Hands on the PS3

Sony sends PS3Mag a PS3. It is real and it works brilliantly. Some more details of the brute in action:

1) It's quiet like a sleeping baby. A barely audible hum. With the TV on you simply can't hear it at all.

2) It's heavy like a planet. No, really. It's impossible to pick up with one hand.

3) It's shiny like a mirror. In fact, it's impossible to take a photograph of it without the flash spanging every picture into a starburst mess. And therefore it's massively prone to fingerprintage too, with the tiny amount of dust in the office magically attaching itself to its surface in seconds.

4) The PS3 joypad is very light and the tilt system is very responsive. We like.

5) The start up is amazingly fast. And game load times were faster than expected. In fact, PS3 does both at about the same speed of PSP. ie, Long load times due to the massive Blu-ray disc? Nope. Simply not an issue.

[kingboy]

yea dude! awesome.nice find

[TheMART]

Well I would like to say

AT LAST

But why stop at the start up screen? I would like to have seen some footage actually. Did it lock down to much that they didn't show? What reason exactly?

[kingboy]

you guys not buying the ps3,so please for ones sh*t up.Go play live or something jeez!

[shoota33]

Man xbox fanboys just keep getting owned lol.We have short loading times and a near silent console unlike another console i know.And dc rider your jealousy and extreme fanboyism is unbelievable.

[Anerythristic26]

My 360 really is not loud. I would be honest with you if it was. I can't hear it at all.

[Donkey Slayer]

Very jealous that they are playing motorstorm..
Nice pic of resistance, I hadn't seen that area yet.

[Silverwolf]

and all getting to the start screen isn't a big deal (which took around 15 sec). They should've loaded the actual gameplay to see how long that would take.

[Optimus Prime]

wow. i laugh at you because you think you are king of the world because you think you have the best console. THEY ARE VIDEO GAMES. get a life.

[bullet]

How did xbox fans get owned again???? Regardless of what you heard or what you make up I never hear my xbox...Maybe if I shut off everything in my house and put my ear right on my 360 Iam sure I would then hear it.....

And as far as load times my 360 loads pretty fast.How can you compare it to the ps3 yet have ya played it. Because from what I have SEEN of the ps3 the 360 is just as fast.

So please tell us again how the 360 fan's got owned again.

[Grown Folks Talk]

if somebody likes ms and hates sony, then they probably look at it like this. "Too bad for me. The ps3 loads those games that i can't stand extremely fast. On top of that i can't even hear it while they load. I hate Metal Gear and Final Fantasy, but they start up so quick i think I've changed my mind." if you're a fan of one system, then you really don't care what the other does. if you never want to play a 360 game, why do you care about load times or noise? and finally gametime, look up the word hypocrite, then read your comment to dc rider about being an extreme fanboy.

[Anerythristic26]

I like the look of the PS3. I'm glad it's close. I plan on getting a 499 version if the games I want for my 360 slow down. So that's what? Summer '07.

[Grown Folks Talk]

are not fast. anyways, for any xbox fan that has played halo, you shouldn't complain about any load times. halo takes quite a while. i seriously doubt load times will prevent anyone from buying a system anyway. if you don't want a ps3 but are looking for reasons as to why you might, then continue to come here for news. if you work for a company where this info may be useful i.e. gamestop, ect, then continue. if you just come to talk trash to ps3 fans, or can't have a legit discussion as to your disagreements, then you should probably hit the bricks. i've had disagreements with the truth in the past, but we handle it properly. he states his point and why he feels that way, then i do the same. it's not hard to have a logical debate with someone. and his dislikes of the 360 are valid. he owns one, and it doesn't meet HIS expectations. his personal preference is different. i know i'm glad we're not robots, and that everyone doesn't do and like the same things. be pretty damn boring that way. at least the truth contributes to the site with news and decent posts.

[shotty]

I feel happy for ps3 fans that the console is closer to launch. However I don't feel the load time was short. That was just to get to the title screen, what I consider load time is when it loads a level that you play.

[zonetrooper5]

I am looking to buy the PS3 but not until as least next year after the shortages have been sorted out. i suppose christmas 2007 or maybe sometime in 2008.

[Deceased]

But I can't wait till pictures or videos of a running PS3 disapppear. This is hardly news, more like a drewl fest for PS3 fans.

[DG]

That thing just looks cool and shiny you know thats enough reason to buy it, maybe Christmas 07. That thing is good for gaming overall xbugs, nintendites and sony bots alike. Bring it on with availability in store and a price drop and Im all over it.

[beans]

In the future all bashers that speak there mind will be sentenced to jail time! And yes there will be a back log of every person on this site who bashed at one point or another! We the future military will come and scoop you up and exterminate the one's that just never had a life! So stop the bashing and just enjoy the games and news!

[bullet]

I heard from some where that the ps3 comes with a little japanese guy inside of it and that is why it weighs so much:) So if you are laying in bed late at night and you hear some one cursing in japanese.Dont be alarmed you just forgot to turn your ps3 off.Just kidding:) Great news for ps3 fans....

[Antan]

Very good reply, though never saw what DC`s post was. As Mart said, Finally we have some concrete news and positive news i`d say. Now lets see some games on the damn thing! because they are most certainly playing catchup, make no mistake.

[Aramis001]

Looks pretty cool, have fun with it guys. Never played a PSP so I can't comment on the OS. They said that it weighs a lot, is that due to the power brick being inside the system or just the overall density of the ps3 itself?

Also, read the comments underneath the story. I know it's a PS site and all, but some of those people make gametime look good!

EDIT:(Nothing personal gametime, I just needed an example of a big fanboy on this site. I could easily have used Achira, PS3OWNESXBOX360, DC rider 360, or PS3 Ultimate. Hmm, I guess I did just use them...)

[Aramis001]

Wow, 10 posts in the time it took me to type that one. Who wants to esimate how many this story will get? I say between 200 and 300.

[Solidus]

Some of us are gamers here and really appreciate it you going and finding stuff like this.
Thanks!

[Munky]

nice to see it in action..the load time was really fast. all in all some great news for GAMERS, now can everybody get along?

[Donkey Slayer]

Two different things ;)

[Grown Folks Talk]

and read #5 under the news title. he says it starts up and loads games about the same speed as psp. i didn't say it. he did.

[THAMMER1]

The PS3 needed some good news. And this is right on time the 500,000 console launch is in 6 weeks.

[Gamer13]

Im in uk so its about sometime next year before i get a PS3 but ive got a 360 so my head is not blowing up for a next gen console becuae ive already got 1 out of the 3 next gen system.

IM OUT.

[neeharb]

If only i had more 600$ to spare i would have loved to put it next to my 360 ....Great for sony fans...

[ImTheNumber12]

That thing is nice looking. It does kind of look like it ate a ps2 though. I can't wait to get my hands on one. Now all we need are games that ps3, 360, and pc can play online against eachother. That is the future!

[OutpostCommand]

Hmm...excellent news post.
Damn it...you can not begin to imagine my jealosy.
And yes...im from England.
Ach...stuff it. Im importing one from Japan/America.
I dont care what it costs me. £600/£700/£800/ even bloody £1000.
I NEED THIS DAMN CONSOLE !!

[shortyNZ]

well i cant wait for the ps3 to come out so i can see what problems it has when it finally hits the real world! been a struggle for poor sony, so if it ever does arive in the shops im sure the real problems will only just begin as people take their new geoge forman grill home and find it overheating or having to be recalled because of fire risk.....history repeating guys you aint gonna be as blown away as you think, gonna be a big black letdown.

[Boink]

nice one on the noise sony. The first batch of 360's off the line seemed to be crazy noisy. although the next ones were fine(i think the samsung drives were responsible), mine I can barely hear.

I watched the video they had...I don't know how they says "load times non-existant" It seemed like they were staring at a black screen for a while, seemed like the camera guy even checked the ps3 too make sure it was working(about 23 seconds from ps3 menu,to game screen, yeah I counted) and even then that's just the openeing screen, no actual game loading. I wish they had showed that, might have given us a better idea.

I don't see the load time being that big a deal though, it only took a little while longer than the 360. won't be a deal breaker for most.

[zonetrooper5]

Well i got my xbox 360 in febuary this year and i really don't notice the sound as i'm playing games. I suppose its like driving the car with the radio on, you know its on but your concentrating too much on driving but the PS3 will be a good console but many fanboys on this site really need to grow up.

[BIadestarX]

I didn't have any doughts Sony would pull it off on any of these areas, except, "2) It's heavy like a planet. No, really. It's impossible to pick up with one hand." but then again who cares; I'm not going to be holding it while playing with it. Now, what worries me is that there is no reference to the online network. Maybe there is nothing to be worried about, but to me the online network is my selling point.

[Captain Tuttle]

The Sony online service (or lack of one) is the elephant in the room that everyone pretends isn't there. Next-Gen is not just about graphics, it's about a gaming community and that means an extensive online service. Sony falls short, at least so far they have.

[ASSASSYN 36o]

Noisey 360 hell I can`t hear crap over my 5.1 dobly digital surround sound logitech speakers and two woffers. So who gives a crap about noisey or quite systems. People act like they are playing in a battlefield somwhere or in your moms house and she keeps complaining about the noise. Turn the volume up if you hear your system.

[richie007bond]

Looks good,shiny though lol,ill propebly pick one up some time next year if the price drops,i just cant justify spending £425 plus and thats not including the games its just to dam exspensive,besides the wife would kill me spending that much on a games console lol,and thats coming from a games fanatic so that says somthing.I have bought every console to date from the dreamcast to the xbox 360 which i may add is an awesome machine,but and its a big but the ps3 justs costs to much and it will show after a few months on sale.The hardcore gamers will snap it up but after that who knows...

[THAMMER1]

I agree $600.00 is alot. I'm a parent the average family spends $600.00 - $800.00 for X mass. The price just dose not sit well with people at all. The games are the only thing that can save the PS3 at this point. They need games that say buy this console. Right now the Wii and the 360 are the only next gen consoles on the market with that in their corner. But one thing Sony has is hard core die hard fans and brand loyalty. I want a PS3 myself but I'm in no rush. Now if I get my hands on one I'll sell that sucka for $2000.00. Because as soon as this thing is out people will turn into monsters just like when the 360 launched.

[BlackCountryBob]

Its sleek and shiny yes but bloody hell it looks huge, big like the first gen xbox big! It looks like something that will need a special reinforced shelf to hold it! Its gonna take more than shiny plastic and quiet fans to make me drop £425 for something that will, for me atleast with my standard def TV, do nothing better than a significantly cheaper 360 for atleast 3 years. if I had cared about graphics over everything else I would have had a old xbo instead of my PS2.

[USMChardcharger]

gametime - 1 Hour ago | Let him/her speak
Man xbox fanboys just keep getting owned lol.We have short loading times and a near silent console unlike another console i know.
i counted how long it took me to load up CoD2 and jump on to xbox Live...it took around 8 to 10 secs. i will do it again (been awhile) to get the exact time.

anyway, my point is that the xbox boots up and loads games really fast.

also my 8 to 10 secs was getting into a game on live. so take some secs away for just loading...unreal how fast.

so i guess i got owned, according to you, somehow.

it is somewhat noisy though...but only if you have the tv volume off for some reason.

note added: also my time was with CoD2 disk already in the drive when i turned my 360 on.

[achira]

very fast ? loooool.

[Funky Town_TX]

Why does everthing turn into a fangirl fight ?
Juts game and have fun. I remembner when it was about fun.

[specialguest]

ahh! i know most are thinking the samething im thinking, which is why they had to stop the video at the good part. i know teasing is part of their business and they don't want to show everything at once, but ahh! i wanna see more.

the release of the PS3 is bitter-sweet because finally it'll be release, but i'll never get my hands on one until later next year due to shortages.

[The_Firestarter]

Anyways, looking at these pics make me soooo envious! PS3, PS3, PS3! I wonder if they're using the 60 GB version, or maybe just a sample 20 GB. *shrugs* It's so glossy and cool with that wireless controller. Flawless. I like that HDTV too, it's sweet. Don't worry I'm not gonna say,"The 360 sucks", but I'm just a person that bought the PS2, loved it and can't wait for the PS3. Just like other people that got the original Xbox would look forward to the 360 a year ago. There's no point saying that one system is better than the other. The systems themselves are obviously just figure heads and what makes a system so cool is the games! Duh. I'm glad DC Rider only has one speech bubble, I don't think any of us would like to hear any fanboyism. :S :P

[Stone Cold SA]

The graphics suck, the load times were crap and it lags, which all statements were rubbish!

[The_Firestarter]

Thanks for the update. :)

[Grown Folks Talk]

zone trooper wasn't making a derogatory comment about ps3. he simply pasted what someone on another website had previously posted. he stated crap like that was uneeded.

[richie007bond]

Guys am not a fanboy i love games any games reguardless of what console there on ,i bought my 360 on launch day and have had the best gaming of my life period and i was really looking forward to some ps3 gaming, BUT then they announced the price and then blue ray crap and that was it for me along with all the bull.£425 is a lot of dosh to fork out in anyones book then theres games and cables ontop of that and were talking round about £600,how much that translates to $$$ i dont know buts it hell of a lot i can tell you.At the end of the day its the high prise tag thats going to let the ps3 down and it will be felt within the consumer market i can garentee that,ps3 will sell but at what cost to sony,theres two other big players on the market now and sony will find it hard to justify the high asking price when xbox 360 is growing from strenth to strenth with an amazing cataloge of games and fantastic online service,not forgeting the wii, SONY are not going to have it all there own way come this generation

[Deceased]

Why are people fighting about this? i don't understand. I few pics of the PS3 loading games and a small video. If you want to argue wait till two respective games come out for both systems like assassins creed, then we can argue about how much better the crowd A.I. is on the 360. LOL

[Bhai]

Thanks 'The Truth', we are looking at the most master-ful technical development in history indeed, Sony is bringing about an absolute next-gen device, the content, the quality, the royalty all speak volumes for themselves, I envy those PS3Mag folks for having their hands on such a delightfully must-have existence in their office, DAMN they are lucky !!!

[original seed]

but its a great suprise. Something to be happy about. I can wait to hear one for myself.

[HyperBear]

That Samsung LCD TV they have and were using to play PS3 on, i have the exact same one, except mine is a 2006 made, theres looks 2005, but w/e. It still looks sweet on theirs, and i cant wait to get mine and see how sweet-lookin it is on my tv. This rocks. Also i like how the demos were motorstorm and RFOM, most likely cause those are the titles to get at launch and Sony wants to show them off. Now sony's on the right track, more good news like this, and its a surfire. CANT WAIT. Nov.17. Its gonna be sweet.

EDIT: Whoever voted lame, are really lame themselves, and are the most retarded gamers i have ever seen in my life. Also on a bright note, apparently tomorrow, they will be putting up another video and it will show motorstorm in action, with a human being playing it and live on the PS3 while its on. So just in-case those of Xbox fanboys say that Motorstorm is crap and all cgi, tune in tomorrow.

[DJ]

The statements about the PS3 being just as quiet as the slimline PS2 and emitting hardly any heat have been proven true yet again. Their statements were pretty relieving to read amid all the false rumors being spread such as the system being extremely hot, extremely noisy, and having very slow load times due to the blu-ray drive (which is horribly untrue).

"1) It's quiet like a sleeping baby. A barely audible hum. With the TV on you simply can't hear it at all.
2) It's heavy like a planet. No, really. It's impossible to pick up with one hand.
3) It's shiny like a mirror. In fact, it's impossible to take a photograph of it without the flash spanging every picture into a starburst mess. And therefore it's massively prone to fingerprintage too, with the tiny amount of dust in the office magically attaching itself to its surface in seconds.
4) The PS3 joypad is very light and the tilt system is very responsive. We like.
5) The start up is amazingly fast. And game load times were faster than expected. In fact, PS3 does both at about the same speed of PSP. ie, Long load times due to the massive Blu-ray disc? Nope. Simply not an issue."

Considering the large amount of heat and noise generated by the 360, it's great that Sony saw what happened with the competition and got rid of these problems. No wonder they don't like being first to market. Nyko must be pissed at Sony.

[sparco]

I agree with what you're saying m8. But have they fixed whatever was causing all the break downs at TGS? I hope so. Although by the time i get one (xmas next year most likely), it should definately be sorted.

[sparco]

Seeing this makes me want the console so bad. Its the same feeling I had when i first saw the 360. Theres only one things that i dont like too much. And its the dashboard/ps3 menu screen (whatever its called). Its just a bit too plain id say. But still, motorstorm looks fu**in amazing in those pics. The other game isnt mind blowing, but still looks pretty damn good. Cant wait to get one maybe xmas next year lol.

[ChickeyCantor]

okai a few screens......... YEAH lets kill each other for that?

why not w8 and experience it all youself?

[The Milkman]

Hi nice find BTW, I say I love to see new things like seeing the PSP when it first came out it looked awesome. When I spent 300$ on it I knew it had went to total waste within a month of playing it if that.

I'm not going to let Sony waste my money like that again. Plus this is the people from the PS magazine or whatever of course there going to make it sound good just like Sony would. Thats why exactly why Sony let them have one now.

Also as I looked at the screens no that is not worth the money that I have added up for getting the experience from the PS3. I have seen just as impressive Xbox 360 games on HD TVs^^. What Sony was trying to do is cause a hype like I said from the PSP that I lost 300$ on getting much enjoyment from at all.

I also look at the games and compare them to each console and this year Xbox 360 is by far to me the most promising. So why should I get a PS3 this year? When I could get a better experience and save 200$. Nintendo Wii I could very well buy this year the price looks very reasonable and it has its own unique style.

Just maybe PS3 will impress me more next year. Plus have a price drop. Or then again maybe not maybe the 360 will have more promising titles for me again next year.

As I'm not sure why maybe because Ps3 has to many Japanese Developers and not enough of the games I prefer are being made for it. Now dont go pointing your finger at me. Maybe I'am wrong but whatever the reason the Xbox 360 still has the most promising games for it without a second glance.

[bullet]

Good point milkman...It would be stupid for playstation magazine to say anything negative about the ps3 being they would be out of work if ps3 failed. so ya they will say it is the greatest thing since the television to spread the hype.Which everyone can agree SONY need's all the hype they can get with all the bad news they have had.

Also I think it is funny when the first xbox came out all the SONY fans gave it a bad rep for it's size all the time. And now that the ps3 is comming out and is twice the size as the first xbox it is no longer an issue. Now they try to say the new xbox is to noisy..

But if the ps3 sounded like a harley in your living room when you turn it on.Noise would not be an issue either. They would just tell everyone the louder the better. SONY's logo should be "w3lcome chang3 only if it's SONY"

[MySwordIsHeavenly]

Twice as heavy maybe...but it's actually smaller than the original xbox. PSM has said negative things about sony. They even praised the 360 when it came out...they're just clearly saying that the PS3 is obviously the superior console. It is coming out later...and this American hype/fanboyism isn't helping anyone...it will be better than the 360...but honestly...so is the computer i'm working on...and it's a standard DELL.

DJ...i love your work.

Where is realdeal...haven't seen him in awhile. Maybe he's actually enjoying his 360. I know...i haven't seen it done either, but he's a fun guy... If anyone can do it...he can.

Everyone else...go play your system!

[MySwordIsHeavenly]

You HAVE to be a fanboy. you're willing to pay 400 for a peice of junk that you have to buy add-ons (hd-dvd, web-browser) for...but you won't buy a PS3? It's top-of-the-line technology that isn't THAT EXPENSIVE!!! Anyone with a job can afford one! I had a job for 2 months...TWO MONTHS...then...got fired...but the point is...i have PLENTY of money to buy that thing. What's YOUR deal?

[Grown Folks Talk]

you might want to look up the word hypocrite with gametime. you call someone a fanboy and then talk about how something they like is a piece of junk, just because you don't like it. 1 fanboy to another i guess.

[ElementX]

Why would you need a web browswer on a console? If you have Internet, you probably have computer for web browsing. I buy a console for gaming, pure and simple.

[mithrael_PS3]

hello everyone... i'm new here and i hope to have a very good discussion with all of you... as you can clearly see at my name, i'm on the ps3 side... so please don't expect me to be unbiased all the time.... but i'm no fanboy.... i don't let fanboyism overshadow my arguments... but still i take sides.... well, let's get on with the discussion, shall we?

"Also I think it is funny when the first xbox came out all the SONY fans gave it a bad rep for it's size all the time. And now that the ps3 is comming out and is twice the size as the first xbox it is no longer an issue. Now they try to say the new xbox is to noisy.."

- you know, if the console looks good... even if that's the size of a CPU, it won't matter... the original xbox looks ugly... uhmmm.. like a lunchbox... adding to it the bulkiness of the design = a big, ugly console... the ps3 as everyone have seen (in pictures) has a sleek and elegant design... so to me, in my opinion, it doesn't matter how big it is... as long as it looks good.. and besides... you won't carry it around all the time with you, will you? and wtheck, even the 360 is big, but people doesn't mind it that much, do they?

[UNREAL-T]

oh my god ps3 looks better than my 360. I think ps3 will have better graphics than 360.
i cant wait to get a ps3, when i get my ps3 ya wont see anymore in this website NEWS4GAMERS oh my bad! i mean this is not news4gamers it's everybody against ps3.

I KNOW KIDS, GO AHEAD BLAME ME.

[original seed]

you just want to start flame wars. DJ DJ DJ. Only early 360 had fan problems. Mine is very quiet and can hardly hear it when my tv is on. Its exaclty as the PS3 is described in this article. Its good to hear that PS3 wont make much noise.

[Chewy 101]

They tested loading times to get to the "press start" screen? lol...
I thought a game was supposed to start as soon as you inserted the DVD/BR!

[MONOLITHICIDE]

i cant wait to pick up a ps3 on Nov 17

[The Milkman]

I'm not saying the PS3 is a horrible console at all. What I'am saying is the PS3 is not offering the great games like the Xbox 360 at this point. But I'm asking myself right now why get a console that supports blu-ray (which is what a big thing about the console) and I dont have a 2000$ or more TV to support it?

The Xbox 360 has got incredible online service with new updates coming all the time and are very dedicated to there online services. There may be a time that I do buy the PS3 but right now isnt the best time to do that to me. Also losing the rumble feature isnt good news.

I cannot Bypass what more the 360 has to offer for gamers than the ps3. Mass Effect, Gears of War, GTA4 exclusive extras, Halo 3, Splinter Cell: Double Agent, all of these BIG NAME TITLES. Also including some of the big title coming for ps3 to like Assasins Creed. If I'm going to get these title for the 360 also why get the ps3? Also the 10 year life span would it be even useful? By time then they will be a new console release setting it even higher quality. Honestly PS3 in my mind would not be a good choice this year. I'm not being biased because ps3 could have a better turn next year. This year is a hands down though.

[achira]

nice for you, go buy your overhyped and overpriced crap.

[Bebedora]

...stayed with that you did like your games better than those on the PS3. Then you would have been seen as a gamer, and everyting would be fine, and not seen as a xbox fan. Too bad.

[eques judicii]

I'm sorry, but the dashboard is a lot better than the crossbar menu. There are more intuitive options... and from what the load's showed me in the video they had there is nothing different than the 360. This really is nothing but a few fanboys getting exited over their lovedoll...

[original seed]

or maybe im just use to the 360's dashboard. i wonder why they haven't shown any games and only the start up. They also said it loads quick but what about in-game loading?

[CAPS LOCK]

the ps3 is worth the price in the long run, let me compare:

x-box 360 premium = £280 + wirless adapter(£100) + 1 year of x box live(£40) + charge kits(15) + 1 extra wirless controller(40) + 2 games(80) HD-DVD add on = £755

ps3=425 + extra controller(40) + 2 games(80) + mini usb so u can charge ur pads(5) hdmi cable(10)= 560

more worth the money, no need to have an add on cause it is already built in and wirless aswell, people dont bash me over this, u may correct me if u please but that is what i think.

[The Milkman]

Well let me put this to my since right now.

To get the experience PS3 offers.....

is mostly unknown!^^

Reason is that the havent realy confirmed enough prices to realy get a total cost. Not even what the cost for all party games.

Also man you a funny guy picking the lowest looking currency slick lol.

But what I do know is that to get that blu ray that your paying special effect your going to have to hunt down a 2000$ TV.

So 600+2000= Damn bro you crazy!?

The games may come in at a higher rate even though I heard one of the parties will be 59.99$ I dont know the rest so not much fact there. Why the hell the put such a expensive thing like a blue ray in it if I wont get all that it offer after paying that much for it unless I have that 2000$ TV? How many places are even selling that?
So I realy dont like to hear things about the price and that its worth it until its confirmed.

And hell yea they better not have nothing else I have to buy if I have to get that.

[Tut]

A $2000 TV will help any gamer for any console. Don't single out and be a flamer, it really shows us what type of person you are.

[achira]

the ps3 is amazing !!!! its nice to see how all xrats are very jaleous. the ps3 is the king, the reason is its far superior to any other console !!! and the xbox360 is very loud, i cant understand how ppl can say its not loud.

[Bebedora]

...I've heard the xb360 in action. PS3 could been heard when the tv was on - just barely. 29db.

[Daewoodrow]

because it's not. When it's n the dashboard you can't hear it until I turn everything in the room off, when it plays an original xbox game you hear a moderate fan hum, and the slight scraping noise of the laser moving back and forth. When you play a 360 game, it is its loudest, by which I mean it makes an audible hum and the laser movement is a bit louder. The "OMG LOUD" thing is from the first shipment, which had the old drive format. They updated the drives since, and now it's very quiet.

[Bebedora]

I can only say it is noticably louder than my PS2, and this is more audible than the PS3 is. It may not be a "kille feature" of the PS3 but sure is a welcomed one. Yeah, you do not 'hear' the XB360 while gaming, but when you turn it off is a different story. Those saying it is as silent as the PS2 or PS3 is not in the know.
[edit] This one must've been from the first shipment then. [/edit]

[mithrael_PS3]

Why the hell the put such a expensive thing like a blue ray in it if I wont get all that it offer after paying that much for it unless I have that 2000$ TV?

- here, look at it this way... the PS3 is a console that would last for almost a decade... 10 years! they are not saying: "buy it now! it has all the new technology"... heck.. even they (sony) expect most of the consumers to buy it after 1 year or 2... of course they want you to buy it... but if it's too expensive for you.. don't... wait 1-2-3 or even four years for the desired price you want... maybe by that time even HDTV's have lower price, say 1000$ and is standard.. but still sony could say after four years: "we have a console w/c is packed with all the needed technologies for you to have a wonderful gaming experience. long hours of gameplay, full-blown graphics, and very realistic texture and physics. all that thank's to Blu-ray."

Why Blu-ray? Because by that time, we could have 2080p, and it will need more space, you know... and as game technology evolves, even the textures, AI, physics, and sprites will need more space... you won't need 10 DVD's... just 1 or 2 BD/s is enough... the ps3 is future-proof...

PEACE!

[Daewoodrow]

Now this is more like it. That last Article said sod all, but this one actually gives out new info. That being said, it still only points out things that are 360 related, which makes me respect their opinion less. Why can't they just focus on the console, rather than instantly drawing parallels to the 360? It makes the magazine look like it's run by fanboys.

Anyway, I had a feeling Bluray would not be as big a problem to load times as people made out. But this still doesn't make me want a PS3 any more than I did, the fanboyism doesn't exactly help either.

[SDS Overfiend]

About the Joystick i Did'nt See the PS Button in the Middle Cause he was Covering it and the top shows no PS Button in the middle(Please look Closely).Besides whatsup just 10 Pics? i want to see the Joystick and the System the whole way through. I want to Know why no one was playing Resistance Split screen in that office? Why the Fuk do the Dudes Playing The Games look more like posing Rather than being interested in the Games.
Why is the PS3 in the Corner next to the Window? I think i Know why to get a Better oxygen Support for the vents and they Secretly Have a Xbox 360 on the Bigger Plasma HDTV in the Central part of the Office.
I see Somebody's Perpetrating the Fraud something still seems Fruity.

[gsquad]

First for all the people out there that say “why couldn’t they just report on the PS3 and not draw parallels to the X360?” They really didn’t talk about the X360 that much in this article but your right they did say “like some system I know” but what do you expect?

It is in our nature to compare!! We compare everything from cars, to houses, to cloths/shoes, everything, and as people we compare what ever is closes to the subject matter as possible. So lest recap, the X360 is already out, the only next-gen system out, and we already know that the WII will not be as powerful in the graphics and physics department. So what do we have to compare the PS3 against? Right, the X360. Xbox fanboys you should be happy that it is compared to the X360 that means that people really look at the system as a contender against the PS3. (I only call it a contender because I assume that we can all agree that PS is at the top of the hill as far as it is considered with console gaming right now, next-gen is a different story, you can't compete in a competition all by yourself, your just the leader.) Now before you start screaming fanboy at me think about it.

Last go around most people just wrote off the Xbox. When ever someone brought up the comparison between PS2 and the Xbox the argument was over before it started. All someone had to say was PS2 has more exclusive, it has Madden, it has GTA, it has DMA, it has Metal Gear, it has GT, the list goes on and on, plus EVERYONE HAS ONE!!!!!! (100million people is a lot of people folks) That was it, end of the discussion. Now THIS TIME everyone has to stand up and take notice to the new kid on the block. Why because now X360 has good exclusives (even though a lot are just timed exclusives) a better price point (lets not forget PS2 was cheaper than the Xbox for years) and right now a better line up for Christmas (this is Sony’s launch holiday, If you compare Sony’s launch holiday with X360 launch holiday, that would be a better comparison.) And don't forget a killer online application!!!!!

Now as for this whole $2000 TV business, lets be real you had to buy a new TV for you X360 TOO!!! Maybe you didn’t spend 2g’s but I know most of you spent close to 1g (that’s one thousand dollars) for a decent 720p TV at the time. And if you didn’t you are still enjoying you X360 on a standard TV Right!!!! So lets not get in to this thing about how the PS3 is so expensive. So is the X360 people!!!!! And I am sure that if PS fans cant afford the new TV they will do fine with a standard TV TOO!!

This news, is good news leave it at that. It’s just news, and I would rather hear this type of news that ramped rumors from false informants about what Sony is or isn’t doing. Lets be real there has been a lot of jealous people on both sides but there has been a whole lot of false information spread from the Xbox fanboy camp. It’s all options folks but….. the system will be out soon and the race will begin. But even before that you will see a test unit in you local store right beside the X360!!!!! Then you will be able to see for yourself

“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3” the ride will be Great!

[Daewoodrow]

I appreciate what you're saying, it's not fanboyish,
what I was refering to:
=1) It's quiet like a sleeping baby. A barely audible hum. With the TV on you simply can't hear it at all.=

They are saying this because of the ongoing rumours of the 360 being loud, which simply are no longer true. All 360s after the first shipment have a quieter disk drive, and they give you the new drive free if you send your console in for repairs.

=4) The PS3 joypad is very light and the tilt system is very responsive. We like.=

I could just be paranoid here, but this seems to once again be waving around the whole tilt sensor function, to make it more of an attractive sales feaure against the 360.

=5) The start up is amazingly fast. And game load times were faster than expected. In fact, PS3 does both at about the same speed of PSP. ie, Long load times due to the massive Blu-ray disc? Nope. Simply not an issue.=

They're saying this to back up that Bluray has no faults, again to take the wind out of the sails of the DVD > Bluray argument.

They didn't do it quite as bad as they did in the other article, but still, it makes it appear that their main arguments are not why you should buy a PS3, but why you shouldn't buy a 360. I find that underhand.

Personally though, I never believed the whole disk load thing for a second. That's not my problem with Bluray. My problem with Bluray is the fact that I think Sony are more interested in expanding their Bluray profit than they are in improving the gaming experience. And I think that claiming we need to make the jump to the next disk format wen we're not ready yet is their means of doing so. But note the "I think". I'm not trying to convince anybody of this, I just want it to be known that I don't support it.

[Tut]

Daewoo no one knows how much Blu-Ray will impact the gaming community because the PS3 has not been released yet. So for you to pass judgement on something before it is even released tells me that you listen to all the critic reviews and base your judgements off of them. Why not wait until you can experience it yourself and THEN say whether or not THE WORLD is ready for a new technology? I have seen both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD players running and I can tell you I am completely ready for this.

I do respect your opinion and don't expect this to really change your views about it, but I would encourage you to experience it for yourself when it is released and wait until then to pass judgement.

~

[Bebedora]

what I was refering to:
=1) It's quiet like a sleeping baby. A barely audible hum. With the TV on you simply can't hear it at all.=

<D> They are saying this because of the ongoing rumours of the 360 being loud, which simply are no longer true.

I say what? Where did that come from it refering to XB360? It's more silent than a PS2. That is worth mentioning, dont you think?

=4) The PS3 joypad is very light and the tilt system is very responsive. We like.=

<D>I could just be paranoid here, but this seems to once again be waving around the whole tilt sensor function, to make it more of an attractive sales feaure against the 360.

And now you say competing is bad? Even if so, the tilt can be used with a better experience, I have no doubt about that. The option is always there too.

=5) The start up is amazingly fast. And game load times were faster than expected. In fact, PS3 does both at about the same speed of PSP. ie, Long load times due to the massive Blu-ray disc? Nope. Simply not an issue.=

<D> They're saying this to back up that Bluray has no faults, again to take the wind out of the sails of the DVD > Bluray argument.

I must say alot of badmouthing has gone over the Blu-Ray DVD being a bad thing, especially to loading. Good they brought that up I think.

You are playing the devils advocate a little bit too much. You see too much XB360 vs PS3 in this article <my opinion of course>

What Sony wants with Blu-Ray is like an open book. They want it to succeed. Who can blame them? Put it in the PS3 for the 1080p games, more content, bigger longer what-ever too. Who can complain about that?

[gsquad]

I see your point and I think it is fair about the “barely audible hum” part, but that to me that was the only other direct shot at X360.

Now, you said that “…but still, it makes it appear that their main arguments are not why you should buy a PS3, but why you shouldn't buy a 360. I find that underhand.” (Admittedly you said that you could be a bit paranoid here, which I can appreciate you saying. Thank you, this is one of the few civilized conversation that I have had with some one about the systems)

That point was about the PS3 joy pad. I think that this IS a reason you should buy the PS3. It s a feature and features are why you buy systems. All I am saying is that if the shoe was on the other foot and MS came out and said something new about their online feature would you still say the same thing, that “… it makes it appear that their main arguments are not why you should buy a X360, but why you shouldn't buy a PS3. I find that underhand.” I don’t think that you would because it’s just a true observation. I just hope that you can see what I am trying to saying.

As for the last point about the Blue-ray I agree Sony defiantly has a lot invested in the new format. Absolutely more that MS has in HD-DVD or DVD in general. But again it is just a feature, nothing more nothing less. And I believe that more storage is better. Do we need it, maybe not, (more than likely, not if you take the time to code tight, and there are good compression algorithms available) but, just like people don’t need 1 terabit or even 500gigs of storage in their computer I know people that do.

I think that there are problems in both camps and I know that I would have done things differently for both sides. But right now try not to look at this or any new information as someone is trying to persuade you to buy the PS3, just take it for what it is worth, new information, the dispelling of rumors made up by people that obviously don’t want others to buy the PS3, and a choice!!!!!

I hear all of these X360 fans say it’s about choice but yet they don’t want people to make a choice about the PS3!!!!! Just something to think about.

“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3” the ride will be Great!

[Daewoodrow]

cheers, I get all too pissed off at talking on this site sometimes.

I have actually pointed out where MS do the same thing. Like that article not too far down where someone from Microsoft says they can make better graphics than the PS3 can produce. And they claim for 2-3 years, too. I can agree they are capable of better graphics than the PS3, but claiming they can do it consistently for 2-3 years when the two consoles are almost equal is a lie.

It is true that with the extra storage space offered by Bluray the developers can cut loose and it would be a benefit, but the part that annoys me is when people try and tell me DVD is insufficient for this gen because Sony said so.

Were it not for the Bluray drive, the console would be cheaper, and roughly equal to the 360 in power. They might even have made it cheaper than the 360, I could speculate. In which case, I would have bought one, to pick up the PS exclusives, and reap all the benefits. But in all honesty, the price they gave is out of my budget, and whilst I could save up for one, i'd feel cheated about being charged the premium for their Bluray expansion. I guess you could say my weariness increases proportionately to the amount of money i'm spending.

I consider myself a little fanboyish, but only in the sense that I don't dislike people buying the PS3, I dislike them buying one and telling me reasons about why they should get it that aren't true, either things that aren't true about the 360, or things that aren't true about the PS3. And when you explain to them that it's not true, they break it down to one new untruth after another until they come down to "well it's Sony innit?". That kind of s**t bothers me.

[gsquad]

I hate it too, some times, having to fight with some of the people on this site. That’s why I have recently just kept my post to like one per article. And I would be lying if I said that I wasn’t a little fanboyish myself but like you I don’t like people telling me why I shouldn’t buy the PS3 and how I must be stupid or rich just because I can afford it. (Saved for it really)

When it comes down to it I just waited because I had other priorities at the time. (Not to get personal but I moved VA to GA, houses were way to expensive in VA) But along the way I have meet people like you that I could have reasonable conversations about the systems and I like them both and I will probably have both. (X360 has great FPS and has an online to compliment/PS3 has a Blu-ray player built in (I love movies) and it has great action adventure games as I would call them. DMC just incase what I was talking about didn’t come across) there are other benefits to both but I will just leave it at that, and say it was cool to talk to you. I wish this site had a way for us to keep in touch on issues. Well I guess I will just have to keep an eye out for you on other articles.

To me this type of conversation between two people on opposing side of the argument is how it's supposed to go. This is how an online community is built. I wouldn’t mind playing against this person any day of the week on any system.

“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3” the ride will be Great!

[LiquifiedArt]

I'll just stop playing video games.. SOny or BUSt!

[gsquad]

On a side note we should give each other "let him/her speak" bubbles, its really the only way to have good conversation with good respectable people. And just not respond to the blatant fanboys, let the monitors get rid of them. It's cool to have an opinion but some of these people are just taking it too far, like they get pay from Sony of MS for every post.

“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3” the ride will be Great!

[Bebedora]

I have no illusions what so ever, the fanboy crowd is loud. Emotional. Which leads to horrible conclutions (I let the fanboys talk for themselves). Well, I am glad there is some persons to argue more than "my dady is bigger than your dady". It's refreshing. :)

[EnforcerOfTheTruth]

...bites the dust ;-)
And sorry, Xbox 360 is loud. It doesn't matter what you biased fanboys say, it only matters what reviewers say. You will just never accept the truth. You will never accept that 360 is the louder and inferior console. You will never accept that MS doesn't care about Xbox fanbase. You will never accept that 360 is a ripp off. You will never accept that $99 for a 20GB HDD is a ripp off. You will never accept that $99 for Wi-Fi is a ripp off. Lastly you will never accept you made the wrong decision buying the 360.

[Retard]

I back PS3, don't bash Xbox360 though. I'd like to see both consoles have success and not global domination. The only thing inferior is Wii, but thats only from technical standpoints.

[EnforcerOfTheTruth]

...I'm just enforcing the truth. It's not my fault that it's that ugly.
360 is also inferior from technical standpoints.

[Aramis001]

And you will never accept that $600 for a console is an unreasonable price for the average consumer, and that it is the average consumer (NOT YOU) who decides the fate of consoles. I have heard the MS addon argument over and over, and it still makes as much sense as the first time I heard it, namely none. $600 is $600, and no matter how you put it, 400<600. The HD-DVD addon will not be a big issue, as only early adapters will get it. The average Joe off the street does not care about HD-DVD, when there are so many DVD's out already. Even so, bundled it's still less than $600.

Wi-fi, though nice, is not an essential element to any game console, including the ps3.

It's obvious that you don't have Xbox Live, because if you did, you wouldn't be whining about the price point. Xbox live is a great service that Sony has yet to match, and Silver version is free. That means free downloads, demos, and patches for your xbox. And you also get Gold free for a month, so you can test it out and see if it's for you before buying a subscription.

You talk about all the great stuff the ps3 comes with, and yet forget about the consumer reaction. When people see a $600 price tag, they're not going to buy in any offhand kind of manner. Even if they had a ps2 last gen, the price tag will force people to step back and look at the situation, wheras they would have grabbed a $400 ps3 without hesitation. This is why the ps3 will not do as well as the ps2 did, because of the huge original price and the lack of any serious advantage over the xbox 360.

If you could see past the tip of your nose, you would realise that there are no right or wrong desisions, everything is based on perspective. For example, from your perspective, you think you are enforcing the truth, while from mine you are being an ignorant, single minded fanboy who only enforces opinions, which are neither true nor false, but once again depend on perspective.

[EnforcerOfTheTruth]

$399 Xbox360 premium + $199 HD-DVD addon = $598
Almoust the price of the future proof 60GB PS3. Xbox 360 sadly still lacks Wi-Fi, HDMI and offers only a 20GB HDD.
If you don’t care about Wi-Fi and can live with a smaller HDD, you can buy the 20GB PS3, which offers exactly the same what Xbox360 with HD movie playback offers, but for almoust $100 less and unlike 360 it’s future proof.

[Aramis001]

Once again, instead of enforcing the truth you are enforcing opinions, and even worse they are opinions with no basis in fact. "Future proof" is a phrase I hate, because once again it is based on opinion and therefore perspective. By that logic I can say the n64 is future proof because it has great games. I could say the xbox is futureproof because of Live. I could say any system is future proof for multiple reasons.

Also, you did read my part about how the HD-DVD player will not be a major issue for at least a few years, right? Because you continue to list the 360 price with the HD-DVD player addon. And if you didn't do that your entire argument would break down.

Also, you mention something about no HDMI for the 360. Wrong. Educate yourself. http://www.news4gamers.com/...

Sure, you may get wi-fi and blu-ray, but do people really care? Especially since those only really sell to the early adopters. The fact of the matter is that with options instead of forced adaption, the average buyer will spend less on a 360 than a ps3 (NOT including games).

[richie007bond]

This is a rabid sony fanboy at the worst,this twat needs putting down or banned,his kind of comments make geniune gamers look bad..

[Stone Cold SA]

Achira speaks more of the truth than you and the Xbox fanboys, what he says may be fanboyish, but at least it's true stuff, unlike your self with retarded comments!

[GamerMan]

As a gamer I'm refreshed to see civilized conversations about the systems... of course there was the stupid fanboys in the middle of what seemed to be a very decent conversation.

Although you guys admitted to being fanboyish I commend you on being gamers first. Yes every gamer has there preferred system that they like over the rest because of exclusive games or series they are very biased about.

This article to me was a way of seeing the system in action.

1. I'm sure the system will launch directly to game or movie if you have it in the system already and will bypass the main screen. Just like the psp does.

2. I watched the video and the load time from the time the game was in and they clicked on it to launch it was 15sec. from :07-:22. Which is much better than some games on my ps2, but again load times are also based on how the game is designed. So I'm sure others will be longer and others will be shorter. Same goes for games on psp, and ps2. (only talking seconds difference, nothing as a gamer people should really worry about.)

Just 2 things I wanted to note. Up for argument but again its really a moot point since its all a matter of perception and how one person perceives the load times. The only place load times really matter is when your playing the game and what you perceive is a reasonable amount of time between maps (or whatever the case may be) This of course this was my perception.

I have followed the Final Fantasy series from SNES til now and will go where it goes but I have found other titles I like on the playstation and ps2 such as GT, GTA (although now multiplatformed), Romance of three Kingdoms (also was SNES to playstation), RPGs, MMORPGs, Strats, puzzle, and etc. (Having a hard time remembering all the games that I like)...

I honestly can't comment much on Xbox\XBox360 cause I haven't owned those systems yet but so far haven't seen too many games that interest me. I think there was one but I got it for the PC instead. I have played them because of friends that have them but I'm not comfortable with the controllers yet so have a hard time with the games but they are fun systems. (played sports games on them which I'm not good at in the first place)

Anyways to all the gamers out there: enjoy your system of choice and enjoy the games you like to play.

To all the fanboys: well try to tone it down a bit and have a normal conversation with the rest of us and try to keep it retaining to the article.

I would probably jump in and say more if I knew it wasn't going to be battle everytime a comment was given.

(another long winded article by me oh happy happy joy joy lol :P )

[Boink]

this conversation is so much more than what I had expected...are the bubbles working?:)

[zonetrooper5]

"in his defense
former questionmark - 21 Hours ago | Let him/her speak
zone trooper wasn't making a derogatory comment about ps3. he simply pasted what someone on another website had previously posted. he stated crap like that was uneeded.
Reply | Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Spam/Offensive"

At least you got some common sense to see i was not bashing the PS3 nor was it spam or anything else. I copyed and pasted it, to show how bad fanboys can be and how it nearly runied this site and it is ruining this site still but not as bad. Thanks to the bubble system which the news4gamers team put in, fanboyish comments will become less, this goes to all sony, xbox, nintendo and PC fanboys.

[zonetrooper5]

"68.4 - I think you are in for a rude awakening:
EnforcerOfTheTruth - 21 Minutes ago | Let him/her speak
$399 Xbox360 premium + $199 HD-DVD addon = $598
Almoust the price of the future proof 60GB PS3. Xbox 360 sadly still lacks Wi-Fi, HDMI and offers only a 20GB HDD.
If you don’t care about Wi-Fi and can live with a smaller HDD, you can buy the 20GB PS3, which offers exactly the same what Xbox360 with HD movie playback offers, but for almoust $100 less and unlike 360 it’s future proof.
Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Spam/Offensive"

EnforcerOfTheTruth could you please stop saying that every single xbox 360 owned needs the HD-DVD add-on (i don't want the damn thing) or the Wi-fi and some people can get onto xbox live sliver which is free. I pay £40 a year for Xbox live gold which i can do everything that the sliver can do but i can play games online. You and other fanboys need to add up all that cost but with those stuff then you will see what it will mostly cost. Also, don't shove down my throat or others with your bias views. I want some proof, i want good grammer, i want good maths and i want common sense on this site, which many of you don't have.

[The Milkman]

Ok whoever it was that called me a Flamer is not seeing my point clearly. You can get a HD-tv that doesnt support 1080p for quiet cheaper I seen them at 1000$ and actually cheaper and thats what you need to get to play Xbox 360 games in HD. But if you want to realy get the Blu ray effect then you have to pay 2000$ for the Tv that supports it. Sony rattles on about the Blu-ray all the time what good is it if you dont have the TV to support is what I'm saying.
Now please stop running your mouth on me because its true. Why have a system with it when its completely worthless to me right now?

[richie007bond]

LMAO ANOTHER rabid sony fanboy that needs putting down lol

[drewdrakes]

Looks fantastic. And its not that quick load times, quicker then expected. 19 seconds to get to the main screen, hope they are having fun :).

[The Milkman]

Wait a second did you just say 19 seconds? computer screen count to 19. Thats a long ass time man. I think you got something wrong there.

[drewdrakes]

Nope, it was 19 seconds, i counted when this article was first posted, because someone said it was really quick. I used the timeline of the video to count it, i dont think the timeline lies.

[EnforcerOfTheTruth]

Sheesh you MS fanboys are delusional, when somebody is rabid here then it's surely you. Only sad kiddos without life go to site of a console they dislike and bash it there. It's not without a reason why people call you Xflamlbles ;-)

zonetrooper5 - I nowhere stated that every single xbox 360 owner needs the HD-DVD add-on, I was just making a simple comparison how much 360 would cost if it would offer some of the things PS3 has. Don't be angry 360 has lower value than PS3, just live with it.
BTW before you start expressing some ridiculous wishes, you should first learn to read correctly ;-)
And buddy, a console's fansite is the wrong place for good grammer etc. Maybe you should start visit some more serious places?

Here are some facts MS fanboys don’t like and hate to accept:

Mark Rein - PC/360/PS3 dev:
“One thing AGEIA’s done that’s really smart is that — well, if you’ve seen our PS3 demo, and this is really version .1, really not a finished performance at all, but we’ve got some really great cool physics things going on PS3. They’ve done a really good job of optimizing their library to work well with the SPUs in the Cell processor, which means we’re going to be able to get a lot of physics performance out of PlayStation 3. Also on Xbox 360 to some extent, but definitely on PS3 we’re going to be able to get a lot of physics capabilities out of that. Which means that, to bring [games using those methods] to a PC, you’re probably going to need the hardware."

http://www.shacknews.com/ex...

Epic CEO Sweeney:
“he was very positive on Sony’s open attitude to networked content compared to the Xbox 360 - he commented of Microsoft’s platform: “Unfortunately it’s more of a closed platform," and even noted that Microsoft seems to be “quite negative toward user-created content” under certain circumstances Epic has encountered."

http://www.gamasutra.com/ph...

Factor 5 President Julian Eggebrecht:
“It’s amazing to work on the most powerful real-time hardware platform ever created without having to worry about porting to other systems."

http://ps3.ign.com/articles...

Itagaki:
“The infamous Team Ninja front man has a thing or two to say about Microsoft’s decision to assign standard DVD format to the Xbox 360. Limiting his development team to a measly 9GB does not sit well with Itagaki, especially when Team Ninja is looking to include any number of (MS-coveted) HD cut scenes."

That’s why we get for the first time Ninja Gaiden. Thanks Blu-ray.

http://www.joystiq.com/2005...

Carmack:
“Though Carmack expresses a “preference” for the Xbox 360’s CPU design, he admits that the PS3 “will have a bit more peak power." "

http://www.gamepro.com/news...

Even the PC dev admitts it, he just prefers 360, cause for him as a PC dev it’s easier to develope for. If PS3 developing would be really that hard, 1st gen PS3 games would never look better than 99% of 2nd gen 360 games. If PS3 developing would be really that hard, devs wouldn’t be able to deliver ports with updated graphics, cause they would invest all their energy to just make the ports run on the PS3.

MS fanboys bash Sony for having manufacturing problems, funny that MS has the same problems:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/new...

Best TGS games, voted by gamers:

http://xbox360.qj.net/TGS-2...

WOW mighty Sony completely destroyed the competition. 7 out of 11 games were for the Sony consoles.

Sam Kennedy:
“Virtua Fighter 5, White Knight Story, and especially MotorStorm (OMG) were well beyond anything I’ve seen on the 360.
It was kind of like the difference between, dare I say it, the PS2 and the Dreamcast. Which, as you know, wasn’t that big a deal at first — the Dreamcast had some fantastic looking second gen games — but you could still tell the PS2 was a more powerful system (and to reiterate, I’m only talking hardware here — I know the 360 is in a much different place software-wise). I think that’s a rather fair comparison, to be honest — similarly, as with the PS2, the PS3 is a platform that will distance itself even further once developers get more familiar with the hardware. Julian Eggebrecht of Factor 5 told me that they’ve only just scratched the surface of what they can do on PS3, and he fully expects all second gen PS3 games — or certainly all third gen PS3 games — to run in 1080p.
So yeah, there’s a tangible difference in the visual quality between PS3 and the Xbox 360.
PS3 is a better piece of hardware”

http://www.1up.com/do/blogE...

You heard it, 1080p and already 1st gen PS3 titles are delivering it. Do any remember of the MS 1080p announcement? It’s nice to hear 360 supports it, but where are the games? Where are some announcements of native 1080p 360 titles? As sad as it is, there are none. Sure, 360 can support 1080p native, but the question is, does it have enough power to run such games in acceptable framerates? GF5200 also supports dx9, but you can forget playing dx9 games in acceptable framerates with such GPU.
All ATI and MS can do is talk, but as sad as it is they can’t walk the talk. They say 360 has 5 times the bandwidth than the PS3, but why do 99% of second 360 games look worse than 1st gen PS3 games? Isn’t that strange? And how can they add the bandwidth? People are laughing at it seeing this picture:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Xbox’s Director of the Game Technology Group Scott Henson:
“I think 1080p, just to address that directly, will be basically impossible. I think if you talk to any developer they will tell you that they will not have a performing game at 1080p."

LOL how come this folks are even making a PS3 360 comparison? It appears they even don’t have a clue about the PS3 hardware, otherwise they wouldn’t make such ridiculous statements. Unlike them, Sony walks the talk and delivers with their games.

Now after the truth was enforced, I come to my favorite part and this is how MS is ripping it’s fanbase off.
The MS fanboys like to cry PS3 is way too expensive, but in fact it’s very cheap for the things it offers, much cheaper than the 360. Let’s see what Xbox360 would cost if it would only offer just the not so future proof HD movie playback:

$399 Xbox360 premium + $199 HD-DVD addon = $598
Almoust the price of the future proof 60GB PS3. Xbox 360 sadly still lacks Wi-Fi, HDMI and offers only a 20GB HDD.
If you don’t care about Wi-Fi and can live with a smaller HDD, you can buy the 20GB PS3, which offers exactly the same what Xbox360 with HD movie playback offers, but for almoust $100 less and unlike 360 it’s future proof.

$399 Xbox360 premium + $199 HD-DVD addon + $99 Wi-Fi = $697
Still not future proof, no HDMI and no 60GB HDD, but costs almost $100 more, what a ripp off.

MS fanboys like to say Sony is forcing us to buy Blu-ray and MS is giving them choice. I’m askin myself what choice? Choice to get ripped off? Choice to buy way too overpriced products?
$99 for Wi-Fi is a ripp off. No thanks MS, in the PC market we get such an adapter for half the price.
$99 for a 20GB HDD is a ripp off. No thanks MS, for the PS3 we can buy an usual 2.5inch HDD for half the price, but twice the size. WOW thanks Sony.
MS just wanna milk their poor fanboys, that’s why they made it impossible to use an internal 2.5 HDD. And please don’t come up with that you can use external drives. Who wants to use external drives? Not only that it looks ugly, it also takes more room. That’s another advantage of the PS3. It takes just less room and looks much better if you have everything in one device than having an external HDD and external HD-DVD connected. And how dare MS even to release a HD-DVD addon without HDMI? Most of the buyers won’t even know that this device can be only used for a limited time. So how will all the addon buyers feel when after some time they find out that they can’t watch HD movies on it anymore? They will feel ripped off, or do you think MS will advertise it’s HD-DVD addon as a HD player with a limited usage time? As a liars, as a thieves they are, I can guarantee you they won’t.

Sony isn’t forcing people to buy Blu. If you wanna experience real next gen games without any cuts, Blu is nescessary. Why should people give up on spectacular CGI, something that was already standard in the last gen? This would be a step back and next gen shouldn’t make a step back in any area. The next gen isn’t about making a step back, it’s about making a step forward. Many gamers love spectacular CGI’s and the devs are very happy with Blu, so Blu is nescessary.

Another negative side of Xbox360 are the additional costs for recharging the controllers. While Xbox360 owners have to buy a Charge Kit, the PS3 owners can do it with a simple USB cable.
This shows that Sony thought about everything to make it as cheap as possible for their fanbase and this shows that MS thought about everything to milk their fanbase as much they only can.
MS just doesn’t care about gamers and their fanbase. Also the very short(only 4 years) Xbox support demonstrates it perfectly. They killed Xbox right after the 360 was released and this was an awful move. With such a decision they showed how much they care about the Xbox fanbase. From the Xbox owners I know, only 1 bought the 360. The rest is very pissed and some of them don’t wanna buy a MS console again. Truth is, many gamers don’t buy the new console right at launch. They want to wait 1-2 years for a price drop or for some games that really interest them. But MS doesn’t care what they want, all they care is how to milk people of their money.
What makes all these even badder, is that MS is the richest company in the world. They could very well still support Xbox, they could very well sell the Xbox360 accessories at a lower and more reasonable price and they could very well make even a console that offers more than the PS3 but is cheaper. As the richest company in the world, sure they could, but that’s not what they want. All they want is to milk people, same goes for the PC gamers. Why do you think they release dx10 only for Vista? The answer is simple, as greedy they are, they wanna force all PC gamers to buy Vista.

Truth hurts, isn't it?

[drewdrakes]

Very long, stopped half-way through, very boring. Didnt seem to mention anything to rebut all of those facts. If they are good PC programmers, theyll be able to do very well on the 360. And if they arent lazy programmers 9GB will be enough. And will take less to load (not that im saying that is a problem, id also be willing to change discs, but it really shouldnt come to that). Everything you have said is just echoed from other people. Of course the PS3 is better at math (physics). Because thats what makes a game, physics? Ive said it before, power doesnt make games, look at the Wii. And even if you do need a lot of textures and models, procedural synthesis takes care of the space problem. These 2 systems are powerful enough to handle procedural synthesis, so why not use it? And also, even if space was a problem, I said it a few weeks ago, by the end of this gen, we will be downloading games to our hard drive. Guess what, a Sony exec said the exact same thing on an article that was referenced on this site. Also, if the in-game 3d models are so "awesome" and the in-game textures are so "amazing", then why do we need cut scenes anyway? They could just use the 3d models from the game and render the cut-scenes on the fly to save a tonne of space, because these machines are beasts and should be able to handle it right? Dynamic cut-scenes would be cool, would they not? Thats what Dead Rising does. I had that stupid yellow helmet and a kids outfit on my guy, and that was all rendered in the cut-scenes. All im saying, if developers want a game to fit, it will, with no real cost to assets that wont have a solid alternative. Im also saying, hard drives are the way of the future, they are much faster then disc drives.

No More Discs Article: http://kotaku.com/gaming/bl...

[Donkey Slayer]

good work.

[DJ]

Enforcer nailed everything, hehe. -thumbs up-

[LiquifiedArt]

I'd have to say i agree 110% with everything you say, and i feel the same way. People that "Want" to blindly follow M$ are ridiculous. They already own PC users, isnt that enough. I'm looking forward to a GOogle OS

[ChickeyCantor]

"you know, if the console looks good... even if that's the size of a CPU, it won't matter... the original xbox looks ugly... uhmmm.. like a lunchbox... "

no fanboy are you? wow you just showed your real self!

[gsquad]

Hey not to get in the thing too deep but EnforcerOfTheTruth has a few good points, specifically about how MS does its business and how they do their marketing. So on that note, dredrakes said that the future is using the hard disc drive for games. Two things, first to download games to the hard drive right now or anytime in the next 5 years is not going to happen simply because of bandwidth problems. And secondly, if you have a X360 you know that although they boast to have 20gigs of space, really after the upgrades to the X360 and your initial setup you only have like 12gigs left on your 20gig HDD.

I watched my best friend open his for the first time sign-up/register for the silver/gold package (cause you get the free month of gold) and before he went to download his FIRST free demo he had just about 12gigs on the HDD. WOW ….. If games are going to be on HDD and games are about 4gigs right now on X360 then that is 3 games, that’s it. WOW ….. That’s not going to work. Now I know what people are going to say well they (MS/X360) will bring out a bigger HDD. And yes they have been talking about it but if the 20gig is $99 then how much you do think they will charge, honestly, for a say 60gig. I wont say 300 but defiantly between $200 and $250.

P.s. To my knowledge you can hookup an external to your X360, but you cant get it to recognize your profile on the external while the 20gig one is hooked-up. I could be wrong though I will try tonight. (that’s also not to say that MS might not come out with some patch to fix this. But……)

P.p.s. I’m not saying that I agree with everything that EnforcerOfTheTruth said, just this is something to think about.

“Jump In” and “Welcom3 Chang3”