Even the most hardened hetero male couldn't fail to get excited over these glistening, bulging, sweaty torsos. Yes, what you're drooling over are the first images - in-game, mind - of Fight Night Round 3 on PS3. The Xbox 360 version just can't go the distance with these photorealistic boxers. Nor does it boast PS3's exclusive new mode, Get in the Ring, which changes the side-on third-person perspective to a much more immersive first-person view, designed to show off the outstanding damage model.
Games Asylum: "It’s a little-known fact that Nintendo granted both EA and Activision reduced GameCube licensing costs. It was a resoundingly pro-active move from Nintendo: around ten years ago the two publishers released big-budget, heavily promoted, titles on almost a monthly basis"
Pay for a demo!? Pah! That would never happen. And if it did, we'd definitely do a little checking before running a story on it... But some demos kick all the ass, and here's 10 we'd happily pay for.
Wouldn't pay for any of them and its not because they aren't good games
i was buying playstation magazines for psx demo discs, i remember playing the shit out of THPS demo.
I rarely play demos as I'm usually sure about which games interest me and which do not, and I don't want to spoil even the slightest bit of the games I'm truly interested in. So ultimately the only demos I try out are for games I know I'm not going to buy. I don't even touch alphas or betas for much the same reason. I don't understand why anyone would pay for a demo.
Except that it was a mistake which has since been corrected. Who likes pesky facts though, eh?
Not 85% (roughly) of the posters on this site thats for sure, they LOVE misinformation. The glossy mag journos of the internet are a rabid bunch :)
Without facts we would live in a lawless society, which I wouldn't mind. The strong or the most cunning will rule and everyone else are fodder.
Since we do have actual facts that are universally accepted, we can come together and have a civil debate.
I highly doubt it was a mistake. Out of all companies. Keep in mind ea and microsoft also have a contract. I am sure it was damage control
it does look more polished, but the crowd still looks shocking... look at picture 9 or 10, behind ali and they look just as bad as before. really takes from the game i thought
it does look more polished, but the crowd still looks shocking... look at picture 9 or 10, behind ali and they look just as bad as before. really takes from the game i thought
Read the posts on the web page featuring the PS3 screenshots, pretty funny.
1.) This game had a whole extra year of dev time ; I would hope it might be more than a direct port of the 360 game. But visually, I see no discernable difference. The crowds/background still have the same low-poly, 2-D look, and the boxer details look EXACTLY the same.
2.) I'm sure Sony early PS3 adopters will love this....but I'll be playing FNR4 in less than a year, so I've got ZERO interest in this. ;)
It's the same game and yes a pretty good game, I also saw that they made a first person version available, I'm assuming due to the low available memory on the ps3, so by freeing up and not showing the fighter fp style they allocated more available memory to help the system out. Not a must buy but more of a good bye.