140°

Wii U gamepad price almost same price as a PS Vita

PSX-Sense writes: "The Wii U Gamepad is a very cool controller, but that's actually everything. To buy a Wii U Gamepad you will have to pay approximately $150. For a few dollars more you can have your own PS Vita, which is a great handheld and can be used as a controller with the PlayStation 4."

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.nl
TOGC4226d ago

Few dollars more? Uh...last time I checked the vita started at 299.99. That is double the price of the Wii U gamepad.

M4GN3T4226d ago

At target the Lego bundle is 209 dollars.

1upgamer994226d ago (Edited 4226d ago )

Yes it is, but don't forget it does not come with a memory card.

Coltrane_C4226d ago

Also the motherboard try is not removable.

BullyMangler4226d ago (Edited 4226d ago )

. playing with the Vita feels just like when i'm trying to flip half an orange inside out, because my thumbs land in the same position. playing with the gamepad on the other hand makes me smile and my hands almost feel to be inside a perfectly fitting glove .

so no matter the price difference between both handhelds, i and millions of others rather play on the wiiU gamepad rather than a Vita . .facts of comfort

redrim2174226d ago

@bully
Shame it's got such a crappy single touch, pressure pad display.
I really like the premise of the wii u, though after having a crack on my friends I was left feeling a little underwhelmed. Playing multiplayer feels ridiculously unbalanced, based on the fact that EVERYONE would rather use the wii u pad than a wii mote or classic controller. Having the most fun pad being reserved for a single gamer is unfair, and un-nintendo. 150 whatevers is far too expensive for a single controller. At least the Vita is worth its price, and exists as it's own entity.

--Onilink--4225d ago (Edited 4225d ago )

@redrim217

Yeah because multitouch has been so useful in the vita.... Pretty much every game out there is using single touch in the vita as well. Multitouch is pretty much useless when you already have analogs, buttons and triggers

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4225d ago
Godchild10204226d ago (Edited 4226d ago )

The Vita is about 20,000 yen now in Japan. So this article comes at a good time. Though a few dollars is off by a bit.

Kamikaze1354226d ago

The starting cost of a Vita is $249.99. Target has a sale going on atm as well.

joab7774226d ago

Price drop just came to Japan, will be coming here. By November, expect it to be quite reasonable.

On the other hand, i didnt realize how expensive the touchpad was. This could be an issue for the wiiU.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4225d ago
TheLyonKing4226d ago

Literally forgotten about the wii u with all the ps4 talk and what reminds me of it is this negative article. Oh Internet.

Jadedz4226d ago

Though the Wii U also functions as a universal remote (the Wii U system isn't needed to use the gamepad's, "TV function" button).

1upgamer994226d ago

The Wii U and the Vita are not the same thing. I am sure in the next few months the gamepad price will come down, when some games start to support 2 gamepads. Hell Nintendo is losing Money on every Wii U sold, so they have to make some up somewhere. Also 6 years ago I paid $129 for a smart remote for my TV, the gamepad does allot more than that.

CouldHaveYelledUiiW4226d ago

What I really want to know is...
Who is the hand model who has the monopoly on holding game devices?

Whoever it is they have pleasant hands.

Wait I was going to say something about the article... MEH.

I hope another game is announced today-
When is the Next Nintendo Directs?

Show all comments (26)
230°

Nintendo Accused of 'Bullying' in Weak Patent Dispute Over Palworld

The article discusses a claim by an intellectual property (IP) expert that Nintendo likely does not hold patents strong enough to prevent the game developer Pocketpair from creating Palworld, a game that some believe resembles Pokémon. The expert suggests that Nintendo's legal challenges against Palworld could amount to nothing more than corporate bullying, as the patents Nintendo might be relying on are not robust enough to stand up to legal scrutiny. The situation could be seen as an example of a large corporation trying to exert undue influence over a smaller competitor.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
-Foxtrot1d 20h ago

Crazy how far they are willing to go over nothing rather than tell Game Freak to get their shit together and sort the quality of the mainline games out.

Personally I'd drop the two game bullshit, make a full on complete game, and take their time making the best game they can without relying on a silly battle gimmick they'll ditch after one game. Gimmicks out of battle is what they should be focusing on, beauty contests, berry making, secret bases, the underground, Seasons, events during day / night and post game content like travelling to a new location or something.

porkChop1d 14h ago

That's the thing, this is why we're now seeing more serious competitors in the genre. Game Freak has just been coasting by, doing the bare minimum in innovation for the last 20+ years. They need to get with the times. Hire more devs, give more dev time to foster creativity, etc. But now that they can't get away with that bare minimum they're trying to sue their competitors out of existence. It's disgusting.

gold_drake1d 9h ago

been saying this since sun and moon.

gamefreak just isnt used to, still isnt used to, the console market. they did well on the handheld space but as a complete 3d developer z they fail miserable

the last two pkmn gens look like gamecube games. not to mention the bugs at launch.

but uve seen the ridiculous anount of copies sold at launch too.

Profchaos17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Realistically though palworld Pokemon with guns featured so many themes and concepts that Nintendont
There's no way they would make a game where you could use realistic weapons or have pals slaving away.

They're not the same genre at all they just feature similar characters

Markdn2h ago

Can't hide plagerism I guess, Palworld had it easy, even flaunting it, they deserve ever thing Nintendo decides to throw at them.

FinalFantasyFanatic14h ago

I pretty much agree, two editions of the same game shouldn't even been a thing at this point. The foundations are solid, but the lack of content and having a lived in world really let the latest games down.

Profchaos7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Two editions worked way back in the day as a gimmick hey your mate has different Pokemon in blue than you have in red so trade them but nowadays it's pointless we don't have any of those limitations system links not really a thing anymore and two editions feels exploitive nowadays like they are targeting kids to double dip

badz14913h ago

why would they do that when the fanbase is still willing to buy whatever low-effort and low-cost crap they are churning out? they are out to make as much money as possible with as little investment as possible and say what you want but GF is excellent at that front mainly because the fanbase allows them to. Nintendo is saying nothing because they are making money.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
Valkyrye1d 18h ago

posting articles from msn.com now seriously?

MaximusPrime_1d 11h ago

The article is actually Gamesradar's. MSN just used their page like a URL shortened link.

MeteorPanda18h ago

It's straight up bullying with mooney and using the government laws as a tool to do so. They should be fined.

Show all comments (22)
60°

F-Zero: GP Legend, a Twenty Year Reunion

WTMG's Leo Faria: "Sadly, F-Zero: GP Legend did not become the commercial hit Nintendo was expecting, at least in the West. The game came and went, just like its anime counterpart. It was the last hoorah for the franchise in the States, if you don’t count F-Zero 99, that is. It wasn’t a bad game per se, but it felt like a setback after the excellent Maximum Velocity or F-Zero GX. As a result, it probably did not sell that well, Nintendo saw it as a sign that Westerners weren’t into F-Zero, and we’ve been living in this hellish drought of antigrav races featuring bird-named racers ever since. Twenty years later, it clearly doesn’t hold up very well, with a lot of people barely remembering its existence, unlike F-Zero GX."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
70°

PS Vita Fans Want Soul Sacrifice to Return on PS5, PS4 Next

There was a period when the PS Vita was new where Sony was desperate to secure a Monster Hunter-style hit on the system. You may recall that Capcom’s series had been extremely kind to the PSP, effectively securing it a second wind in its native Japan. But it’s widely rumoured that Nintendo swooped in and bought Nintendo 3DS exclusivity for future entries, leaving its rival scrambling for a replacement.

The company published several high-profile projects in the genre, including Freedom Wars, which will be remastered early next year. But that’s left some fans pondering whether Soul Sacrifice could also make a comeback, the first of its Monster Hunter-inspired projects.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
ravens524d ago

PLEASE! I sold my vita copy smdh and I want to get back to killin them big ass creepy Cheshire Cats lol

Goodguy014d ago

Weren't great games but they were fun. Deserves a sequel.