New Resistance footage. New levels and weapons.
That was Amazing. The environments were unbelievable and the gameplay was breath-taking. I hope the online play is nothing short of an excellent online experience.
I sure wish that there was as many ps3 fans on this website as there are 360. It just seems that so many ps3 haters come to this site to reak havoc on the ps3 fans. It was one of the reasons i decided to become a member, so that i could help balance things out a bit and rightfully defend the ps3. But until the tangible truth comes out on nov. 17, the 360 fans will continue to bash any good news about the ps3.
was the action fast or what ... the game looks like nothing new to me too .. but the weapons and the fast non stoping action ... is something that i liked about this game
But to me it's pretty dam close, I must say for a launch title that is badaa$. I haven't seen anything that looks this sweet out yet. I'm not comparing this to GOW because it's not a TPS but this looks better then any other FPS that I've seen.
I am curious what was the rectangle mesh wall that kept showing up...why were the bushes 2D in a 50 gb game...and are their any vehicles? And what on-line play? The one with 40 players...that they have yet to show almost less than a month away.
I am not hear to totally bash this game, because I certainly think it looks fun enough...but I just don't see where all the hype is coming from over this game. It reminds me completely of Call of Duty 2 just substitute Nazi's for Aliens and give some different weapons. As for the enviornments...they were nice, and definitely showed some nice detail...but I just wasn't awe struck like so many other people seem to be. I hope I am wrong...I hope this game turns out to be great and that what I have seen is not what the whole game is like. I really want to like this game, cause it was one of my reasons to contemplate getting a PS3.
That was a shield weapon that's been mentioned as being one of the alien-tech weapons you can use.
this game is fantastic, i want to play it so much!
The rectangle was his shields. The game looks great and the environment seems to have some great interaction in the game.
It was a logical question I was simply curious.
edit Looks like someone beat me to the answer. /edit The "mesh wall" is a shield that is derived from the secondary fire of one of the weapons. That particular weapon can shoot through objects, including its own shield. That is the foundation for the strategy shown in the video: put up a shield with secondary fire and hide behind it while shooting through it at the enemy. What I don't understand is why the player kept strafing and dodging when protected by the shield. I like some of the weapons in the game, but a couple of things bothered me. 1. The character took frequent damage without going down - the gameplay is very run and gun. I think the fast gameplay would be better served if there were SOME accountability for being shot. 2. Not much vertical variety to the levels shown - mostly corridor fighting with an occasional open space. That said, I like some of the guns - secondary fire always makes for interesting play. I won't be getting it, though, as I don't plan on purchasing a PS3. For the PS3 buyers, though, I hope it is a worthy FPS.
Good luck with this though sony guys. I was only curious about some details being this game is getting attention. I just see a lot of Duke Nukem gameplay in there...so er aaaa Good luck with that right der.
it looks boring for all that play call of duty 3 with out the alians and the fureristics guns.the graphics dosent look all that and the smoke grenades dident do nothing.and where is the tanks and planes to help out with them big spider looking things not no little gun supose to drop somrthing that big.
. <-- Here's a period. . <-- and a spare
I though the game play was amazing, even the big spider ememy at the end kept trying to shield his face behind the wall, also I really cant judge the level desing because those where all clips "edited" so i would have to question you on that " Not much vertical variety to the levels shown - mostly corridor fighting with an occasional open space." but yes he does look a bit powerful, much like if you play halo on normal or novice, but change it to hero or legendary and you're dead. so i am sure it's just a matter of what level of hardness you want to play.
the game looks ok but 4 600$ no
If you purchase a gaming console for ONE game you are, in fact, an idiot by my standards. If there was a game that single-handedly convinced every single gamer to purchase that console then the world of gaming would be intensely different. Be more closed-minded please, it helps everyone. I do not plan on purchasing this particular game because I don't like this genre. I think the closest thing I last played to that was the original SOCOM and even that was far different than this game. Regardless, it looks good but not enough substance yet to sell me. ~
i think what needs to be done with this title is see it as a LAUNCH game, and compare it to past fps launch games. let's take the xbox 360 for example. the "fps launch game" for the x360 was perfect dark. it was ok, but hardly a breakthrough title and many do not consider it to be a solid launch game because it wasn't very polished. for ps3, we have resistance. gfx look better & game play looks better than pd and it's a LAUNCH game. i think all this shows is that there is alot more to come for the ps3. granted, this won't be a "halo killer", but given the limited time and resourses, it at least looks to be a solid launch title and it will certainly sell well.
um... pdz was not the app that everyone bough... that would be call of duty 2.... And with halo 2 working really well on 360 no one needed anything else yet (no competing systems yet) now they have gears of war which will be the most sought after game this christmas (besides zelda)
wow, i guess i should have said "fps launch game, exlusive to the system". cod2 was a port...
Don't get me wrong.. I plan on getting a PS3 sometime in the future, but this games seemed just ok. Enemies kinda looked boring. I think Lost Planet for 360 looked more impressive.
this is my point. sure, you can say lost planet looks better. it's a second gen x360 game! lost planet will make me buy a x360, but you need to be more objective to the fact that risistance is a launch game for ps3 and not a game or system that has had time to mature. time will tell...
fact that risistance is a launch game for ps3 and not a game or system that has had time to mature. time will tell... bs ps3 is bs and now we no
wow, now *there* is a well said, ojective response.
you seem to be new around these parts. let me be the first to welcome you with a sound opinion: objectivity is a concept that is NOT known on this site. you will find a few of us who prefer to share our opinions in a respectful, constructive manner; but thats a slim (i'm talking maybe 3%) few. me, andy capps, DJ (sometimes), outlaw, and a few other PS3 and 360 fans. but for the most part objectivity is met with cynicism, criticism and plain'ol immature biasness from fanboys. for my part: welcome aboard.
thanks for the welcome! and i'm not really new to the site, i just don't post comments often. i've been coming back here to this post, just to see what kind of responeses there are. as you mentioned, not much in the way of constructive or factual rebuttals =(