In his latest article for Zero1Gaming, Chris isn't happy with the cost of digital console games, with the new inFAMOUS title causing particular annoyance.
Huzaifah from eXputer writes, "My favorite type of genre in games is when enemies are merely animal fodder in the eyes of the protagonist's sheer power."
Fans of the action-adventure franchise have been eagerly awaiting news of a potential sequel to one of the best games on the PS4.
They really need to
Go off the evil ending off Second Son
Delsin absorbs all those powers
Revealed he’s the real Beast and John in Infamous 2 was just an anomaly created by timelines being messed with by Kessler.
Cole vs the Real Beast
quite honestly, i dont remember a whole lot about 2 amymore, but i absolutely hated the guy in second son haha.
It would make more sense to go off the evil ending of 2 and the good ending g of SS where Cole is The Beast.
Ha, yea Delsin was obnoxious.
I wouldn't mind another new character, but somehow bring Cole into the story.
We can just pretend like Delsin never existed. :)
Everyone that age is obnoxious. It's been years and is like to think delsin has grown
Until we wait for a potential new entry it would awesome to have infamous collection for PS5
Umm ... how about this?
First we get the Tushima sequel(coz its most rumored)
Then a new Resistance (need new PS SP FPS)
Then a totally new IP (new IPs are always interesting)
And then a new inFamous?
I had a great time with the second son. Never got to play the originals and hope they get remastered one day.
If I had a choice between another Infamous game and another Spider-Man game, I choose Spider-Man. Sony should spend its resources on its winners.
Infamous was such a winner its studio was given the freedom (after 3 titles + their expansions) to do a new IP with GoT, just like with Sly Cooper before infamous.
I'd welcome a 4th title even more than another Spider-Man, it'd be exciting what they could do with new powers fit for the hardware outside the limits of a licensed superhero game.
Spider-Man is guaranteed and is made by Insomniac so why not both as Sucker Punch would make Infamous.
inFAMOUS Second Son was one of PS4's best exclusives, but does it hold up a decade later?
100%, locked 60fps and still look great all these years later, same with the expansion, definitely worth a look if people haven't played it yet, not the best games ever made but a good experience, hopefully a new infamous gets released
Never was my favorite infamous, but it was definitely a graphics showcase early on PS4. Still plays well with the unlocked frame rate.
Still remember getting hyped about this game nearing release. Funny because I never even got a PS4. Jumped from PS3 to PC so I never played it ahahaha
Its a good game. But thats it. Congratulations you made the best choice. I dream to have a great PC one day.
@OmegaSoldati I’ve had a few of the highest end PC’s and they’re cool for about a year then they aren’t the highest end PC anymore and not as cool. It’s way overrated imo.
Graphically It's a absolutely stunning game that still holds up today.
Didn't have all that much depth to it forcing you to play though twice for a platinum trophy a good and bad run it was a little disappointing how similar those were Delsin would be like I'm not doing that for you in a cutscene but the cutscene would play out and force you to do it anyway just as you would of in a good run
I did like the story however it got a lot of complaints back in the day people hated playing as Delsin instead of cole despite Coles story being wrapped up.
Overall though the map wasn't overly saturated with useless points of interest there was some collectibles and things to find but nothing compared to a Ubisoft game.
I think it was a good game if a little hollow I've played it through around 4 times now since it's so short.
Also it's DLC was great a full story expansion
"I played all three inFAMOUS games for the PS3 and enjoyed just about every minute of them."
Did I miss a game or something? I only remember playing two....
This guy is going to complain about a $60 game costing $60 on digital? Why should you get a cheaper price just for not going to a store? Pointless article.
well we dont get taxed and i link my PSN acct to my Sony rewards program and get almost enough points to get a $10 psn code back everytime (gotta spend about 75 to get enough for code)
Also you dont pay for gas to turn on your console.
Point is..LET THE DEVS MAKE SOME DAMN MONEY JEEZ!!!
PS This is an expensive hobby and there are tiers (mobile, old school, next gen, last gen, PC, handheld, etc)
IMO next gen isn't just about shiny new consoles and updated graphics. It should also be about new pricing models and different ways to entice to ppl to buy games. Yes, gaming is an expensive habit/hobby but that doesn't me us , the consumer, shouldn't have better options.
The author makes some good points about having to pay retail prices for digital copies. Why do games cost $60 dollars digital when they are disc less, not case, no paper for cover art, or plastic wrapping? Sure Gamestop and the like would be upset but so what, they have raped Devs and consumers for years. Pushing used games over new is bad for Devs as they don't see a dollar from those games.
If digital is to become a viable option on PSN/XBL then it needs a better pricing model or it won't take off like these aforementioned services would like it to. Imagine how many more copies would sell if they were priced $49.99 digital versus $59.99 physical. Ppl who want all of the swag that comes with physical copies would get that and the ppl who could care less about swag and physical discs could get that just at a lower price point. Options are are a beautiful thing.
And yes I understand that one can get games cheaper from various sites if one looks but this isn't about that. Its about getting better deals on digital downloads.