1070°

Pachter: PS4 will feature "hyperrealistic games" and "render games at 240fps"

“They’ll be able to put a lot more characters on the screen and allow for hyperrealistic games,” Pachter said.

Sony’s new console will feature graphics chips developed by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and processors capable of rendering games at 240 frames per second, Pachter said. Current-generation games typically render at 30 or 60 frames per second. As with past model changes, Sony will continue to produce and sell the almost 7-year-old PlayStation 3.

Read Full Story >>
japantimes.co.jp
Walker4519d ago

This is really trolling, lol. Awesome trolling, but trolling.

Dylila4519d ago

i cant wait for the ps4. the official specs and pictures of the system with some game trailers will be amazing.

BLAKHOODe4519d ago

Yea, and that's only the beginning. Imagine what we'll be seeing 2, 4, 6 years into the consoles lifespan. Amazing times ahead!

Deku-Johnny4519d ago

Don't get too excited, Sony have said themselves that the PS4 won't be a massive leap from last gen consoles.

gaffyh4519d ago

I don't really have a problem with Pachter because most of the time he is quite logical, but this is just stupid. Guman's can barely see moving images above 30fps, 240fps is a completely redundant amount of frames, that will increase the price of development by up to 8 times, needlessly. 60fps is more than enough.

Anon19744519d ago

Some have cautioned that we wouldn't see a huge leap in games from this generation to the next, but it has nothing to do with the hardware and everything to do with development resources. Pushing new hardware takes a tremendous amount of time, money and talent and these resources are limited. These are the bottlenecks that games face right now that hold them back, it's not the hardware, and new hardware isn't going to miraculously solve the already tremendous resource strain on developers to delivery AAA titles.

That being said, there's no reason why the hardware wouldn't be powerful enough to pull it off. You can put a school bus driver behind the wheel of a Formula 1 car but chances are they aren't going to win any races. That's not the car's fault.

guitarded774519d ago

@ Deku-Johnny

Sony are right... The modern trend in computer architecture is that we are reaching a plateau of sorts with how many switches can we have in a chip due to heat produced from more and more circuits. For a long time we have used Moore's Law as the standard upon which technology grows. We are in a new position in the way architects design machines.

Anyway, I could go into detail as to why this makes jumps from generation to generation less evident, but I'm already boring myself. Anyway, we will see a significant jump in technical performance, but not the visual jump we saw from say SNES to N64. I have no doubts the visuals will be well sharper, and textures more detailed, but the AVERAGE consumer won't really see a HUGE difference. Pixel and frame rate counters will notice a significant difference though.

I can't wait for the 20th... I'm all giddy... my wife keeps slapping me upside the head and tells me to "stop acting like a _____... it's just a video game machine". Just kidding... but I am excited.

nukeitall4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

I can't wait to see the reveal also, but 240fps is completely utterly ridiculous.

Sony won't shoot themselves in the foot with that kind of hardware, which would cost way more than $600. Sony wouldn't be competitive let alone the fact that 240fps is completely useless to gamers.

I'm almost certain that quote must have been taken out of context! Pachter tend to make pretty logical, but obvious statements and not outlandish like this.

@darkride66:

"That being said, there's no reason why the hardware wouldn't be powerful enough to pull it off."

Well "Mr. Finance", why don't you tell us about the finances of such a move and how great that will be on Sony's overall business strategy and their own financial situation?

GribbleGrunger4519d ago

Great analogy there Darkride66, and I agree with the points you've made

AzaziL4519d ago

Want a preview of next gen, look no further than Far Cry 3 maxed out on PC.

Dee_914519d ago

@Deku-Johnny "won't be a massive leap from last gen consoles. "
where did they say that ?
I read "wont be as big as the leap from ps2 to ps3"

badz1494519d ago

this just shows how minimal Pachter's technical knowledge is! 240fps? sure...if games are rendered at 240p!

Anon19744518d ago

nukeitall said, "Well "Mr. Finance", why don't you tell us about the finances of such a move and how great that will be on Sony's overall business strategy."

I'll bite. How the hell would I know? We don't know any details about the product. Besides, I've been saying for the longest time that the strategy of selling consoles at a loss initially only works if they make up for it further down the road. If they don't make it back when it's all said and done, something needs to change. It's not rocket science. Personally, I worry for Sony entering another product cycle and spending billions to develop a product when the PS3 doesn't even seem like it'll be able to break even when it's all said and done. I've also never denied that for years now, Sony has been in rough financial shape. You'll never find a post from me where I claim otherwise. They've made strides towards moving back to profitability but there still have a long way to go.

That being said, if they want to keep the Playstation brand relevant they need to act before Microsoft or Nintendo's efforts further lose them market share that will then be a struggle to get back, so the timing may be beneficial in the long run. But it's pointless to speculate at this stage of the game because we have no idea what the PS4 is, what it will cost, what it will sell at, when it will launch, how quickly it will catch on, etc, etc..

Just reading your comment, it seems to me you've invented some sort of imaginary position that I supposedly have on Sony's finances. Rather than making up arguments or hypothetical scenarios that you think I believe in, why not stick to making counter points against things I've actually said? I've never claimed to be any type of financial expert. My decade in the brokerage industry and my FMA designation make me qualified to manage investments and build long term financial plans, but I'm no business strategy expert and have never claimed to be. I've poured over thousands of reports and financials over the years to be in a better position to advise my clients, but that doesn't mean I'm any kind of expert. In the brokerage industry, you rely on the opinions of analysts who're paid to make those judgement calls, and if they couldn't do their job they wouldn't last.

Not sure why you're even bringing up the financial side of things. If I didn't know better, it would seem that you're just trolling.

Apex134518d ago

The PS3 had awesome specs and where did that get it?

you guys seem to forget about content, game play and price.

How many versions had to come out before they got anything right?

lfclee4518d ago

Hyper realistic with an Amd 7670 graphics card ? Don't think so !

isyourhouseonfire4518d ago

The best part is you can take the PS4's accomplishments and double them to see what the next XBOX will be delivering.

4518d ago
+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4518d ago
Blacktric4519d ago

If I was the guy who's running the company who hired this idiot, I'd have fired him years ago. How the hell is this guy still considered as an "analyst"?

jukins4519d ago

Not too many ppk will stay employed as an analyst if they are constantly wrong especially working for the kind of place patcher does. Just because you don't agree doesn't make him wrong. Remember Jes working for one of the top brokerage firms and well we're not...

Th3 Chr0nic4519d ago

The article is from JapanTimes. I doubt patcher even said any of it. A Japanese site/paper writing about Sony.... yea no bias there

user39158004519d ago

He hit the ball out of the prak with this one, good job Pachter you are king of nothing lol... 240FPS not even the most super comercials pc can do, but I like the way you think on this one lol...

zebramocha4519d ago

@niv It can but the game would be very simple in terms of geometry,texture and effects.

kneon4519d ago

I seem to recall the last PC I built clocking in around 200fps for some games. But what's the point of such super high frame rates? I'd rather that extra horsepower were used for something else.

REALgamer4519d ago

Older games can hit 240fps, but NO-ONE is able to actually see that, since regular PC monitors have a refresh rate of 60hz (fps) and 3D ones have 120hz.

What's the point of rendering 4 times the number of frames that can actually be displayed by a screen?

Oh, and for anyone wondering, HDMI has a maximum of 720p @ 120hz, or 1080p @ 60hz. The cables can't even work with higher than that.

This is just ridiculous.

DeadlyFire4518d ago (Edited 4518d ago )

This is not impossible at all if he is talking about upscaled PS3 games on the PS4 having up to 240 frames on the new hardware.

PS4 games I do not believe possible at such framerates with new game engines, but games with current gen/old game engines. Could easily see 200 fps solid performance. Will we see it. Maybe a little, but honestly in most cases your hardware is locked at 60 hertz or so. That is likely max you will see. It makes a heck of a difference to some games though to see that.

Take a game like Mass Effect 3 for example. PC version gets up to 145 frames with high end AMD 7970 card @ 1680x1050 resolution. Now if you consider most PS3/XB360 games have a resolution of 720 or less. We could easily see performance up to 240 fps for PS3 games and small games.
http://www.techspot.com/rev...

Is it beneficial to us? In some poorly optimized games yes it is. Very much so. As any game from PS3 era would run at a solid 30-60+ fps no matter what. :)

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4518d ago
Abdou234519d ago

I need some of whats this guy is smocking

dubt724519d ago

It looks like you're already "smocking" something, lol. But yes, Pachter is a moron.

edwoods4518d ago

Can someone help me understand this. I thought the human brain could only take in close to 60-70 fps visually. I thought I remember reading that somewhere. Also wouldn't the higher 240 fps actually make things appear slow. I thought thats how people capture things like bullets in slow motion etc, thru higher frames. I always thought 30 fps was ok but the once u got to 60 fps, that was as smooth as it gets, but after 60 fps, it start to be too much and creates the slow effect.

BitbyDeath4519d ago

Hyper Realism might sound a bit crazy but if Quantic Dream can pull this off on current hardware it'll be amazing to see what they can do with the PS4.

http://blogs-images.forbes....

landog4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

cool bullshot, the real games they have made look worse than this in game;

http://www.playstationeupho...

still nice, and its been touched up becasue all the jaggies are gone, in the real game the windows are ALIVE with artifacts...lol.. NOTHING like that screen you put up...lol....there is NOTHING on ps3 that looks even remotely close to that....that screen you posted will not even be achievable with ps4's mid-range 3 year old pc specs, unless that is all that is rendered, once you have backrounds, ai, physics, other character models, in game charachters like that are only possible on pc

turgore4519d ago

I believe hyper realism. But 240fps ? Give me a break. Maybe PSN games.

sonic9894519d ago

@landog

oh PC is this PC is that everybody is getting sick of it
btw those specs were rumored noooooooot offfffffffffffficial get it people

USEYOURFIST4519d ago

@Landog your comparing the screen with a different game that was made years before Beyond, i dont see how thats logical or fair, you would have to wait for a 'proper' in game shot of beyond to judge

BitbyDeath4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

@landog, Heavy Rain is 3 years old.
Beyond is releasing this year, of course it is going to look better-

http://cdn.inthegame.nl/wp-...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4519d ago
4519d ago
GraveLord4519d ago

PS4 is gonna be awesome. Suck it haterz.

zerocrossing4519d ago

I wish patcher would just shut the hell up sometimes...

imdaboss14519d ago

Patcher is right he knows everything. PS4 exclusive games will take advantage of the hardware ..I am so HYPED up right now

user39158004519d ago

Pachter do come out as an individual that has to have his name in the gaming comunity, and I belief his able to come up with great adviced for stock holders. However, I believe him to be awkward and intelligent on his own rights, he has poor common sense and definately not wised, but as in this set up, I like his sense of humor.

Ritsujun4518d ago

*does
*community
*believe
*he's
*definitely

Mounce4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

Dude, I still can't wait for PS7, the console that enters your mind and warps your reality into a gaming world.... Hoe damn I can see the media reacting to it now! LOL

In mother Playstation 7, shooting hookers NOW gives you POINTS! Online-Reality Leaderboards for most hookers killed! ALSO! Don't forget the introduction of RL Achievements, some notable ones being "Woke up for the 69th time" or "Went to work on time!" - "Urinated 5000 times!" GOLD TROPHY!!!

Tsar4ever014519d ago

(SIGH) People keep expanding the HYPE BUBBLE, and when it burst, people's hopes will be shattered cuz they keep hyping rumors to the point of the impossible. I wish people will just shut the fuck up and just wait for the official statements from Sony.

Mounce4519d ago

Hype trains/bubbles are fun to join for the sake of just joining the excitement. To those that let it get to their heads and emotions are the one that 'we' later on shoot the flak cannons at for being irrational, which continues the cycle of fanboys and whatever else is illogical of people who just don't think realistically :DDD!

4519d ago
morkendo234519d ago

RUMORS FOR GAMERS there you have it.

let patcher spew his rumor= trolling

solar4518d ago

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahaha.....now that is rich.

the ps3 still hasnt done 4D. riiiiiiiiidge racer!!

Syntax-Error4518d ago (Edited 4518d ago )

I'm sure people thought the same when we went from 60hz to 240hz on TV's

DigitalSmoke4518d ago (Edited 4518d ago )

Pachter should be ignored, he doesnt know anything regarding games or the industry.
He's a money man trying to make a name for himself in the game scene, and as a jewish reporter, the media suport is massive.
Wile us gamers look at he's flawed expectations and analasys over and over and over.

4518d ago
+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4518d ago
parkerpeters4519d ago

Those are some outrageous claims. But who knows. I don't see games rendering that well unless they are extremely outdated software on this new hardware.

awi59514519d ago

Those are outrageous claims but sony hasnt started there outrageous marketing yet. Just remember all the crazy crap they said about what the PS2 and PS3 could do before launch.

wishingW3L4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

let's just focus on realistic goals better. 1080p/60frames and good art-style.

tubers4519d ago

I'll be a bit more realistic:

Games with more geometry, more and better physics, more and better AI, larger expanse and draw distances and much much more effects..

@ 768p/30 fps with the good AA filters.

4519d ago
PersonMan4519d ago

Marcus. Every gen has been 30fps and below for the most part. Developers can push more effects and geometry with double the render time.

Plus, with controllers, you don't feel like 30fps difference as much as with a mouse.

pr0t0typeknuckles4519d ago

240fps, is this ninja cereal, XD, i love playstation but lets be serious, 240fps on a console,hyper realistic graphics,hes either trolling or he smoking some amazing weed.

FanMan4519d ago

240 fps would be complete overkill. pretty sure the human eye mayes out at like 60-80 fps. after that it wont look any different to us

jmc88884518d ago (Edited 4518d ago )

More like 500-600 FPS.

Biggest lie of the internet.

Does it involve Richard Gere and gerbils?

Or

The human eye only sees.....

By far and away the human eye 'sees' far far more than 60-80 fps.

http://www.100fps.com/how_m...

Try more like 500FPS, and maybe more depending on what 'threshold' seeing is.

Oh and 1080p is 'noticable' far below 40 or so inches. (another lame....can't notice X resolution below X inches screen)

You've been conned.

That said Pachter is smoking crack if he thinks new games will run 240 FPS.

Far more powerful PC's don't render new games that high.

Qrphe4519d ago (Edited 4519d ago )

They said a similar thing about the PS3 and look where that took us. 1080p 30fps will be a next-gen standard.

Show all comments (216)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor36d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7236d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7236d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

36d ago
S2Killinit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7235d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 34d ago
drivxr36d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation36d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

36d ago
DarXyde35d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50135d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer33d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 33d ago
36d ago
36d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6936d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave36d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit36d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno36d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit36d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay36d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7235d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos36d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania36d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox36d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

36d ago
Bathyj36d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

36d ago
BeHunted36d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit36d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

36d ago
drivxr36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow136d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania36d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox36d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

36d ago
S2Killinit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 35d ago
Lightning7736d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts36d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango36d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7735d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts35d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit35d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7735d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 35d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer36d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos36d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer36d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit36d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion36d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer36d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14935d ago (Edited 35d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake35d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha