Official Nintendo Magazine deliver their verdict on the best Wii U games so far.
Former Nintendo PR manager says that the reason their games rarely go on sale is because they value their games and aren't like Ubisoft.
Just throwing shade at Ubisoft like that.
"Nintendo’s audience will buy the game if it wants to, regardless of sales."
Sales? What sales? People buy Nintendo games at full price because they don't go on sale.
theres a reason why hes a "former" employee.
woth that kinda mindset, i would have fired him too ha.
They value their games? Meaning others who have sales don't? How fking rude of this dude. Nintendo are really arrogant
Dr. Serkan Toto says: While things do not look great for many studios in the West, things are very different in Japan – and I was shocked how little people in the industry still know and understand about the third biggest gaming market in the world (which is a probably a positive for a Japan game industry consultant like myself).
Honestly, it looks about the same if we are measuring a company's success on their all time high stock price. It has nothing to do with the sentiments some in the industry have.
Objectively the two biggest problems are cost cutting and consolidation.
The late 1980s and early 1990s saw gaming giant Nintendo engage in a rapid-fire series of corporate deals and backstabbing — the consequences of which would create a new rival and industry titan to change the gaming landscape forever.
TBH, there's no longer any rivalries. sure they are selling consoles but those looking for Nintendo games, will buy Nintendo's but those looking for higher end console experiences, will definitely choose Playstation
It needs a Pokémon MMO.
Well I guess you can infer that ZombiU wasn't in the top 4, since they ranked the others. #4 got a score of 80, which I guess would mean ZombiU got in the 70's or lower.
If ZombiU was supposed to be the best one, then the whole way they wrote the article was very poorly done.
So I wonder what they didn't like about ZombiU? Then again there are big differences between various review scores amongst reviewers. They have Nintendoland at 90, while others have it in the 70's and 80's. One review doesn't always hit everything right, and some things bug or are loved more by certain people than others. Are the potential knocks on ZombiU really big deals? Or just a reviewer that decided to judge these other games ahead of it? We'll learn more when other reviews hit. Then learn ourselves when we play it.
edit: NVM another article says 92, so it was just bad journalism that gave a #1-4 ranking, when a higher scored Wii U game will be revealed later. Seriously they should either then label them #5 to #2 or just hold off on the article to do them all at once. Or not even rank them. Then you could just give them those scores and leave the surprise that the #1 game is ZombiU.