The greatest praise and strongest criticism I can level at Halo 4 is that it sure is Halo.
He says the multiplayer is great, spec ops is good, and the single player has great moments. And it all equates to a 5.5?
From what I understand, for what such is worth coming from me, its another case of MP over SP. That SP or story has moments doesn't help that the actual story is near exact retread of Halo 1.
I’ll wait until i play it to judge and compare these reviews to mines.
The SP for halo 4 is one of the best single player's i have played for a fps this decade almost
I'm a proud PS3 fan, and i depise first person shooters, all of them, but 87 is a great score, stop trolling.
The story isn't a retread. Yes you are discovering a new world/environment for the first time but that's where the similarities end. Master chief and cortana have evolved as characters and their relationship so much farther than what they were in halo 1. The main enemies are new and different. Multiple new characters are introduced and older story threads are also expanded on. Not a retread. It's a great story.
You're also discovering an ancient enemy at the same time the old, who you supposedly settled things with, are up to their old tricks. I could see if this were about renegade human and convenient factions fighting over Forerunner tech, but no, a major legal military force just happens to turn up as the same location MC does with all aspects of war at the exact same level they were at the end of the old war. MC and especially Cortania are going through some personal issues, but besides that and enemies who revive everything else is the same.
Yeah, there's a lot of hate but it's always going to be expected. It doesn't matter how good a game is, there will always be some troll with a low IQ hating on it.
Because what else is more fun than discovering something for the first time? 343 is trying to capture the halo 1 feel, they've never been secretive about that. But what you're discovering is something so much more than in halo 1. In halo 1, you discover one of their abandoned ring world weapons that just sits there. You fight covenant over it. Thats it. In halo 4, you find one of their planets. You find their home, their actual place of operations which is very much still alive and teeming with Forerunners themselves. You even find and speak to the didact, who is one of them but betrayed them. You may as well give return of the Jedi shit for retreading a new hope with the death star battle, which is what both movies lead up to and revolve around. And it's mentioned in the story that the UNSC infinity had been orbiting the planet for some time, they didn't just pop up when master chief got there too. It makes the game more interesting and gives a reason to have more characters and use Human weapons for variety.
Why is it only these troll reviews are on frontpage N4G?
It's simple. Fanboys cannot see their beloved game/console getting based without responding. So, when a no-name site posts a negative review of a beloved game, the fanboys come pouring in to it's defense and the article's temp shoots up to 1000 degrees. The site then laughs all the way to the bank as the fanboys argue in the comment sections.
These obvious troll reviews designed to lover the Metacritic review and also give sites hits are why it's clear that Metacritic has turned into user reviews on Amazon.com. EGMs reviewer got exposed on Neogaf and it's not even worth looking at this review. The word of mouth from Halo fans that ACTUALLY play the game starting in 4 hours are going to drown this out. Excessive backlash hate scores no matter how they are pretending to justify them won't hurt Halo 4 at all. When the smoke clears, the game may end up breaking every Halo record in existance, including Halo 3. But, the precedance is now set. Other MAJOR upcoming games from Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo are about to suffer the same fate. Some arent going to be as lucky. This is now going to be standard for games to get Medal-of-honored. Look at the clicks garnered by this site for a blood review. Don't believe me.. Just wait till Black Ops 2, God of War prequel, Gears, Zombie-U, Bioshock: Infinite, Grand Theft Auto 5, Last of Us, Beyond etc. are all released..it's going to be the same outcome. I salute 343 for the accolades it has achieved, Metacritic can't change that. Now it's time for the real fans to finally get are hands on this Epic gem. Evil
It will be nice when you just get the damn game so you can stop cheer-leading the $hit out of it. Yes, we get it, you like halo. But your need to constantly come to every single one of these low scoring review stories just to try and downplay and make some condescending remarks is tiring. I think Halo 4 looks great, and I believe it will be great but isn't that enough. If you truly believe these reviews are pointless (which they are) why do you continue to try a make some sort of mockery out of them? Let the sub par shoddy journalism speak for itself. By the way to everyone who might have a problem with instant respawns. Go away.
@ money gun GTFOH...I commented on one other article just like everyone else who is in ANY article commenting. Don't like that I'm a fan of Halo? Get over it..cry yourself to sleep. Lol @ these lames pretending that only trolls have commenting rights on N4G. Once again on topic it doesn't matter if the the guy destroys the game, the proof is in the pudding. On line for my copy right now..With 300 fans at GameStop.. Life is good.. Evil
So far I count 4 including this one with the above mentioned, the duke nukem comment, the egm review, and the is the halo 5.5 review one. Comment history dont lie. I really would rather not get into a rabble rabble off I just made a statement that your need to dismiss worthless reviews over and over is a little....childish. But you did do great at throwing out assumption after assumption. "Don't like that I'm a fan of Halo"- Where did I say or would I ever feel the need to tell you that statement "lames pretending that only trolls have commenting rights"- Thats a bit elite for yourself wouldn't you agree, and the fact that was never insinuated "I commented on one other article just like everyone else who is in ANY article commenting"- Now it would seem everyone else is doing this, right? I would not be so happy to be included into "group awesome" Now that people have the game we can all see that it is and will be a great experience. But for the future you could try and tone it down. Just a thought. Enjoy the game, it looks awesome. Just picked up my copy, looking forward to seeing what 343 has cooked up. Have fun everyone
Holy $hit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahaha your comment got pulled onto a website article. They said the same thing about whining for worthless reviews. I think its time to retire from site commenting when you become the problem for an industry. hahahaha http://games.on.net/2012/11...
LMFAO @ these LAME arguments..the ONLY reason you got an issue with what I'M saying is BECAUSE I'm talking about Halo.. This will be too easy.. S'o far I count 4 including this one with the above mentioned, the duke nukem comment, the egm review, and the is the halo 5.5 review one. Comment history dont lie.' Again, I'm talking about ONE other review in regards to Halo. The EGM and this one..period. Your b-hurt so bad that your scouring my history just because I commented on a Duke Nukem article..LMFAO. Two games??? Let me remind you where you are. This is N4G.com..someone puts an article, review, etc. PEOPLE comment on it. They give THEIR opinions. I gave mine..and you can't even argue against it.. Instead you only point me out? LOL 114 comments alone in this one..check out the other ones. Don't like mine..keep crying click disagree..but you clearly got nothing when it comes to proving me wrong. Typical.. Once again..The EGM reviewer got DESTROYED on NEOGAF when his bias was exposed. This one is laughable and I'm FAR from the only one to point it out. But the best part is some little site uses a snippet of my response and guess what THEY AGREE with me..as it's used on N4G as a headline titled.. 'Halo 4 shows why review scores need to go' http://n4g.com/news/1115548... Hahahahaha..your pointr is reviews need to go as a rebuttle to what I said. If you took the fan goggles off you would have read my ON TOPIC point wasnt even soley about this game. Halo 4 is only the latest example of this trend. 'Just wait till Black Ops 2, God of War prequel, Gears, Zombie-U, Bioshock: Infinite, Grand Theft Auto 5, Last of Us, Beyond etc. are all released..it's going to be the same outcome' Either way..the results don't lie.. Halo 4..Metacritic 66 positive reviews.1 negative. I salute 343 again..The game is phenominal..period. Real Halo fans already know. Evil
I believe they were pointing out how people bitch and moan at all the reviews. Your not the solution your the problem, people invest way to much into a review. Good or bad. By the way, I do not disagree with people on N4G. Its there opinion, let them have it. IF you are so interested in metacritic, halo 4 is the worst reviewed one in the series. Something to think about. I however do believe the game is a solid 9/10. Plus it has the best sound design this side of battlefield. You can also stop disregarding the fact I have only had praise for the game anytime you like. How do you say it. Goggles. Please for the love of god stop with the LMFAO,LOL,GTFO's it comes across as some sort of nervous tick.
if anyone takes this review seriously they need to be shot
Yes, that`s how you argue in the land of the free and home of the brave.
Yes. Thats exactly what happens when everyone is free to express their opinions.
The site is .au which is Australia, not the US ;)
EDIT: Never mind, misread. Move on...
Let's assume that this review is terrible and unfair. It shouldn't get this much attention. It shouldn't be attacked. It should be ignored.
If it's any consultation. This dude also gave MW3 a 9.5.
Says it all really......
The guy that gave MW3 a 9.5 also says this: "Halo is so rigid in its linearity that the player is forced to learn gunfight sequences by rote - remember where the snipers are, make sure you find the Watcher quickly to put him down, memorise where extra ammo is. There's very little reactive gameplay, because the path of least resistance is by way of recall." Apparently COD has much larger environments and the 1-2 seconds it takes to kill someone leaves you tons of room to react.
That's funny, this review is complaining of linearity and the guy who reviewed it for EGM complained that the environments were too vast and that it wasn't linear enough. Are these people actually reviewing the same game? Halo 4 has received a fair few 100s and plenty of 90%+ marks from more mainstream sites - it's clear to see that the "lesser" sites are trolling for hits.
"Halo 4 has received a fair few 100s and plenty of 90%+ marks from more mainstream sites - it's clear to see that the "lesser" sites are trolling for hits." Or the mainstream sites were paid off.
"Or the mainstream sites were paid off." Is that a tinfoil hat you're wearing? ;)
No, I'm pointing out the opposite and being completely flippant about it. It could be that the reviewer simply did not enjoy the game. It is possible. People cry way to much over bad reviews. The game isn't better if a reviewer likes it. The game is as good as you think it is.
True. If you enjoy a game then it doesn't really matter what other people think. BUT that doesn't mean that we can't make fun of people who are illogical and write poor reviews. Or for that matter people that wear tinfoil hats and come up with all kinds of wild conspiracy theories with zero evidence to back them up...
What's funny is that this guy complains about Halo 4 being too linear, while EGM whines about it being not linear enough. You'd think the negative reviews could at least be consistent...
"Or for that matter people that wear tinfoil hats and come up with all kinds of wild conspiracy theories with zero evidence to back them up" Wow, somebody else who spends too much time living in the box MS is a RUTHLESS company, probably one of the most ruthless corporations on the entire planet, i dont need to show evidence of that, its common knowledge
for some reason i can't bring myself to read garbage! I am not a Halo fan but i have played them all and while not the best games they are good. If IGN gives the game a near perfect score of 9.8 than the game is at least a 7-9. which means its worth playing. I for one want to play this entry to Halo..
What a pretentious POS review. Sums up the Aussie game media in a nutshell.
Sorta agree. I live in Australia, and here especially CoD is talked about so much. It's like there are no other games. Hardly any games get a midnight launch here. I still think CoD is good for the games economy here. Before CoD, hardly anyone over here talked that much about games. Good Game TV are also weird. I love their show, but their ratings are so dumb sometimes. They don't conform with anyone elses. They'll either give a super high score or a super low score. They never hit that sweet spot, also known as an average. They are also hard to swallow as they have handed out reviews for games when they admit they haven't actually completed it.
I enjoy Good Game. I just don't understand this review. I loved the game!
As for good game, Halo 4 review on tomorrows ep. (Nov 6th) I miss Junglist... A way better reviewer than Bajo and Hex.
I am by no means a fan of Halo, but I think too many gamers are concerened about what reviewers say, I know Halo4 has taken some flack but at the end of the day its the gamers choice to get it or not.
Smart comment of the day. I'm leaving for the midnight launch in a few hours, and couldn't give a sod for reviewers opinions. Bottom line is, if you like Halo, you will love Halo 4. I do find it weird that Halo 4, although mostly very positive reviews, has got hit by a few 'troll' reviews. Most games only get 1 or 2, but it seems Hao has attracted A-holes in droves. Entitled to his opinion, but in my book a 5.5 means that it is pretty darn broken, which cannot be the case. We need an industry standard set in lace, as game reviews are a joke. It's not asking how much you personally enjoyed the game (you could have had a bad day and CBF giving a damn), but rather the overall quality and precision of everything. Just my 2 cents. I don't want to sound like I'm whingeing lol, but I find it hard to swallow when some of the criticisms are overlooked in other games. Particularly other FPS games..........military ones to be even more precise.....oh to hell with it, Call Of Duty (Not a CoD hater, just think that AL games should be held in the same regard when it comes to reviewing).
5.5 is not a broken game, come on man.
If 5.5 is broken, what the hell do you consider a 1 or a 2? In a traditional sense, a 5.5 is supposed to mean an average game. Nothing stands out but it's not terrible. Also am I in no way defending this review. I'm just saying, there are more numbers in a 10 point review system then 5 through 10.
I disagree (with Totti and ZombieNinja) and def think 5.5 would mean a broken game. I view it as a 55%. Or about half of what it did, it failed at. A 7/10 or a 'C' would be the minimum for what I would consider a pretty good game. @ZombieNinja A 1 or 2 would be unplayable
@dmeador agreee, it's a score not a mathematical percentage of the game worth. It literally doesn't mean shit besides getting people's attention. When a reviewer gives 10/10 he's implying he loved the game and it's an easy way to show it. When a reviewer has some personal issue with the game,the inner troll leads him to abuse his power and he gives the game an extreme noticeably low score, most probably to feel better about himself.
I don't know if concerened is the word... Halo fans are not going to listen anyway. It's just annoying somewhat that some of these reviews are sooo off-key. If they are free to write their opinion then we are just as free to point out why we think they are full of crap. watch the floods of reviews come in for blops2 and lets see if they are just as picky. it's got to the point were Halo 4 is getting low scores for being... Halo... yet they were all so worried about 343 not being able to do Halo. Now they have done it they can't find fault so they pick at the dumbist things possible to give it a low score.
"The greatest praise and strongest criticism I can level at Halo 4 is that it sure is Halo." wat?
I think he might be a highly intelligent retard. Or a highly retarded intellectual.
The greatest praise and strongest criticism I can level at gamearena.com.au is that it sure is gamearena.com.au. N'stuff. Peace. (drops the mic)
There, there, it's ok buddy.
looks like this is going on metacritic....
Halo 4 could drop to a 65 average on Metacritic and it would still be the best-selling exclusive this year by miles. Millions will be enjoying the hell out of this game no matter what the reviews say. And 95% of the reviews have been positive, so either way Microsoft has got another winner on their hands here.
the same could be said for wii fit.
Best selling exclusive .....Until the next Mario drops...
I don't understand some criticisms of this game...I mean, I've only done 2 missions on SP so can't comment on the story, but the game is smooth and you can certainly tell it's Halo. The graphics are brilliant, not just brilliant by Xbox 360 standards, but it is among the best looking console games. You can see the quality wherever you look. So now multiplayer. Multiplayer is virtually all I've done since I got it. Everyone knows the MP is where Halo shines and this one is no different. I have no complaints about it, I've been addicted to it since Saturday. Like I said, I haven't much done SP, and haven't even started Spartan Ops so I haven't found anything that would warrant a massive criticism. The game is a solid 9 for me so far.
The Halo hate train is chugging a long from the random no name sites. And it's always days after the main sites or mags come out with theirs. Just like clockwork. It's funny how I seen this game get tons of perfect scores from respectable sites/mags but everybody cares about the 1 or 2 bad scores from elementary sites. Lol @ metacritic. Only nerds care about that site. Anyways, I'll be enjoying this AAA title tomorrow at 1am, so be warned...if you see me on the other team...grab rockets and hide. ;)
in this day and age yea we as a whole stay away form 5.5 out of 10 rated games, that is now considered trash, playable but overall a crappy game so this wreaks of total BS.
Hmmm....posted by @Rayan007...First comment made is trolling site hit comment by @Rayan007... all adds up to something doesn't smell right in the kitchen. I can skip reading this sh*t review.
The low scores arent going to affect sales, the $$$$!!, Halo 4 will still & ALWAYS WILL sell millions & millions, ...the Reviewer's , there controlled by the INDUSTRY, they make it seem as if there opinion isnt contrived , but it really is, They HAD TO give a game like Dishonoured lmao a high score, 9's , which is a complete joke, cause it was being published by 1 of the darlings in the Industry Bethesda, who is owned by Zenimax, Big BIG MEGA BUCKS Corporation, who's influenced extends way beyond the Interactive Entertainment Industry, way beyond... So had Dishonoured gotten the scores it REALLY DESERVES, 7.0-7.5, it wouldnt have sold very much, beings its a New IP, Halo is ESTABLISHED, has a HUGE following, its here to Stay, Microsofts flagship IP, its dug in like an Alabama tick lol, so reviewer's , the Industry knows it can afford $$$$! lol get it?? lol , to be over critical, hyper sensitive & negative towards Halo, its creates a controversy which only heightens Halo awareness & buzz, its still sales big time, despite what the reviewers say, just like COD, lol. ...Its just a game, its lieing journalist whipping, stirring the emotions of gamers, just for kicks lol, they know Halo rocks!!, & gamers fan's of the series could give 2 sh!ts! what journalist say about Halo.
Haters gonna hate.
I meant the reviewer, not you guys. Or am I getting tons of disagrees for some other reason...? OMG THE SUSPENSE IS KILLING ME.
Slightly off topic but to those who own the game; Where can I find free-for-all Slayer? The only 2 Slayer types on there seem to be team.
They don't have that option yet. 343i have said that it and other traditional modes will be added in post-launch. They wanted to keep the playlists short for launch so they can get everything organized and ready.
Nothing to see here another guy who wants to get hits. I don't want Halo to get all 10s but a 5.5? I highly doubt it.
Call me stupid but i only go by ign there games that have over a 9 are must play titles.
For every 1 garbage review there are 50 (literally) great reviews. All these negative reviews are from hit seeking sites trying to stir the pot.
Received a letter from metacritic today stating that Quarter to Three's review is being taken down. Gonna critique this review and see if it worthy of being on metacritic, but this is complete bullshit.
I hope something is being done about this review being taken down as well. What criteria do sites have to meet to for their reviews to be published on Metacritic anyway?