180°

Is Gaming Too Hard? Examination of Difficulty Settings and Games

Excerpt: A game’s difficulty is a very interesting thing. Sometimes it defines a game, and sometimes it destroys a game. In some cases, people hail it as the thing that makes a game a hit, while other games live in infamy thanks to just how difficult they are. Difficulty is certainly a subjective measure, and certain people are going to find different thing more difficult than others, but when the majority of a community holds one opinion, It’s probably a fairly good measure of a games difficulty.
So what happens when a game, or part of a game is so mind-numbingly, pants-dirtyingly hard?

Read Full Story >>
puresophistry.com
Cam9774617d ago

Absolutely not - if anything, I'd argue they're too easy.

Nitrowolf24617d ago

ha with the addition of save where ever you want, checkpoints, and even difficulty settings, they have gotten easier. Heck even though KZ2 Radec boss was crazy hard, at least we didn't have start teh whole game over again after dieing like we did for old NES, and such.

God I remember trying to beat GTA: SA without a dam memory card XD. Left the console on for weeks lol

chobit_A5HL3Y4617d ago

play doa5 on the hardest difficulty.

Aghashie4617d ago

Play Virtua Fighter on the hardest difficulty.

Temporary4617d ago

I was gaming since the NES age...I KNOW what difficult is as well as everyone else who didnt just start gaming last gen haha.

isarai4617d ago

The fact that this comment has 0 dislikes on N4G speaks for itself

Knight_Crawler4617d ago

Play Hot Line Miami and tell me how many times you died before you actually pass the game.

vork774617d ago

then you have not played darksouls lol

Cam9774616d ago

I have completed Demon's and Dark Souls.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4616d ago
smashcrashbash4617d ago

I agree. A perfect example is Super Mario Brothers. The first three were a serious challenge especially the second and third one.But now I beat them with almost no effort at all. I finished New Super Mario for the DS and thought 'wait, that's it? Are you kidding me?' Many games I can easily breeze through and even hard mode isn't hard anymore. Gaming has gotten so soft and most people don't even care. I sit and watch gaming degenerating before my eyes and most people don't even care.And now people are starting to say single player isn't important anymore. I really think the industry is trying to stop people from buying games or something. People are already buying less and less games and they just seem to be look for more ways to disrupt sales.

schlanz4616d ago

Nsmb was pretty darn easy, but 3d land and both galaxy games had some really challenging stuff. Either way, even when mario is easy its still a joy to play

PureSophistry4617d ago

The examples given are a little more unforgiving that the new Super Mario for DS.

Any individual who questions the fun of games like Dark Souls and Demons Souls and thinks they are easy games are lying to themselves.

Does the mere gimmick of being Hard = More fun?

smashcrashbash4617d ago (Edited 4617d ago )

A game being hard is not a gimmick. The challenge of a game is what is fun. The fact that you feel like you accomplished something especially when someone else didn't. I was proud to tel people that I finished the original TMNT when they claimed it was to hard to do.But what fun is it to breeze through a game and it ends before you even get into it? So yes, challenge does equal fun. What is the point in playing the game if it has almost no challenge at all and you basically stroll through the game and everyone can finish the game in a half a day without breaking a sweat.

When you finished certain games long ago people were in awe that you did it and you felt a sense of accomplishment. In many modern games everyone beats it and you have no feeling of accomplishment at all. I beat New Super Mario for the DS and it was like I might have well not played it at all. I don't even remember any parts that challenged me in the least. In SMB3 I remember perfectly what levels challenged me and I kicked up my heels when I beat them. Now it's 'I beat this game. Whatever' and you just toss it aside and start on another.In NSMB I barely even died and didn't even need extra lives. While in SMB3 I needed every life I had just to survive certain stages. People may pretend that developers aren't purposefully dumbing down and making games too easy but any seasoned gamer can see it happening.

ShaunCameron4617d ago (Edited 4617d ago )

Man, that's an old gimmick arcade developers used as a way to get gamers to waste more quarters trying to beat the stage back in the day. Talk about price-gouging!

<Does the mere gimmick of being Hard = More fun?>

If there's one good thing about today's games being easy, it's that you no longer need cheats to beat them unlike some 8 and 16-bit era games which required them and GameGenie/GameShark just to stand a fighting chance.

torchic4616d ago

I see your point.

one thing about games back in the day was that they were difficult, but in a stupid way. like a cheap boss with 50 arms and one hit K.O. and that definitely was a gimmick.

modern games like Killzone 2 for me present a better kind of difficulty

prototypeknuckles4617d ago

well back then yes, even ps2 games had a lot of challenge but nowadays these games are hella easy.

Show all comments (32)
50°

Guild Wars 2 Cookbook Gets You Free Butterknife Spear Skin

Game Rant gets a first look at the upcoming official Guild Wars 2 cookbook, along with a preview of the exclusive Butterknife spear skin.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
140°

50 Best PS3 Games of All Time

The PlayStation 3 is Sony’s most interesting home console ever, but what’s most interesting of all is trying to nail down the very best games on a console with hundreds of incredible games. Let’s give it a shot.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
darthv72114d ago

Personally, I'd rank Pacific Rift in my top 10. It's the best of the series.

badz149114d ago

We desperately need Motorstorm back. Evolution is no more though and this makes me sad

Cacabunga114d ago

Sly Thieves in Time
Stay the Party
Portal 2
Dj Hero
Demon’s Souls
God of war Ascension

rudero114d ago

2 of those games got railed through the “gaming media” during release.
Sly and god of war.
Both of which were fantastic games.

Cacabunga113d ago

Ascension is VERY underrated. Remake please!

Venoxn4g114d ago

Decent list.. I would put the Castle Crashers as well..

1Victor114d ago

Yes it’s a decent list of popular games with a heavy hand on FPS and no Warhawk or Starhawk 2 of the best games (not sale wise) on ps3.
I would buy a Starhawk again even if it didn’t have a graphics upgrade hell I would even take a new one with micro transactions 😱🤯

Profchaos114d ago

I've noticed a recent nostalgia for the PS3 and I don't get it for me it's been my least favourite generation to date and I've been gaming since the NES I just feel like the ambition of the developers outweighed the capabilities of the consoles so I remember lots of games running in the lower end of 20fps range and I remember for the first time ever actually disliking the duelshock 3 and it's curved triggers

Sure there were some standouts and great games but that's the only gen I switched entirely to PC gaming

darthv72114d ago

Maybe the recent nostalgia is because pretty much all of its games are trapped on that console. People want to play them on more modern hardware. hell... if XB can do it then so can Sony. there are competent emulators out there that can run on PS4/5 hardware but Sony just wont let them become official... why is that?

If we are talking least favorite generations (personally) then this one is certainly mine. i had more fun playing 8th, 7th and 6th gen stuff than 9th. And it isnt like i dont have access to do so... the heavy hitters just havent shown up anywhere close to those previous gens. The few here and there just doesnt cut it compared to the likes of constant good games that showed up in 6th, 7th and 8th gen. hell.... I'll even throw in 5th gen has been better than this one.

Profchaos114d ago

I tend to agree there's lots of amazing games locked to the PS3 like GTA IV or mgs 4 but then again my issue was never with the content the PS3 had but rather it's performance many other people have said the PS3 felt like it couldn't walk and chew bubblegum at the same time using PSN and downloading a game could take a few minutes to just start a download.

I typically don't worry all that much about performance I've never had a problem with games that run at 30 but games like crysis 2, Skyrim are good examples where the performance was so unstable you would never even touch the top of the frame cap and the hitching was worse than say Goldeneye on the n64

I think emulation is more than possible on the ps5 though it's just that Sony has no incentive to rush it's development it will likely be a ps6 feature if it ever happens at all.

But yeah the 9th gen has been so bad from a content perspective thats a given I see constant articles where people are frequently expressing their disappointment around the industry as a whole right now to much live service competition that sinks longstanding studios and consumes Devs time less ambition and games cost so much to make they have to play it safe.

The 5th gen was easily better than the 9th we had some all time greats crash, Spyro, Tony hawk, mgs, Mario,64, Goldeneye, Mario kart 64 the list goes on. The 5th gave us a new dimension and I remember being blown away by how much more open gaming had become the 4th gen with the mega drive and SNES was great and very easy to still revisit some of the greatest games of all time came out like earthbound, secret of mana, sonic , Mario world etc but saving our games was still not a standard function or a given so gaming was still evolving but it was very impressive to see some of the tricks Devs used like dithering to give us new experiences those earlier gens limitations bred innovation.

Michiel1989114d ago

if XB can do it so can sony? I didn't know xbox had a cell processor in their older consoles, that's the reason why ps3 was so cool, but also the reason why games are hostage there and no, xbox did nothing similar even though their backward compatbility is good, they always had a similar architecture to their consoles.

darthv72113d ago

Sorry Michael... I guess you missed the obvious part where i said there are already emulators out that do this. and that is what XB is doing... emulators for OG and 360 games. Its why the full slate is not BC on XBO/Series.

coolbeans114d ago (Edited 114d ago )

The list is missing Folklore.

Show all comments (16)
370°

FromSoftware didn’t want Sony to publish Dark Souls due to how Demon’s Souls was treated

Former SIE president Yoshida explained that Sony wanted to work on the sequel to Demon’s Souls with FromSoftware, but the developer turned it down and instead decided to work with Bandai Namco on what would become Dark Souls.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Luc20125d ago

Not sure what Sony was thinking. Wrong people testing the game. It was my favourite game from the PS3 days. Had to import it from Canada because it wasn't available in Europe at the time. Then I bought it again when a local version was available. It was fun to play online and get two separate platinum.

Cacabunga125d ago

I understand, sony acting so cocky when it came out. But they quickly realized what they were missing on. I remember an interview of Yoshida saying clearly he hated the game.

SDuck125d ago

"But they quickly realized what they were missing on."
So they've been sleeping on Bloodborne too

RaiderNation125d ago (Edited 125d ago )

Sony didn't realize what they had with Demons Souls. It happens. Marvel approached Xbox to make Spider-Man before they went to Sony and Phil Spencer said "thanks but no thanks". You win some, you lose some. Personally I wasn't THAT bowled over by Demons Souls either when it launched on PS3. I thought it was slow and clunky. The remake on PS5, however, is fantastic! So I get why Sony was lukewarm on the franchise. I dont know if anybody could've foreseen what From Software would eventually become.

Palitera125d ago

To be fair, not even From Software knew the huge success it would become. Their revenue target was tiny, as already confirmed by Miyazaki.

LoveSpuds125d ago (Edited 125d ago )

Exactly, these nipple head 'journalists' trying to spin this into a story to wield against Sony are ignoring the fact that hindsight is 20/20.

As you correctly point out, Demons Souls was incredibly niche at the time so it's not a surprise that Sony were cautious about investing huge amounts into advertising and support etc.

Pyrofire95125d ago

You can't just find the RIGHT people. This kind of thing didn't exist yet. FROMSOFTWARE started something huge and you could never see it unless you happen to get someone who not only gets a gut instinct but also the will and authority to act on it. You can't look back from 2025, you have to see it in a 2009 landscape. And Demon's Souls didn't even hit big, it wasn't until Dark Souls that it all started hitting, shortly after it's release in 2011.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 125d ago
GamingSinceForever125d ago

Hey sometimes you just can’t see the potential.

It’s like the Chicago Bears moving up in the draft to take Trubisky over Pat Mahomes.

Pyrofire95125d ago

I don't know one ounce of these sports teams, but yes, exactly like that.

125d ago Replies(2)
jznrpg125d ago

I bought the Japanese version of Demons Souls before US release. Me and my friend heard about it from an online friend in Japan. It took a while for it to become popular in the US. It was a new IP with nothing like it at the time and it wasn’t easy to play obviously. Eventually word of mouth spread about it and sales picked up after launch. I don’t think anyone could have seen how big it would be at the time. It was considered very niche and hardcore games were minimal.

Scissorman125d ago

I do wonder if we'll ever see Demon's Souls 2. Sony clearly wanted it. FromSoftware's subsequent releases penetrated the mainstream in ways the developer likely never imagined. Any stigma or negative perception around the original game's release has long passed. Bluepoint's remake sold very well on PS5. I think the time has come to visit the IP that started it all.

ocelot07125d ago

With Sony now firmly in bed with Kadokawa now. I think a Demon's Souls 2 and/or Bloodborne 2 is fairly likely.

Pyrofire95125d ago

They also seem to not want to get on Fromsoft's bad side or undercut them in any way. I think it's completely up to FS. (which is kinda funny cause FS themselves makes weird moves with their games whenever it's not Miyazaki helming the project. ie DS2 and Nightreign)

Show all comments (38)