270°

Pachter to Nintendo fans, “Put your money where your mouth is and buy a Wii U”

Pachter says consoles are a dying breed and Nintendo fans should put their money where their mouth is.

Read Full Story >>
wiiudaily.com
zeal0us3816d ago

Some already did others however are waiting for certain games to come out before they make the purchase.

mikeslemonade3816d ago

Sorry the core Nintendo fan base just isn't that big. When you look at all the core gamers who bought the N64 and Gamecube. The install bases for those two systems were small.

Just face it.. the 3DS install base is made up mainly casual gamers. Don't believe me? Just look at the software sales outside of Pokemon.

BosSSyndrome3816d ago

Fire Emblem Awakening says hello.

mii-gamer3816d ago

What? The best selling games are traditional Nintendo franchises

Animal crossing: New Leaf
Super Mario 3d World
Mario Kart
New Super Mario Bros
Fire emblem
Kid Icarus
Mario & Luigi
Luigi ghost mansion
Ocarina of time 3d
paper mario

plus there is a huge array of succesful 3rd party games

layton
castlevania
resident evil
monster hunter
kingdom hearts 3d
street fighter IV
Ace attorney

Casual titles like brain age and nintendo cats and dog are not nearly doing as well as its predecessors. Casual titles are clearly overshadowed by the sheer amount of quality Nintend games on the 3ds

Sly-Lupin3816d ago

Not really the best counterargument. You're assuming Nintendo hasn't arcued any additional core fans with the massively popular Wii, NDS or 3DS. You're also failing to account for the large library of high quality games the WiiU has access to thanks to the virtual console and Wii backwards compatibility, both of which (I am very sorry to say) absolutely dwarf the competition.

Compared to the PS3, the WiiU may not look so hot, but next to the XB3 and PS4, it's a much better machine for gamers.

mikeslemonade3816d ago

Well if you say there are that many games then why isn't the install base growing at a fast rate. It's because those games don't sell. You can argue that they are quality games but they don't sell.

Metallox3816d ago

Do you just care of sales or what?

jcnba283816d ago

"Just face it.. the 3DS install base is made up mainly casual gamers."

That has got to be the biggest fail comment I have read on awhile lol

Why is it then that the top selling games are mainly triple A titles? Casuals don't play Fire Emblem, Monster Hunter, Pokemon, Ocarina of Time, Mario Kart 7, Kid Icarus, Super Street Fighter 4 etc.

Nice try though.

mikeslemonade3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

^
This article is about sales. Patcher says Nitendo fans need to own up and buy Wii U.

^
Thanks for supporting my argument. So the core games are the bestselling but however it doesn't translate to high system sales. ..Prooving my point that there's not that many core gamers to begin with for Nintendo.

..What it does say is the core gamer buys the most games where as the majority of sales(just like in the other systems are casual gamers). Just that Nintendo has the most casual gamers. Those casual gamers have a low attach rate. They probably buy the 3DS and then have only 3 games in 2 years typically.

^ regards to the article
It's not about the DS anyway! Patch says 30 mil for Wii U, 90 mill for X1, 110 mil for PS4. I'd say 120 mil PS4, WiiU 30 mil, X1 40 mil.

And then my orignal argument is that the core gamer has already bought the Wii U. Which is the 2-3 million Nintendo console fans. PS4 and X1 have a large demographic in COD or Sports games which account for 20 million. COD sells in the 15 millions.

Yes the marios, zeldas, DKs, metroids, fire emblem etc. and etc. sell systems and games. But their ceiling is somewhere around 30 million. Because when you look at the SNES, N64, and Gamecube. They all sold 60 million and under.

The Wii1 found the casual market. With Nintendo's focus on WiiU they are not innovative enough compete in the casual market or strong enough to compete in the hardcore market. What's left is just the Nintendo 1st party fan. The Nintendo fan that only accounts to several million.

mii-gamer3816d ago

mikeslemonade @ Dude you are contradicting yourself.

First you make the claim that majority of 3ds owners are casual games and the Nintendo fanbase isn't that big.

Yet the evidence shows that the best selling games are in fact core nintendo franchises, therefore the correlation is that Nintendo fans are indeed buying the console and games.

then you make this claim

"So the core games are the bestselling but however it doesn't translate to high system "
sales."

and yet the 3DS is selling extremely well better than any console thanks to the core games mentioned above. So your point is wrong

."What it does say is the core gamer buys the most games where as the majority of sales(just like in the other systems are casual gamers). Just that Nintendo has the most casual gamers. Those casual gamers have a low attach rate. They probably buy the 3DS and then have only 3 games in 2 years typically."

wrong as this stems from your previous point. And where is the source for your attachment rate. Unless, you can provide evidence, you are pulling stuff out of your arse without any substance

Skip_Bayless3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

Yes I meant to say WiiU since the article is about the Wii U NOT THE DS.

No.., where is your proof that these games sell that well. When I look at VG chartz the top 10 games are not DS games and certainly not Wii U games(besides Pokemon). However system sales the 3DS is selling well.

Excuse me for mixing the systems up.. I don't play Nintendo games anymore. I just got carried away giving more examples on why there's more casual gamers.

And I did not contradict myself about the Nintendo fan base. Nintendo fan base and install base are two different things. I own a Wii but that doesn't mean I'm a NIntendo fan, but however that counts as 1 sale in the install base. Ya get what i'm saying?

guitarded773816d ago

Nintendo fanboys are the biggest detriment to Nintendo. Whenever someone voices a reasonable criticism of Nintendo, they lynch the person. Nintendo needs these criticisms to advance. Nintendo's current model is years behind Sony and Microsoft in terms of online gameplay and features. If someone is REALLY a fan of Nintendo, they would voice their concerns to Nintendo. If enough people say the same things, Nintendo will have their hand forced, and ultimately add features/support which would sell more units. With a bigger install base comes more games... more features... more everything.

Shnazzyone3815d ago

Since when is pokemon a casual title? It's pretty much as hardcore as monster hunter. It's as hardcore as you want it to be. Pokemon is more hardcore than call of duty because it's infinitely more complex.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3815d ago
THamm3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

He's right, unfortunately.
Nin fans: "We want more 3rd party games"
However, only a speck of the owners even purchased a 3rd party game.
Nintendo did this to their own image by catering to kids with the Wii and moving away where the Gamecube actually was getting great ports at the time while being weakest
mikeslemonade is absolutely correct

Concertoine3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

When 3rd party games are late ports, gimped ports or overpriced ports... why would you buy them.
Rayman legends sold comparitively well, in some reports better on wii u than the other platforms. Zombi u sold 600,00 copies, i dont know how it wasnt profitable considering the game was hardly big budget.
Sonic all stars racing transformed sold best on wii u.
Otherwise there are no 3rd party titles WORTH buying.
The gamecube got great sales on good 3rd party games like soul calibur 2, but when games were missing features like splinter cell or i believe timesplitters AND lacked online multiplayer (nintendos fault there) of course they didnt sell! Gamecube owners embraced good games not crap ports, same with wii u

truechainz3816d ago

Gamecube was not the weakest. It was stronger than PS2.

THamm3816d ago

Sorry I meant 3rd place

Concertoine3816d ago

Why is THIS getting disagrees.
This is the case with every console ever. It's no different with wii u. When theres NO games out, no one will buy it. When the big titles come out the system will sell. Even the whole core nintendo fan argument is flawed, i doubt the wii invited NO additional fans onboard. Look at the sales of 1st party nintendo stuff compared to the gamecube, although the percentage is lower, sales increased across the board.

Neonridr3816d ago

Vita was no different, look how it sold for the first year and a half. Especially in Japan. It's only now that sales are starting to take off there.

Let's see how this little machine does over the holidays before we dig its grave prematurely.

Chupa-Chupa3816d ago

Patcher doesn't own gaming consoles and he drinks milk on hot summer days.

ritsuka6663816d ago

Once an idiot, always an idiot. Don't bother listening to a word he says, it's better for your health..

InTheLab3816d ago

The man is good at what he does. Unfortunately, most gamers have no clue what Pachter's actual job is and it most certainly isn't gaming predictions.

He's also a very smart man. Wedbush doesn't hire any chump off the street.

Studio-YaMi3816d ago

"Once an idiot, always an idiot. Don't bother listening to a word he says, it's better for your health.."

Says the fanboy.

Blastoise3816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

I'll pick it up at some point

Just waiting for a reasonably priced Monster Hunter bundle with the Pro gamepad

ricochetmg3816d ago

The wii u gaming pad works fine for wii.

-Foxtrot3816d ago

I think I'd rather play Mario Kart to Smash Bros to Monster Hunter with the pro controller to be honest

ricochetmg3816d ago

I played mh with the pad and it grows on you.

AJBACK2FRAG3815d ago

Arrrrrggghhhhh! It's gtowing on me!!!!!!!lol!

ricochetmg3815d ago

Its a great controller just needs games.

LOL_WUT3816d ago

This goes out to those who defend the WiiU but don't actually own the system yet. You guys need to go out and support your system and yes that included 3rd party games ;)

Thepcz3816d ago

yes, i have been saying this for a while now.

wiiu has no games, and the proof for that statement is the fact it isnt selling. meaning there are millions of nintendo fans who wont even buy it themselves.

i am one of them

just because i like nintendo doesnt mean i will splash out £200+ on a console with nothing going for it

Chrischi19883816d ago (Edited 3816d ago )

I am happily willing to buy third party stuff for my Wii U, just like CoD Ghost, but as many have already mentioned, I dont have endless money and I dont want to spend my money on games, that are better everywhere else. I am not talking about graphics, I can easily live with that, but getting no DLCs, having no multiplayer or getting a late port for full price, while on the other consoles for the same price, you get the whole trilogy. I mean, what do you expect? Nintedo was always suppodes to be a cheap console to get and it is like that, but with what third parties do, it is not really cheap anymore. I mean, on amazon you can get a Wii U for under $250 in the warehousedeals.

The only games, which were not gimped down, but also had its issues, was Rayman Legends and it sold best on Wii U, not that it sold very well, but best on Wii U. This just shows, that people are willing to buy a full game. I own a PC, why should I buy AC4 for Wii U, knowing it wont get any DLC, if I can get the whole game, with all DLC for cheaper than any console version and with better graphics, than any of the console version? OK, I dont care that much for graphics, as long as they dont look like utter crap, but getting more for less is an argument, that make sense.

I am talking to a lot of people who own a WIi U and who want to play third party on it and we didnt have only one conversation about how third party is somehow sabotaging all their Wii U games in a way.

Name me one 3rd Party game for Wii U, which was not gimped down, bad port, no DLC, released date pushed to later that year to make it multiplat, no multiplayer or overpriced, because the whole trilogy with same graphics just released for the same price on the other consoles. There is not 1 game.

JackieCruise693816d ago

I agree with all of that besides the 3rd party, unless that's aimed at me directly for my previous comments On third party...
I'll gladly go buy more third party games, as long as they're not gimped. which there aren't many.

ELpork3816d ago

Nawww... No I'm good... I've got my 3DS, and that's the only one really worth owning.

Show all comments (73)
80°

Nintendo's Massacre Of The 3DS And Wii U Is Finally Complete, Regrettably

Hanzala from eXputer: "The cruel hammer of Nintendo has fallen. Farewell, 3DS and Wii U, you surely brightened my life and many others; you won't be forgotten."

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple10112d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref11d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde11d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander197211d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville11d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff218311d ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos11d ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
isarai12d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref11d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan11d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis00711d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander197212d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

12d ago Replies(3)
Einhander197212d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

12d ago
12d ago
Zeref11d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde11d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander197211d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander197211d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier11d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto11d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff218311d ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto11d ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 11d ago
Hofstaderman11d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts11d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic11d ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
90°

Nintendo's War Against Player-Made Content Will Hurt The Company In The End

Danish from eXputer: "Nintendo has historically gone against player-made content and emulation of its games. This has done much to harm the company's image."

XiNatsuDragnel18d ago

I agree nintendo hire some these folks to help in your games it'll help imo.

banger8818d ago

They need to stop announcing these mods and fan remakes until they're finished. Finish it, upload it, and then if Nintendo dmca's it tough shit. Once it's online, people can share it around, even if the original download gets taken down.

Jingsing17d ago

True, but most modders need constant admiration during the process to motivate them.

PRIMORDUS17d ago

Yup, once it's a torrent nothing can be done Nintendo is helpless at that point. But it would be wise if they just had a site on the dark web, it's also easy to use with Tor and no one will bother you.

mastershredder17d ago

This is all coming from the mouth of short-sighted fandom and grifting madness.
No.... it wont. There is a clear defined reason why they don't. This is nothing new. Make your own shi7 from your own original ideas especially if you are trying to capitalize of it it. Duh.

Yeah, hire people that have zero respect or understanding for an established process. Wow. Yep. Totally makes sense.

shinoff218317d ago

Those guys that made that sonic game got a gig from sega or something along those lines and that game was dope as hell. One of the best sonics as of late.