360°

Sony in talks with Morgan Stanley, Citigroup on Electronics and Entertainment split – report

Sony is reportedly in talks with Morgan Stanley and Citigroup regarding splitting its Entertainment and Electronics divisions.

Read Full Story >>
bloomberg.com
DiRtY4408d ago

So Sony is splitting the entire company. There will be a comapny for entertainment and one for electronics.

Loeb, which is a major Sony investor and owns quite a big part of the company, wants to sell at least 15% of the entertainment part to fund the electronics company.

And no, this is not just a restructuring thing. Sony won't be the same company after this. They are starting to sell big parts of it.

Playstation will be in the electronics part of the two new companies along with TVs, cameras and audio systems as far as we know.

mushroomwig4408d ago

You really have no idea what you're talking about do you?

jimbobwahey4408d ago

Yeah, I thought PlayStation came under the entertainment division along with music and movies? Since they're also the most profitable division as well, as far as I know, I thought the whole reason for the split so that the entertainment division could prosper without being dragged down by the electronics division's repeated losses while they figure out what to do?

cunnilumpkin4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

ummmm

dude.....

http://www.digitaltrends.co...

the playstation brand costs sony millions in loses every year!!!

just like the games division for xbox

why do you think hardly anyone makes consoles?

apple could, amazon could, heck Johnson and Johnson could, they don't see any money in it

im glad sony and ms do it, but many of their shareholders are not

Panthers4408d ago

That is the PS3. The PS2 had huge profits and helped Sony with its other struggling divisions.

BeZdaBest4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

@ panther... ps2 got money.. ps3 lost it all an then some..

in 2000 sony had 100 billion dollars..in 2010 only 18.b

so yay come people we know the ps3 was destroying the bank for 5 years( a little bit after the second model was released)

its doing a little better now but nuthing to write home about

GameNameFame4408d ago

That PS3 was the reason what caused Sony to lose near 100 billions?

LOL. are you out of your mind? PS3 loss was tiny fraction in that 100 billion

soniqstylz4408d ago

@cunnilumpkin

SCE is profitable every year (that particular quarter in your link they posted a $45 million loss; but in the year ending that March, they had a $370 million profit

http://www.gamesindustry.bi...

DiRtY4408d ago

@mushroomwig and all the disagrees,

This is about an IPO of the entertainment segment. If you don't know what an IPO is, look it up. That means (at least a part of it) is for sale and will be offered for the very first time. Talking is that there are 15% - 20% offered. You can read that in the article.

Kaz said that the entertainment part of Sony is not for sale. 3 weeks later there is a 180° turnaround.

"Third Point LLC’s Loeb, which acquired more than 6 percent of Sony, is pushing Chief Executive Officer Kazuo Hirai to sell as much as 20 percent of the entertainment assets in an initial public offering."

straight from Bloomberg. Read it here: http://www.bloomberg.com/ne...

So Sony is about to sell a part of the company.

The 10% rise of Sony shares after the Xbox reveal was not due to MS. It was because Loeb communicated that Sony should split the company and investors jumped on it. Of course gaming sites like N4G did not get this at all.

@ jimbobwahey
No, the PS division is not the most profitable part of Sony. Not at all. Sony financial services is the most profitable division. Sony does a great job selling life insurances.

Look it up: http://www.sony.net/SonyInf...

@DJ Marty,

Companies do this all the time?
If so, feel free to name me a couple of companies that did this recently. Companies do not do this all the time, that is just nonsense.

And IF the Playstation is a part of the new entertainment company, it will be partially sold as well. I am not making this up.

I still believe it will be part of the electronics segment though.

4408d ago
dlocsta4408d ago

About ten years ago Sony was my biggest client. My department made the repair manuals for Sony TVs. This was when the XBR was the hottest thing on the market and even then Sony was bleeding money form the electronics department. Let me clarify, they were making a profit but it was a shrinking protfit every year. I know because I was privy to a lot more at that time. So much to the point that in 2001 (I am going to tell you something you never knew) Sony began to used the Mitsubishi all-in-one processor chip for their large screen HD TVs because the Sony architecture used three separate chips (and did provide a better picture)and was cutting deeply into the profits on the TVs. I said all of that to say this, PS is in the electronics division, period. Just because it is produced by SCEA (Sony Computer Entertainment America) does not make it entertainment. If you notice the word computer is in there as well and I also made the repair manuals for Sony computer monitors. For those of you still using CRT monitors, it you look closely at your monitor and see two lines separating the screen into three equal parts horizontally, I don't care what name is on the basil, it was made by Sony.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4408d ago
DJMarty4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

@DiRtY - Companies do this all the time, issue shares to raise investment funds.

Sony will be STRONGER after this.

QUOTE
'Loeb said that he owns 64 million shares of Sony, giving him just shy of a 6.5 percent stake.'

6.5% does'nt seem much of a share.

@THC CELL - Sony arn't selling up, they looking into issue shares in a split Sony company. Money raised will be reinvested.

Sony not going anywhere. Sony share value is rocketing.

GameCents4408d ago

Doesn't seem like much of a share but is the biggest share held by a single investor/group.
Also, SONY shares went up in response to these rumours.

It always makes me chuckle how n4g flip flops according to SONY's decisions. When this was first rumoured everybody who said it wouldn't happen because SONY was too strong got massive agrees.
Now that it seems it might happen, anyone that suggests it's a great thing that will make SONY even stronger is getting massive agrees. Just plain LOL.

OC_MurphysLaw4408d ago

@DJMarty, companies do offer stock splits often...they DO NOT offer to split the company often.

Whether or not it happens remains to be seen but clearly something is brewing given their (Sony's) response to recent questions about it:

"A Sony representative clarified matters at the time by stating that it welcomes investments and dialogue with shareholders, but that Sony Entertainment wasn’t on the market.

Today, a Sony spokesperson Shiro Kambe declined to comment, as did representatives for Morgan Stanley and Citigroup."

dcbronco4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

DJMarty it looks like they plan to split the company and do a IPO on the new company. That money would then be used to try to prop up or fix the rest of the company. I'm not sure how they plan to help the people that own common stock. They most likely get left with the Hardware part of the company. And that stock will plunge. But Sony being a Japanese company they will probably show more class. If it were a US company I would expect the common stock holders to get screwed like they did with GM.

The new company should rise. But the company as a whole is already junk bond status or close. This might make it pure junk bond until they can get it together if that is possible. One other possibility is that this is a move that will separate anything of value so that it can be protected from a bankruptcy. If they move Financial services with Entertainment common stock holders better look out. Financials have been one of the few bright spots. It most likely means bankruptcy for Sony proper.

I just looked up the rating of the stock and it doesn't have one. I would get out if I had common stock.

PiTCHBLaCK4408d ago

As far as I know the Playstation brand and It's games are very successful, The TV(electronics) part is losing them money, not the Playstation brand.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4408d ago
sway_z4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

Even MS were split in 2 by a commission in the late 90's or early 2K, happens all the time.

...and Sony will still hold the dominating share if only 15% is sold.

PigPen4408d ago

That's not how it works. If you stop riding nutz you will know that. When its sold its gone, like forever.

dcbronco4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

MS was never split. There was a threat that they would be with business software split off as a separate company. Office and their server business are still a part of the company. It was strictly about MS not having lobbyist in Washington to pay off congressman to leave them alone. Guys like Steve Case from AOL used his political contacts to try to hurt MS.

Sony is splitting to try to raise money and increase the stock price of the entertainment parts of the company. They are being dragged down by the hardware side, mainly TVs. Unless they're doing something different from the first talks, nothing is being sold. The hope is that the entertainment parts will be able to get financing. As a whole right now, it's hard for Sony to get money from anyone.

Edit. Bet you have no idea why you disagree. Or maybe you're just hatin'.

THC CELL4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

At the time, a statement from Sony reiterated that "the entertainment businesses are important contributors to Sony's growth and are not for sale.

LeRise4407d ago

Maybe I'm wrong, but I've got an erratic feeling that this Sony's split story will have an effect on the DRM decision.

Remember that words about "A suit may come in and crush our stance to support used games"? Maybe such a suit is waiting for the company decisions to split it or not.

I hope Kaz Hirai makes right decision that will lead to more freedom on PS4 for gamers and will allow offline play and used games. Never before in my life I was worrying about a corporation. Kaz, good luck in there!

danny8184408d ago

Can someone with knowlege please tell me how this will affect the playstation division. Nobody is talking about it and well i wouldnt like to be left in the dark

BitbyDeath4408d ago

In short Playstation will benefit from the split but the TV side will be a lot more vulnerable as it will no longer have the entertainment division help prop it up.

danny8184408d ago

Thanks. Hoepfully it will mutually benefit those divisions. Seeing sony branded tv sets is aleays nice.

RioKing4408d ago (Edited 4408d ago )

^Yes "nice" indeed, but unfortunately a little over-priced. With great TV brands out there, especially with Samsung, having the edge with price would be a nice sales boost. I do love me my Sony Bravias at home though :)

Also I'm gonna piggy-back off of Danny... how will this benefit the Playstation brand?

SlavisH24408d ago

Call your stock holder, "sell, sell, sell"!!!!!!!!!!!

HammadTheBeast4408d ago

Actually, now is the time to buy when shares are going up.

KwietStorm_BLM4408d ago

Sure. Sell yours to me. Genius.

PigPen4408d ago ShowReplies(5)
Show all comments (58)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted14h ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast16h ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay15h ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted14h ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl348512h ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted9h ago(Edited 9h ago)

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK14h ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (11)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor41d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7241d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7241d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

41d ago
S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7240d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
drivxr41d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation41d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

41d ago
DarXyde41d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50141d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer39d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 39d ago
41d ago
41d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6942d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave41d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit41d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno41d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit41d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay41d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7241d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos42d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania41d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox41d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

41d ago
Bathyj41d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

41d ago
BeHunted41d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit41d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

41d ago
drivxr41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow141d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania41d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox41d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

41d ago
S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 40d ago
Lightning7741d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango41d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7741d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit40d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7741d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 40d ago
Show all comments (46)