160°

What are Epic's "unannounced projects"?

OXM - Epic Games helped define the last console generation with the Gears of War franchise and the ubiquitous Unreal Engine 3. Yet as the new generation hits its stride, we've heard not a peep from the studio that brought us one of the Xbox 360's most iconic leading men. What gives, eh?

XiSasukeUchiha3813d ago

Epic hopefully you got something Epic up your sleeves

dirigiblebill3813d ago

It's got to be new IP at this point - Gears Judgment was fun, but I don't think it sold that well. Or maybe they could reboot Unreal Tournament...

LAWSON723812d ago

IMO they should just make a new IP.

thehitman3812d ago

I would love a new Unreal if they supported it with features properly. The one the made on PS3 was really fun but lacked matchmaking and a real singeplayer component. I think it was missing split screen multiplayer as well...

fenome3812d ago

They're not exclusive to Microsoft anymore, so I think they're gonna take the Bungie approach and branch out with something new, I'm thinking a new IP. It's time to spread their wings

LackTrue4K3812d ago

@ thehitman

split screen came in the 360 game, was then updated on the ps3 the same day. that game was a blast!!!

last time i played it, i used a Playstation Navigation controller with a mouse.....with in an hour. i was a beast on the online matches!!!!

incredibleMULK3812d ago

Yeah judgment blew big time. I want another gears trilogy...no prequels. Remember you got locusts and kantus which is like some predator type race. They can work something out. I want it on PC and ps4 too though.

Freak of Nature3812d ago

With Cliff B gone I wonder what is up with the Gears series? Possibly retooling it, or negotiating for the next deal? Will it be multi-plat?

They have "projects in the works, both new Ip's and old ones in the works known through various sources. Several programmers and producers have joined the company in the last months, with job listings on its official site calling for artists, designers and engineers "to work on multiple new and existing IP's across multiple platforms"? Gears on the PS4 too?

Fortnite looks interesting, like to see just where they are with it, how expansive in gameplay they are going.

That tech demo would be great to see as a full fledged title, wonder if it is?

These next few months are going to be full of new game announcements and unveiling's... Real exciting times...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3812d ago
captainexplosion3812d ago

I have had more fun playing Overrun in Judgment than any other online mode ever. I play it daily. I hope Epic makes another Gears game and it comes to PS4.

Roccetarius3812d ago

With Epic bleeding more people, i doubt we're going to see much quality from them. It was a fun ride, but things inevitable ends.

Nodoze3812d ago

Agree. I heard they are now Chinese owned. Ferguson, CliffyB all gone. It is NOT the same Epic.

Roccetarius3812d ago

Yeah, a lot of people weren't really happy about that.

70°

Fortnite maker's appeal in Epic vs Apple case smacked down by Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court seems to have given it's final verdict on Epic and Apple's legal battle in the US.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
220°

Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fight

Three years after Fortnite-maker Epic Games sued Apple and Google for allegedly running illegal app store monopolies, Epic has a win. The jury in Epic v. Google has just delivered its verdict — and it found that Google turned its Google Play app store and Google Play Billing service into an illegal monopoly.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
gold_drake188d ago (Edited 188d ago )

oooo shiiiit
well, there ya go

but i think the biggest issue are the judges in these cases.
most of them have no clue about all them things.

ii wonder what the judge will decide Epic actually "won" or what the out come is.

Petebloodyonion187d ago

Why are you saying the judge have no cases?
I think the judges shows lots of clairity that in a duality market (APPLE and Android) there's no competition when both are already agreeing on the price.
Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?
How would the argument of "but there's competition between Cookies and cereal brands" would hold up when Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?

There's already tons od laws to make sure that there's not only 1 physical store brand and that store owners can't be in cahoot with competition in order to fix price so why would this be different for Virtual storefront?

gold_drake187d ago

i didnt say that.
read properly next time.

and the digital market is more complex than supernarkets.

Einhander1972187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

"Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?"

This isn't even the same types of argument, you have a variety of different devices you can get content on, like Apple pr Google or PC or consoles, all these things plus more compete with each other.

The only winner in this decision are Epic, Microsoft and other people who are already rich. All these greedy companies are using the law to steal profits from each other and it's going to be the consumers who pay more.

All these devices we use are heavily subsidized by the profits these platform holders make from selling peoples products. If you think Epic is going to start charging less for their MTX now or whatever your crazy, consumers are not going to get anything back from the winners here. All consumers get is the privilege to pay more for devices.

Edit:

"Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?"

Walmart does take a cut of every sale in their stores....thats how they make money. They also sell shelf space, the products that are are in the center instead of the top or the bottom pay to be there and to have higher visibility and easier access. They also sell access because obviously they don't have enough space for every brands products.

Using your Walmart analogy, how long do you think Walmart would stay in business if they just let anyone walk into their store and sell things without helping to pay for the upkeep of the stores and other costs? They wouldn't that's why things don't work like that.

That is what Epic wants, they want to use these devices with out paying to help maintain them.

Petebloodyonion187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

@Gold _Drake
Sorry bad writting from my part I meant to say Why do you think Judges have no clues?

@Einhander1972
Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recently
https://www.gamesindustry.b...

As for Walmart Upkeep, I would like to remind you that it's Wallmart and other store who need to cut in THEIR profit margin if they want to match price seen in other stores and not the other way around like in the digital market where Game publisher must sign price parity clause to please Google, Apple, Valve and Sony
https://www.linklaters.com/...
https://www.ign.com/article...

187d ago
Extermin8or3_187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

Thst isn the issue here. Thr issue ws the secret deals Google was doing to lower its cut for certain big apps publishers and only them and the fact that a requiremenf for said deals was nof helping epic games sefup its own mobile store.

Einhander1972186d ago (Edited 186d ago )

"Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recent"

Yes, yeah developers and other people who are selling things to you may benefit but the main benefit is these large companies who want to bypass fees.

But at the end of the day they are not going to start charging you less, they are going to charge the same but get more profits.

And the link you posted about the case against Sony is filed by Alex Neil a certified con artist who doesn't care about consumers they just want a huge personal payout.

And as for parity clauses again the money is going to come from the consumers one way or another, these people are fighting to take each others profits, if the parity clauses are blocked we'll pay more for hardware.

The idea that any of these changes are going to make things cheaper for the consumer are a joke, the only thing that changes is who gets the profits.

And as for Walmart, you missed what I was saying Walmart may lower the price on an item but they just charge the manufacturer of that item more to stock it on the shelves.

In some ways the digital stores are better because they don't charge an upfront fee to put an item on the store they instead charge a fee per sale. Which if they have to reduce the fee that charge for sales they would likely recoup that money by charging a fee to sell something on the ap store. Which also would benefit the rich companies over small developers who would be able to pay upfront fees that smaller developers may not.

Which is the reason Walmart only stocks the major brands and not a bunch of start up small brands, because the major brands can pay for shelf space.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 186d ago
1Victor187d ago

Don’t hold your breath yet there’s a long road ahead with the appeals process then the Supreme Court will have the last words and I don’t see this court going against the big corporations earnings.

I’m been known to be wrong some times and truly hope I am on this one

anast187d ago

The pot has been stirred.

Einhander1972187d ago

This is terrible news for consumers, while Epic and others get richer we'll now have to pay more for our devices.

ChasterMies187d ago

How? Android phones like Samsung Galaxy are not subsidized by purchases from Google Play Store. And Google can’t quit on Android because of how much money Google makes from Google search on Android.

Einhander1972187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

Google pays Samsung billions to have their store on Samsung phones.

Samsung also offers it's own store.

neutralgamer1992186d ago

Einhander1972

samsung has it's own store but how many know about that store? its like comparing MS store to other well known stores

GamerRN187d ago

So does this mean Apple also has a monopoly?

Plague-Doctor27187d ago

No. The cases argued were different.

Epic sued Apple for a monopoly over iOS. Apple said iOS competes with Android, MS, Nintendo, Sony, etc for Fortnite. Therefore there is market competition and no monopoly. The judges agreed.

Epic sued Google over a monopoly on android devices. Because Google was found to have shady deals preventing phone manufacturers from putting competing stores on phones as a default app, among other shady dealings, they found google has a monopoly on android marketplaces specifically.

Basically, Apple being a walled garden actually kind of protected them

ChasterMies187d ago

Android isn’t a walled garden tied to hardware like iOS. Android is like Windows or Linux for PCs. Any phone manufacturer can use Android and any seller can have their own store on Android. But Google used its muscle to tie up 90% marketshare for apps on Android. That’s monopolistic behavior.

Hofstaderman187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

Phil and slimey company sitting up and plotting.... expect to hear how Sony is anti-gamer for refusing to have GamePass on their ecosystems they may very well do this to avoid 2027 . I can imagine his email to Satya...."we got them" lol.

Show all comments (33)
80°

The Epic Game Store Has Two Freebies This Week

The Epic Game Store has two free titles they are giving away this week.

Read Full Story >>
terminalgamer.com
Minute Man 721198d ago

Got them both to play with my kids