Head2Head: Call Of Duty Black Ops II Screenshot Comparison

Lens of Truth writes "Welcome back for another exciting Head2Head! This week we take a closer look at Activision’s Call of Duty Black Ops II for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Come join us as we compare one of the most anticipate game release this year."

Read Full Story >>
Oculus Quest Giveaway! Click Here to Enter
The story is too old to be commented.
RudeSole Devil2652d ago

Wow close but again expected the results..

NastyLeftHook02652d ago (Edited 2652d ago )

lens of lies. c'mon use full rgb.

2652d ago Replies(2)
ALLWRONG2652d ago

"c'mon use full rgb" that has been the excuse for years, even when it's being used.

Awesome_Gamer2652d ago

Both look like trash, ugliest game to release this year..

MGRogue20172652d ago (Edited 2652d ago )

I honestly can't see a difference apart from PS3 version having a slightly higher brightness/contrast. Anyway, Regardless of which version looks better.. Treyarch have done an excellent job with the PS3 version of Black Ops 2 this time around compared to the first one, BO1.. That's for damn sure. It runs so smooth & looks so good which is awesome, just like X360 version.

I especially love the 'texture install' feature, very handy for when you'd like to keep things quiet from constant disk reading & save your blu-ray drive from becoming dead/broken from over-use.. there's also a little bit improved texture draw-in performance from using the option as well.

I'm really glad they've finally got both console versions pretty much looking on-par with each other now. :)

LocutusEstBorg2652d ago (Edited 2652d ago )

Looks butt ugly compared to PC. It's got awful muddy textures, jaggies everywhere, floors and walls which are completely blurred without anisotropic filtering and the overall rendering quality is very poor. On top of that it's zoomed in... sorry "upscaled" to 200% the area.

Oh and that's compared to a 7 year old PC with a 7800GTX (basically the same GPU as the PS3) which produces flawless image quality. I just don't understand why image quality automatically becomes horrendous when running on a console with the exact same specs.

chukamachine2652d ago

Because it's not a 7800gtx.

It's 128bit gpu and has half the bandwidth of a 7800gtx.

It could be sharper on PS3, but maybe turn up sharpness on tv. :)

Either way, it's smooth and plays well.

Sykoticz2652d ago

Not a fan boy or anything but the 360 has a modded x1900xtx in it which back in the day ripped the 78-7900 nvidia cards so at the end of the day when it comes down to raw graphic's based engines like this game the 360 will win every time.

If they used a different engine (Which wont happen for awhile) it mite be a different story. But at least this is better then MW3 and BO1 etc.

r212652d ago

Wow, they are both the same, I seriously cant tell the difference! Good work Treyarch :D Now let's see bout performance wise.

360 man2652d ago

if you cant tell the difference. then you need glasses my friend.

r212652d ago

Im sorry buddy but with these still screenshots, they practically looked the same judged from a reasonable amount of eye distance. Unless you were putting your face up close to your screen, then yes they might(emphasize on might) look different.

In any case, the version that 'wins' is the one that both looks pretty AND performs well on console. Again, awesome job Treyarch :D

Skate-AK2652d ago

Look at his name. He's obviously trolling.

Show all comments (22)
The story is too old to be commented.