180°

Is There A Valid Excuse For Not Having Playable Women in GTA 5?

Gameranx takes on Rockstar Games and its defenders' reasons for not including a playable female protagonist in GTA 5.

Read Full Story >>
gameranx.com
tigertron3908d ago

For goodness sake. Women are playable on GTA Online.

StillGray3908d ago

Obviously the article is talking about the singleplayer campaign.

KonsoruMasuta3908d ago

Article never specifies that. He is talking about GTA V as a whole.

Nitrowolf23908d ago (Edited 3908d ago )

@KonsoruMasuta

TBH, I think it can be implied with the comparison the The Last of Us and this line "The issue is that “women don’t fit into a story about masculinity” is in itself a statement I don’t agree with."

But nonetheless, making this an issue is just dumb. Don't get me wrong, I think Rockstar could really work it out, but considering the humor and lines that they always use for the Male characters throughout the whole GTA franchise, a female character going the same representation as the Male character would probably give them more hate than having no playable female in the story.

It really does make sense. They just don't want to piss off a bunch of people for something they never have done in any of their games. Rockstar games revolve around male characters going from rag to richies.

0ut1awed3908d ago (Edited 3908d ago )

@KonsoruMasuta

To play devils advocate, GTA V is not technically GTA Online according to what rockstar is marketing. I mean it's the online component on the same engine and all. You wanted to get specific about the article though, so specifically speaking you are incorrect.

Hicken3908d ago

Obviously the article is a weak hit grab and/or misguided attempt to latch onto a hot topic.

I write in my free time. A LOT. I've got a few dozen novels at varying levels of completion. There isn't one of them that would allow me to just swap the main protagonist for one of the opposite gender.

Stories just don't work like that. You can't just pull off or pop on a penis and everything goes on as planned. Relationships change, reactions and interactions change. Entire world views change.

So yes, there is a valid "excuse"- I'd call it a reason- for not having playable women.

What's your excuse for such a silly article?

PoSTedUP3908d ago

yeah bc its a mans world and a mans game. funny how this shit attacks one of the most masculine games ever made, fk'n feminist...
write about call of duty bc women are noble enough to wanna fight in our military, but you cant play as a female charcter? that is certainly less rightouss than the bs they are attacking gta with. its just a bunch of sour feminists, now excuse me while i go treat women equally as i mow them down with my car in gtaV.

Gaming1013908d ago

The author doesn't know anything about art. When you have a canvas and story you want to create, it's your art, and it isn't up to anyone else to whine like a bitch that you didn't make your art the way they would have liked you to make it. Complaining that the story wasn't more centralized around women is not objective whatsoever, it's like complaining that He-man wasn't actually She-woman back in the cartoons and movies. They just didn't want to tell that story. It's like complaining that you don't play as any American Indians - as if it's up to you as a developer to include every single identifiable group, homogenized into your gameplay. It's retarded, and a non-argument.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3908d ago
B-radical3908d ago

It's a story.....you cant tell someone what to put in there story...its just wrong if r* didnt want playable female in the sp then fair enough

UnHoly_One3908d ago

Exactly.

You don't see any articles complaining about not being able to play as a guy in Tomb Raider.

okmrman3908d ago (Edited 3908d ago )

yes there is a reason
the writer didnt include a woman in his story

why does everything has to be politically correct

nypifisel3908d ago

Yeah political correctness got to go. What's wrong with the simple fact that the story was written for 3 men..?

Blaze9293908d ago

....women, smh. Always wanting something

3-4-53908d ago

Where is the playable women in almost 95% of games?

Why single out GTA 5 ?

O yea, because it just released therefore it will have it's own exposure which this person can then leach off of.

Attention whoooors and nothing more

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3908d ago
Taislin3908d ago

Hmmmm, let me think. Because the developers didn´t want to, and the whole story was created with the three protagonists in mind. Why does a game NEED to have female and male playable characthers nowadays? Same bullshit with FFXV, people whine about no playable female characthers. If the game doesn´t have them it´s for a reason.Doesn´t mean it isn´t nice to have both, but it´s not a necessity at all. No excuse is in order

DoctorJones3908d ago

Talk about flogging a dead horse, it isn't an issue to pretty much everyone playing it. I'm fed up with hearing the same thing over and over again.

It hasn't got a female protagonist so get over it, none of this matters to most people and it isn't going to change anything. A game shouldn't have to shoehorn a female character in just to please a small minority that take issue with it.

If you're that worried about it don't buy and play the game, it's as simple as that.

chrissx3908d ago (Edited 3908d ago )

This is getting crazy

Show all comments (34)
60°

Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5) Best Settings for Low End PC: RTX 3060/RX 6600/RTX 4060 Laptop GPU

Grand Theft Auto V was released over 9 years ago, but the player base is largely intact due to regular updates to the Online Multiplayer. The game had some technical issues at launch, most notably a CPU utilization issue, but most recent chips shouldn’t have any issues running it.

Read Full Story >>
pcoptimizedsettings.com
290°

PS Plus Is Losing 12 Games In June 2024 Along With A Major Rockstar Release

Subscribers of the Extra and Premium tiers of PS Plus will lose access to a total of 12 games during the month of June, 2024.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gold_drake7d ago

i think the only real loss is GTAV

OtterX7d ago

I think everyone and their sister owns the game by now. They likely want to squeeze the rest of the holdouts before GTAVI releases.

Profchaos7d ago

That game comes and goes from subscriptions so frequently I think it's expected now. Like rdr2 on gamepass Rockstar Games only last a max of 3 months On a service

MrBaskerville7d ago

Talos Principle is the real loss.

BanginTunes6d ago

Facts that game is good as fuck I'm playing through 2 now, very underrated

Huey_My_D_Long7d ago

indivisible was pretty neat. Cute artstyle, fun throwback to older RPGs, shame its leaving but it is on sale often

shinoff21837d ago

Definitely. I e joyed what I played of it. Still gotta grab the physical at some point

Petebloodyonion7d ago

I'm not surprised by GTA V removal, Rockstar never allows this game to stay long on a subscription service.
They usually allow 4 to 6 months.

lodossrage7d ago

Yeah, they do that routinely with both GTA and Red Dead.

But it's because they know they can still sell them so they take them off and on to these sub services in cycle.

The weird thing to me is why is anyone still buying those games at this point? You would think after 3 generations of being sold GTA 5 that everyone and their momma would have it by now

RNTody7d ago

I fail to see how the loss of an almost 11 year old game that released across 3 generations is in any way a problem.

6d ago
Show all comments (15)