EA confirms Battlefield: Bad Company 3 is not in development

Electronic Arts has revealed that development is not underway on Battlefield: Bad Company 3.

The story is too old to be commented.
Kanzes2978d ago

I want BFBC3 not BF4 :v

IanVanCheese2978d ago

Meh, Bad Company's attempts at humour and character development always fell flat for me. If we must have generic FPS games at least keep the tone right.

Hellsvacancy2978d ago

Bad Company was awesome, the multiplayer anyway, I would love BC3

Maybe EA are waiting until they make the Bad Company tv series

Captain Qwark 92978d ago (Edited 2978d ago )

im with you, BC and BC2 were much better than BF3. SP and MP were better on both than BF3. BF3 had better graphics and thats about it but it was also at the cost of all the destruction which they tried to cover up with "we removed the destruction for design purposes" also removed any reason for the attacking team to try and blow the crates ASAP as opposed to waiting. i cant count the amout of times nobody would try until they had a handful of tickets left, you try that shit in BC and the battlefield would be leveled by then making it nearly impossible therefore it was in your best interest to blow them up as soon as you can

EazyC2978d ago

It seems that's the opinion of the general community, surely it would also make sense from a financial standpoint. I mean personally, i thought BC 2 was so much better than BF 3 (on console)

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2978d ago
badz1492978d ago (Edited 2978d ago )

Unlike the generic campaign of BF3 which is pretty much lifeless! I like the balance in BC series between SP and MP as both are fun to play but BF3 is better of be a MP game only like BF2 because the campaign is boring as hell.

Sad that BC3 s not in development as it's the better game IMO.

CapsLocke2978d ago

Right, because developing something new like BC3 is a lot harder then just reusing assets from BC3 for BC4.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI2978d ago

Pretty much. At the very least, it's a very pretty game. You gotta give 'em that.

UNGR2978d ago

Shame, BFBC2 had a fantastic multiplayer, compared to battlefield 3 I'd say it was much better. Except for vehicle combat, of course.

Fairchild Channel F2978d ago

The NAM pack was a lot of fun also.

UNGR2978d ago (Edited 2978d ago )

Lot's of fun doesn't begin to describe it, my friend. But as much as I want BF4 to succeed EA puts me in a funny position. We'll see by release but I don't want this to be another EA overhaul.

Starbucks_Fan2978d ago

People are still playing it on the 360 version :D

The VIP pack is free now!

despair2978d ago

not sure how I feel about this, I want it but I also want Battlefield 4 to be the greatest thing ever...ah well..

SITH2978d ago (Edited 2978d ago )

I likeed the BFBC series more than the BF series. The characters made the single player worth experiencing. The bad company single player story even had a better relation to the multiplayer than battlefield to it's multiplayer.

Show all comments (29)
The story is too old to be commented.