130°

New format war is 'unfair to gamers', says Nintendo exec

Pierre-Paul Trépanier, marketing director for Nintendo Canada, has told GamesIndustry.biz he believes it's unfair to "force" new technologies such as HD-DVD and Blu-Ray on gamers.

Speaking in an interview at the Montréal International Games Summit last week, Trépanier said he's not concerned that Blu-Ray will help shift PlayStation 3 units - despite the fact that PS2 sales were boosted by the console's DVD playback feature.

"When I'm buying a gaming system, I'm focused on the games; I want to play games, and I think that's the primary reason why someone would buy a gaming system," said Trépanier.

"I think forcing a decision on consumers would certainly not be part of Nintendo's strategy, because we want to get more people into gaming and we want to make it affordable. Forcing people to adopt a technology and a model that's proprietary and still not established is unfair to gamers."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Groom6364d ago

When buying a games console, like he says, it's the games that are important. But who cares about the format??

When byuing a PS3 I get a BD-player on top of a console. Cool.

And if HD-DVD wins the format war? Well.. Maybe I won't be using my PS3 as a movie-player, but the games still comes out on BD-Discs, so what's the problem?

THWIP6364d ago (Edited 6364d ago )

1.) Sony is the ONLY one "forcing" a format on the consumers....something they've become an industry leader in doing.

2.) HD-DVD has NOTHING TO DO with games, so it was stupid to even bring it up.

3.) Nintendo hasn't even embraced DVD technology, which was established over 10 YEARS AGO. They have NO RIGHT to speak about what's fair to consumers, in terms of a media format....they don't even acknowledge a NEED for one.

Shadow6364d ago

I remember the public outcry that Nintendo tried to induce when it was known that PS1 was going to use CD's. Sony was "forcing" gamers to buy into CD's when carts were perfectly fine. Nintendo has problems innovating in formats.

The other thing being, that 3-4 years down the line, will BD-DVD be better for games than regular DVD? Probably.

videl6364d ago

hmmm, i think new techinic is better than old, if i want old technic i can play the nes. unfair ? its unfair that they sell the wii, althugh its the same as the gamecube.

Tut6364d ago

And release Twilight Princess on the Wii.

They should be kicked in the throat for making us wait that long and then screwing us in the end.

PS360WII6364d ago

It is un-nessasary for this format war to go to consoles. This is more of a movie biz thing. Dvd's are nice and cheap and movie makers don't like that cuz it stops the profit margin. Sony say's hey we'll get more people to move in on this with the player inside the ps3. MS says oh yea well we'll put in the other guy for our system. (Sure it's not for games now but come on, who we fooling here) Nintendo hasn't even jumped on the DVD becuase everyone has it and there isn't a need for yet another dvd player in your household. And no sony hasn't become industry leader with thier formats I don't feel I need to elaborat on that one

Show all comments (9)
30°

Tales Of Graces Ƒ Retro Review – Holding Out For a Hero

Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
GoodGuy095h ago

Odd this and the xillia games still haven't gotten remasters yet.

110°

Paying Extra For Early Access Cannot Be The Industry Norm

Charging for early access has started to become a regular practice in several AAA games, and the gaming community should not tolerate this.

CrimsonWing694h ago

Don’t uh… don’t pay for it then? 🤷‍♂️ It’s 3 days early, let people who can’t wait pony up to pay for early access. I’d hope people have more control over themselves if they don’t want to pay extra. I personally, do not see an issue with the option. If I’m hyped for a game and they give you early access, I’ll pay. If it’s something I can wait to play on “actual release” I won’t pay extra. It’s as simple as that.

Crows904h ago

Except your entirely mistaken if you think it's "early access"

Theyre just charging you extra to play it on release. So gullible.

Obscure_Observer2h ago

"Theyre just charging you extra to play it on release. So gullible."

Not really.

In some cases, paying for early access will grant you access to play those games at the same time media outlets and reviewers are playing their copies.

Besides, it´s a single player game. It´s not like early access to MP competitive games like Battlefield which EA would grant a full week early access to those willing to pay; which gives a unfair advantage to those gamers and breaks the game´s balance.

CrimsonWing692h ago

are you playing it earlier than retail release?

If that’s the correct answer, how is it not early access?

Crows904h ago

It's not early access...it's playing on release...early access is when the game isn't finished and needs a little more time...you also get it months in advance.

Let's not get confused here..

Andrew33648m ago

You get access to the game before it goes live for people who purchased the standard version of the game... thus you are getting early access.

VersusDMC3h ago

Microsoft has been doing premium edition early access for awhile(Forza and Starfield recently) ...so why is it an issue now when Ubisoft does it?

It can't be the gamepass excuse as Ubisoft has day one subscriptions as well.

Obscure_Observer2h ago

I´ve paid for Starfield´s Premium Edition to get early access to the game, plus Shattered Space expansion.

I don´t regret my decision and I mighty pay for it again to get early access to Fable and TESVI.

Andrew33647m ago

@VincentVanBro yea like the kind of idiots who worry about how adults spend their money.

gold_drake2h ago

as long as people are paying for it, it will be a thing unfortunately.

the fear of missing out is ... huge. especially online.

CrimsonWing692h ago

I don’t think it’s about missing out. Think of it like a movie you’re hyped for. You can see it early if you pay extra or just wait until Friday when it officially releases.

It’s nothing more than that.

Show all comments (20)
110°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil1d 1h ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai19h ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing696h ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle5h ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal4h ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

Abnor_Mal1h ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing13h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.