Gamer Limit: "To be clear, this is not a classic Devil May Cry game. Combat is not nuanced down to exact tenths of a second, you aren’t going to ponder over which ability based unlockables to buy, and there isn’t a whole lot of thinking going on in general.
Still, as an action game, Devil May Cry succeeds far beyond what Ninja Theory has ever accomplished in the past. Whether that can be attributed wholly to their own merits, or a bit of Capcom supervision is unknown, but the fact remains: I have a little more faith in Ninja Theory as a studio from here on out."
It's been six years since Capcom dropped Devil May Cry 5, but it's still more than worth replaying in 2025 thanks to its rich gameplay.
Because the anime is on Netflix and we gotta ride that DMC in the news again wave.
It’s been sitting in my backlog for a while now. One of the first games I wanted to try for this current gen due to the long load times of previous gen. I’ll get around to it soon!
Everytime its on sale I think about buying it but never do. I only played the orginal and somr of 3 so I guess that's part of it.
Steam's Summer Sale looks primed for Steam Deck players - with a huge collection of titles on offer for the handheld.
VGChartz's Mark Nielsen: "Upon finally finishing Devil May Cry 5 recently - after it spent several years on my “I’ll play that soon” list - I considered giving it a fittingly-named Late Look article. However, considering that this was indeed the final piece I was missing in the DMC puzzle, I decided to instead take this opportunity to take a look back at the entirety of this genre-defining series and rank the entries. What also made this a particularly tempting notion was that while most high-profile series have developed fairly evenly over time, with a few bumps on the road, the history of Devil May Cry has, at least in my eyes, been an absolute roller coaster, with everything from total disasters to action game gold."
3,1,4,5 to me, never played 2. 5 gameplay is amazing but level design was really disappointing to me, just a bunch of plain arenas, the story felt like a worse written rehash of the 3rd and the charater models looked weird ( specially the ladies ). Another problem with 5 was that there was not enough content for 3 charaters so I could never really familiarize with any of them
2.
Dmc.
4.
5.
1.
3.
God DMC2 was an awful game.
And in case this isn't obvious it goes worst to best
Order changes depending on your focus. I tend to focus on gameplay/fun factor, so...
5, 3, 1, 4, 2.
I really didn't like 4 but commend Dante's weapon diversity. The retreading of old ground was pretty unacceptable to me.
But even then... Still more enjoyable than 2 for me
This is a fair review from someone who obviously had many reservations. He did a good job of giving credit where its due and by pointing out things he thought were better in older iterations. As far as difficulty is concerned, u have to give NT credit because u know they were forced to streamline for the masses. But they did include other difficulties for the hardcore fan. Yes, it stings to be a longtime fan and feel like a company has no reverence for your love, but this article points out that maybe, just maybe it isnt as black and white as it is portrayed by many. And we may have got a good game afterall. The question is, is some really good danye better than nothing?