790°

Microsoft Says Nintendo's Legal Power Over GoldenEye 007 is More Than Just influence

Mundorare writes:

"Here we go again with a newly baked episode of the never-ending but always-interesting GoldenEye XBLA drama. Some weeks ago we published several comments coming from Microsoft about this sensitive topic. You don't see representatives from gaming companies commenting on unofficial games everyday, and if the unofficial game in question is the epicentre of a licensing conflict between three major developers, the chances of getting a single word equal zero.

That's why we felt both shocked and confused when they told us that "the rights to the title [meaning GoldenEye 007] are shared between Microsoft and Nintendo." As we said then, we would ask Microsoft again about that part just to make sure we heard well."

Read Full Story >>
mundorare.com
TheTerminator5871d ago (Edited 5871d ago )

edit: to all who are disagreeing, read the second paragraph and rethink your decision

too bad for MS, most of Rare is at Free Radical, developing Haze for PS3, with great AI
:D

Now if only the Military could see what they can do with AI and defence systems....

i be back

sonarus5871d ago

i don't even understand what the big deal is. If msoft or sony were in nintendo's shoes, they would do the same.

I mean its golden eye great game about a decade ago but far from a system seller.

BrianC62345870d ago

I don't think Rare owns any of Goldeneye 007 actually. They were part of Nintendo at the time so wouldn't that really mean the game belongs to Nintendo? What a waste of money Rare was for Microsoft. Every Xbox/360 game they've made has been bad. What exactly did Microsoft get when they bought Rare?

General Pinky5870d ago

Let’s get everyone that went the game and start sending Nintendo some emails.
Cos we all love the game and it doesn’t matter what console it comes on..
and nintendo will have to listen to the fans

mintaro5870d ago

actually they've made some pretty good games in their time with Microsoft such as Kameo, and Viva Pinata. Soon to be Banjo :D

Blank10175870d ago

Nintendo doesnt have to listen to anyone. theres no way nintendo is gonna let a competitor touch one of their games. if a deal is reached MAYBE we would see the original on the VC.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5870d ago
Covenant5871d ago

Here's a novel concept:

Release it on XBLA;

-and-

Release it on the Virtual Console.

Win/Win.

I'm sure the logistics are more complicated than that. But that seems like a great solution to me.

thekingofMA5871d ago

ive thought the same thing

it would finally give the wii a good game haha---i kid, i kid, theres a few

sonarus5871d ago

that was apparently the initial plan but nintendo pulled out last min

Fux4Bux5871d ago

Just need to agree to release it on both networks. I'd definitely buy it.

poopface15870d ago

Im sorry but nintendo is hurting themselves and MS when they do this. Both the wii and 360 could have versions of goldeneye but nintendo has completly abondened the older audience. the 64 had more mature games than the gamecubbe(I think) and the wii has very few mature games, let alone FPS. The 360 goldeneye could have HD and the wii could have wiimote controll. Both are good and I would buy it, even tho I still have a 64 and goldeneye.

BlackIceJoe5870d ago

I so want to play this game again. I hope Microsoft will still try to get this game on the 360.

BrianC62345870d ago

If you want to play it that much I see you can buy the game and an N64 on eBay for around $25 total. There you go.

Show all comments (50)
260°

Do You Prefer Single Player or Multiplayer Games?

BY WIL HARRINGTON: From GoldenEye to Fortnite, from Zork to Horizon Zero Dawn, gamers have long had a vast selection of great single player and multiplayer options. Is one mode genuinely better than the other or is a balanced experience between both best? Let us dive in, shall we?

Read Full Story >>
growngaming.com
isarai343d ago

Single player or co-op, I usually have like one competitive MP game on the side I'll play for a couple years, BF used to be my go to but 2042 sucks and I haven't really found a good replacement

chrisx343d ago (Edited 343d ago )

I'll take Single Player over MP today, yesterday, forever.

Flawlessmic342d ago

Yep single player all day, everyday and twice on sundays!!!

1Victor342d ago

I prefer single player but don’t mind a fun addictive 3rd person shooter like Warhawk and Starhawk

RpgSama342d ago

Single player games 999 times out of 1000

blackblades342d ago

Always gotta have that 1 MP for that fun competive entertainment.

PhillyDillyDee342d ago

Im the exact same. Used to play BF all the time until they ruined it.

isarai342d ago

I miss that awestruck experience when I'd play BF4 in my ps4 for the first time, or the extremely defined classes of the bfbc games

Markdn342d ago

Yeah I prefer single player, but I do like the way destiny let's you casually drop in to public events and leave whenever, don't like the crucible mind.

neutralgamer1992341d ago (Edited 341d ago )

single player games

MP games are like work now with their seasons and battle passes. For most with family, work etc, there just isn't enough time to play

Notellin341d ago

Yeah then you throw in esports and twitch and there is no way I can keep up. The kids are getting practice and watching film.

Knushwood Butt341d ago (Edited 341d ago )

These days almost exclusively single player, but I have over 600 hours in Uncharted 4 MP.

Last thing I played online was Returnal co-op with randoms.

You know what? I could play Returnal again and I have 250 hours on it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 341d ago
-Foxtrot343d ago

Single Player

Having developers create rich, lore filled worlds and giving us great single play driven stories always appeal more to me. When developers do multiplayer games it always feels the effort just hasn't been put into it, like they are expecting replay value and overall fun to come from gamers gaming with each other, especially with close friends.

Rather having a well crafted level that will capture you and draw you in they'd rather create a short generic like level which you need to grind over and over with your party. It's like they are hoping you are so distracted playing with your friends, talking amongst yourselves that you won't realise and when you finally do click on and start to get bored they'll flash a shiny new update or expansion in your face which really is just the rest of the game you WOULD have gotten it if was purely single player.

The reason for that is by playing by yourself you don't have any distractions and you are concentrating more on the world on screen. You then start to notice if the gameplay is short, repetitive, not fun, buggy, generic etc which is why developers have to try harder when doing single player games. I always feel that's why developers want GaaS titles because it doesn't mean more money for them but less work as you drip feed the game content.

IMissJimRyan342d ago

Both.
I like tits growing games like jrpg and rage inducing games like Rocket League.

sadraiden342d ago

Genuinely curious what you meant about "tits growing games like jrpg".

IMissJimRyan342d ago

It's about my own tits. They grow when I play those games.

GoodGuy09342d ago

Singleplayer. But it is fun to play pvp/e MP at times.

Show all comments (84)
110°

Are There Too Many Remakes?

There’s been a lot of remakes in 2023 like Resident Evil 4 and Dead Space with plenty more on the way, and Kurt can’t help but ask: is this a good thing?

ZeekQuattro352d ago

Short answer. No. Long answer. Hell no!

isarai352d ago

Nah, actually without a lot of these remakes I would forget why I loved gaming in the first place. So hard to just get a straightforward complete game out the box these days, remakes help fill that void considerably

jambola351d ago

no
there's hundreds of games every year
a handful are remakes
maybe it's because they are good remakes they stick with us

outsider1624351d ago

Not until we get
MGS4
Tenchu 1 and 2
SOCOM
KILLZONE 2
im sure there are other gems. These are a few of my favorites

merlox350d ago

Why not a remake or a remaster of the Resistance series?

RaiderNation351d ago (Edited 351d ago )

I mean, Ive enjoyed them. So I cant sit here and say there's too many. For the most part they've all been very good remakes. As long they remain of high quality and people are buying and enjoying them, I think its fine. They help fill the gaps between new releases. This year alone Ive beaten The Last of Us Part 1, RE4, Metroid Prime Remaster, and Dead Space and I loved every single one of those games.

Show all comments (18)
150°

Goldeneye on Xbox Game Pass is a bitter disappointment

Compared to the abandoned 360 remaster, this re-release is a painful reminder of what could have been.

MIDGETonSTILTS17433d ago

It still blows me away that Xbox couldn’t secure online multiplayer for this…. Like, why even bother then?

Number1TailzFan433d ago

Both versions should've had cross platform online play, and both versions should have been the unreleased remaster, with optional original n64 mode.

_SilverHawk_433d ago

Remove " goldeneye on" and it'll be a correct statement

Profchaos433d ago

It should have been the cancelled rare remake that was a total rebuild of the game but we got poor emulation instead

CobraKai433d ago

I didn’t know it existed until i this version came out. OMG. I want that remake.

warriorcase433d ago

You can play it on PC via emulator and it's pretty good. The remake was shelved when Nintendo blocked it's release because it was Xbox exclusive at the time and Nintendo being part owner of the title wasn't having any of it.
The licensing right for Goldeneye are a mess.

badz149433d ago

$70bil to splurge on ActiBliz, they can't even get right what they already owned!