200°

Watch_Dogs delay might greatly embarrass Ubisoft

Watch_Dogs was just delayed from November 2013 to Spring 2014. This Watch_Dogs delay might not be as embarrassing to Ubisoft had they not taken a shoot at Grand Theft Auto V in one of their official ad.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
vishmarx4259d ago

gta v or not...it is embarrassing given the fact that it should of been going gold anytime now and was a part of ps4 launch bundle....
some deel shit , they are in.

showtimefolks4259d ago

i know some may not be happy but i feel like if it needs more time than we should be glad UBI is doing the right things

IMO atleast they showed too much of watch dogs to than delay it.

now it will really have to compete with the big boys come next year, there are some really AAA games launching in 2014 so UBI is gonna have to earn the money where if they launched with the system it was gonna sell regardless

Scatpants4259d ago

I'm skeptical that it did need more time. I feel like they decided that AC4 and GTA5 would overshadow it and they stood to make more money from it in their next fiscal year. As it is now it should come out in the middle of the after Christmas drought when everyone will be finished with their launch titles and looking to get something new.

abzdine4259d ago

sad for people who are interested in this game, but it changes nothing for me.
i am still getting Killzone and Knack day one.

hulk_bash19874259d ago (Edited 4259d ago )

It sucks that they delayed it cause I, and I'm sure alot of other people, were looking forward to picking it up along with their new next gen consoles next month. But, if it means that they can get a better game out to us then by all means delay it. It is disappointing non the less.

PS4isKing_824259d ago

What I find odd about this is everyone is just talking about the ps4 watchdogs bundle but it was an Xbox one bundle as well. It's like ppl don't even care about the Xbox one version.

Deadpoolio4259d ago

Thats cause One80s are pretty much fully expected on the One80

MadLad4259d ago

Because this was totally the fault of Microsoft . . .

ooquis4259d ago

Sad thing is....i think UBIs knew long ago they were going to delay. they screwed everybody over the bastarrds!

DragonKnight4258d ago

They don't care about the Xbox One version. Xbox One fans will sit there and spout off the launch titles they have so they're not going to talk about Watch Dogs and no one else cares about the Xbox One except the diehard Xbox One fanboys.

Regis4258d ago

I care about my games for my console I guess you could imply I'm a fan boy but I would like to play Watchdogs on release day.

DragonKnight4258d ago

Well, the fact that you didn't create a list of Xbox One launch titles pretty much states that you're not the kind of Xbox fanboy I'm talking about.

I wanted to play WD as well, but instead I had to cancel the pre-order for that game (not my PS4 pre-order, had that since June) and get something else. Not too happy about that either.

skipper4258d ago

Allot of people are shying away from XBO. For me it is PS4 and Wii U. Sure there are allot of fanboys picking up XBO, but allot of. My friends who own PS360's are skipping XBO at launch and getting PS4 first. Better price and more power. I personally doubt I will ever pick up XBO.

FlameHawk4259d ago

Lol wow, I completely forgot about that picture. Yeah they do look stupid now but delays happen and its for the better.

The_Sneauxman4259d ago

I cancelled my pre-order today and went with Killzone at launch. This has changed my decision from owning it, to maybe. I'm extremely disappointed and wished they hadn't changed their minds with less than a month of releasing

kparks4259d ago

How did u cancel ur preorder its pretty much sold out... And u may of just screwed yourself u would of deff got 60$ off the order or something comparable and sony prolly would of threw some free stuff in the mix also!

The_Sneauxman4258d ago

Gamestop... not Amazon and it was the game not the bundle

kparks4258d ago (Edited 4258d ago )

Oooooooo yup makes sense lol.. I refuse to buy from gamestop damn crooks.

Jdoki4259d ago

I'm not sure I see your logic. I can understand the disappointment, but normally delaying a game means one of two things.

Either the game is a dud and needs major rework. Or, the game needs more polish and bug hunting and the publisher is good enough to allow it.

I think Watch Dogs falls in the the second camp, so it's likely we'll get a better game because of the extra time. I know I'd rather have a game a few months late than a buggy mess.

extermin8or4258d ago

Well.... it has to fall into the second catagory becayse a few nobths really isnt enough time to rework it completely as even having a massive dev team some things you could have 1 guy or 20 but it'll still take the same amount of time no matter how many people work on it. If they had delayed a year then I'd say rework but as its just a few months and will likely be released in february/early march its probably just polish I suspect there really wasnt much left todo and they tried to get the team tobhave it done by going nuts with overtime as the point for going gold approached but that its become clear it couldnt be done so theyve given them more time better than releasing it and patching it like some publishers and devs do... cleaely they have faith that the game is good and will do well anyway they dont need to rely on it being one of a limited number of launch titles. Whereas mext year we'll be looking at alot of releases in spring-games like destiny and the crew and infamous. More games will have been announced at vga's etc. I think games llike mgs5 will have release dates and we'll be looking forward to games due to release in the summer/autumn of 2014 like say witcher 3, dragon age inquisition etc. So the game must in essence still be very good.

The_Sneauxman4258d ago

.... or that UBISOFT is known for delaying a game to maximize profits. I like what I see from Watch Dogs but part of the appeal is that it is launching next gen.

Until Ubisoft says the reason for the delay, I will keep my money

McScroggz4259d ago

Delays happen all the time.

Beastforlifenoob4259d ago

really?
ALL THE TIME i.e. nothing has ever happend without delay than expected, so no one has done something earlier then they expected?

McScroggz4258d ago

I think you are being a little hyperbolic there.

Show all comments (47)
60°

Report: Inside Ubisoft's Project Renaissance, a Cancelled Minecraft-Like Voxel Game

In recent years, Ubisoft has canceled several games, one of them being a project code-named Renaissance.

100°

16 Ubisoft Titles Can Now Be Purchased on The Xbox PC Store

In a very intriguing and interesting move, 16 Ubisoft titles can now be purchased on the Xbox PC Store. Of course, this is a first as Ubisoft PC titles have never been purchasable on the Xbox PC Store previously.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
jznrpg29d ago

Servers are going to be bogged down by that 1 guy who will use this.

SimpleDad29d ago

Ahhh, the good old... Xbox PC store?
Who tf uses that?

Tacoboto29d ago

Kind of weird without them being updated to Xbox Play Anywhere purchases

MrDead28d ago

I uninstalled it as I was sick of the ads popping up on my login screen.

180°

Ubisoft Announces Weak Financial Results, Delays Games, but Assassin's Creed Shadows is Going Strong

Ubisoft announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024-2025, and they're not good, but Assassin's Creed Shadows is doing well.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
neutralgamer199229d ago

Three companies keep showing their true faces and telling us who they are but for some weird reason we refuse to believe them. Even when everything they show just makes their greediness even stands out more

Keep messing with the consumers and keep being greedy. Keep telling your consumers to get comfortable now owning your games and we will. You only have few IP's that gamers care about anyways so

"soon enough tencent will buy you out. They already own 49%. Keep deleting games from gamers libraries and getting sued over it instead of making offline play possible for the crew" it's sad that I believe in 10 cents more than UBI because atleast tencent knows how to run a proper business

These executives can taking millions and bonuses and stock options yet they fire those actually making the games without thinking twice. Gaming has become so greedy that their own greed will be their downfall. Companies like Capcom have realized making good quality games and treat gamers with respect

AC series started with a soul but now it's just a soulless empty option world with icons filling the game map. They make their own games so grindy so that they can see the XP boosters to even the odds. As a gamer in my 40's all I want to know is when did gaming just stop being about Fun and all about greed. Double XP weekends selling cosmetics and dances. I use to be a big sports game guy when I was in my 20's the other day I wanted to play NBA 2k and after doing some deep research I realized the best NBA game was 2k17 and NBA 2k25 at $9.79 I couldn't pull the trigger on that 2k25 for how egregious the micro transactions were. So much of the fun is behind a pay wall

dveio29d ago

True words, buddy.

Q: "So how many units did Shadows sell?"

Ubisoft: "Well, look, we ... it's been a busy week."

neutralgamer199229d ago

For over a decade, the price of video games remained steady. We paid $50, then $60 for full, content-rich experiences. Developers found creative ways to deliver incredible games without charging more. From the PS2 era through the PS4/Xbox One, pricing consistency gave players a sense of value and trust.

But then came the jump to $70 during the PS5 and Xbox Series X launches—justified by "rising development costs." And now, barely four years later, we’re seeing $80 price tags becoming more common for standard editions. At this pace, by the time the next generation of consoles launches around 2027, $90 games could be the norm. And with a behemoth like GTA 6 on the horizon, a $99.99 base price wouldn’t be shocking at all.

Yet we’ve also seen proof that this kind of pricing isn’t necessary for success. Look at the recent launches of Expedition 33 and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered. Both released at $49.99 and have been met with strong sales and positive reception. These games show that there’s still plenty of room for high-quality, mid-budget (AA) titles that offer great value—and gamers are more than willing to support them at fair prices.

But here’s the problem: the big publishers don’t care. If we as consumers keep paying for deluxe editions, early access, and overpriced base games, they’ll keep pushing the limits. They’re not going to back down unless we speak with our wallets—because that’s the only language they listen to. If they see record sales, they’ll take it as validation.

It’s frustrating when these same companies report record-breaking revenue and profits—yet still complain about tariffs, still find excuses to raise prices, and still hand out bigger bonuses to their CEOs. If they’re doing so well financially, why are they passing more of the burden onto players?

It’s because gaming has become the second biggest entertainment market in the world. And with that comes attention from hedge funds, investors, and boardrooms focused on short-term profit, not long-term player trust. To them, your passion is just a revenue stream. They care about quarterly numbers, not the health of the industry or the joy of the experience.

And unless we—as players—take a stand, the greed won’t stop. The monetization will grow, the price hikes will continue, and the soul of gaming will keep slipping away. The choice is ours. We can either keep paying more for less, or we can push back. One purchase—or one refusal to purchase—at a time

dveio29d ago

"And unless we—as players—take a stand, the greed won’t stop."

And that's the tough part about it.

Look at those annual figures showing billions and billions of money being spent on the most ridiculous add-ons, DLCs, pre-release accesses, even pre-orders, digital deluxe crap, etc.

I mean - we've stood together at times. I don't say it didn't happen before.

But within all of our communities there's so much passive aggressive defensiveness.

Look at the debates regarding physical vs digital.

Publishers can't keep a straight face reading our discussions in which many people abandon physical.

Playing straight into the cards of publishers out there.

neutralgamer199228d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Like I said gamers are the biggest issue with gaming. We may united on a issue but as soon as our favorite gaming franchise gets a release we will support it. If there any doubt Mario kart will be one of the best selling games on switch 2?

Things we use to unlock by simply playing a game has not be sold to us as extra content

Rainbowcookie28d ago

I think people arebgetting tired of the formula. We see it in sales. People just want fun again.

neutralgamer199228d ago

I just want games to be fun and not geindy and full of micro transactions

anast28d ago

Even the $130 ultimate editions of UBI games are only a bit less grindy and they still beg people to buy helix coins throughout the whole experience.

It's a travesty what 2K did to NBA 2K.

neutralgamer199228d ago

It really is because NBA 2K is simply unplayable without spending money and you can't even respec for a new my player you are required to spend again

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
SimpleDad29d ago

When you don't disclose units sold... and your stock goes down... how is this doing well?

CantThinkOfAUsername28d ago

"According to the company, Assassin’s Creed Shadows achieved the second-highest Day 1 sales revenue in franchise history, following Assassin’s Creed Valhalla. It actually had the best Day 1 performance of Ubisoft’s history on the PlayStation Store."

S2Killinit28d ago

AC Shadows is doing good yes.

gigoran829d ago

but but 2,000,000 players...

Chocoburger28d ago

Ubishit burned so many bridges with fans, releasing filler dreck that was purposefully designed to push you towards micro-trash-actions. It didn't have to be this way, they could have respected us players more, instead of making players waste countless hours of their life just to see stupid "experience points and resources numbers go up" and attempt to profit off us in such a disrespectful way. I stopped supporting them a long time ago. Keep burning bridges, and keep burning your company from within.

S2Killinit28d ago

Which UBI games did that? Im legit asking.

Chocoburger27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Any game (be it Ubisoft or any other company) with an unnecessary shoe-horned in experience points system, endless resources collection, and a micro-trash-action store that sells you boosters that alleviate the grind.

They do it on purpose to nudge players towards spending more money, and its something I refuse to support. Nearly all modern Ubisoft games have experience points and skill trees these days, not because it makes the games better, but because it can potentially make them more money by exhausting people into giving in and buying boosters.

Assassin's Creed, Ghost Recon and more series are offenders of this game design blight.

S2Killinit27d ago

I see. And I agree. I dont like these trends either. Although I dont remember AC having paid upgrades (given that my last one was black flag)

Show all comments (19)