740°

We asked three PS4 developers how expensive their games are

The answers we got ranged from the frank to the philosophical, but development costs -- and studio headcount -- are clearly going to rise for those making triple-A console games this coming generation.

Read Full Story >>
gamasutra.com
cl19834503d ago

Save everyone a click none answered the question.

blackbeld4503d ago Show
dcbronco4502d ago

Of course not. They won't be too much more than current. Tools are getting better. But why not leave open the option to charge more by not answering the question.

morkendo234502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

let's see I'll take a wild guess at this

current console games (ps3) in the state of wa.
run about 59.99 plus sales tax 64.38 so 4.38cent tax or increase. either ps4 games be 69.99 or 72.99 including tax 69.99=74.38 or 72.99=77.38 might not be accurate but a ball park guess.

either way they will be EXSPENSIVE!!!

SORRY,at those prices i'll stick with my ps3 until sales,lower price announcement for ps4 even then wait til a game i like on sale 29.99.

m-s-8-24502d ago

You're basing that on nothing but speculation.

Anywho, I haven't paid more than 47.99 for a new release game with no sales tax and free shipping and even less if it's not a game I want as soon as possible. Newegg is you're friend.

RankFTW4502d ago

Shopto.net have all PS4 games announced so far priced at £48 for pre order.

dcbronco4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

@m-s-8-2

Computers get more and more powerful every year and the games cost less than consoles. As hard as it was to program for the PS3, they still kept prices at $60. Now they have two systems that are modified computers and the modifications are things that make programming easier and people think because the games look better it had to be more expensive. The word corporation is synonymous with pimp. Well, only kinda because people make it so easy for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4502d ago
PurpHerbison4502d ago

What is up with the improper use of the word "troll" on this website?

Knight_Crawler4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

Pricing on next gen games is going to be the deal breaker for me...the most I am willing to pay next gen for AAA games $69.99 and not a penny more.

If games cost more than that then I am done with gaming.

Also PS3 and 360 should cost about $30 at launch.

1nsomniac4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

So your saying PS3 & 360 games should launch at £15??

I think games are too expensive to but dont be silly!!

A sensible & accurate price to suit both customer & developer should be £25 - Which is what PC games retail at & was also the biggest platform earner last year surprisingly enough!

REALgamer4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

I'd love to only have to pay $69.99 for console games...sounds like a dream come true to me!

We pay $100 US for new games here in Australia, and have for every generation previous (except PS3 games were $119.95 on launch). Nintendo 3DS games cost $69.95 US new here.

Have a look (Gamestop is branded as EB Games here): https://www.ebgames.com.au/

Jockamo4502d ago

Man, Australia is messed up. Their torrent sharing must be through the roof...

DeadlyFire4502d ago

The Alternate source states .99 cents to $60 bucks.

----------------
On pricing, Tretton said that the PS4 is "designed with the game developer in mind and the consumer in mind," and will offer games with prices ranging from $0.99 to the more traditional $60 range with the ability for players to sample games before they buy.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/1004...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4502d ago
Bahpomet---4503d ago (Edited 4503d ago )

i dont care about the games i want my console looking hot its not about the ram or the games or the controller its all about the box underma tv
derp sarcasim dont work a nowadays

ElectricKaibutsu4502d ago

"Fire? I was born of this!" Sorry, that reminded me of a line from Constantine.

stage884503d ago (Edited 4503d ago )

Don't forget, those who think they can't afford them, PS+ has got your back.

Ripsta7th4503d ago

HAHA yur crazy, PS + wnt offer ps4 retails games at the start, maybe a year later.

stage884502d ago

Ok so:

1. You own a time machine
Or
2. You're a top Sony executive

I'm willing to bet none of these but thanks for your input.

Ripsta7th4502d ago

Let me borrow yours then , since your over here claiming PS + has got our back

juandren4502d ago

It will offer retail games you imbecile. And will obviously be discounted for PS+ users

rainslacker4502d ago

It's a reasonable assumption since all games coming out will want to make their money off retail and DD before they go to the IGC. They may offer up some freebies, but don't expect the AAA games to be there unless Sony wants to push PS+ subscriptions. UC4 on PS+ would be a huge boom for them for sure. Wishful thinking though.:)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4502d ago
1nsomniac4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

Come on people, get real. You honestly believe PS+ will offer brand new full retail PS4 games at launch!?

..or are these comments sarcasm again, I cant tell on here anymore?

Qrphe4503d ago

So Evolution and Guerrilla said it was a small incremental increase. Ubisoft Montreal said it depends on the tools and expertise of the studio. I'm ok with this.

REALgamer4502d ago

Generally it will increase of the generation as gamer's demands increase.

The number of people who worked on Call of Duty 2 at the launch of the Xbox 360 is nowhere near how many were required for Modern Warfare 3, for example. Same with Assassin's Creed 1 compared to 3.

ziggurcat4503d ago (Edited 4503d ago )

if it's not the same price, then probably $5 - $10 more.

although, most people probably don't realize that the last mortal kombat game on PS3/X360 was $69.99 when it was first released...

Steadyhndz4503d ago

I don't know where you're from but if you're using the $ sign then I'm assuming USA. Games started at $60 here, and always been that way.

Qrphe4503d ago

They're talking about development costs, not retail cost of game.
IF we were to make an assumption based on what's said in the article and the fact that more expensive games would scare people away, I'm gonna say pricetags will remain the same for the most part.

joab7774502d ago

Yeah, i think i read $60 again. I wish there were benchmarks. publishers must send out 100 copies of the game to impartial gamers. These gamers get questionaires concerning length, quality, etc. Then they send them back and a board or something determines the price to be charged. It will need to be regulated. This could work in some form (i know how ansurd it sounds). I would love it because i wouldnt mind paying $70 for some games that r great, took 3 yrs and 100 million to make. I dont want to pay $60 for a 6 hr campaign or an unfinished or unpolished mess.

Unfortunately, if games remain $60, but production costs go up, the money will have to be made elsewhere. Especially early on in a consoles cycle before many ppl own one, and if the economy stays down (ie. Sony and microsoft havnt posted their best numbers, sony has big issues), and ppls cost of living goes up, it could get dicey. EA has talked about free to play which menas micro transactions. I would plan to see lots of dlc, subscription fees. It wouldnt surprise me if MS or sony released a cheap cosole with a monthly fee like smartphone. Everyone gets one but they get a constant revenue stream. There may be offers by both to sell games digitally to cut out retailers. Its gonna get interesting because neither can afford to lose alot of money in 2014 so revenue will have to come quick. Its not my fathers video games industry anymore. Oh wait, i am old. Its not my industry anymore.

1nsomniac4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

I remember buying Turok on the N64 for £75. So that would of been around $150 RRP from 'GAME' or as it was called back in the day 'Electronic Boutique'.

Developers or even publishers will charge what ever they think they can get away with. Price increase has nothing to do with making their money back, its all about profit. If people start saying these games cost more publishers will realise that they will be able to increase prices & get away with it. They will set the price high before possibley lowering it to a reasonable increase.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4502d ago
Show all comments (42)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor37d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7237d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

37d ago
S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7236d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 36d ago
drivxr37d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation37d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

37d ago
DarXyde37d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50137d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer35d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
37d ago
37d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6938d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave38d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit37d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno37d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit37d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay37d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos38d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania37d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox37d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

37d ago
Bathyj37d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

37d ago
BeHunted38d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit37d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

37d ago
drivxr37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow137d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania37d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox37d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

37d ago
S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
Lightning7737d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts37d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango37d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7737d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts37d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit36d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7737d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 36d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer38d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos37d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer37d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit37d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion37d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer37d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14937d ago (Edited 37d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake37d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha