigns are off and Bungie can go wild and do things they were not able to do with Halo (in this case the Diablo-esk leveling system). That's not to say some Halo-esk elements won't make their way into the game. That is just the nature of the game coming from the same team of developers - artists will always have their own identifiable style no matter how much they change the medium - it's human nature.

showtimefolks4078d ago

GameSpawn

that was also under EA's partners program. so EA didn't own the IP, also i played Amular and it could have been so much better than it actually was

instead of game being 100 hours of very very generic missions how about 15-20 hours of excellent story/rpg elements

they went for the MMO feel and failed, i hate the fact curt schilling lost all his hard earned money(i am a yankees fan so i do dislike him as a red sox player lol)

one thing Amular got right and so many RPG's get wrong is the combat, damn it felt good. It was on last gen consoles so the frame rate was never steady

Ittoryu4078d ago

Agree I was so disappointed when 38 folded I loved the game.

spicelicka4077d ago

Don't know or give a shit about commercial success, but it'll be a critical success mark my words!

Baccra174077d ago

I think the game will be a commercial failure to Activision but a success in gamers minds.

medman4077d ago

Well, xbuttocks, you've already failed, so there's that.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4077d ago
XtraTrstrL4078d ago

If it goes sour, it'll be mainly Activision's fault. I still can't believe Bungie went with them as pub. I wish they just kickstarted this a year or 2 ago and go for some large scale $$$, Halo fans would be all over once they heard it is what they wanted Halo to be to begin with. Anyhow, I hope it's atleast fun, considering they'll probably be force advertising store items on us in our menus like COD:Ghosts. The fact they mentioned recently that they are "trying to keep it non-subscription based" was very worrying. When they clearly stated long ago it would be tied to no subscriptions to play, they're already preparing to start playing the 180 game. I really hope Activision lets this game be as good as it can be, before greedily strategizing how to quickly capitalize on some type of wack monetization scheme.

ShowGun9014078d ago

We'll just have to see, ive got a lot of hope for this game, but anymore its mainly the hope they don't dissappoint... come on Bungie, dont let activision drag ya down!

Meltic4078d ago (Edited 4078d ago )

Stupid article. Diablo and Destiny ?. Two diffrent games.

Codewow4078d ago

But they have their similarities even from different genres. If you read the article they have a lot in common between the two games.

Meltic4078d ago

shooter and RPG game hello ?. Skills meaby similarities but not gameplay wise.

papashango4078d ago

they could have just used borderlands as example....It does the exact same thing once u hit cap. Just farm for weapons and gear basically.

ShowGun9014078d ago

eh, he's just comparing the games systems. its like saying COD has rpg elements in their multiplayer. "shooters arent rpgs!"

duh! its just an interesting comparison. lets never make interesting comparisons!

/s

The Meerkat4078d ago

At least Destiny has a release date.

WHERE IS MY PS4 DIABLO 3?

4078d ago
Show all comments (31)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans152d ago (Edited 152d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr151d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast300d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

300d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris300d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

300d ago
anast300d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole300d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast300d ago (Edited 300d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

300d ago
anast300d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 300d ago
Profchaos300d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_300d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981300d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140300d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85300d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj300d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman300d ago (Edited 300d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake300d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn300d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg300d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07300d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

299d ago
Knightofelemia299d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 299d ago
Chevalier299d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom300d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac300d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake300d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark300d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde300d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125299d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)