Exclusives: PS3 vs Xbox 360

GC writes, "GC Spotlight is one of the few places you can go where only cold hard facts are used. Today we compare PS3′s and 360′s exclusive game using sales data and review scores. We will go through year by year and expose the truth and not twist the facts with personal opinions".

[Belking]

Everyone knows that PS3 and Xbox360 have no exclusives.

[r21]

My god...ps and xbox fans uniting together to disagree with you :O

[saladthieves]

Was about time these A vs B articles resumed showing up.

[ShinMaster]

a) They're counting games playable on PC.
b) They're counting timed "exclusives" or games simply released at different times.
d) They're counting versions of the same games already released on the PS2/GC/XB.

[edit]
They did -__-

[Kevin ButIer]

Actually is a good reading, PS3 exclusives quality is top notch.

But adding kinect/move titles to the mix... its kinda lame, IMO

[Gazondaily]

Wow good article. It seems like both consoles have really got an even spread over the years in terms of exclusives and quality. The fanboys on here almost fooled me into thinking that one console doesn't have any games at all.

[InactiveUser]

factsvsfanboys.com

[InactiveUser]

This article's results were padded by sales; like that makes an exclusive good or not. They make it look like the PS3 and 360 are neck and neck in terms of exclusives.

"When it is all said and done it looks pretty even." My @ss it does.

360 won:
* "Had most exclusives in the year" (padded by Kinect, Arcade, and 30-40% rated games)
* "Had the highest total exclusive sales in the year" (sales #s)
* "Had the bestselling game in the year" (sales #s)
* "Had the highest top 10 sales average in the year" (sales #s)

PS3 won:
* "Had the best game in the year" (quality)
* "Had the highest overall critic rating average in the year" (quality)
* "Had the highest overall sales average in the year (sales #s)
* "Had the highest top 10 critic rating average in the year" (quality)

So PS3 won all quality categories and a sales category.

360 only won 3 sales categories and the 'most exclusives' category padded by poor games and multiplats (PC/360 or other combo; not 'True Exclusives').

[sticky doja]

@EeJLP
I just checked out http://factsvsfanboys.com/ and that site it so biased toward the PS3 its funny.

That site does everything it can to exclude top 360 games for reasons like "well Live Arcade games are basically HD PS1 games" but they include PS2 HD remakes in the list. It makes me LMAO that someone would buy that domain and take the time to keep it running just to spew their "anti 360" propaganda.

Fanboys trip me out man I swear.

[mewhy32]

Wow. I knew this one would stir up the bees. Look, if you love Xbox great, if you love ps3 great, or pc great. Competition among the manufacturers is good for us. Oh sheer numbers both had lots of exclusives. I'm not sure why so many n4g members get so torn up about this?

[ShinMaster]

Funny, but that's not the same thing.
Those you mentioned are all exclusive PlayStation IPs released exclusively on PlayStation platforms. See the difference?

I probably still wouldn't count them though (if that makes you feel any better).

[GamerzElite]

Lol... joke of the year.

[user5467007]

I'm sorry but didn't this article fail the first time it was submitted...and then failed again the second time

Guess third time is the charm

@EVILDEAD360

Well if other flamebait articles fail then this one should of aswell. It's only fair, just because you add Metacritic and VG chartz info dosen't make it any less flamebait.

Anyway this will will end up a hot topic, people will argue then get bubbled down. Same story...differn't aticle.

[EVILDEAD360]

It's interesting that they fail this article when this guy seeemed to do alot of work..

We have seen plenty Metacric articles, sales articles, and a billion flamebait exclusives articles on N4G.com that make it through with flying colors with some of the laziest research ever.

Many of them are flamebait from the title to what's beyond. But, THIS particuliar one failing is interesting indeed.

It's literally the combination of VG chartz and Metacritic..but done year by year.

I give the author props for originality..as many site will literally copy and paste one VG chart and milk it every week.

The only thing that should be noted is you can compare year by year but these reflect lifetime sales of titles and not what they did that particuliar year.

Evil

[Christopher]

Originally it failed because it lacked a lot of the elements that are there now. It got approved now because the author went back and improved on the article.

Edit: Just FYI, I respect you guys whether your agree with me or not. Just remember to discuss the topic at hand and not the fans behind the platforms.

[EVILDEAD360]

@ cgoodno

Then there you have it..guess the guy got it right this time and there is no 'interest' behind it at all. I stand corrected ..because this one is actually a pretty good stroll down memory land of this gen

@ Mike

That's the point..The flame passes with flying colors..some of it is from you know the Kotakus and the IGNs as well as the no name fanblog sites..I just gave the guy a little props for doing a lot more work than even the big boys and the flame N4G standards like CVG and that 'fake' Xbox site.

At the end of the day, I guess that's what brings in the hits..you now got the 'Official' console sites joining in as well..

Honestly whats there to argue..you either love or hate VG Chartz and it's the same for Metacritic..this guy laid em' both out there..so it's DEFINATELY going to get a strong reaction

But, what can't be argued is whether the games were released or not.

Evil

[Anon1974]

A bit of a thought provoking piece with one huge, glaring flaw. For sales data it uses VGChartz. VGChartz, the fan site run by the Neogaf user Ioi who was banned from those forums for posting bogus sales numbers back in the day, is notorious for getting their software sales wrong. Often when software data is made available by the developers themselves, we've seen VGChartz numbers off by more than 100%.

But as a fan site, there's no one out there to hold VGChartz to account for inaccuracies with their data, and as software sales are rarely made public - how can you even verify the data they present? All we do know is that when data is made available, actual numbers from devs and VGChartz are usually miles apart.

I applaud this piece for trying, but VGChartz simply isn't a reliable source and shouldn't be taken seriously. There's a reason no one in the industry looks at them. Microsoft's Greenburg once even mocked them via twitter. "LOL'ing at sales reports from VGChartz, why do people release info as official when there is no source or science behind the #s?"

What's sad is the site makes the bold claim "GC Spotlight is one of the few places you can go where only cold hard facts are used." I admire what they're trying to do, but you might want to rethink what you classify as "facts".

[avengers1978]

For me PS3 has the best exclusives, and that's why I'm always playstation first... 360 Has good ones too, Lost Odyssey was/is one of my all time fav rpg's, Gears is good. Playstation seems to have more, and usually comes out with a steady flow of new exclusives... that really hit a wide range of gamers.

[Persistantthug]

2007--PS3 = 7.......XBOX 360 = 7
.
2008--PS3 = 7.......XBOX 360 = 6
.
2009--PS3 =10.......XBOX 360 = 4
.
2010--PS3 = 7.......XBOX 360 = 5
.
2011--PS3 = 9.......XBOX 360 = 4

Wow

[lastdual]

It's just a year-by-year list with metacritic scores and sales data, but yeah, these kind of topics tend to be flame bait. The article also leaves out downloadable exclusives such as Journey and Bastion, etc.

[Allsystemgamer]

Both have amazing exclusives. Leave it at that.

[ame22]

Microsoft may have had it's fair share of moments, but when it comes to delivering software Microsoft can't hold a candle to Sony, so there really isn't an argument to begin with, let alone dedicating an article to the matter.

[NastyLeftHook0]

yeah, between the two, sony has the highest rated exclusive game.

so ps3 wins.

[ProjectDeputy]

theres no comparison

ps3 exclusives ---> xbox

[dalibor]

I am a Ps3 gamer at heart but you just can't say that because let's face it it's all opinion. But the Ps3 does have a lot more exclusives though. When I bought the Ps3 way back in 07 I knew the games would come and they sure have. Both consoles are great systems now really but there will always be a preference factor involved. I do like the fact that the Ps3 provides different genre of exclusive games. But I feel that the Ps3 really needs a awesome new rpg game. It's lacking a bit in that department.

[Withdreday]

Try White Knight Chronicles 2 If you haven't already. It's cheap as hell depending on where you get it and it even includes the first game.

[Max-Zorin]

Both PS3 and 360 are good systems. But their fans.......................... .......

[BushLitter]

Well said

[M1chl]

Have to add bubbles for this : D

[PCgamer4ever]

The Witcher 2,Trials Evolution and Minecraft.Great console exclusives for the 360,this year.

[TheRacingX]

The Witcher is good, 1st game I bought for my 360 in year or so....sorry I play online for free in PSville

[Oh_Yeah]

theyre not exclusives though. all those games are on pc also...if you look at the games that are only available on the 360 meaning EXCLUSIVES..then there is only gears, halo and forza. ps3 outdoes that number times 10 or more. sony has quality and quantity.

[Gazondaily]

I'm sorry, what?

Halo isn't quality? Forza isn't quality? Arguably, Halo and Forza represent the best of their respective genres as far as consoles go)

What PS3 fps trumps Halo?
And Forza...well I'm not even going to go there with all the denial there is regarding this.

And as for games like left for dead or the witcher not being exclusives, these are still nonetheless seminal games that the PS3 doesn't have. And please don't forget, not every PS3 owner has a gaming pc- especially on this site judging by the passive hate for pc gamers 'marked as elitism' on here.

[Oh_Yeah]

@Septic I never said they weren't quality games. I said sony has quality & QUANTITY. microsoft doesnt have the quantity, thats fact. They only have 3 exclusive retail franchises at the moment.

as for halo and forza being the best of their genre, thats your opinion. i dont have a gaming pc i have a 360...i do like halo, fable, alan wake, and the witcher but best in their genres? thats debatable.

i know most wont agree but a game thats similar to halo but better imo is the crysis series. if we're talking about fps in general, ill throw the rainbow 6s and fallouts over halo also.. probably some more. skyrim/oblivion + dark/demon souls > the witcher and fable, dead space + uncharted + starhawk > alan wake and gears..midnight club la > forza, those are just some similar games that top the 360 exclusives but im not here to debate opinion.

theres many similar multi plats and some exclusives on the ps3 that are just flat out better than the 360 exclusives in their genre imo. they need to step their games up a little bit to be considered the best in their perspective genres.

my point is ps3 has a bunch of great exclusives and more on the way. to sum it up ps3 exclusives > 360 exclusives. microsoft HAS NO ANSWER to god of war, uncharted, metal gear solid, little big planet, heavy rain, demon souls, infamous etc etc etc.

[Gazondaily]

Firstly, Rainbow 6 and Fallout above Halo? How can you even compare those games to Halo? Rainbow 6 games this generation have primarily third person shooters and even then, aren't comparable in terms of quality/scope. Fallout is an RPG as opposed to a shooter albeit in the first person perspective. Your comparison makes little sense here.

Crysis and its overall quality leave a lot to be desired (story, multiplayer component and features etc) and again, doesn't offer any real competition whatsoever.

I actually prefer Uncharted to Gears but only as far as the single player is concerned. Multiplayer wise there is no competition. Uncharted's MP is just an after thought in comparison (hence why it didn't even feature in the first game). There are some on here who would go to extreme lengths to even argue against that even if objectively, the truth is quite clear.

Your post lists some very specific games that you prefer and they make don't really form any real comparison. Take how you list Midnight Club La, an arcade racer against a racing simulation. The new Forza isn't out yet so I'm sure you're not comparing it to that.

I completely disagree with you about exclusives bring flat out better on the PS3. Whilst Metal Gear and LBP have no comparison, 360 exclusives, in my opinion not only stand up well but are superior in some respects:

*Infamous vs Crackdown: Crackdown in my opinion and even as a form of objective scrutiny is a far superior and innovative game (not including the sequel). Infamous feels generic in comparison. In crackdown, the developers (the person who made GTA may I add) really nailed the whole super hero element as well as what makes sandbox games fun. The way you leap through buildings, attack objectives in your way, transform cars and play all of it via co op....it was and still is an amazingly fun game. I completed infamous and I never understood the hype. Basic electricity attacks, poorer platforming, less original compared to the orbs etc in crackdown, lacklustre combat compared to the sheer unscripted chaos you can unleash on crackdown, poor implementation of good vs evil choices.

I don't think the Sony exclusives are as amazing as many on here make them out to be. Still, I do concede that the 360 needs more exclusives but not because of any pressure from Sony. The multi plat games plus 360 games are more than enough.

Still, I own a PS3, 360 and gaming PC and I'm getting the best of all worlds. I actually game on all of them equally in terms of time spent. I have my preferences and I still maintain that, as a multiplayer centric gamer, the 360 is the clearer console of choice.

I'm at work so I don't have time to elaborate further, although this post is long enough already.

Basically, each to their own. I actually sincerely believe that the PS3 and 360 are equally as good lately.

[tordavis]

Wait what?! No Fable? No Banjo and Kazooie? No PGR? No XBLA titles? Are you serious?

[AngelicIceDiamond]

Probably the most useful article to grace N4G either way Both Sony and MS work hard to deliver games.

I already knew Sony's games are quality and MS games are top selling.

But dare I start something (gets devil horns) which game will sell more next year? GoW ascension or GOW Judgment? They both are a week apart.

[BushLitter]

I'm about 78% sure that Gears will outsell God of War. Gears is a shooter after all.

[HammadTheBeast]

Good point..This will be a big event. GoW Vs. GoW.

Chained Blades vs. Chainsaw Guns

[DOMination-]

God of War has never been a huge blockbuster seller. Doesn't mean Gears will be better though...

[Tontus]

God of War has always been a huge blockbuster seller. All the main entries have sold at least 4.25 million & God of War III has sold over 5.3 million copies in 2 1/2 years and is tracking towards passing 6 million lifetime sales, that's not far off the best selling Gears of War game.

I think God of War: Ascension will outsell Gears of War: Judgement and Gears:J will be the worst selling Gears game yet for 5 reasons; 1) Gears of War 3 was a massive disappointment to a lot of people, 2) It's releasing far too soon after Gears of War 3, 3) It has a different main character which will put off some gamers, 4) A different developer is handling the bulk of development, 5) It the first time a Gears of War game isn't being released near the xmas sales period.

As of right now GoW:A is destroying Gears:J in overall and weekly pre-orders in the USA (source: Vgchartz), both franchises best selling regions, I'm 80% sure God of War: Ascension will sell more unless something goes horribly wrong or Sony don't market the game well.

[DOMination-]

God of War I & II scraped 4 million when the userbase of the ps2 was 120 million. Hardly blockbuster sales.

[DEATHxTHExKIDx]

Ps3 has MOre exclusives and a wide genre. 360 JUst does it BIG. Either way my PS3 is pure exclusives. MY 360 is my mulplats/360 exclusives and online play.

[NastyLeftHook0]

why multiplat? do you know some games you can get free content with the ps3 version? example :dead space 2, dead space extraction comes free. assassins creed 3 gets 1 hour of exclusive content, why would you not want that?

[AngelicIceDiamond]

Yeah but PS3 only has a handful of exclusive content when it comes to multiplats. That kind of thing is usually done by the Xbox.

Either way, it should be interesting to see a hour of exclusive content for AC3 for PlayStation though.

[DEATHxTHExKIDx]

I agree with u on some parts the biggest reason I use my 360 for multiplats is Most of my friends own a 360 and its eaiser to connect and play with them online than PS3. If its a single player game that has excluisve content it depends if it rlly interests me enough to get it on PS3. EX. personally Im not interested in Dead space but Assassins Creed 3 I may get on PS3.

[InactiveUser]

There's also:
*Assassin's Creed (original) included on Revelation's PS3 disk

*BioShock (original) included on Infinite's disk

*play as the Joker in Batman: Arkham Asylum

*Mass Effect 2 comic and bonus missions

*Medal of Honor: Frontline included on PS3 version of Medal of Honor

*Battlefield 1943 free with Battlefield 3

*Elder Scrolls Oblivion included Knights of the Nine

etc. I'm pretty sure a lot more PS3 multiplats included extra content.

Not to mention everything being on 1 disk on PS3 compared to many more examples of multiple disks or DLC vouchers for the 360's Game of the Year editions, etc.

[saimcheeda]

but they dont seem to be of as good quality as compared to the PS3 ones which is why people incorrectly say PS3 has more exclusives!

[BushLitter]

I think a lot of the exclusives that made up Microsoft's numbers the last two years were Kinect titles. Aside from the casual sector, Microsoft's exclusive line-up the last two years has been relatively lackluster. Let's hope they pick it up again next-gen

[Lvl_up_gamer]

Mincraft
Halo Reach
Gears of War 3
Forza 4
The Witcher 2

And you think those titles are "lackluster"?

I think not.

MS may not have as many 1st party exclusives (since we are not counting Kinect titles where I don't know why we are not counting them) as Sony but the franchises that are coming out consistently from MS are top quality IP's from well established and highly rated franchises.

[Rhythmattic]

Lvl_up_gamer

Minecraft, The witcher 2 aint exclusive to 360.

[Ben_Grimm]

@Rhythmattic

They're exclusive to me since I can't play them on PC. (Since I don't have a game rig)

And I can't play them on PS3 or Wii.

[HammadTheBeast]

No. If you want to bring in XBLA games, then also consider PSN only games, and you have a major difference. Then, you can aslo take out Kinect games, or compensate by including PS Minis as well.

[Jazz4108]

Online only games is not even a compairson as xbox would win hands down. Its exactly what i thought as the facts show the 360 has had more exclusives than the ps3 every year so far and that is why this article is not popular as the sony fans constantly say xbox has no games. So if thats true then ps3 must be real crap since 360 has more games then ps3 everyyear so far.

[A-Glorious-Dawn]

Personally for me it's PS3.
But they both have good exclusives.

[DigitalRaptor]

Oh this old chestnut. I'll say that for their respective fanbases, both companies do enough to satisfy them from what we've been told. So from that, PS and Xbox fans clearly have different standards. PS has the more diverse selection and will continue to.

Though, Sony have been more dedicated to games, new IP, new experiences, and have done for years. You'll see their strategy very much mirrors that of PS2 in its later years , except with more exclusives. The release of a PS2 masterpiece -> Shadow of the Colossus. The release of a PS3 masterpiece -> The Last of Us.

[from the beach]

Fascinating read! Looks to be very comprehensively researched and, yeah, destroys some of the fanboy stuff that often gets repeated.

'New IP' would be another interesting category.

[MRMagoo123]

Hmmmm it says no personal opinions just facts yet has review scores, arent reviews defined by someones personal opinion ?

[Christopher]

The facts are the review scores. It is a fact that those are the scores the games got from reviews, not it's his opinion that those are the scores they deserve(d).

[Quiescent]

Trannquil Calmness let theair flow you please lets enjoy life as intended. Both are excellent consoles lets be adults and not kids ok?

[InTheLab]

So if the Witcher 2 is an Xbox exclusive and it's also a PC exclusive? The Xbox is a platform. Steam/Origin/GFW are platforms. The PS3 is a platform.

Games are either exclusive to that platform, or they're multi-platform.

There's no such thing as console exclusives and that is not an opinion.

[PersonMan]

Yeah, if they're counting the Witcher 2 as an exclusive for XBox, they should also count DC Universe Online, Red Dead Redemption (for both consoles) and all the console-only sports games and such.