1070°

Xbox One Presenter Humiliated Me on Stage, Says Transgender Journalist

A journalist says she was "completely dehumanised" on stage during an Xbox One Event at Eurogamer Expo 2013, by a comedian who made degrading jokes about her gender. Eurogamer Expo says it is investigating the matter.

xHeavYx3915d ago ShowReplies(10)
Regis3915d ago (Edited 3915d ago )

Its a comedian its his job to be an ass of course it was wrong but since when did people really care about what we say in public? Oh wait ever since people been screaming about who say what and they get fired, where as you can can that stuff on Xbox or PS and not have a problem.

xHoii3915d ago

Yes it might be his job, but what is sad is his lack of sense of humour, I mean the only jokes you could come up with is to make fun of one of a few female gamers between all these male gamers? For me it's just so low..
Good choice in picking him MS.

xHoii3915d ago

LOOOOOL I got this tottaly wrong.

SilentNegotiator3913d ago

LOL, oh my. At least you admit you were wrong.

Anthotis3913d ago

Clearly, this male journalist doesn't make a very convincing woman, otherwise the comedian wouldn't have noticed this man trying to look like a woman.

DragonKnight3913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

This story is a few days old and according to the presenter, he admitted to making a mistake in what he said (which according to him was only "this person" and not "it" or "thing" like the journalist says) and said that he should have said "this person" to every individual he was presenting. This was blown way out of proportion just like every "instance" involving social justice and its warriors.

Here's a good video on the subject.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Also, why am I not surprised that this is a Kraptaku article.

SonyWarrior3913d ago

must have happened in cali where all the trans gender mental case people live. such a filthy state that is.

Bimkoblerutso3913d ago

The sad thing about so many of these stories is that the public never really gets the honest-to-god truth.

You get two sides barking at each other over events that a very select few even witnessed in the first place, so all of the arguing and debating ends up as nothing but a bunch of empty conjecture and shallow white-knighting.

I'm tired of jumping behind all these little controversies without any real frame of reference. The internet just likes to squawk.

Pogmathoin3912d ago

I am sorry, but jesus h christ..... Who does she , it , thing whatever think she is, it, thing??? It is funny.... Your at a place where they have a comedien....what do you expect??? F off girl/man.... Been to many shows where I have been if there is an irishman in the audience.... Yes sir, give it to me good and it is funny!!! Ahem... Comedian..... Its in the name....

Army_of_Darkness3912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

It doesn't matter who , or what you are. If you get offended over someone stating you as "this person" your just a sensitive little biatch. Get over it.
This is an example of "a person" making mountains out of mole hills.

UltimateMaster3912d ago

A comedian's job is to make people laugh, not laugh at people.

Especially not making them ashamed and embarrassed.
If you're the only one laughing, then it wasn't a joke and sincere apologies are required.

Gaming1013912d ago (Edited 3912d ago )

LOL a guy trying to wear a wig and a dress doesn't expect a professional comedian to even make reference or acknowledge the fact that he looks like my plumber wearing a bad wig?

This is what he looks like on his twitter, included is the vid clip, completely harmless if you ask me. Comedians have done wayyyyy worse than this on a regular basis on stage. I'd tell him to grow a pair but it seems that's a lost cause.

https://twitter.com/LaurakB...

PoSTedUP3912d ago

i like comedy
all types: racial, crude, sexist, disrespectful etc.
a comedy club is a place where we laugh at things and ourselves other people get offended over or violent.
this person is no different nor in a special category.
but, this isnt a comedy club, this is a gaming event.

imo, uncalled for,
unless you have a warning that there will be a comedian on stage. in this case you should leave of you are sensitive.
i would have stayed and laughed at the joke.

AndrewLB3912d ago

SonyWarrior- I agree. Within 20 years, Los Angeles will be given third world status and the "fundamental transformation" will be complete. The rest of the nation will soon follow suit.

As for the topic, the day this "tranny" decided to start dressing like the opposite sex was the day "it" gave up any and all right to complain about other peoples opinions. I've met a few tranny's over the years living here in Long beach and I would classify them all as severely mentally unstable aka should be in a rubber room.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
-Foxtrot3913d ago

If he was a high profile comedian who is known for this sort of humour...take Frankie Boyle or Jimmy Carr for example then it wouldn't be as bad. Yeah it would be a horrible thing to say to her but the point is she would be getting jokes pointed at her from someone who is well known and people know what the comedian is like

Dee_913913d ago

We can't really talk on the situation because we weren't there.If things were as bad as he was making it seem then I can understand the backlash the comedian will receive, and people keep trying to excuse the remarks by saying he's a comedian, but this isn't his show and this isn't a "bit".When a comedian is out in public, they should act like a normal person.Imagine an actor acting like he's in a movie while he's out in public...
How ever, from reading the article, it looks like the transgender (or cross dresser)over exaggerated and lied and said the comedian said things he didn't say.Now that its blown up he want the story pulled.
Really if I seen this https://si0.twimg.com/profi... I wouldn't know what to call him either.
Doesn't even looks trans lol.I'd just think he's a weird dude.

Blackdeath_6633913d ago

you can make a joke about any subject no matter how controversial as long as its funny the moment it stops being funny is when it starts being offensive. what is funny and what is not depends ofcourse on the audience and from person to person people who find these controversial comedians like frankie and jimmy funny are the people who will turn up to their shows. the built their style over time to just turn up at an expo infront of a random audience many of which never heard of you ofcourse people will be upset.

ChrisW3912d ago

A man is a man and therefore should be referred to by his gender.

ZombieKiller3912d ago

If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen. Just like the whole Carolyn Petit thing. I don't feel bad at all....

First off, its not like he/she was born that way and couln't help it. Expect backlash if you CHANGE YOUR FUCKING GENDER.

Secondly, it's over the internet. The internet is the worst place bringing out the worst people. If you are a trans gender, reporting anything over the internet, expect backlash. I don't like to dish it out, but I've sure as hell seen it happen many times. Expect it, it's the internet. Carolyn Petit is a perfect example

miDnIghtEr20C_SfF3912d ago

Yep. It's a comedian. Everyone get a grip.

Pretty funny how transgender think they're immune to comedians. He should of manned up and taken it like a woman.

What?

BTW.. I have a gay friend, and lol, even he thinks transgender is bizarre. Anyways.. point is.. this wasn't someone from MS... it was a comedian from comedyville. Not MS.

Gekko363912d ago

@All - Guys just think about this?... What if the comedian had been Frankie Boyle?... He's very supportive of gay rights and that of transgender however that said every other creature in the room would have been up for grabs. God help any American who felt "Dehumanised" during one of his gigs!.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Gardenia3912d ago

Of course it's still a he. You can give plastic surgery to a monkey so it looks like a sheep, but it's still a monkey

Enigma_20993912d ago

And what part of the job description does it say he had to attack her for a laugh?

Can't wait until it happens to you.

JsonHenry3912d ago

oh noes! I got my feelings hurt! Cry more please. I love the tears of the weak.

Enigma_20993909d ago (Edited 3909d ago )

Look, everybody! The insensitive douche learned to form words.

"We're gonna bully you under the guise of being humorous. Who cares if your feelings are hurt or if you didn't do anything to deserve this. Just grow a thick skin and deal with it! I'm too busy laughing over here!"

This is basically what you're saying. You do realize that, right? And the only type of person that would justify that kind of behavior is the kind of person who also does it.

@KonsoruMasuta

Yeah, you're right. It wasn't wrong. It was just mean spirited. From what I'm seeing, and lemme drag out my soapbox for a second.... *ahem* LGBT community. You will be hated, feared, shunned, ridiculed, made fun of, assaulted, and frowned upon. But the one thing you will never truly be... is accepted. And that's a f*****' shame.

JsonHenry3909d ago

Lol. Your insecurity makes me laugh. One day when your balls drop you'll stop giving a damn what others say about you.

Humor is humor. Get over it. No one hooked the he/she to the back a tractor and went down the road. It was WORDS. If you can't handle that in life you've got bigger issues than an identity crises.

Enigma_20993905d ago

Words can still hurt, or have you never been bullied a day in your life? Some people don't have skin as thick as yours. Does that mean they have no right to feel bad about anything?

People have flat out committed suicide over things like name calling, hazing and being the butt of jokes. Sure there are people that laugh it off when it happens to them, but there are just as many that can't deal with it. This person obviously can't, but f*** her because I got a laugh out of it, right?

...AND THE JOKE PROBABLY WASN'T EVEN FUNNY!!!!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3905d ago
KonsoruMasuta3915d ago

The comedian was wrong to call him "it" and "thing" but calling him "he" was not wrong. No matter how much this guy wants to be a girl, he is a guy. That is his biological gender and he can't change that.

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

xHoii3915d ago

You sure you don't work for MS?
Hmmm...

KonsoruMasuta3915d ago

Nope. Got two PS4s in pre-order. Not getting a One because of how MS tried to shaft consumers with their asinine policies.

I just speak the truth.

ALLWRONG3913d ago

Funny watching people make comments on something they clearly didn't read.

Pogmathoin3912d ago

Bullshlt, your an asinine fanboy...:)

ALLWRONG3912d ago

Opps! my post was for the comments above this one.

my bad

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3912d ago
-Gespenst-3915d ago

Wrong. Biology has nothing to do with it. Generally, people who choose to have a sex change operation feel like, in the case of men "a woman trapped in a man's body". Who are you to tell her what she is and is not? She feels overwhelmingly like a woman, you can't just judge on surface appearance, not to mention that sexuality is only very thinly defined by biology, and also not to mention that sexuality exists along a spectrum. There are men who are less man than other men, as well as more. The same goes for women. There are no fixed categories and none of them are authoritative or somehow a "standard" or "ideal". Even the notion of "woman" and "man" is merely an imposed scientific categorisation that cannot account for the full humanity of a person with such limited definitional parameters. Binary thinking is deluded thinking.

We need to therefore respect this persons subjectivity, their subject position, their sexuality, their humanity.

KonsoruMasuta3915d ago (Edited 3915d ago )

Him*, He*, He*

There is no such thing as a "woman trapped in a man's body". These people are only men who want to be women, nothing more. They may feel like women, they may act like women, but they are men. You can act less like a man than other men but you're still just a man.

If you're born a man, you're a man, nothing else. He has no control over that. He is nothing more than a man who thinks he is a woman. You can act like a woman, dress like a woman, and talk like a woman. Guess what you'll be! A man that talks, acts, and dresses like a woman.

Get an operation and you will be a man who got an operation to be like a woman.

Same goes for women that want to be men.

DarkBlood3915d ago (Edited 3915d ago )

@KonsoruMasuta, afraid of a little competition or something?

go on and jion the club i think you'll like @mika oh wait ..............

your just another user who hasnt even been on here for 2 full months stating your gender as "U" which is fricken ironic by the way and your already hating and trolling

xKugo3914d ago (Edited 3914d ago )

LOL

If you are born a man, then you are a fucking man. Don't care how flamboyantly gay you are, you're a guy. You were born with a penis and testicles not a vagina. You WILL NEVER BE ABLE to reproduce and can't have children through fertilization. You don't have ovaries, you don't have a menstrual cycle and you don't produce eggs. You can get breast implants but you will never lactate milk. You can cut your dick in half to simulate a vagina, but you will not self lubricate and will NEVER feel any sexual pleasure whatsoever through penetration. Thus, NO PART OF YOU can ever be considered woman. This "I'm a woman trapped inside of a man's body" is just nonsense. You're not a woman, you're fucking gay. If you like guys, fine but don't pretend like you were fated to be a girl. If the universe, God or whatever wanted you to be a girl then you would be a girl. But you're not....

And stop calling it "she" because it's not a female. If you're a guy, would you date a trans-gender(man into a it). I'm guessing not because no matter what it looks like, it's a guy. Can't even make babies, dude. Lol get real

-Gespenst-3914d ago (Edited 3914d ago )

First of all Kugo, trans people aren't gay. They look at women and then think, "I want to be one of those, I feel like one of those inside". In other words, the anatomy they've been born with DOES NOT accord with their inner subjectivity- it's a clear case of biology NOT defining who they are and how they should act. Most confidently gay men don't WANT to be women, they're fully content being men, and they just happen to like other men. God what an ignorant and insensitive thing to assume.

Secondly, your definition of what constitutes a woman seems primarily based on reproductive organs and parts of the anatomy that function in the nurturing of children. So what are you saying exactly? That a woman HAS to have children, or has to be able to have children in order to prove her womanhood? That's got to be among the most ignorant things I've heard on N4G, and that's saying something. You define sexuality purely by biology and by ancient social roles assigned to that biology. Biology doesn't entail determined social roles- that's something WE built around it and is completely open-ended. Whatever you've been reading you ought to check the use-by date on. Have a bit more tolerance and educate yourself for chrissakes. What a damn simpleton.

Pozzle3914d ago

"You WILL NEVER BE ABLE to reproduce and can't have children through fertilization. You don't have ovaries, you don't have a menstrual cycle and you don't produce eggs. You can get breast implants but you will never lactate milk."

Many biological women can't have children, can't have periods, can't produce eggs, and can't lactate. These things aren't what makes a woman a woman.

Though personally I don't see what the problem is. If a transgender person wants to be called a "she", then call her a "she". Why is that such a big deal for some people? How is that difficult? If a person says their nickname is "Dave", you wouldn't tell them they're wrong and call them "Fred" instead. I just don't understand why people go out of their way to be mean to others. Regardless of what you think of transgenderism, that doesn't mean a transgender person doesn't deserve kindness or politeness. What ever happened to: treat others as you wish to be treated?

-Gespenst-3914d ago

@Pozzle: Yeah, I totally agree. What is it about people who just can't deign to refer to these people as "she". What exactly is the problem? I think it's just because they feel it destabilizes the narrow binaries of gender they swear by. They feel betrayed in their masculinity by these people. I think they need to learn that masculinity and heterosexuality aren't sovereign genders and sexualities.

Fez3913d ago

I thought it had everything to do with biology and chemistry. Not just someone's subjective choice to have a sex change. I know nothing about transgender people but I would assume that they don't just go out on a whim to change their sex.

I'm going to read this wikipedia page on intersex and I think a lot of people could do with joining me :D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Qrphe3913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

Bubbles for being one of the few objective and cultured individuals on this thread of two year olds

Same to you Pozzle

FunAndGun3913d ago

@ KonsoruMasuta and xKugo

Have you heard of a hermaphrodite?

Some people are just born different. human biology is not just black and white.

Some women can be born with a penis and some men can be born with a vagina. If physical differences can exist, then why can't mental differences exist that contradict your physical body? Of course it is not something you can observe, because it exists in that individuals self (mind, body, soul). Just because you can't understand it doesn't mean it can't exist.

quit being ignorant.

TongkatAli3913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

@ Pozzle, people are assholes, that is the answer. They think they're right and they know the answer to all and their hateful outlook at life and people is correct.

Hate is never justified unless the hate is aimed at corrupt people, some guys calling themselves woman makes brain melts for some reason, Oh! I know why! People love to judge others, makes them feel good, sick.

ACwarMACHINE3913d ago

some people think they're dogs,some people cut their limbs off because they don't feel right with them,some people are good at math but can't carry a conversation.so, no matter how normal they seem,they are still mental in some way.

Imalwaysright3913d ago

A man wanting to be a woman doesn't make him a woman just like me wanting to be a millionaire doesn't make me a millionaire. We are what we are and we can't bend reality just because we feel like it.

@ TongkatAli The irony.

-Gespenst-3912d ago

^^ Might wanna change that username then...

Imalwaysright3912d ago

What a waste of a bubble. Reality is an universal truth that cannot be bent no matter how much we try but of course, we humans are the epitome of arrogance so we will always try to do so to feed our ego.

"Earth is the center of the universe".

I might think, I might feel, I might believe or I might want doesn't in any way, shape or form means that I am. No, reality dictates who I am.

DragonKnight3912d ago

@-Gespenst- Don't try to act as though those "feelings" are anything more than heightened hormones in the body because that's what they are in this case. It's common knowledge that estrogen and testosterone have immense impacts on personality and that the increase or decrease of said hormones can effect thought processes. It's highly likely that a male individual born with unusually high estrogen levels would "feel" like a "woman trapped in a man's body."

This means that control over those feelings doesn't lie with the individual and is a result of hormonal conditions so yes, Biology has everything to do with it. You don't just feel something just because you feel something. Science dictates that emotions are nothing more than chemical reactions so in this alone we see that it's about Biology. And I'm sorry but, what has this person done to earn the right to demand we respect anything about them? I don't know this person, so why should I respect their decision to change genders? Because I would want them to do the same for me? That's not a reason, that's a hope without obligation. Just saying. I personally don't care what this person wants to be (and "this person" is a correct term in this context, not a slight against anyone), but I certainly don't have to offer respect simply because someone "is."

@Pozzle: This is a case of too much information. A person who is transgender does not get to identify as transgender and then also identify as one gender. Sorry but you can't have your cake and eat it too. If Laura Kate Dale wanted to be seen, treated, and announced as a woman; then the fact that she was born a he should never have been something she brought up to the public. It's no one's business that Laura was at one point Larry, but the point of bringing it up is a point for attention. This person made a choice to be a gender, so identify as that gender except in cases where it's necessary not to, i.e. medical emergencies.

Honestly, the amount of people with thin skin in this world looking to start issues over nothing (and then going on to say they wish they'd never said anything, which is a load of bull) is beyond ridiculous. Whatever happened to the ideology we learned as children that "sticks and stones will break my bones but words can never hurt me?" Children are far more emotionally mature than adults it seems.

Hudahudahuda3912d ago

I do not consider them women because they are not women, they are men with defective wiring in thier brains. Just because they say they are is not sufficient reason to consider them that.

When it comes right down to it, transexuals damage society because the very nature of thier lifestyle is based on decieving people that they are actually the opposite sex and eventually as these mental cases get more and more pushed by the media people will not know who is actually a man and who is actually a woman and thus genders will begin to distrust each other I know most of the liberal loonies here who support transexuals would chicken out of ever dating or having sex with one unless they were gay themselves, because deep down they dont consider them women either

-Gespenst-3912d ago

@DragonKnight: There are CHILDREN who are born who feel like women but have the outward appearance of men. My point is that regardless of outward appearance - i.e. a child might be born a "boy" with a male body and sex organs - the inner life of a person can be very different. If a boy feels like a woman, why on earth does he have the body of a boy? Estrogen and testosterone have a lot to do with how the body forms- the former generally associated with females and the latter with males. Why then are children born overwhelmed by a sense of sexual identity that doesn't correllate to what's been branded upon them at birth based on the appearance of their body?

Secondly, and no one arguing against it seems to be able to answer this: Why won't you let them be known as a "she"? What does this disrupt? What problem does this cause? It's completely harmless and actually, respectful. They're not trying to one-up you or pull the wool over your eyes, why can't you just accept who these people want to be? Instead you bring in all sorts of dogmatic scientific notions and rigidly adhere to social constructions built around severely insufficient and unsatisfactory scientific "facts". Science is still evolving to incorporate the complexity of reality, any good scientist will be humble like that- will be aware that most scientific knowledge is provisional. I'm not saying biology and hormones are completely without influence on who we are, how could they not be? But the fact is that the parameters they prescribe are certainly less deterministic and confining than we once thought (or even than was once lied about). We don't know as much about ourselves as a species as we'd like to think, and we're not some race of gods. Understand that our knowledge about everything is far from complete.

DragonKnight3912d ago

@-Gespenst-: Part 1: Oh forgive me, I forgot that children aren't capable of chemical or hormonal imbalances and that biology doesn't apply to them. Are you frickin' serious right now? And do I really have to explain to you the simple science of reproduction, and why a person is born a male or a female? You're delusional if you think there is some kind of injustice going on and that "feelings" have nothing to do with biology and are just something that exists that we have to "deal with." GTFO with that nonsense.

Part 2: "Why won't you let them be known as a "she"? What does this disrupt? What problem does this cause? It's completely harmless and actually, respectful. They're not trying to one-up you or pull the wool over your eyes, why can't you just accept who these people want to be?"

Firstly, I actually did refer to her as she, re-read my post. Secondly, it's not about disruption it's about fact. It is a fact that she was born a he, it is a fact that instead of keeping that fact to herself she chose to identify as transgender and then chose to be offended by this situation. It is also a fact that people who identify as transgender instead of simply as the gender they wish to be identified by, are doing so out of the need to feel different and at the same time the desire not to be treated differently. The hypocrisy paradox is ever present. Like someone else said "I want to be a millionaire, doesn't mean I am one." I can accept that someone WANTS to be something, but it doesn't mean they are especially when they try to exploit two different realities. If Laura wants to be Laura, then she should keep the fact that she's transgender to herself and actually try to BE a woman instead of a woman who was once trapped in a man's body. The Past is irrelevant, so she needs to stop living in it and allowing it to be part of her Present.

"Instead you bring in all sorts of dogmatic scientific notions and rigidly adhere to social constructions built around severely insufficient and unsatisfactory scientific "facts".

LMAO! Dogmatic scientific notions is not only a hyperbole, but also an oxymoron. It's only insufficient and unsatisfactory to you. And why is that? Because it destroys your idea that biology plays no part in this when it plays the biggest part in this. Your refusal to acknowledge that paints the picture that you believe personality and emotions are just separate aspects of our existence that exist in a psychological vacuum free of any outward stimulus or inward imbalance and that's just not true.

We may not be gods, but there are many things about our existence that have been tested and proven as fact. One of those things is that proof that hormones and various other chemicals in the mind have potentially huge impacts on the way we feel, the way we act, and even the way we view the world. That's how we know that a man with low testosterone is less aggressive, less physically active, more likely to succumb to depression, suffers from low energy, etc... while a man with high testosterone is the polar opposite. Since estrogen affects more feminine tendencies, what do you think the impact of a high estrogen level at birth could affect a person could be throughout their life?

You can attempt to brush that under the rug all you like in favour of the illogical "they have feelings" approach, but science has an explanation for your illogical stance and it's not going to go away because you want it to.

Gekko363912d ago

@-Gespenst- Agreed on most of what you say, however in practice knowing how to handle a certain situation regarding a MTF for example, they maybe fine with either, the problem is with MTF's themselves at times who can be inclined to snap at someone for genuinely not understanding.

With sexuality issues and acceptance - it goes both ways. I'm as gay as a yellow duster, however I give people the same respect and understanding as I expect from them.

So if a person uses words that are not acceptable to me, I'll handle it quietly and to the point with that person.

The same should be expected of this MTF / FTM. It's a two way street. This debates has many sides, lets not just pick one...

-Gespenst-3912d ago

What's wrong and or paradoxical with someone wanting to be different and having the desire not to be treated differently? First of all define your terms. Secondly, people in the heterosexual community achieve this everyday with little effort merely because their sexuality is an enforced and central "norm" around which every other alternative is made to orbit. Each heterosexual person asserts their individuality, and yet they belong to a community of heterosexuals and thus are not seen as "different" in that regard. The problem seems to be a refusal to allow trans and homosexual people that last privilege (well, it should be an inalienable right). They ultimately are barely different from us at all anyhow, superficial bodily traits comprise a negligible amount of genetic material, and, I say this a lot, but humans are the LEAST diverse species on planet earth, contrary to outward and bodily appearances which so many people base their judgements on.

Your normalisation and centralisation of these fixed ideas of male and female is based on ideological extrapolations from provisional knowledge. You centralise heterosexuality because this idea is bound up with reproduction, which you seem to think is somehow the meaning of life, our raison d'etre. Says who? It's not a "hormone imbalance"- that implies there's something wrong with it. If anything it's just a different hormonal arrangement. We live in a world where we can realize these things more fully, so in respect to the people who experience them, why shouldn't we? The only reason these alternate sexualities aren't more common is down to social, cultural and, previously, technological reasons, not anything natural. The reason we ought to respect these people boils down to a social and cultural responsibility. These are people who have been wrongfully suppressed and oppressed across history. We don't have to respect their personality, but we do have to respect their sexual identity JUST as much as we accept heterosexuality. There should be no "central" sexuality. There also IS "a point in bringing it up" if not because of historical suppression, but because of active oppression such as has been documented in this case. You want them to just remain silent about this kind of treatment? You might have a resilience to "words", but why wouldn't you? You're clearly a privileged white, heterosexual male, you're not used to words being used against you anyhow. These are people who see that the words and the sticks and stones all comprise a singilar discourse that is tacitly against them.

"Dogmatic scientific assumptions" is only an oxymoron if you assume that science is both infallible and never dogmatic, which is a terribly ignorant thing to claim, given the ideological history of science that still persists today.

I never said "feelings" exist in a "psychological vacuum". I said biological parameters are not as deterministic as we think. That admits an interplay between the two but not as socially oppressive and deterministic as you, the grand justicar of sexuality, seem to think. There's much more to how we act and think than hormones pal, MUCH more- external and internal.

As for your desperate clinging to orthodox science, you ought to read Science Set Free by Rupert Sheldrake.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
ritsuka6663915d ago

Dude, stop the hate on homosexual please? Anyways,It's rather sad that today's industry is plagued by despicable moments like these.

DoctorJones3913d ago

You think it's just this industry?

Eonjay3914d ago

Yeah, basically the problem with this is that when you have people representing your product, you can't have them insulting people or entire demographics. Its really basic PR. The "comedian" is obviously in the wrong and not Microsoft directly, but the point is that you don't want to attract that kind of negative attention to your brand... especially before it launches.

If you own a business you would understand that anyone can be a potential customer... and the last thing you want is someone promoting your brand acting like an ass and taking the focus away from your product.

3913d ago
Elda3913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

If this person is a transexual..meaning he is now a she because of a sex change & they look like,sound & carry themself like a woman & legally have their name & gender changed to a woman then they should be respectfully addressed as one.Because she wasn't born with woman parts doesn't necessarily mean she can't be a woman,a big part of womanhood is state of mind.

Mystogan3913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

He can't be a woman. He does not have a vagina, he can not carry babies. He is not a woman he is a man.

How would you like it if they put him as a female on his passport or ID. And you date it for a few months. Only to find out you've been dating a man this whole time? I don't know about you but I think that is disgusting. This needs to be avoided. Maybe people around him(Family/friends) will call him a she but it should never be on his Passport or ID. He should never be identified as a woman period. This should not be accepted and I think its disgusting that its even allowed to perform sexchange surgeries.

Elda3913d ago

@Mystogan...some people are born in the wrong body,it's not at all disgusting because you don't understand it or willing to understand what is disgusting is that you come off as a typical bigot that's ignorant to real life situations.

Narutone663913d ago

Reminds me of an episode in Friends where Joey said that he dated a lady who was an excellent kisser, but has a huge adam's apple.

Hicken3913d ago

The funny thing about this debate is that people who will never have the issue are deciding how people who DO have such a dilemma feel.

If there are people who are attracted to the same sex, then there are naturally people who feel they are the wrong sex. Hell, there are people whose genders have to be physically decided at birth, because nature, for whatever reason, didn't finish the job.

As someone else said, it's not a black and white thing, and claiming that it IS is pretty ignorant.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3913d ago
LordDhampire3913d ago

Watch bicentennial man it will blow your mind, also its a pretty good movie.....I was on your side of the fence until I thought of that movie

jocomat93913d ago (Edited 3913d ago )

YOu are right. Its mostly a identity crises as well.

TripC503912d ago

Yeah but is it a male duck?

ZombieKiller3912d ago

So if it looks like a girl and f***s like a girl then its a girl? ......and furthermore, would you do it if you knew at one point that "it" .....yes I said "it" because its a little bit of both, was a guy?

Don't answer that, and I'm not trying to insult, but seriously think about what you said. you contradicted yourself there dude.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3912d ago
xKugo3914d ago

How can you call it a "she" if it's transgender??
It wasn't born a fucking woman, so you can't call it a woman. Stop encouraging this disgusting bullshit. It's immoral and can lead to devastating revelations in the real-world should it choose to date..

3913d ago
ravinash3913d ago

First you call her it and that say she's immoral!

I think your immoral!

celestiatem3913d ago

Hi bigot, how's it going? There are many T people who walk the planet, none of them are by nature "immoral". In fact, some of us are much nicer than say, people like you.

Automatic793913d ago

This website just wants hits.

SilentNegotiator3913d ago

Kotaku...just wanting hits?!

AAAAAAHHHH MY BRAIN INCONCEIVABLE

clrlite3912d ago

Finally something everyone can agree with.

Show all comments (229)
90°

15 Great Games Where Every Minute of the Experience Feels Earned

GB: "We take a look at 15 amazing games that had the perfect length."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
23d ago
coolbeans22d ago

Pretty good list. Botany Manor would be the newest addition that encapsulates that title.

400°

Anyone else not blown away with graphics these days? Me neither

Talal writes: "I'm talking about having that rush of excitement - that feeling you get when you know you've just made a memory for a lifetime."

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
OptimusDK25d ago

There are different games. Some have gamplay at it highest priority, some have the story, some have the replay value and choices... There are a lot of different game experiences.

It is laughable that just now graphics does not have anything to do with that experiene. We have had many games of that type over time. This is just the one that have come closest to feel like playing an actual movie. Just look the the Digital foundry walkthrough it is a masterpiece in that perspective and hence wrth trying. But yes do not do it for the gameplay - but that was never the goal of this experience.

GamerRN25d ago

It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!

Lightning7725d ago

Pretty much my thoughts. They were technical marvel's on PS and still are. The moment Xbox puts out a graphically intense game is doesn't matter suddenly.

4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. Glad to finally see it in its glory.

fr0sty25d ago

FFS, gaming journalism has really gone downhill. At least hire people with a basic grasp of grammar... "Me neither" means the exact opposite of what the "author" is trying to say. That's like saying "I could care less"... lol.

S2Killinit25d ago

Maybe because the gameplay being dull allowed it to have the amazing graphics and people are not as impressed by graphics alone anymore? I mean there is a lot of sites saying the story and the gameplay are lackluster. So what are we supposed to enjoy then? Cgi graphics are beautiful but since they arent interactive, they dont impress me as much as they used to. Thats an extreme example, but you get my drift.

Terry_B25d ago

When Playstation (Sony) does it..its usually a great game and not a cinematic experience..or at least something new at the time..like Until Dawn back in 2015.

1Victor25d ago

@gamer:” It's because it's on Xbox. When Xbox has amazing graphics, they don't matter. When PlayStation does, it's a game changer!”

The game looks as good as any other PlayStation game in my eyes why can’t you and the other hardcore Xbox be happy about it and drag PlayStation into every conversation and force PlayStation hardcore to look into the game and find flaw that most games have in one way or another.
@light: “ 4 years ago this month would the UE5 tech demo debut with the girl flying (tech demo said it was only possible on PS5 because of the SSD. ”
Yes at that time it was only possible on PlayStation SSD how ignorant of you to think that after 4 years the technology wouldn’t evolved and move to a industry standard 🤦🏿I wish your mentality wasn’t so naive and narrow to post stuff like that 😩 in a year or 2 a new game will come out that might look better, it’s the nature of the industry.

Now that the distraction is gone I feel that is a good thing that the graphics in games are starting to hit the rooftop and hopefully the developers will put more thoughts into story and gameplay mechanics than just the next shiny oily skin of old.

Reaper22_25d ago

So true. Not surprised by all the negativity. It's a really good game and looks better than any game I've ever seen. GOTY nominee for sure. Like I said before, sony screwed up big time by not purchasing Ninja Theory.

Asplundh25d ago

Pretty much. It's like how the Switch and Steam controller using haptic feedback in their controllers wasn't a big deal but then Sony did it and it was then a "game changer".

fr0sty25d ago

The game runs at as low as 21fps... That isn't much to brag about no matter how good it looks.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 25d ago
MajorLazer25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

We've had graphical gamechangers before, such as Crysis but those games still had gameplay to compliment it. Hellblade pretty much has none, and only achieved such graphics through being incredibly linear and having very small, closed off environments where very little is happening.

Vx_25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

GFX does not mean anything if the game is boring. It is simple like that and these major companies need to understand this simple concept.

Games are like your lady, she may be beautiful to look at for a while but then it gets boring if her character isn't interesting and fun to be with.

25d ago Replies(7)
Kneetos25d ago

Mario kart 8 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Sonic188125d ago

Horizon forbidden West has great graphics and great gameplay

GamerRN25d ago

Yeah but graphics don't matter, remember?

anast24d ago

@RN

I've been pretty consistent in saying that we need both.

GamerRN23d ago

So until dawn, too human, or whatever those series of games were... Graphic masterpieces it garbage with no gameplay?

VincentVanBro25d ago

I agree and I actually think Forbidden West looks better than Hellblade 2. I easily prefer looking at it at least.

Sonic188125d ago

It does look better in my opinion as well. I don't know why it looks better but there's something about the Decima engine or that guerrilla games is using tricks that we don't know of

Abear2124d ago

Can you fly a mount under water in Hellblade 2? I think not! One of the best moments this Gen

Show all comments (111)
90°

Two Decades Later, the Original Splinter Cell is Still a Masterpiece

They don't make games like this anymore.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
vgvill34d ago

Too dated in my book. The AI is way too unpredictable to be acceptable today. It's definitely a game of its time.

Jingsing34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Agreed with those sentiments. The quality of the CPU controlled characters make or break a stealth game and they are pretty poor in all the Splinter Cell games by today's standard. This is what led me to playing Spies vs Mercs all the time in later games just to get a better stealth experience from a real person. Arguably Sony are making better stealth games albeit not Tom Clancy stuff.

TheProfessional34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

You should stick with fortnite or one of the countless bloodborne style games then. What a joke.

rlow134d ago

I had a good time with the game. It is a product of its time. But when it came out it was a must have game for a lot of people. I wish Ubisoft would make another game in the series or at least a reboot.

vgvill33d ago

They are making a remake, I think. I loved the original game when it was released, but I tried to play it again in recent years and just couldn't get on with it. The same with the older Hitman games.

PrecursorOrb33d ago

Yeah chaos theory still holds up though I gotta say. If you’re a fan of the series I highly suggest you go back to that one. Ubi has said they are remaking sc for “modern audiences”. I don’t have a lot of faith for the future of that company

Chocoburger33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Due to the lack of modern stealth games, and me constantly playing the MGS series, I've been looking for alternative stealth games to play, and went back and re-played the SC series recently. I wouldn't call SC1 or SC:PT masterpieces, there are AI issues, they're very much trial-and-error games, and that can lead to a lot of frustration. I also found the stories in this series to be boring, uninteresting, and just sloppily told. Cinematics are also of poor quality for both in-game scenes and CG cut-scenes, the soundtrack didn't leave any impression on me either.

Chaos Theory is better, but there was still a lot of room for improvement, and Double Agent (old gen ver.) was a sloppy mess that ended up a regression from CT. But still, at least they tried back then, these days Ubi-junk doesn't even try to make good games!

HvNzSoul25d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnessacery Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games.

HvNzSoul25d ago

Everyone needs to quit with all of the unnecessary Ubi-hate. SC Conviction and Blacklist are both still good games, they just weren't 100% focused on stealth with Conviction and they remedied that in Blacklist. The only thing they have released recently that I was disappointed with was Watch Dogs Legion, and Skull & Bones. Everyone seems to be salty about the misleading trailer for the original Watch Dogs and The Division. Which are also, both good games, and actually Watch Dogs seems like it was ahead of its time even with all the trailer drama (having gone back and played recently, can say the game didnt deserve all the flak). Yeah the misleading E3 trailer that had better graphics than release is understandable to a very small degree, when most Teaser Trailers, or Game Demo's only have that portion of the game developed so they use the highest quality assets of w/e they have being showed, or what they are showing was made purely for the showing, allowing for extra polish . As to the gripes about minor game design changes, or cut features upon a games release just goes to show how unknowledgeable most gamers are in terms of how game development works or to even understand what what the hell a WIP, let alone titles still in early development.

Good games from Ubi since 2014 (Year that SC Blacklist Released) include:

Watch Dogs 1 & 2
The Division 1 & 2 (Although I had a hard time getting into The Division 2 at first)
R6 Siege
Ghost Recon Wildlands & Breakpoint
Immortals Fenyx Rising
AC Origins, Odyssey, MIrage (Haven't finished Valhalla games too damn long)
Far Cry Primal, and 5 (6 also has a length issue)
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
Prince Of Persia The Lost Crown

Haven't played a couple of titles those being For Honor (played at launch but didn't honestly give it an actual go), The Crew, R6 Extraction and at the time of writing this xDefiant.

Even if you absolutely hated any of the above titles, they aren't inherently bad games, they're just good, but not always top quality either.

I say give Ubi credit where credit is due, they at least fix games post launch if they start out rough, Breakpoint is an excellent example this and is such an enjoyable experience now compared to it's launch.