170°

Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes: Do Price and Length Really Matter?

Hardcore Gamer: With the recent reveal that the upcoming Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes can be completed in under two hours, a major debate has been sparked in the gaming community about whether or not the price and length of a game is relevant to its quality. There are strong feelings on both sides of the debate, an both sides have solid points. This is a debate with no right or wrong position, but both sides would be better served by looking at it from another point of view. Ground Zeroes is in a slightly more unique situation than most games that get brought up in the dollar vs. playtime debate because it’s a bite sized prelude to a large and expansive game.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
ChaosKnight3741d ago

Of course not. I pay $60 for games and never play them for more than two hours, so this is a great deal for me.

Ratty3741d ago

Except you can get this one for 20$. Not 60$.

PoSTedUP3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

this is like a prologue (or something like that). MGSV is going to be the real deal. its 20 bucks for 2 hours of a Kojima experience; if ppl are complaining, chances are they arent even worthy of being in this franchises presence.

porkChop3741d ago

Only for the digital copy of the last gen version. Digital next gen and physical last gen are both $30, and physical next gen is $40.

rdgneoz33741d ago

Except if you want the best looking version of the game, it's gonna be another $10 to $20. $30 if you want a digital version, and $40 if you want to be able to bring it over a friends. And a lot of people like a physical copy of their game which is why everyone is complaining about the $40 price tag. Hell, a lot of indie games that have come out lately offer the same quality / game length, but are $10 to $15 at max.

It's when mindless sheep tell publishers/devs that it's OK to extort them by cutting content to sell as DLC later on / day 1 DLC, or over charging for content that is short as hell, that everyone else thinks its OK and follows their example.

Ratty3741d ago

There are sheep on both sides.

PoSTedUP3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

oh ok... GT5Prologue was $40 digital and $40 physical and that wasnt 1/87th of what was in GT5, also sold like 4+M, or even 5M? i forget. point being, the fans of MGS will buy it and also if the game CAN be beaten in under 2 hours does not mean it is a 2 hour on average game. GTA SA CAN and WAS beaten in 4 hours. MGS4 CAN and WAS beaten in 3-5 hours... see where im going with this? this whole thing is being blown out of proportion, itll be a 4-5 hour on average experience for the majority of us i bet.

jetlian3741d ago

Posted thing is nobody beat those games that fast 1st time around. 2nd they were full games not a chapter which will leave you on a cliffhanger.

3rd gt5p had online components. If this had mp with 5 maps people wouldn't care so much.

PoSTedUP3741d ago

maybe not thoes games (but dont really know) but many games can be ran through in a short time on a first play through.

and them being full games... exactly, this isnt meant to be a full game... this is a prologue to hold you over until mgs5. and 2 hours is just a rumor atm.

GT5p was just a meaty demo, fans would have bought it if it didnt have online. there was some back lash because of the price, but fans of the franchise bought it bc they didnt want to wait for gt5. thats what this is for, the fans who dont want to wait. kojima said its not gonna be an over priced demo. and even if it was: dont buy it and, umm, ...Wait. lol

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3741d ago
1nsomniac3741d ago

"Of course not. I pay $60 for games and never play them for more than two hours, so this is a great deal for me. /s"

..I fixed it for you.

v6volume3741d ago

No! If the price and length is an issue then buy the digital version or don't buy it all. Stop complaining

Batzi3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

Nope. I buy games because of quality.

Quality = solid story + solid gameplay + high replayability.

Quality is something synonymous with the Metal Gear series and I have confidence after over a decade of experiencing this fantastic series that Kojima-san will once again deliver whether it was a 5 mins experience or a 100 hours experience, history repeats itself, we're looking at another masterpiece in the Metal Gear franchise.

V has come to!

-Foxtrot3741d ago Show
Irishguy953741d ago

Yeah, when the Phantom pain comes out. Skip ground zeroes. Unless you like getting buttraped.

MetaReapre3741d ago

@foxtrot
I must be missing something, why is kojima such a bad guy? What has/is he doing wrong?

SoulMikeY3741d ago

People are forgetting that this is $20. If more is spent on it, it's by choice. You have a ps3 or a 360 (unless you were dumb enough to trade it in...), you might be choosing to spend extra for physical copies or the new gen, but that's STILL and always will be your choice.

And 2 hours for just the story is just fine. Supposedly "huge" games like skyrim are like 3 hours just for the story. This game will probably be somewhere around 10 hours to do most of it, and that EASILY justifies $20.

Ratty3741d ago

I keep telling that to people too but there's so much misinformation that the majority of people think it's 40$ across all platforms and some even think it's 60$.

Batzi3741d ago

Totally agree. No one is forcing anyone to get the 40$ edition. You want better graphics/framerate? Get the PS4 version which is 30$, you want a physical? The option is there but then you have to pay an extra 10$ but the game is still the exact same thing with the same quality. They are giving you choices, and you are choosing the most expensive deal and you're complaining about it. You asked for a physical copy and KONAMI answered. Get off their backs now because this is getting ridiculous. People whining over something they asked for.

McScroggz3741d ago (Edited 3741d ago )

I have a PS3 and a PS4, I certainly don't want to play the inferior version of a game if I have the option. As for physical versus digital, there are people with data restrictions or that just prefer owning a physical copy for various, understandable reasons.

But that's not the REAL issue. I was more than happy to pay $15 for Journey and that game doesn't even have replayability. The real issue here is that Konami is selling what appears to be a glorified demo for up to $40. That is a practice that could very quickly get abused.

If this feels like a prologue, then I'm ok with its existence even if it's overpriced (and I LOVE the Metal Gear Solid series). But if it is just a single mission without a boss with a cutscene at the beginning and ending and a few throw away missions then that's a practice I don't think should be supported.

It may be a fine line, but it feels like this "game" is going to fall on the wrong side for me.

EDIT: And comparing this to Skyrim is just utterly ridiculous. You do realize that right?

porkChop3741d ago

You shouldn't have to buy an inferior version of the game you want just to get a decent value.

If they're doing this with GZ, then what are they going to charge when MGS5 comes out on next gen? Are they going to raise the price again?

If the PS3 version is $60, will the digital PS4 version be $70? Will the physical PS4 version be $80?

This is an obvious cash grab and sheep like you are actually defending it. It's just pathetic and sad.

Tdmd3741d ago

More importantly, this is a dangerous precedent to an industry that just love to grab every excuse it can to nickel'n'dime it's customers. What if this gets to be a huge hit? Suddenly, it is ok to sell overpriced demos. People will complain, but they will buy it anyway. That's what worries me the most. As if to sell in disc (cutted) content as dlc or to release broken products with 5h of main campaing isn't bad enough, now will might have a nice new trend on our hands.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3741d ago
CrossingEden3741d ago

I happen to enjoy large amounts of content for $60, that's why I enjoyed the AC4+GTAV+Link Between Worlds way more this year than the cinematic games that have no side content.

Ratty3741d ago

Is this supposed to be aimed against GZ? You realize it's 20$ and has more side content than main story, right?

rdgneoz33741d ago

They've mentioned 5 ops missions and 1 platform specific mission. Unless they having another 20 missions added, 6 missions before more content than the main story would be sad... And $20 is a digital copy of last gen. If you bought a next gen console, you'd be spending $30 to $40 for 2 hour demo. And do you realize for that you could get 2 or 3 PSN or XBLA games?

Ratty3741d ago

If the price is an issue, just get it for last gen like you said... or don't get it. But anyways, yeah there's more side content from what I read.

SoSolidrejaul3741d ago

I swear how did this article even get put up on here, next thing im gonna read is, does gameplay even matter, typical shit

KwietStorm_BLM3741d ago

Seriously though. I'm floored seeing how many sites are asking these silly questions and defending the whole deal. Do price and length really matter? What the actual phoque?

Batzi3741d ago Show
Show all comments (39)
140°

The Metal Gear series has sold over 59.8 million copies

300,000 Metal Gear games were sold during the first quarter of 2023, Konami has announced, bringing the total number to 59.8 million.

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
FallenAngel1984354d ago

Still waiting on Konami to put the MGS Collection back on digital stores

Nyxus354d ago

I know right? And rerelease the games for current gen systems while they're at it.

just_looken354d ago

Do not worry they will give use those pichincko remakes for top dollar soon.

Metal gear solid 3 in the fox engine looked/ran amazing but was sealed away :(

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Sarcasm354d ago

I know re-makes and stuff have been played to death this generation.

But damn I wouldn't mind an MGS4 remake

gold_drake353d ago

i played it quite recently and it holds up very well

CantThinkOfAUsername353d ago

It does, but a remake will be available on platforms other than PS3.

itsmebryan354d ago

I thought the series would have sold more over all these years and different releases.

Ready4nxtgen354d ago

Yeah I would have thought over 150 Mil. Something.missing here

Nyxus354d ago

Metal Gear isn't that big, and there hasn't been a new release in years. Also MGS2 and 3 are still missing from digital storefronts.

shinoff2183354d ago

5 mgs games in total if I'm not mistaken. 59 60 million seems about right. Mgs is dope to some of us but it would be hard for a lot of regulars to understand

ChasterMies354d ago

I would love to buy MGS4 but it’s still a PS3 exclusive.

JEECE354d ago

Although there are notable exceptions (GTA, certain first-party Nintendo games, Gran Turismo), as a rule games didn't sell as much in earlier generations as they have in the past few generations. So a lot of PS1-PS2 era titles that are viewed as seminal games didn't actually sell all that much by today's standards (yes, despite the large install bases of those systems lol). I remember a similar surprised reaction happening a few months ago when Square announced the total overall sales of Final Fantasy VII.

Deathdeliverer354d ago

Some of the best fun you can have online was the first metal gear online and to a lesser, but still fun to an extent, MGO2. The magazine, CQC, stealth, and tactical play Vs real players is just a blast. Not to mention playing Snake vs everyone? Amazing. The game will never be the same without Hideo, but Konami can definitely update what’s already there and take my money.

ceyoga354d ago

You wouldn't be talking about the OG MGO that was included with MGS3:S would you? It's rare running into another former player. Those were some of the best memories of any online game I had.

Deathdeliverer354d ago

Yes my man!! That seems like the BEST game that nobody played! Tranquilizer pistol, drag the body to a corner and lay a girly mag right by their head so they wake up and instantly get caught by the mag. You could get real toxic if you wanted at that point, but man that game was incredible! The only thing annoying was that damn Konami ID

P_Bomb354d ago

Did my part!

“You’re pretty good” 🫡

Show all comments (20)
220°

Kojima looks back on Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes on its 9th anniversary

Hideo Kojima: "After the launch, many people seemed to expect GZ to be a full game."

Read Full Story >>
metalgearinformer.com
-Foxtrot412d ago

People would have gotten “your intention” if you stated it from the beginning but people didn’t want smaller episode like MGS games.

He should have just focused on MGSV and work Ground Zeroes into that game instead

I_am_Batman412d ago

I don't remember there being confusion over Ground Zeroes being a full game. But then again I was just starting to catch up on the MGS series as a whole at that point so I might've not paid enough attention or simply have forgotten that there was confusion about it. I bet the whole Moby Dick Studios thing didn't help the casual observer understand what the hell was going on though.

I only got both MGSV games when Phantom Pain was already out and I kinda agree that it probably would've sucked if I had to wait one and a half years to pay The Phantom Pain after Ground Zeroes.

jambola412d ago

I'm sorry what now?
Who expected that?
If it was meant to be episodic or an experiment for that, the price should / would have reflected that

MadLad412d ago (Edited 412d ago )

To be fair, there really wasn't enough content to actually justify even the smaller price tag. It was still half the cost of a full game, yet a 20th of the content.

I can't stand these paid glorified demos.

CrimsonWing69412d ago

Honestly, it was basically similar to the FF15 Duscae demo. My theory is he was taking too damn long to make a game and Konami was like, “Sell what you got!” It just has kind of a scummy corporate “let’s sell this demo for half the price of a full game,” feel to it.

That’s just my take on it. I love Kojima and I love the MGS series, but this and 5 were the biggest let downs, ever. Clearly unfinished work forced out because, in Konami’s defense, Kojima was going over budget and taking forever on the project.

MIDGETonSTILTS17412d ago

Lol, I loved Ground Zeroes, but releasing that level at $40 during a dryspell for games at the onset of the new gen was an obvious cash grab.

I handed over my money happily, but plenty of non-diehard fans were understandably letdown by the scale of what $40 bought them.

Chocoburger412d ago

The price was originally $40 for the physical PS4 and XBO versions, but due to controversy it dropped down to $30 before launch. And as much as I love GZ, and even bought it twice, I do agree that $30 was too much. It should have launched at $20.

https://kotaku.com/konami-c...

staticall412d ago

I don't know how about anyone else. But i've bought it for $20 1 week after release (or $15, don't remember the exact exchange rate) and spent 24 hours beating every mission and getting all the steam achievements. I was 100% aware what the game was about beforehand though and i did enjoy every second of it. I knew it was a work in progress and it was probably the best and less restrictive game i've played in a long time (and controls were just perfect).

Even previous MGS games didn't gave me that much freedom as Ground Zeroes did.
Love stealth? Got you covered.
Want to speedrun? Here's the timer.
Wanna kill everyone? No problem, grab that AK then and let's party.
Wanna cause chaos? Just tell Pequod where to land.
Love to drive? Then go ahead.
Miss Raiden? Then play as him.

I wish they would continue MGSV, finish remaining chapters and add more missions as DLCs, there was SO many options... A poor man still can dream...

Show all comments (15)
370°

Metal Gear Solid V Is The Greatest Stealth Game Ever Made

Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful. Everything about it is mechanically focused and aesthetically nuanced, and not a single thing feels out of place or without purpose. Big Boss moves about each environment with a pace that provides the perfect cadence to use all manner of gadgets in whatever ways you like.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Mobis-New-Nest584d ago

You are incorrect and I will be taking this time to correct you. The Legend of Zelda Wind Waker Forsaken Fortress is stealth that no game has yet to match. Having Link, crawl, sneak and hide under a barrel is innovative stealth that Metal Gear Solid, Splinter Cell, Thief and Tenchu wish they had achieved. I rest my case.

ChubbyBlade584d ago

Cardboard box beats barrel

584d ago
got_dam584d ago

Lol I see what you did there.

fr0sty584d ago

So tired of opinion pieces... I come here for hot news, not hot takes.

-Foxtrot584d ago

Shit Metal Gear Solid game though

It's boring, empty, repetitive

Great mechanics and gameplay but it's just so dull....

585d ago
Chard585d ago

I played it long after the hype had settled, and I had a blast with it. Strip away the disappointment over what it could have been, and you're still left with a great game

porkChop585d ago

The gameplay loop was phenomenal, no question. From a gameplay standpoint it's an incredible stealth game.

porkChop585d ago

"Hideo Kojima was dealing with a hostile publisher who was pulling his team’s game apart at the seams in order to launch in some form of finished state, and it’s still downright masterful."

Let's not pretend Kojima was entirely innocent there. The game was 5+ years into development, way over budget, and wasn't even halfway done. That's why Chapter 2 is so unfinished and Chapter 3 was scrapped entirely. He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made. The same thing happened with MGS: Rising. That's why the game got rebooted as MGR: Revengeance and was handed off to Platinum. That's the only way the game was going to get finished. And yet after wasting millions on a scrapped game, MGR only went on to sell a little over 1 million units. It was a failure no matter how you look at it.

That's why Kojima was "locked away" in his office for the final 6 months of development of MGSV. So the team could actually piece together and finish the game. Was Konami just supposed to let Kojima spend more than a decade with infinite funds to make one game? Kojima isn't Rockstar, his games don't sell 170+ million units. At some point the game has to come out.

I get that Konami are a garbage company but they aren't solely responsible for what happened with Kojima. As much as I love his games and will always be a fan, MGSV was almost entirely Kojima's fault and I'm tired of people pretending that it wasn't.

MIDGETonSTILTS17584d ago

Sounds like mismanagement by Konami.

generic-user-name584d ago

Can you prove any of what you're claiming? Because I've seen Kojima build a studio and release a AAA game in 3 years with Death Stranding. All I'm seeing here are the same conspiracy theories that people like to believe to confirm their biases towards certain people, same with Neil Druckmann. For instance, MGSV may have been in development for a while but you leave out that he was also having the FOX Engine developed alongside it, an engine so good that MGSV ran at 60fps on a PS4.

He's gone on record disputing that he ever goes over budget on very rarely has to delay his titles.

"He was wasting time micromanaging and second-guessing everything his team was doing, and little to no progress was being made."

Where did you get this from?

583d ago
Workshyskiver584d ago

Best gameplay of the series hand down, its not even close. Worst story in the series hand down, its not even close.

Ezio2048584d ago

But that ending though with amazing music. The Man who sold the world.

1Victor584d ago

I can’t say it’s the best or the worse to me I stopped playing metal gear at the end of 4 the official end of the snakes saga and the best in my book was 3 snake eater excellent gameplay and excellent story telling giving us the reason for big boss to go and create his own country before the metal gear saga on the 4-8 bits consoles.

Show all comments (66)