Gamesta.com has a slightly different approach on the recent buzz surrounding a strange Wall Street Journal review of Borderlands 2. Why don't we just sit back and quote a few more outlandish claims as entertainment value. Let's not take ourselves too seriously; it's actually a good thing that different industries perceive something from different points of view. It just might look weird inside the gaming world.
GF365: "Whether it be style, speed or firepower, these rides are sure to satisfy. Here are our picks for the ten best vehicles in video games."
The Suzuki Escudo Pikes Peak from the Gran Turismo series
Nissan Skyline from Need for Speed Underground
Motorcycle Steamroller from Dead Rising 3
And finally a car you never drive but saves your ass over and over : Honey Badger from COD MW2
I was thinking of Mad Max. That V8 felt really good to drive around in, especially with upgrades.
GF365: "Sometimes a funny and less stressful game is a welcome change. Here are the best comedic video games that will surely improve your mood."
Despite lacking Call of Duty, the Nintendo Switch has many great shooters to replace it. Here are some of the best shooters on Switch.
Anyone else have a small but noticeable delay in aiming on Borderlands 2? Anytime I move the aiming reticle, there is maybe a quarter of a second (250ms) delay before it moves. Happens in both Handheld and Docked.
Not to bash the Wall Street Journal, but since when have they ever had a valid opinion on videogames? They are only covering game news because it's a cool and popular medium, yet the reviewer knows absolutely nothing about First Person shooters, and I would even say games in general.
Any person who has every played Borderlands would know that it's not a typical first person shooter and that the reason it's praised is because of the RPG and looting formula that it brings to the table.
In the end, to say that you can compare it to Call of Duty is plain stupid and shows what little this guy really knows about both series.