IGN - Single-player could be cool, though.
I didn't liked what i saw, hopefully it'll look much better before i pick up my Vita Bundle.
This title. and honestly, throw the game back into development, i'll wait another 6 months for a good COD game with good MP, not this trash. the Vita already has a sick lin-up of games. the last thing sony wants is one of their biggest games to be garbage. smh.
This is going to ruin the good reputation the vita is trying to build... seriously All the games they showed off looked great, except for this one... It looks like a joke
Its even worse when Treyarch themselves, had no clue was making declassified My guess is that no work was being put on the game, and nihlistic got it when it was announced This game looks like a cheap, and rushed game... if they actually have the nerve to charge $44.99, its seriously going to screw the vitas reputation Seriously? What happened to all the true call of duty experience stuff they said? 4v4 mp? That is a complete joke, considering psp games looked much better and could support 32 players
I think nihlistic (I hate their name) are single handedly going to ruin the VITA reputation.
@Above Nihilistic is a sweet name :) Love the word :P @all... All this article said it was just the same as the old style Call of duty... and i swear not that long ago people were complaining about how CoD 4 was the only decent CoD blah blah blah... So shouldnt you be happy?
You think it will look better? These guys are better at making the game "look" good than actually being good in-game. All or most trailers for CoDs have been improved to look more that what it is.
Its like you're saying you're going to buy it no matter what :/
Anyone that picks this over the console or PC version needs his head examined
Really. What about people who have only Vita, or have a Console but want enjoy their gaming on the Go.
Yes he obviously meant overall, also technically your laptop can be an on the go so yeah...
whoever buys COD in general needs a head examination. Killzone is all i want out of the two. A battlefield game would be nice as well.
Considering its a different game (at least story wise) I doubt anyone would choose this over the other versions when they could get both if they really enjoy COD (and the BO universe) that much.
its only for the vita
Well if sony wouldn't of terminated Zipper Interactive, maybe they could of done the COD.It certainly would of looked much better.
I'm usually not a grammar nazi, but you did it 3 times so I had to say something. It's wouldn't HAVE, could HAVE and would HAVE. No OFs!!! There, now I feel better
Thank you. I wanted to say something.
Don't take this the wrong way and this isn't directed at you. But seriously, everyone spat on anything Zipper had done this generation. So all those fans that moaned and whined about the games Zipper put out this generation have no right to say "I wish Zipper wasn't terminated" Because they didn't like anything Zipper did as of late anyway. And the sad part is, Zipper actually did put out good games this generation.
Thank you. I agree. MAG was one of the best multi-player experiences I've ever had.
Really? As a guy who put years into the socom franchise i have to disagree with you. Zipper was the most lazy, disloyal, worthless devs ever. E-V-E-R! Please allow me to explain. The 1st socom was brilliant, you can tell they were young and hungry and really wanted to make their mark in gaming and it showed. Socom 2 was even better, it included every map from the 1st game as well as new maps and was a complete package. Then, zipper went to shit. First, they announce DLC as coming very soon a short while after the game was released in nov. Of 2003. Then they say the content was ready to go and they were waiting for the HDD to be released, which was released in march of 2004. So we were good to go right? Wrong, the maps came out 1 map at a time from dec. 04 to feb. 05. Thats right, 1 year for 3 maps, $100 for HDD plus $10 per issue of opm per map = $130 for 3 maps. To make matters worse, no more dlc, none of the guns, camo, or other maps they promised were released, they scrapped everything and released socom 3 in oct. 05. Long story short, same empty dlc promises scrapped with socom 3 also, instead they release the joke that was CA. It was basically socom 3 with all the dlc they promised preloaded onto the disc for full price in nov. 06, $50. Another long story short, Oct. 08 they released confrontation, 2 years for no single player, 5 maps, super dumbed down socom. Then they use the excuse that they were also secretly working on mag, lmfao......MAG!!! Again, no single player, 1 map, 256,000,000,000 players though, gj zipper. Don't let the doorknob hit ya where the good lord split ya!
Is it weird that i wasn't really expecting much?
Not at all. It's Nihilistic. What could possible go right?
LOL no.. COD on consoles already looks like a handheld title. I wasnt really expecting much from a COD title on a handheld.
I don't think this'll be terrible, but I'm positive it won't be a huge system seller either.
i dont care what happens with this game.. The team nihilistic hasnt made a singel good game to me.. Knowing this game is in their hands will turn ppl off right away.. Sony should fire them & hire someone else for the project. even if it means it gets delays
This multiplayer is just sad, heck even the wii's black ops (a weaker console) can run a higher player cap and had more maps.
runs 60 fps?
Not good news. I was actually looking forward to it but not anymore. The trailer did nothing for me and the 4v4 is a bad choice. 6v6 would have been good.
I don't mind 4 vs 4, just as long as the maps are designed for it. For example, Nuketown from Black Ops would be perfectly fine with 4 vs 4. With more than that, it actually gets pretty chaotic. But, if the maps are similar in size to the console versions, yeah, the 4 vs 4 would be disappointing.
The PSP pulled off: MGS Peace Walker sound, game play, and most of all appealing VISUALS... The PSP pulled off: Socom Fireteam Bravo 3, Sound, game play and most of all appealing VISUALS AND 8v8 MULTIPLAYER MATCHES... The PSP pulled off: Medal of Honor 2, most appealing feature 16v16 MULTIPLAYER MATCHES AND THE VISUALS LOOK SIMILAR TO COD:DECLASSIEFED Funny how a handheld that is 10+ times more powerful than a PSP in every single way, is going to be poisoned by a games that looks to be taking a HUGE step backwards in everything... While it will be the only handhel COD game that'll have dual analog support, thats the only plus i suppose... Killzone Merc. Will be getting my full gamer support, on day one!!!
i liked the fact that ign brought this up. the developers would surely get the message. this is a .99cent ios game. we want the full experience.
Zipper Interactive should have been given this IP, that way Nihilistic could've focused on Resistance. This trailer literally looks like Burning Skies with COD maps.
where's the fu**ing zombies that's all i care about and the only reason i buy cod games. If zombies isn't included i am out.
Even the f*ckin DS versions of Black Ops and World at War had Zombies. I swear to jesus if they don't even have the frickin common courtesy to at least put Zombies, I'm gonna start making plans to destroy Nihlistic. That developer is complete sh*t and shouldn't even exist. They're proudest work was f*ckin PS Move Heroes for gods sake. Why does Sony continue to hire them to make games?
It's like sony forgot that a good lineup of games is essential when you release a new console (in this case handheld). Vita is really off to bad start, I know I personally have no interest in getting one. PS3 and Xbox provides all my gaming needs, and as far as portable gaming goes, my cheap £50 android phone fulfills that. And if I absolutely had to get a handheld, I'd pick up a 3ds before a vita, oh well good luck sony, this has been a tough generation for you hasn't it.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.