The international humanitarian organization, The Red Cross, is asking game developers to follow international laws of war when developing war-themed video games.
PS5 Pro owners will be in for a treat with the new Battlefield game currently being developed by DICE based on playtester info.
Replies(1)
While thats great... keep in mind that COD has been 120 FPS on PS5 for quite some time... and even supports 120 FPS on Series S. So it would be nice if they could push for 120 FPS on base consoles in the new Battlefield as well.
After I burnt 100 quids on the gold edition of 2042 with a blind pre-order and for as much as they are creating hype on secondary features like the 120 fps thing .... my humble suggestion is to wait for the game to actually release, have it reviewed by REAL gamers and NOT paid Youtubers and if it hits 86 or above on users' review on MetaCritics it will be a buy for me. Any lack of maps, variety, gameplay or key features that they have implemented in other BF game will be a NO GO on my end. More so as this is EA a company I loved in the early era of video gaming but that now has become the king of microtransactions and deceptive marketing.
DICE is changing the gun customization in the new Battlefield game, and it's one that emphasizes balance and personalization.
We have many great Call of Duty games with bad Campaigns in the series and Call of Duty 2025 could very well become one of them.
More hyped for CoD 2026.
IW's at helm. Supposedly doing an engine evolution similar to MW'19. Evident by the current-gen only rumors.
I uninstalled cod24 the campaign was just cobbled together that dream state you go in and then there's that boss that throws gunk at you. How can you have boss fight in a cod
our governments dont even follow the geneva convention!!!!.....'the **** outta here.
What next? Drive according to the rules in GTA? Only hunt during hunting season in GTA?
This is ridiculous.
Yes, because according to Jack Thomson, when you kill someone in a video game, you are killing real innocent people.
http://www.craveonline.com/...
"Enjoy killing people. And you aren't killing virtual people. You are killing real people. You are an apologist for an industry that knowingly trains people how to kill and to want to kill."
GTFO with that kind of B.S. How many people in this world are so stupid that they forget that these are GAMES! They aren't real. They are fictional worlds with fictional characters doing fictional things. Even if a game came out that was a literal depiction of what is happening in the real world, the minute that your character can run through a battlefield like Rambo it becomes fictional.
Geez. This frickin' world. First it was the feminazis, then it was the politicians, now it's this.
http://www.epicgifs.net/ima...
Where applicable, why not? If it's a game like Battlefield or Call of Duty, set in our world, in a time where the Geneva Convention is still relevant, then sure.
But Killzone and Halo don't have much use for the Geneva Convention, so it wouldn't make any sense for the militaries involved to adhere to those rules.