270°
8.2

CNET Reviews Sony's PlayStation 3 (40GB)

Randolph Ramsay from CNET writes:

"Sony set out to make a multimedia powerhouse with the PS3, and we're glad to say that it succeeded admirably. The inclusion of a Blu-ray player makes it almost a must-have for gamers looking to get into high definition video (or even a high-def buff with only middling game aspirations), particularly at this price point. Hardcore gamers, however, may need to think twice. With few exclusive titles at launch and a dwindling list of PS3-only games slated for the future, the
PlayStation 3 will surely have its hands full competing against the Xbox 360 and the Nintendo Wii."

"The good:

* Impressive graphics capability
* Looks swish
* Cheapest Blu-ray player on the market
* Plenty of multimedia features
* Wireless controllers, plus recharge cable is included free
* Robust online store."

"The bad:

* Expensive for a games console
* Few outstanding exclusive titles in launch line-up
* Lack of backwards compatibility
* Only comes with composite cables
* Sixaxis capability needs to be better utilised."

davez825917d ago

this is AU site. Also not a bad score from a microsoft owned site.

SSCOOLCHEA5917d ago

Who cares as long as i have one , people that bash and dont have one . LOl i just want to LOL again laugh at your ass for missing probably the best console ever ( sorry ps2 ) .

MrWonderful5917d ago (Edited 5917d ago )

this is so dumb this ps3 game list is not dwindling! if anything its getting larger. and 399 is not expensive considering people are buying cell phones that cost more than this. and what is this crap " * Few outstanding exclusive titles in launch line-up " its ben out awhile now so there are alot of good games. i pity this site now

EZCheez5917d ago

I wouldn't even have bothered making it. I agree with you 100%.

prunchess5917d ago

I wonder how long ago this was written? As a review it's pretty basic.

SlyGuy5917d ago

This sounds as though it was written a year ago..hmmm

LevDog5917d ago

expensive for a gaming system.. its 40 bucks more than the 360 elite with no extra stuff to buy.. No 100 dolla HD DVD drive or 100 Dolla wi fi attachment to buy.. in the end you end up spending 160 less.. so its actually cheaper.. LAUNCH titles??? why talk about launch titles.. why not grade it on the fact it has more AAA titles in 08 than any other game console.. Cheap way to take away some real points towards the total.. or how about a plus.. FREE ONLINE SERVICE.. My total.. 9.9.. It doesnt get a Ten cause they havent came out with any New Twisted Metal haha

PirateThom5917d ago

Say $60 more expensive, you still need to grab an HDMI cable.

Mr_Kuwabara5917d ago

My HDMI cable cost 28 bucks. Panasonic BTW.

mintaro5917d ago

dude, chill, though you may not agree witht cnets review, this is how they see it

btw, i think the reason they did not factor in the 08 lineup is becasue, a lot of things can happen within that time span, some games(gosh forbid) may not turn out right, so i dont think that it's fair to give points based on things that we've yet to see

Bnet3435917d ago

AAA titles in 2008? How can you know they are going to be AAA good if you haven't played them yet?

prunchess5917d ago

Lads, if you bought cheap HDMI cables you will lose image quality. I bought a Logitech 2m cable for 50 Euro. I noticed some vertical bars on my LCD TV. I had my mates PS3 and HDMI cable. He spent 160 Euro on his cable and boy could you see the difference when I swapped them over. No vertical bars and far brighter colours. Don't scrimp on cables!

actas1235917d ago

You mean 40 dollars cheaper than 360 elite.

rofldings5917d ago

@prunchess

HDMI is a digital signal, it either works or it doesn't. You probably got a faulty cable, but if the cable works, there's no difference from a $100 HDMI cable.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5917d ago
EZCheez5917d ago

What are they talking about? I won't bother making a list because I'm too lazy, but there are PLENTY of exclusives and last I saw the list was doing the exact opposite of "dwindling."

ELite_Ghost5917d ago

"pretty expensive for a console", 360 costs the same.

Show all comments (45)
90°

10 Weirdest Video Games of All Time

Plenty of unforgettable games have completely messed up their players throughout the years, all the way back from the PS1 days to the dark recesses of the modern internet.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JonTheGod22h ago

Why are the Katamari games not on the list??

80°

Tales Of Graces Ƒ Retro Review – Holding Out For a Hero

Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
GoodGuy093d ago

Odd this and the xillia games still haven't gotten remasters yet.

120°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil4d ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai3d ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing693d ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle3d ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal3d ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

DaReapa3d ago

No. Square Enix owns the IP.

Abnor_Mal2d ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing13d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.

Show all comments (10)