Fight Night Round 3 Teaser

Get a look at the graphics upgrade.

Read Full Story >>
eques judicii6341d ago

i'm not seeing a huge difference... but they did have an extra year to improve it

JIN KAZAMA6341d ago

The got final dev kits not too long ago. Thats the bottom line. Also, if the 360 is supposed to be so easy to develop for, why couldnt these graphics be on the 360. 360 is supposed to be a developers dream right. They havent had an extra year to develop it, its about the same time as it took for the 360, its not like they had the final dev kits since 2005. Come on people, PS3 will slowly start pulling away from the 360, its only a matter of time. I say one year max.

Dancryer6341d ago (Edited 6341d ago )

Jin have you played it on the 360 ? because I have and to be totally and utterly honest I cant see any difference between them ....

Deceased6341d ago

Is a dragqueen, I personally didn't see a difference. There will be no difference in graphics a year down the line.

PS3 has greater particle effects performance
XBox 360 has better texture performance

So all in all they have their weaknesses and strengths, I much rather see alot more textures than particle effects.

specialguest6341d ago

though the 360 will have better texture, it won't be anything far and beyond. particles, lighting effects, physics, and hundreds of different things working in real-time simultaneous is what creates the "magic" of a scene. that's just my opinion though.

BIadestarX6341d ago

Keep flipping burgers.
Stop trying to explain something that you don't understand. Only if you were able to understand that what these "graphics" are. Game assets are first made using programs like Maya, 3D studio max and other graphics tools. This translate to the more time developers have to work on these assets the better they will be. Do you actually think they they created every single game asset all over? hah! Consider the PS3 version a FN3.1 since they are using most of the game assets from the Xbox 360 version. Why do you think they call it port? "Also, if the 360 is supposed to be so easy to develop for, why couldnt these graphics be on the 360." for the same reason that no PS3 game look better than Gears Of War and for the same reason why PS2 games today look a lot better than all PS2 launch title. Do you understand? Or I have to explain to you that the console does not magically generates graphics, but that someone has to sit down and do it.

Anerythristic266341d ago

This is the game that alot of people are saying "look at the PS3 difference" I'm looking but it sure ain't obvious. Yes the game looks a little more polished, in other screens I noticed they perfected the sweat. I don't know what else to say. It's a year old game , enjoy it.

Show all comments (18)

EA and Nintendo’s long-forgotten GameCube partnerships

Games Asylum: "It’s a little-known fact that Nintendo granted both EA and Activision reduced GameCube licensing costs. It was a resoundingly pro-active move from Nintendo: around ten years ago the two publishers released big-budget, heavily promoted, titles on almost a monthly basis"

Read Full Story >>

10 Demos We'd Have Paid Money For

Pay for a demo!? Pah! That would never happen. And if it did, we'd definitely do a little checking before running a story on it... But some demos kick all the ass, and here's 10 we'd happily pay for.

Read Full Story >>
XiYakushijuAkeginuXi3524d ago (Edited 3524d ago )

Wouldn't pay for any of them and its not because they aren't good games

PeaSFor3523d ago (Edited 3523d ago )

i was buying playstation magazines for psx demo discs, i remember playing the shit out of THPS demo.

medman3523d ago (Edited 3523d ago )

I rarely play demos as I'm usually sure about which games interest me and which do not, and I don't want to spoil even the slightest bit of the games I'm truly interested in. So ultimately the only demos I try out are for games I know I'm not going to buy. I don't even touch alphas or betas for much the same reason. I don't understand why anyone would pay for a demo.

micx3524d ago

Apparently, EA will gladly give in to your demand.

mushroomwig3524d ago

Except that it was a mistake which has since been corrected. Who likes pesky facts though, eh?

christian hour3524d ago

Not 85% (roughly) of the posters on this site thats for sure, they LOVE misinformation. The glossy mag journos of the internet are a rabid bunch :)

EverydayGuy3524d ago

Without facts we would live in a lawless society, which I wouldn't mind. The strong or the most cunning will rule and everyone else are fodder.

Since we do have actual facts that are universally accepted, we can come together and have a civil debate.