Here are 10 new High Resolution pics for Fight night round 3 for ps3
Games Asylum: "It’s a little-known fact that Nintendo granted both EA and Activision reduced GameCube licensing costs. It was a resoundingly pro-active move from Nintendo: around ten years ago the two publishers released big-budget, heavily promoted, titles on almost a monthly basis"
Pay for a demo!? Pah! That would never happen. And if it did, we'd definitely do a little checking before running a story on it... But some demos kick all the ass, and here's 10 we'd happily pay for.
Wouldn't pay for any of them and its not because they aren't good games
I'm not paying for a demo, I don't care. Now publishers, what you COULD do to EARN more sales with upcoming games without screwball tactics is what a few games have done back in the day: make a game that you don't expect to make PHENOMENAL sales from, and add a sneek peak/5 minute demo of your upcoming big hit. A game that did that was Zone of the Enders with a sneek peak at MGS2. What's wrong with that?
The AH crew brings you their top 5 easiest 1000/1000 GS games.
yeah, i know EA has had about 9 months more development time compared to the 360 version, but even the most jaded, hardcore 360 fanboy gotta admit that those screens are simply breath-taking!
These screen shots almost make me wanna keep my PS3 off eBay! The 360 version was good, although it was a bit short for me.
Question: Could this be considered a 2nd generation game for the PS3?
Logic behind the question: The PS3 was supposed to be released this past spring (due to Blu-Ray according to Sony), so this and some other games should have been at least 80%-90% done by then. Gears of War was delayed from spring 06 to fall 06 also, and that's coming along good also. So I figure thats 9 months to polish them up.
...cause the devs just got the final dev kits. 2nd gen games are only such that are released at least 1 year after the console launch and the devs had enough time with the final dev kits.
It doesn't matter that the PS3 should have launched spring 2006, what matter is that the devs just got the final kits.
Duke Nukem is in developement for around 10 years, so would you call this game a 10 years ago gen game? Surely not, cause this game is developed on actual hardware and not on that from 10 years ago. So as I said, the developemnt time doesn't matter, but the hardware you are workin on.
Impressive pictures but I want to see the game in motion in 3rd person view! The 360 version was great for it's time and this just shows what can be done with more time! Here's a video of the game in motion if u haven't seen it which to me just looks ok! http://media.ps3.ign.com/me...
lol that video isn`t impressive simply because of poor footage.