Review - The Amazing Spider-Man (PlayStation Vita) (What Mobile)

What Mobile - You couldn’t be blamed for writing off Vita version of The Amazing Spider-Man at first glance. We’ve seen ports of console games fare pretty poorly on Sony’s handheld so far. If PS2 hits like Jak and Daxter have suffered then what chance does an open-world blockbuster action game have?

As it turns out, quite a good one.

Read Full Story >>
The story is too old to be commented.
SilentNegotiator2633d ago

A 16-month late port?! Oh my...

Anon19742633d ago (Edited 2633d ago )

So it's not worth playing because it came out over a year ago? Not sure I'm following. Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath came out in 2005 and I love that they ported that over to the Vita.

SilentNegotiator2633d ago

Who said it wasn't worth playing? The review says it's good and I just said "oh my..."

Anon19742633d ago (Edited 2633d ago )

You pointed out the date and said "Oh my.." Why does it matter? Again, I'm not following. What on earth does the original release date have to do with anything?

SilentNegotiator2633d ago (Edited 2633d ago )

You jumped straight to "So it's not worth playing?"

I just thought it was surprising that they took that long to port a MOVIE game. That doesn't happen very often.

Anon19742633d ago (Edited 2633d ago )

Well, you didn't say that now, did you?

You still haven't explained why the length of time it took to bring the game to the Vita even matters. Why point it out even? If you don't want people to jump to conclusions about your intended meaning you could be a little more precise in your comments. I was just fishing for clarification as to the meaning of your initial comment. You've provided one, but it still doesn't make any sense to me why it was worth pointing out. :)

SilentNegotiator2633d ago

Like I said, it's rare to see a movie game get ported 16 months later.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2633d ago
nugnugs2632d ago

Its the £34.99 price tag that made me laugh.