470°

Battlefield 4 in Ultra Mode

The video above is apparently running in Ultra Mode, and showcases the highest graphics mode you can set the game to run at. So far, the Ultra Mode footage looks about the same in Battlefield 4 as it did in Battlefield 3.

Read Full Story >>
battlefield4.net
slimeybrainboy3917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

Is it just me or is youtube just completely not capable of showing this game in ultra, even on original. I downloaded the BF4 17 minute singleplayer gameplay, 4gb 1080p direct capture. It looks 1000x better than any gameplay video on youtube. youtube sucks for anything over 720p, it's just not good enough.

wishingW3L3917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

Youtube requires transcoding and that messes up the original source. It does that to make every video be 30 frames and to compress it for faster buffer, that's why even at 1080p you can still see macroblocking.

This is why I always thought that putting video comparisons of games on Youtube it's pointless.

theWB273917d ago

Thanks...I've never known why they don't put out links to direct feed so we really get a good look.

@Cooguy1212
I'll look into creatoscast too.

ShinMaster3917d ago

At first I thought it looked like Team Fortress 2.

theWB273917d ago

Where'd you get that video from? I'd like to download it...

slimeybrainboy3917d ago

There ya go. 60 fps as well.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

You'll notice the difference is so big. It's so annoying that all these developers make these great games, and spend alot of time crafting a trailer to have all the quality sucked out of it by YouTube. Why don't they offer better quality downloads on all trailers? What could be the harm.

M-M3917d ago

People need to start learning about Creatorscast. It only goes up to 1080p I believe but it supports 60fps and looks miles better than Youtube's quality.

seanpitt233917d ago

Yes I just shot a rpg in your face but you are still in tact even more so you are still a live and has just knifed me and killed me. The realism in this game is phenomenal.

ExitToExisT3917d ago

Youtube sucks for every fast paced gameplay video.

3-4-53917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

Yea they need to be putting 1080p videos of direct feed on the net via their own website.

I'm probably in the 1% but we lost HD cables for Xbox 360 back in 2008 and never bought new ones ( lazy I know), so I've been gaming this whole gen NOT in HD.

Meaning I've been playing BF3 Not in HD, Fifa...NOT in HD, COD NOT in HD.

Next gen is going to be amazing for me considering the huge upgrade I'm looking at vs most everyone else.

I've never been a graphics snob.

Still love N64/SNES/GBA graphics and also old pc game iso style graphics.

HD is awesome, but I don't NEED it to have fun in a game.

elhebbo163917d ago

well thank god both next gen consoles will bring an HDMI cable.

SpecialK3917d ago

I feel like I need to tell you that if you live in the UK, they sell HDMI cables in Poundland =p

Got one for a student house, looks the same as any other HDMI cable.

No excuse not to get one now! =P

Cryptcuzz3916d ago

Just get an HDMI cable man, they sell them on overstock for like $3 each.

It is good to have fun playing a game, but so much better when it looks infinitely better running on a cable that can be found for as little as $3.

3917d ago
Pope_Kaz_Hirai_II3917d ago

I will be playing it on ultra you console guys can enjoy low/medium happy gaming.

Syntax-Error3917d ago

Lighting effects look good in in beta form. Since there's no HUD, I know there's a lot of friendly fire

cyguration3916d ago

LOL... the console fanboys disagreed with you in droves because they don't have an argument.

Sorry guys but it's the truth... unless you get the next-gen versions, which will probably be med-high.

3917d ago
CuddlyREDRUM3917d ago

You can choose the file type/quality.

KontryBoy7063917d ago

yeah it's pointless to show graphical quality on YouTube. I mean it doesn't even do over 30fps. Direct feed is the only way to go.

Plagasx3917d ago

Well firstly that's single player..which is always better looking..

Mithan3917d ago

If you look close, you can see the quality. It shows, you just need to train your eye to see what's been degraded due to the video source.

TopDudeMan3917d ago (Edited 3917d ago )

Yeah, you just need to look at the ground to prove that. So grainy.

edit: mind you, the grass looks good.

assdan3916d ago

I can tell a game looks good on youtube, but yeah, it's really hard to tell how good. I think the only way to tell if it actually looks better than bf3 is a side by side comparison on youtube, and that might not even work.

0neShot3915d ago (Edited 3915d ago )

This setting really shows how the BF4 is lacking textures and still the same with old BF maps, not detailed enough.

csreynolds3914d ago (Edited 3914d ago )

This is Alpha test footage not indicative of the final product. That's why there are limited textures.

Perhaps you missed this... (which is from the E3 Beta build) http://www.youtube.com/watc...

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3914d ago
thehitman3917d ago

Game looks better here than that last article showcasing like 10 secs of "exclusive" gameplay. Game looks like it will have excellent graphics but doesnt look up and beyond bf3 on Ultra. I am sure though the scale of the maps are probably much better and more dynamic things like huge building collapsing is what will be the main difference from 3 to bf4.

Aleithian3917d ago

The scale will definitely be more impressive. But I'm willing to bet we won't see the difference between it and BF3 until we can *feel* it. Playing the game and being immersed in the world is the only surefire way to judge the game's visual quality.

EastBayPunk3917d ago

That's the Alpha version and it looks like they haven't even added most of the textures to the map

3-4-53917d ago

This gen/next gen, is all about the small things getting better. All the amazing graphics will be in the small details we may not have noticed before and may not notice right away initially.

Over time ( 2-4 years) we will look back on what we have now and be able to notice the difference pretty clearly.

Pixel_Enemy3917d ago

Is it just me or does this look just like BF3? I am a huge battlefield fan and support it 100% over COD but it doesn't look to me like a graphical leap like Killzone is taking. Maybe I will just wait till it releases to hold judgement. Either way, my pre order is paid in full and waiting till the day I can pick it up.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3917d ago
MidnytRain3917d ago

If anyone wants to share some true hi res/fps vids you're more than welcome, lol. 60fps is a BIG difference. The animations in this game are nearly flawless - at least in the single-player.

Mikeyy3917d ago

When does the PS3 beta for BF 4 start? it has to be soon..

sovietsoldier3917d ago

video is pointless because the full game will look way different then the alpha/beta versions.

Show all comments (55)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot759d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250758d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface758d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop758d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno758d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel759d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps758d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888758d ago (Edited 758d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33758d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888758d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH758d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
60°

5 Great Shooter Games on Xbox Game Pass

The shooter genre is one of the most beloved videogame genres in the gaming community, and rightfully so. From DOOM Eternal to Battlefield 4, passing through The Outer Worlds, the Xbox Game Pass has a lot to offer when it comes to amazing shooter experiences. Come check out some great shooter games available on Xbox Game Pass!

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
MadLad774d ago

There's a bunch of great shooters on gamepass; both legacy and new.

A recommendation I have is a work in progress preview title called Anacrusis. It's a lot of fun, and has a cool aesthetic.

90°

5 Games That Started Out As A Buggy Mess

KeenGamer: "Sometimes a game starts out as a buggy mess and we all just stop and think, “that definitely could have spent a bit more time in the oven”. This is the case for these 5 games which infamously marked their place in recent game memory."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
KingofBandits866d ago

"Games That Started Out As A Buggy Mess - A Bethesda and CD ProjektRed tale"