500°

Microsoft Hints At a Very Different Future For Xbox Gaming. Plus: What Are EA and Activision Up To?

If people in the gaming industry really wanted to hide stuff, they're going to have to do better. The one and only Superannuation keeps digging stuff up that just has to be shared with Kotaku readers. Today, we're looking to the future... a very weird future that has Microsoft, EA and Activision making games you probably weren't expecting.

DiRtY4358d ago

This is pure speculation on Kotakus part and not good journalism.

Fishy Fingers4357d ago

If people only published confirmed news N4G would be a quiet place. At least it isn't another f***ing 'opinion piece'.

scotchmouth4357d ago

Or a top 9 of top 7 lists

Redgehammer4357d ago

I think your mistake was in thinking Katakus reporters are capable of good journalism.

trenso14357d ago

after that completely bogus rumor they started on versus 13 being cancelled that blew way out proportion. I can't trust anything that comes out of this site.

GraveLord4357d ago

Speculation? No. More like an educated guess based on research and what we've seen from Microsoft in the past few years.

They are moving away from the core, and focusing on the casual. It's funny because this is the opposite of what Sony is doing right now.

DiRtY4357d ago

Educated guess based on 2 job ads?

I mean, they predict the strategy of a whole company on 2 job ads and you call it an educated guess. Well, we might have different definitions of the word "educated" then.

They just hired The producer, desginer and AI developer of BioShock Infinite - do you think these guys will start to make a farmville clone?

http://www.joystiq.com/2012...

The lead designer of Crysis 2 joined MS Vancouver - Do you think he is working on Dance Central 4 then?

Oh and the opposite of what Sony is doing...

MS holiday lineup: Halo 4, Forza Horizon, Fable Journey, Dance Central 3

Sony holiday lineup: PSABR, Wonderbook, LBP Karting. Yeah, that is freaking hardcore.

AngelicIceDiamond4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

"They are moving away from core, and focusing on the casual."

So out of this article that's how you see it? Of course you would coming from you and other SFB's.

I don't know whats completely going here either, but it sounds like MS is making some preparations for next gen and if this is accurate MS is getting busy with a wide variety of games for Xbox and the Windows 8 platforms, F2P, Rares possible new name change plus recruiting. Lion Head possibly working on multiple projects.

This in no way tells the future of MS going completely casual that you suggested, but yet expanding on different platforms. This could possibly be one out of many MS preparations for next gen.

StreetsofRage4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

Ouch! Dirty just pwned Grave!!!

ceballos77mx4357d ago

@ Dirty.
halo 4 and forza are the only "core" titles MS has and you're sayng theyre not focusing on the "casual" please.

moegooner884357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

@Dirty comparing a single season's holiday line up and using it to prove a point is just as ridiculous as making a guess based on 2 job ads (interested in sharing the other Microsoft published harcdore titles that were released this year, then be my guest), Microsoft is definitely still involved in the hardcore market, just not as much as they used to during the first couple of years this gen, whether you want to believe it or not, atm Sony is the one catering the most to the hardcore gamers.

ziggurcat4357d ago

@ DiRtY:

sorry, but you can't just take the games being released during the holiday season, then claim that MS is not moving away from the "hardcore" (or that MS is more "hardcore") just because halo, and forza happen to be on that list (the other two games are clearly casual).

looking at the past year, sony's clearly been focusing on "hardcore" more than MS.

starchild4357d ago

What? At the moment there is absolutely nothing I want to play on my PS3. I'm playing all the amazing multiplats (like Dishonored) on my PC. At least the 360 has Halo 4 this year. There hasn't been anything interesting to me on the PS3 in a while.

You console fanboys always overstate things. Both Microsoft and Sony have diverted significant resources towards the casual market.

ArmrdChaos4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

"Both Microsoft and Sony have diverted significant resources towards the casual market." ....no no no no that's not possible.

One MUST ALWAYS be better than the other...the Ego has spoken. /s

I swear there are more case subjects around here than actual gamers.

Army_of_Darkness4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

Too funny.
saying that Sony and MS are focusing they're attentions towards the casual market more and got no games for the hardcore, yet you mention a multiplat game that your currently playing that is also available on both consoles?!?!?
Sony seemed to be leaning towards the casual market more this year, but next year it's very clear that they are very focused on the hardcore gamers-> The last of us, beyond 2 souls, God of war:A and until dawn to name some at the top of my head..

BTW, you do realize that the PC has TONS and TONS more casual games than the ps3 and 360 combined right? ;-)

Zhipp4357d ago

Grave, are you supposed to be Chunky's antithesis or something? You're a Sony fanboy, and he's an MS fanboy. You have a Simpsons avatar--he has one too. Hell, you both even have only 1 bubble left!

Kurt Russell4356d ago

^ 1 bubble is the new black I tell ye! ^

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4356d ago
Qrphe4357d ago

>Kotaku
>journalism

pick one

doogiebear4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

Oh great, the 3 greadiest, franchise-ruining, casual-audience-catering-to game companies are catering to casuals even more -_-. Thank God for Sony (and maybe Nintendo (if they really do intend on focusing on core gamers this time around)).

Those 3 companies set some decent trends for current gen, but did more harm than good, mostly

Jazz41084357d ago

Nah Sonys on there way out. They are hurting in almost every area and been in the red five years straight and closing studios left and right while ms keeps opening more and now have over twenty studios. I think we will see alot of original ips from ms next gen but there retail offerings will again be to what sells and not that many ips sell and thats why ms has so many new games on arcade.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4356d ago
Gazondaily4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

Indeed.

If MS really do relinquish all ties with casual gamers, we gamers will lose out massively as there really won't be any competition.

Time will tell I guess. I can, however, see MS jumping into the whole Home Entertainment industry quite decisively at the expense of core gaming. The Xbox and Xbox 360 have served as an excellent gateway for doing what MS has long struggled to do otherwise; and that is penetrate homes and the home entertainment market.

We are seeing signs of it now and whilst currently, the game lineup is great with the mix of third party and key first party titles, core gamers won't be content with the status quo in the future.

Not a good sign I'm afraid, if these rumours are to be believed. But like you say DivineAssault, time will tell.

Pillsbury14357d ago

Micr0$0ft never cared about catering to gamers, it was all about taking control of the living room. M$ already has a monopoly on pc side it wants to also control families entertainment, they will focus more on casuals. They don't give a flying fudgesicle about us gamers.

Gazondaily4356d ago (Edited 4356d ago )

@Pilsbury1

And you think Sony's motivations in the industry are more righteous? Do you think they packed in a Blu-Ray player into the PS3 for the sake of it? Wasn't Sony touting its hardware as a media centre when it introduced it to everyone? All these additional features like Netflix, Lovefilm etc, these are just there for s**ts and giggles?

Don't be under any illusions; all these companies operate primarily to make a profit, including Sony. Sony and MS only care for gamers in so far as their money is concerned.

It is, however, interesting to note that key figures working for MS seemed to show a greater personal attachment to the industry than Sony's counterparts; the passion the likes of J Allard had when it came to gaming was evident from his many interviews and presentations. Unfortunately, he seems to have disappeared off the radar. Now, I don;t really see any spokesman for either MS or Sony that resonate with gamers' opinions.

However, this whole "MS never cared about gamers" is a juvenile argument in that MS, Sony and Nintendo operate to make a profit. That is business and anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded in my opinion.

fossilfern4356d ago

@Pillsbury1

The first Xbox was a great machine and MS did try hard to get the "core" gamers, mainly PC gamers. They had a good run for a few years and even the first 2 years ,or so, of the 360 was pretty good but I agree that now the machine is a total joke.

pompombrum4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

Okay so the makers of one of the best fps games in history has been further demoted to making mobile based games. Not only that, the makers of one of the most highly regarded pvp orientated mmos could potentially be demoted to making a scrabble game.. whatever next?

Knight_Crawler4357d ago

@aiBeeze - Do you know how much AAA games cost to make? Well over 30 million dollars...sure some games sell well but people fail to realise that the game developers does not make $60 from each game sold.

Next gen will be 3 times more expensive to develope AAAA games and yes I said 4 A's becuase thats what developes are starting to call next gen games, also since its all going to be new hardware developement time will increase and game companies have to pay thier employees more money.

With all that said I can see why its safer and profitable to make mobile ot tablets games...look at Rovio and Notch those guys are swimming in money right now.

pompombrum4357d ago

I'm well aware of the costs and it is going to be a problem but taking the gaming equivalent of "cult" developers and having them work on stuff aimed at an audience who have no idea who Rare and Mythic are just seems wrong.

Gaming needs to come full circle though tbh. Back when I was a teenager, there used to be so many quirky games coming out on the ps1 that just wouldn't ever see the light of day today.

DARK WITNESS4357d ago

if next gen is going to be soooo expensive to develope for and require sooo much work, then why bother having a next gen?

if the publishers and devs can't afford to make AAA games on the new tech then they may as well tell sony and MS to scrap next gen altogether.

AtomicGerbil4357d ago

I don't believe there will be an increase in cost.

Visually there will be an improvement, but nothing that is not already being done on PC. So I can't see why there would be a cost increase, besides I'm sure visual quality has to be lowered from what is designed to fit consoles.

Programming will be easier according to what the industry is telling us, so that should cut work rates. More RAM will mean less work involved optimizing code or cutting mechanics.

Publishers are whinging about costs now, do you really think they are going to spend more in the future?

unkn0wn4357d ago

@Knight_Crawler

There will be no increase in cost of development. It WILL BE CHEAPER INSTEAD. Look up the various articles on developers commenting about next-gen development. The software AND hardware architecture will make it easier for everyone, and way less costly. I forget what exactly the developer was referencing, but he mentioned a specific task that required multiple people to attack from different angles to have the desired effect. Aside from the new hardware being rumored to be closer to that of a computer than ever, the dev kits will allow set up so the base is established much more easily and things are added on.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4357d ago
forestfrog4357d ago (Edited 4357d ago )

I've already waved goodbye to Xbox brand, halo 4 and all, I embrace my vita now.

andibandit4357d ago ShowReplies(1)
WetN00dle694357d ago

Got rid of my VITA since there was nothing worth playing.

torchic4357d ago

that's interesting, considering you never really owned one.

WetN00dle694357d ago

Yeah cause you were there to confirm whether or not i had one right.

boybato4357d ago

so whats you're PSN so we could confirm that you did own one. And please don't tell me you don't have any trophy since Vita has no games.haha

darx4357d ago

Really boybato? Maybe your dad can beat up his dad.

WetN00dle694357d ago

http://us.playstation.com/p...

UNFORTUNATELY, i had no games for the Vita lol BUT here is proof that at one point or the other i supported Sony and its Console. AND i will sometime soon purchase another PS3. AND maybe even another PS Vita once all the bad *** games hit the stores.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4357d ago
Redgehammer4357d ago

I could never replace my console, with any handheld device. However, as long as your playing games, it does not truly matter to me upon which device you choose to do so. I will be playing Halo 4; actually, I can't wait to tour Requiem. Enjoy whatever you game on, or find something else upon which to game.

forestfrog4357d ago

what if you had a partner and kids under 5 AND worked fulltime nightshift So had almost no time to fire up the console anymore, would you get a handheld replacement then hmmm?

Redgehammer4357d ago

Since I have already lived a similar life to that, i can say I still did not, nor would I, get a handheld. The last handheld I owned was in the 80s, and that was a football game.

KMCROC544357d ago

Will wait for a press release from MS , before some halfass reporting.

Show all comments (76)
350°

Microsoft Reportedly Spends $1 Billion Annually To Get Third-Party Games On Game Pass

Uncover the spending behind Xbox's Game Pass subscription. Discover how Microsoft invests a billion dollars annually in securing third-party games for the service.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer2d ago

Good.

Now that you´re releasing games and making big money from every gaming platform, you should double that amount and give us even more day one third party games!

Jin_Sakai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You’re delusional beyond belief. Businesses wise it doesn’t make sense and sooner or later they’ll be raising prices again to cover that billion they’re blowing every year.

outsider16241d 21h ago

Lucky for xbox that papa microsoft is rich.

purple1012d ago (Edited 2d ago )

As someone else said earlier today, they are past the growth stage, it’s been stagnent for last 3 years, they are now in the money making stage, prepare to be goosed for as many dollars as possible for the least amount of content. It may not be bad now, (actually it is) but it will be soon (even worse) this year you got hellblade and starfirld and a load of other games that could be bought in bargain bins for about $5-30 and for that you pay them monthly

To add I honestly don’t know how you put up with the barrage of Xbox negativity (which is deserved). I put it down to:

A) you are being paid
B) you may have a problem thinking clearly
C) prefer rooting for the underdog, that’s a legit thing too. English people do it by default

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Yeah Aussies also love an underdog as long as that underdog isn't Xbox as they were too of the game with the 360 then lost their minds

Chevalier1d 23h ago

3 straight years of missing Gamepass targets. Some people are just blinded by their own idiocy. Will be interesting to see if COD does anything this fall

CosmicTurtle2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

He is a troll. Designed to stoke people up on here. We know this.

It’s quite funny.

Popsicle1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Yet people still allow the troll to derail an entire topic. I don’t understand how moderation allows it.

I literally just skip the comment. This may be the best comment obscure ever made. I don’t know because I didn’t read it. I have read to many thread derailing post from this person to ever devote any time to reading another.

I wish everyone would ignore the trolls so we can have a genuine discussion. Stop feeding it and it will go away. Even just hitting the disagree button feeds it. Thats what it wants. This is the last post I will ever post about obscure because I am feeding them now.

Legit question to Mods. After such a long history of being a troll, how has this poster not been banned?

Profchaos1d 10h ago

Is he though or does he just blindly love Xbox in the same way Sega fans loved the Dreamcast even though it was clearly dead they thought it could be redeemed

Ok yeah he's saracstic and does troll but I enjoy seeing what he comes out with it would be boring here if we never had conflicting opinions

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money 🤔

Hofstaderman2d ago

Correction....XBOX is already dead.

Obscure_Observer1d 22h ago

"Are you insane? You want them to double the amount when the Xbox is already struggling and losing money"

As long we get the games I couldn´t care less about a trillion dollar company losing money. That´s their business to worry about. I only care about the games.

And "struggling and losing money"? Really?

"Microsoft reports Xbox’s revenue is up 61% in Q4 FY24 thanks to Activision"

https://venturebeat.com/gam...

61% more revenue and BO6 is not even out yet.

MS will make a sh!t ton of money with that game alone in all platforms. So 2 Billion yearly invested in their *core* business is nothing!

So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period.

Sonic18811d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

"So yeah, I want them to double the investments on Gamepass. Period."

That ain't going to happen. Just because you want it 😂

fr0sty2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They'll do that, after creating 4 more higher-priced tiers and making the one that currently includes everything only contain games that have been on the market for 4 years.

"Gamepass Ultra to the MAX: Now only $299 per year!"

MrNinosan7h ago

Already $240/year, so we're there within a year, without new tiers.

jznrpg33m ago(Edited 33m ago)

It will be 29.99$ a month eventually 360 a year

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They are trying to get a return on abk and Bethesda they won't double day one we're lucky we are still getting them now that day one has been removed from base tiers

They want to make money not give it away

OlderGamer171d 17h ago

Sorry O_O, I tought you where loosing it, but i now come to the conclusion that you realy lost it.
The coping from you is not on a stellarr level....

Flakegriffin1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

Homie got 77 dislike and his brain rot will still help him think that he’s right.

1d 7h ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 33m ago
MrDead2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I like how they twist cannibalising game sales into "invests".

No lifetime sales with MS, they'll F-up gaming the same as streaming services have done to the movie industry and it's workforce.

Fishy Fingers2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?

Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games.

TheNamelessOne1d 21h ago

lol

Pretty much. There's a lot of hate on this site for Gamepass, but put games on the different tiers of the PS subscription, and whenever they get that free day one release, it's an entirely different tune. No talk about how this choice is killing devs.

DarXyde1d 20h ago

Do we think they're unhappy?

Umm...YES...?

They literally need to be paid up front to put games on the service. It's become a way to gain a foothold on the platform.

Do you think Atlus would launch on Game Pass otherwise?

MrDead1d 13h ago

"Out of interest do you think those 3rd parties signing the deal are unhappy with the severence and have a gun to their head?"

I think you mean severance... and I've noticed you don't know what it means either, MS aren't firing the third-parties they're purchasing from.

"Bro probably has a PS+ sub and has library full of Epic launcher free games."

I'm not a console gamer, but yes I do have Epic with a library full of free games... but guess what Epic rotating free games every week doesn't do. It doesn't destroy lifetime sales and cut workers out of residuals. Then you bring up PS+ a service that also doesn't destroy lifetime sales as their model allows for new releases to earn.

DivineHand1251d 23h ago

There are pros and cons to everything. Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand. Services like Netflix has made it so that more studios can get a share in the profit where they can reach more consumers worldwide compared to the old days where the masses will only watch a few new titles per month.

The only negative about streaming services is that it no longer makes any sense to sell DVDs and Blu-rays though it can be argued that those persons may have moved on to building digital libraries for the sake of convenience.

The reason Xbox is doing so poorly is because they are not doing enough to be competitive. Their output of AA and AAA exclusive titles are extremely low compared to the competition and they haven't had a game of the year nominee in years.

Releasing their games the same date on PC is also hurting their console and it would have been more strategic for them to delay those releases by a year similar to what Sony does to maximize profits.

Gamepass alone is not to blame for Xbox's current position because it can be argued that if the service didn't exist and they had the same gaming output as they have now, they would be in an even worst spot.

MrDead1d 14h ago

"Streaming services like Netflix is no different than cable tv except it is on demand."

It's nothing like cable. My comment isn't a guess lifetime sale of films has shrunk to a point it's almost gone and so has the revenue it generated, that is money from competing TV networks, cable/satellite and physical media sales.

Lack of revenue transparency with streaming has meant workers job security and pay has massively diminished, earnings from residuals is almost gone for example the writer for Squid Games because of streaming gets no royalties despite series earning $900 million for Netflix, before streaming he would have royalties form lifetime sales.
Or another example Willow the series was pulled and is no longer watchable here's why: “Willow” was one of nearly 50 titles that Disney+ pulled from its streaming library in May. Other titles included the series “The Mysterious Benedict Society” and the feature film “The One and Only Ivan.” Disney CFO Christine McCarthy explained that Disney was expecting to take a write-down in the June quarter of $1.5 billion-$1.8 billion by removing content from its streaming platforms. By writing down the value of the content assets, Disney can remove that from its balance sheet and reduce its tax bill." Also when you pull a show you no longer need to pay residuals to the workers.

Have you also noticed the drop in quality on sfx or thought some older films look so much better then they do now? This is because the industry now relies on cheap labour for sfx outsourcing abroad, more green screen instead of location shooting and a lot less real extras bring life to a scene.

Streaming in gaming is going to be far worse as we've seen with MS consolidating a massive part of the industry to try and make the service sustainable, lifetime sales being cannibalised by gamespass and a work force that has no unions like SAG is already paying the price.

All streaming does is remove income transparency, cuts the workers from the money and sets flat rates and removes consumer ownership... but CEO's and shareholders will still be ok as they benefit from the industry consolidation.

Huey_My_D_Long1d 10h ago

MrDead is absolutely on fire with the post.

Nothing else I have to add other than that.

DivineHand1251d 10h ago

@MrDead like I said pros and cons. Some of those issues can alleviated with alleviated with regulatory intervention to give more transparency to the industry but unlikely anytime soon with all the lobbying going on.

The issue with the squid game's writer can be attributed to the terms and conditions he agreed to. It happens often in business as no one really knows how popular something will be until you catch that lightning in a bottle. I remember reading about how Nintendo hardly made anything off Pokemon Go dispite Niantic making Billions.

I don't blame streaming services for studios finding was to reduce the cost of making films. That stuff would have happened regardless because of the greed of these corporations. We see that same cost reduction happening in every industry from food to Aerospace.

shadowT2d ago ShowReplies(2)
CrimsonGuardVII2d ago

@badz148 its not, it just straight lied.

gold_drake2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

we know this, we have known this since last year.

this is not new or news.

Show all comments (73)
130°

Electronic Arts CEO: AI Is "At the Very Core of Our Business"

Today EA hosted its Investors Day, and Chief Executive Officer Andrew Wilson talked about the company's dedication to generative AI.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Chocoburger5d ago

He's so excited to layoff more employees for FAKE STUPIDITY computer programing to replace them.

Hopefully EA takes a nosedive just like Ubisoft is currently doing. Lack of money is the only thing that can hurt them and possibly change them.

DarXyde4d ago

Knowing EA, I think they're more likely to sell their games cheaper or make Access the only way to play their titles than change course. They seem committed to destroying their labour force.

And the sad part here is that the proof of concept is there, where games can be made using AI.

I hate to say it, but those working in the gaming industry might be cooked. And unfortunately, I'm doubting most people will care as long as they get games they want. EA would absolutely dangle Dead Space 4 or a new Burnout in front of us, developed with AI. I wouldn't take it, but I think most fans would.

CantThinkOfAUsername4d ago

If AI does a better job then yeah why not? Though, I have massive doubts it will. If developers aren't willing to put effort in their games then they shouldn't be surprised that they're replaceable.

Chocoburger4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Damn, a new Burnout, don't even bring that up. It hurts just to read those words.

The indie scene is massive theses days, but the big budget scene is mostly trash. I wouldn't mind to see these big publishers suffer or crumble away.

But that can only happen when the casual gamer stops buying yearly roster updates or whatever garbage is marketed to them on TV.

DarXyde4d ago

CantThinkOfAUsername,

I disagree. I don't believe the developers are at fault here. I would think those people don't like what EA is doing, but it's EA and they have tremendous power in the industry. Not everyone has the leadership qualities to peel off and form their own company. Add to the fact that falling out of grace with EA might just be an industry kiss of death. These people don't have any power, so I really don't agree with saying they're not willing to put in the effort.

thorstein4d ago

Now we just need to develop AI CEO and sell it to the board of trustees.

staticall4d ago

Hopefully, the only people who're going to be replaced by an AI are Andrew Wilson and his top management goons.

TheNamelessOne5d ago

And EA games aren't at the core of my purchases.

XiNatsuDragnel4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Lmfao ea needs to do an ubisoft rn

ApocalypseShadow4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Of course it is. EA has been lazy for years. Profiting for investors and themselves without putting in the work. Having AI write code or build graphics for them just makes them even more lazy.

I'd laugh if those same investors built "executive code" and got rid of EA's CEO and board of directors and replaced them with AI.

Show all comments (30)
120°

Next Battlefield Developers Are "Obsessed With Finding the Fun"

Today Electronic Arts hosted its Investors Day and its executives shared what's next for the Battlefield franchise.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1nsomniac5d ago

ohh god, here we go!

This is exactly why the gaming industry is failing. It's now an industry of suits "trying to find the fun".

...I'll help you out a little, If you're trying to find it, then it's not fun and neither are you. move on!

LucasRuinedChildhood4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I disagree, tbh. I definitely wouldn't classify Vince Zampella as a soulless suit. It's kind of an acknowledgement that Battlefield fell off which is why they had to bring him in in the first place. He's probably the best shot EA has of making this franchise fun again.

From a software development perspective, what I read in the article of Zampella's approach of being able to easily playtest and iterate from early on in development is a good thing. That's likely a big part of why his COD games and Titanfall were so fun.

PapaBop4d ago

Calling Zampella a suit lol! People like Zampella are the half suits if you will, they bridge the gap between art and business. Suits don't care how fun a game is, they only care about profit margins.

Markdn4d ago

It's people like you that's ruining the gaming platform, negativity already before it's even dropped

Noskypeno3d ago

20 years ago, Bungie used to have the motto "making games we want to play", if the devs are having fun it's a good sign it's going to be an enjoyable experience. If the devs are worried about shareholders, quotas, fitting in with current trends and trying to make a small percentage of the population happy, it's not an encouraging sign.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
gold_drake5d ago

if u need to "find the fun", thats a huge problem lol

Redgrave4d ago

This rings a bit like they might be looking for a good, long while

Relientk774d ago

Do they actually mean fun, or "surprise mechanics" and ways to monetize?

EazyC4d ago

Honestly, get them to sit down and play Bad Company 2 together.

If they can't see why that had the magic, they shouldn't be game developers.

Show all comments (13)