Approvals 11/10 ▼
Lord Anubis (4) - 5850d ago Cancel
gtgcoolkid (1) - 5850d ago Cancel
BIoodmask (4) - 5850d ago Cancel
Genuine (2) - 5850d ago Cancel
280°
7.5

Gamespots Gran Turismo 5 Prologue Review

From gamespot.com, Gran Turismo 5 Prologue may be only a practice lap for the real thing, but it's a beautiful joyride while it lasts.

The Good A technical work of art, Varied lineup of vehicles, Brings 16-player online racing to Gran Turismo.

The Bad Not nearly enough tracks, Only a prologue to the real thing, Online suffers lag at times, No option to upgrade vehicle parts.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Bad Editing
Skater5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad Editing
Lord Anubis5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad Editing
Joystick Radio5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad Editing
Hagaf225850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad Editing
"Gamespot's"...add an apostrophe on the title. You don't need to type "from gamespot.com", we know it's from gamespot from the title, delete that. Put "Gran Turismo 5 Prologue may be only a practice lap for the real thing, but it's a beautiful joyride while it lasts." in quote marks like I did. Add a colon, this mark :, in front of Good and Bad
Marceles5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
Bad Editing
So many capitalization and punctuation mistakes even in the headline.
pjeigh5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Check punctuation. Lots of mistakes.
kalistyles5850d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
niall775850d ago

pay your ad bills next time

sonarus5850d ago

yea the tracks are far too limited. Cars are ok but cars are too limited

Surfman5850d ago

i think it deserves a better score, 8.5 would be better.

Wolf8735850d ago

I agree. Gamespot is full of crap. I used to trust them, but now there's no doubt in my mind that GS is bias.

Condoleezza Rice5850d ago

so true,gamespot are nothing but a joke nowadays

INehalemEXI5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

Depends on the reviewer. Kevin V gives unbias ratings. Generally though it seems GS is teh bias.

GT5P is the greatest racing sim yet. We already know game updates will fix current issues and add on's will expand the gameplay etc. For me its a must have not everyones a racing sim fan though.

sonarus5850d ago

How can you disagree that 6 tracks aren't limited. I think they should have given us at least 10.

Gspot isn't biased they just have their own taste. Like i said though when it comes to reviews ign>gamespot>game trailers. Every other review is just extra.

I think the review was ok. GT5 will surely be the best driving/racing game ever made i have no doubt about that i am downloading the game now and can't wait to finally get my hands on it. But 40 bucks price tag is still too steep. But even at that GT5P despite its limitations is still a better racer than 90 percent of the racing games out now

Wolf8735850d ago

but that is besides the fact that the game got a 7.5 rating when it is easily a 8.5 at the least, they didn't take it into consideration that this game is a "Prologue". But its not just this game, Uncharted and Ratchet are two games that I took the risk of buying against GSpot's review, at that point I still trusted them. But later after playing those games, I discovered how pathetically nit-picky those people really are.

One of the minus points for Uncharted was difficulty, I thought they were suppose to be pros, but an average gamer like me, I play like 2 or 3 times a month (no joke) and I still managed to beat it in 3 days by being patient through out the game. Mario Galaxy ends up with 9 while Ratchet gets 7.5, both games equal in quality terms if I may say so, though Mario is getting old and repetitive for me.

I don't know what they want out of PS3, but their taste and their review reek of biasness.

sonarus5850d ago

Thats just the problem. It is a prologue. GT4 had 720 cars that is roughly 10% of what we are getting in GT5P. Can't remember how many tracks GT4 had but i know it was certainly more than 6.

So basically we are paying for 10% of usual content for 70% of the usual price. So imo this review is relatively fair. GT5P is an absolutely fabulous game and i am saying this off the impression the JP demo left on me. I had forza the same week the demo came out and i played the demo more but then again i have always been a fan of the GT series.

Gamespot may be a microsoft fanboys who knows and quite frankly don't care, but i do feel the 7.5 review was fair. I didn't read all of it but the pros and the cons were spot on. GT5P is a beautiful game and offers only a glimpse of what GT5 will so rest assured that GT5 will not only look better but play better and will have more content than GT4 before it. So expect 10's all around. GT5 without a doubt in my mind will be the greatest racing game ever made.

Kleptic5850d ago

people...its a prologue...GT4 had one too...and it recieved an identical ~80% from everywhere...its GT5 that will set the world on fire...although GT5P seems to be selling very well...

InMyOpinion5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

I appalude Gamespot for having the guts to stick to their own opinion, and not just follow the others like the rest of the sites do.

dexterwang5850d ago

A bit too critical... motor storm had 8 or 9 tracks (forgot)? And this costs 33% less then that, so 6 tracks isn't bad at all

I do agree with the terrible online lag though... people teleporting, ghosting, and other weird artifact. Though it very easy to join a random game. Gotta find a way for more efficient online coding

Still a great freaking game by all means ;)

sonarus5850d ago

GT5 is not motorstorm. GT5 is about ultra realistic bliss. I just spent 2 hrs playing and i don't even know where to start. Still haven't checked out online modes but i will

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5850d ago
ktr5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

Obvious they are rating the game based on quantity, not quality. The game is $20 cheaper for a reason.

The only issue with the game is the crappy online performance.

Genuine5850d ago

Wow, with all of the hype around this title, I wasn't expecting the score to be that low.

Real gamer 4 life5850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

no the game is actually great dont let them discourage you ign and gamepro gave it a high score. to tell you the truth i dont go to gs for my reviews, i tend to agree more with ign.

jwatt5850d ago

Gt prologue is sort of tricky to review, do you review like a full game or a prologue. If you give this game a high score, don't you want to leave some room for the final version. For example Gt prologue gets a 9.0 then GT5 gets a 9.2 it doesn't make sense. Gamepro reviewed it like a prologue and gamespot reviewed it like a full game that's why you will get some scores low and some may be high.

pwnsause5850d ago

almost every reviewer is giving gt5p over a an 8.0 which is were this game should be rated at since its not the full game, but gamespot, knowing their bias and all.

4D5850d ago

Your saying you like reviews that are favorable to PS3 exclusives then. Heaven forbid they gave it an honest try and an honest review right? They must be on Microsoft's Payroll correct? Give me a break. Looks arent everything. What are they supposed to do give every game a 10 just because you like it.

Maybe your opinion is wrong not thiers. You ever think of that?

Biased? Not.

Too critical? Maybe.

Spydr075850d ago

Wow, you're pretty quick to pull the MS card, huh? Ever think maybe his nothing to do with MS? Ever think of that? Probably not. You're too caught in the Sony/MS fanboy war to have a thought that isn't in someway related to the console war. Get. A. Life.

Vanqu1sh5850d ago

Wow, GT5 prologue looks like a big flop

scoring a 7 is lousy

INehalemEXI5850d ago

How do you call making millions on a demo a flop ....

Stryfeno15850d ago (Edited 5850d ago )

$40 for a demo? Don't give EA any ideas.

Spydr075850d ago

I wouldn't. The six tracks just kills it for me.

Show all comments (78)
160°

Worst Business Practices In Gaming Industry

iLLGaming contributor Anikait Makkar writes about the gaming industry's current business practices, and how it affects the consumer.

Read Full Story >>
illgaming.in
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3712d ago
desertpunk863712d ago

free to play no matter how good the game is if it is a free to play i dont play.

i want to pay full price for a full balanced experience unlocks shouldn't be earned by money but by the hard work you put in the game.

my free to play nightmares are borderlands,diablo,titanfall,w arhawk 2,halo and star wars battlefront.

SteamPowered3712d ago

If you have ever played Path of Exile, that is the best way of microtransactions ever. PoE is a great game. Its what Diablo 3 should have been and it is completely free. All the items for purchase are cosmetic and the store isnt intrusive at all. In fact, I had to actually look in the menu to find where the microtransactions are housed.
But for the most part, yes. F2P is garbage.

iceman063712d ago

I would add Warframe to that list as well. Very much like you describe. Everything that you need is offered to you in game. Things that you pay for are either cosmetic or for convenience (i.e., you are impatient). Might not be the game for you, but the F2P structure is pretty sound.

caseh3712d ago

At which point did Titanfall become free to play hmmmm...

ThatArtGuy3712d ago

He's not saying that they are, he's saying it would be horrible if they were.

caseh3712d ago

He should have said 'would be' rather than 'are' I guess.

lonelyplayer3712d ago

Hey I agree 100% with you. I hate those unbalanced pay-to-win games.

maniacmayhem3712d ago

I agree.

The whole F2P model is designed to keep the user playing and paying well past an ordinary retail price. Most devs also design features that prey on a person's gambling, need to collect or complete an objective as soon as possible type of vice.

Trust I worked at Zynga and you should read the design tricks and tactics used to squeeze every penny out of their user base.

Yes, every company has their tactics but the F2P design in most video games is so blatant and disgusting. I stay away from those games...well I try but that damn Marvel Alliance... :(

gamer20133712d ago

A great example of a game that features the blood sucking F2P model would be Warthunder.

ExCest3712d ago

The Valve f2p model is really good. You don't have to pay a dime or grind for hours to get items to boost your "skills". You just happen to want more hats so you pay money for them.

Prime1573712d ago (Edited 3712d ago )

Edit: I'm just not sure it's so simple as lumping free to play as bad....

That's pay to win which is a derivative of free to play, and which is also very common amongst AAA $60 retail games. The $60 lures you into a false sense of free.

There are games attempting many facets of the free to play model and some are pretty good, like planet side, some private servers, team fortress, DOTA and warframe WHERE you literally never (have to) spend anything - I didn't on planet side 2 with 20+ hours, and similar with warframe.

There are also some like killer instinct and warframe (KEYWORD: CROSSOVER) where it's basically a glorified demo. KI has only one/two characters, and warframe trenches you into a character you might not like in a little (but least you can build a new one several hours later).

Then there are the worst of the worst where you have to pay to win. Sometimes it's by buying upgrades to your gear like in runes of magic, or buying overly expensive increased experience in leveling grinding games like Rohan: Blood Feud.

Where I'm coming from: I had a free to play phase where I played (in no particular order but memory):

ragnarok (both subscribed before free to play, and free to play), path of exile, dragons nest, cloud nine, holic, requiem: bloodymare, runes of magic, tribes, warframe and planetside 2 (pre-ps4), blacklight, dcuo, dragon's nest, maple story, runes of magic, Farmville, clash of clans, team fortress 2 (actual, I bought it that long ago), dota, league of legends, lotr online, minecraft, wizard 101, dungeon fighter, many aria and net gear games, perfect world...

And many more that I can't remember because I don't want to.... And by played, I would say I spent more than 5+ hours (but mainly 20+ on aforementioned titles) on each of those game listed above, sometimes hundreds.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3712d ago
Jovanian 3712d ago

Worst business practices

Paying to play online (PS+, XBL)
Season passes
disc locked content
Paid DLC (DLC should be free unless it is significant enough to be an expansion)

Jubez1873712d ago

Paying to Play Online: It's a service. A TV is a product, cable is a service. A playstation is a product, PS+ is a service. How many services do you get for free? I'm sure you pay a cellphone bill as well.

Season Passes: I 100% agree on here. Never pay for anything that is not guaranteed to be coming.

Paid DLC: No one says you have to buy it. If it's cosmetics or trivial things such as Themes and Avatars there's no problem with it. You don't HAVE to buy it. It takes resources to MAKE dlc. Why would a company (video game companies are profit maximizers, btw) go and make a whole DLC questline or storyline and then give it to you for free? That brings ZERO marginal revenue to the company. I know it sounds great, and companies that do it are great. But the suits up top, yea they don't care. That's just business. Just because you bought an entre doesn't mean the dessert is going to be free. And AGAIN, you don't have to buy it or support it.

Imalwaysright3712d ago (Edited 3712d ago )

Games are NOT services. We pay full price for them and that means that we should be able to play 100% of their content with no additional cost.

crusf3712d ago

"Paid DLC" Then people complain no DLC is coming for there particular system or game.

Prime1573712d ago (Edited 3712d ago )

I agree with you mostly, but I disagree with ps+...

I bought into that in 2011 and don't regret it. It's like Sega channel, but feasible.

Maybe I just play too many games, so ps+ makes sense.. Like the payday 2, remember me, bioshock infinite, outlast, and more in the last month or two... I would have had to spend an easy few hundred on those games I wanted to play.

Jubez1873712d ago

As a business student, I have to disagree heavily with some points.

_FantasmA_3712d ago (Edited 3712d ago )

Paying to use your own internet, DLC (all of it, I'd rather have expansion packs with a ton of content), DLC coming out a week after the game's release, incomplete games with missing sections sold as DLC, pre order bonuses, short and pointless campaigns, not having server lists (like COD which insert you into random games and maps), expensive and permanent digital prices, yearly sequels with minor changes at full price, lack of challenging AI, lack of originality, and most of Micro$ofts "business practices." This may sound like a hateful statement, but I blame M$ for bringing most of these things to consoles. I remember when there free and inexpensive map packs on Live in the early years of 2006 and 2007, then they started pinching pennies.

MaxwellBuddha3712d ago

Who else here has been gaming long enough to remember when paying $50 got you the WHOLE game? No left-out content sold as DLC, disc-locked content, season passes, outfits, avatars, etc.

Excuse me, I need to go have a cry at what has happened to my beloved hobby.

Derekvinyard133712d ago

Amen brother, plus there wasn't as much bugs as there was today. Nearly 80% of games have patches

Vegetarianshark3712d ago (Edited 3712d ago )

Ea happened,Capcom happened these giant shameless corporations has bastardized the gaming industry with their BS money-grabbing tactics and ruined so many amazing games (Battlefield,Resident evil and many more).Very sad indeed.

Show all comments (24)
70°

Grand Turismo 5 2.08 Update to be released on September 25

TechPrezz: The Grand Turismo 5 update 2.08 is set to be released and coming with a trio of new DLCs and will be launched on coming Tuesday

Read Full Story >>
techprezz.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4232d ago
NastyLeftHook04232d ago

The new cars include the Nissan GT-R N24 GT Academy ’12, the Subaru BRZ S ’12 and the Honda weider HSV-010 (SUPER GT) ’11, with a cost of $0.99 for each of them. The update also include some enhancements apart from the fix to reported bugs.

With this update, you will be bale to select “Disable collisions” in the [Event Settings] of online races and the clutch pedal response while using the steering wheel controllers “G25 Racing Wheel”, “G27 Racing Wheel”, “T500RS” and “TH8RS” has been adjusted. The ID’s are now shown above cars when watching online races. There are also some other improvements. The Grand Turismo 5 2.08 is coming as free downloadable update.

that's why i love the real driving simulator.

dantesparda4232d ago

Wow updates for this game are still coming. i wish all companies were like this

krisq4232d ago (Edited 4232d ago )

Grand?? Reminds me of people saying Soul Caliber.

black9114231d ago

Now just imagine GT6!!!!!!!

40°

Top 10 Driving Games for PS3

Chillopedia.com | PlayStation 3 is the hot favourite console in the console gaming community. Game developers know this and they try to make the best out of it by introducing addictive and interesting games now and then. We have compiled a list of top 10 driving games for PS3.

Read Full Story >>
chillopedia.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
add some related game tags
Relientk774382d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4381d ago