When I was reading her review on IGN all I could think of is Cartman booing Wendy in the last episode of South Park. So, boo! Boo Lucy O'Brien boo! Boo!
@Sobotz lol, when IGN give Tlou 10/10 you guys went crazy, and now you're saying you stopped listening to IGN when they give a bad score to this PS exclusive. so you must a of seen a comment from me on TLOU review from IGN didn't know that i don't watch ign ok so calm your dumb assumptions down i stopped listening to IGN because of COD like i said so i don't get where your coming from anywho i will play beyond and make my own review of the game like i do with every game you seem like a person who wants Sony games to fail.
The more sony fanboys saying "I can't wait to play this on my PS4" made me wants the Xbox One even more...
knowing its games such as Titanfall and DR3 are most wanted that even for Sony fanboys that bashing Xbox One in every way.
Not like Killzone or Driveclub (especially Knack). I'll just play Halo and Forza that much superior in every way. #1.2.5 4d ago by sobotz | View comment
So you're an Xbox guy i see why you found yourself on a review of a PS3 game makes sense.
Great review. I agree with everything they have said. Gamespot has been going great ever since they have stopped being biased and gave games like The Last Of Us what they deserved. Now we agree with gamespot ps trolls?
Wow, Gamespot is one of those sites that don't give every PS3 exclusive a nice score.. they gave the game higher than The Last of Us. Great review, looks like this game is very worth it. Great job Quantic Dream.
The discrepancy between review scores is really weird. Destrucoid doesn't count because he's personally bias against David Cage, but some of these other scores shock me, like IGN.
I can see why this sort of game wouldn't appeal to certain people, so I'm not too surprised by that.
Though some of the reeeeeally low scores (e.g. the 3/10 review) are disappointing. Those reviewers might not like the game, but it definitely doesn't look like a 3/10 game. :/
this isn't a game that is easy to review because just like a movie it depends only on your enjoyment of a narrative. Another thing is that Beyond has a very weird but interesting kind of story-telling, so it was obvious that some were going to like it and others hate it because it was not what they were expecting.
Why do you think games like Pokemon and COD always get good scores even though they all are simply more of the same over and over again?
I think fans of Heavy Rain like me will love it. While people who hated Heavy Rain will hate it. Thats why you see the giant gap between the 2.
Some reviewers have stopped looking objectively at a game and just shove their opinion in your face without explanation why the game is getting 5,4 and even 3s.
the charm of Heavy Rain was in the fact that you could mold the story and make it your own. But in Beyond you might be able to change how an scene is played out a little bit but will still be the same outcome for everybody.
So you liking Heavy Rain doesn't mean you'll enjoy Beyond even though it has better acting, writing and graphics.
"Inaccurate" implies that the review is "wrong," which is incorrect in and of itself. It's an opinion.
I will agree that the reviews never seem consistent on Gamespot. The reviewers don't follow much of a pattern, so it's difficult to know their specific tastes in games. One game like Rayman Legends is too difficult for them, another like Dark Souls is too easy. It's tough to relate when the preferences are scattered all over the place, even from a single staff member's reviews.
I heard that Gamespot is planning on introducing multiple reviews for bigger games, mostly to show multiple opinions, which I think is a good idea.
Gamespot reviews are so much better than IGN,IGN has been so sh!t these past 2 years,rating system gone,1 page onlu,new reviewers reviewing the heavy hitters,reviewers who review unfamiliar games,reviewers who hate the genre they're reviewing and score it low
a lot of these reviewers have been making fun of the game way before the embargo. all from "we need emotions" to "feelings", very evident yet silent jabs even from that joystiq guy - “We’ve hired real Hollywood composers to ensure that there is a piano playing during the sad goodbye scenes.”
their agenda seems to be that they just hate cage and his statements, and have judged the game on that basis. they played the game not to experience it, but to find every flaw they can find to solidify and justify their perception of him. these reviewers give a lot of negative reviews, but they don't make fun of the games before embargo lifts with such specificity and worse, they are making fun of the game by straight-out inferring to cage's statements. that's how anyone can tell that these reviewers had an agenda going into this game.
Why are people surprised that this is getting such polarised reviews, its just that kind of game. Either you want to play it or you don't and either you like it or you don't.
Doubt it's a 10 or even a 9. It'll be fun though. I'm predicting a 7.5 or an 8 on my own personal scale. Just waiting on U P "slow @$$" S.
Wow, Gamespot is one of those sites that don't give every PS3 exclusive a nice score.. they gave the game higher than The Last of Us. Great review, looks like this game is very worth it. Great job Quantic Dream.
The discrepancy between review scores is really weird. Destrucoid doesn't count because he's personally bias against David Cage, but some of these other scores shock me, like IGN.
I think fans of Heavy Rain like me will love it. While people who hated Heavy Rain will hate it. Thats why you see the giant gap between the 2.
Some reviewers have stopped looking objectively at a game and just shove their opinion in your face without explanation why the game is getting 5,4 and even 3s.
This site is very inaccurate at times
It gave 'The Last Of Us' a 8.5? That game is a 10/10 easily and this a 9/10 - haven't played it yet, but expecting 9/10.
Very inconsistent.