I just saw all 3 driving games at PAX. I watched them all very closely. To sit there and say one is killing the other it totally nitpicking. I mean the dash on F5 and DC didn't look as good as GT6. The outside of the cars were all very very good. The trees in DC looked very digital still in many shots driving by. Certain times the camera pans of F5's cars it goes from realism to cartoonish. You can see it very clearly. At the end of the day, GT6 looked the best over all with the least amount of visual notices. But again, it's kind of nitpicking when all 3 are done well. I made sure to watch them all!
I swear Sony guys have the best personalities. They are very easy to relate to in real life. Where MS guys seem very stale, dry humor, total white collar nerd types.
Take it for what it's worth as I own a lot of consoles. My statement about Sony's staff is just that. Zero to do with actually seeing these games in person for a long period of time. Which is better then 90% of you just sitting here guessing and watching YT videos. Which we all know YT videos do nothing justice.
How can two completely different games be compared, Forza is a arcade-sim leaning heavily towards simulation, while Drive Club is a pure arcade racer in the same vain as the Need 4 Speed games. It would be more beneficial to compare Forza to something like Gran Turismo 6 or even the up coming Project Cars, as these games are simulation heavy.
All this jorno has done is take a load of Turn 10 PR rubbish and splash it across this page, with out doing a bit of research.
Facts are this, Forza 5 has: Static backgrounds Pre-baked lighting No day/night cycle No varible weather conditions
Drive Club does all this and is (according to Evolution Studios) is nearing that magical 1080p@60fps.
"In comparison, the PS4 exclusive Drive Club looked remarkably last-gen - with muddy textures and the demo riddled with environmental 'pop up"
That is a total fanboy comment coming from a so called journalist.
"All this jorno has done is take a load of Turn 10 PR rubbish and splash it across this page, with out doing a bit of research."
That is the Daily Mail in one sentence, they don't have a CLUE what they are talking about, don't bother to research or even spell check their articles, and are just outwardly racist and homophobic.
e.g. if a credible news source (e.g. BBC News) were to report on an influx of immigration it would be neutral and just state facts after research. The Daily Mail would splash it on the front page with something like 'DIRTY IMMIGRANTS ARE RUINING OUR COUNTRY, STEALING OUR CHILDREN AND RAPING OUR PETS!!'
and this is why people with even the slightest bit of sense don't bother to read it...
I was just going to say that, the Driveclub picture is from a video while the Forza 5 picture is rendered and not even from a gameplay and it doesn't even have the hud.
@FlameHawk It is in game footage, if you actually saw the gameplay videos on Prague you'll see that this picture is actual gameplay. BTW you realize that you can turn off hud, I do it to maintain immersion.
Nitpicking much? You're comparing a shot with a lot of lighting to a shot with a not so sunny day. Even then, Driveclub still looks better. http://gyazo.com/accebd588c...
lol this is really ridiculous I think both of the games look too good to determine a clear winner.Even at this stage.I get a serious laugh reading these comments.People acting like 1 is 8 bit while the other is 4k resolution @ 120fps
Overall I would say forza looks like the better racing game but that don't mean it will be. I will say that there are things in drive club like the environments and lighting that look way better than forza.
Redemption you got me with Gran Turismo "king of racing" lol
But Forza being the better racing game that is up in the air especially since alot of previewers are saying that Drive Club is actually the most fun out of the three according to their time with it.
I just saw all 3 driving games at PAX. I watched them all very closely. To sit there and say one is killing the other it totally nitpicking. I mean the dash on F5 and DC didn't look as good as GT6. The outside of the cars were all very very good. The trees in DC looked very digital still in many shots driving by. Certain times the camera pans of F5's cars it goes from realism to cartoonish. You can see it very clearly. At the end of the day, GT6 looked the best over all with the least amount of visual notices. But again, it's kind of nitpicking when all 3 are done well. I made sure to watch them all!
How can two completely different games be compared, Forza is a arcade-sim leaning heavily towards simulation, while Drive Club is a pure arcade racer in the same vain as the Need 4 Speed games.
It would be more beneficial to compare Forza to something like Gran Turismo 6 or even the up coming Project Cars, as these games are simulation heavy.
All this jorno has done is take a load of Turn 10 PR rubbish and splash it across this page, with out doing a bit of research.
Facts are this, Forza 5 has:
Static backgrounds
Pre-baked lighting
No day/night cycle
No varible weather conditions
Drive Club does all this and is (according to Evolution Studios) is nearing that magical 1080p@60fps.
"In comparison, the PS4 exclusive Drive Club looked remarkably last-gen - with muddy textures and the demo riddled with environmental 'pop up"
That is a total fanboy comment coming from a so called journalist.
Driveclub doesn't look as good as Forza and they haven't reached 60 frames yet they said they are trying
http://i.minus.com/imifClpZ...
The difference
http://i.minus.com/iEH2HpQn...