330°

Sony: “New IP is the lifeblood of the industry”

Sony’s Fergal Gara has been explaining why Sony continues to release brand new IP like Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls well into the lifespan of the PlayStation 3 instead of saving them for a new console.

Read Full Story >>
beefjack.com
DaThreats4698d ago

I <3 New I.P.'s
So does SONY
So It makes me <3 SONY

4698d ago Replies(3)
shutUpAndTakeMyMoney4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Me to! But why is 97% of sony AAA games third person adventures. Different flavors one category.

Uncharted 1,2,3. = third person
God of War 3, God of War:Ascension = third person
Dark Souls = third person
Infamous 1,2 = third person
Starhawk = third person
Heavy Rain = third person
Sly ciooper = third person
Last Gaudian = third person
The Last of Us = third person
Beyond = third person
FFVersus = third person

I am sure there is more.

This is a lot variety of third person games.

Gave a lil constructive critism to sony sorry guys.

They are making shooter of the year on pc! But not on ps3. maybe ps4 though.

Army_of_Darkness4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

New Ip's call for new character and what better way to showcase a new character than to place him/her in a 3rd person view where the player constantly see's That character in action. I would think it's a very smart way to keep a new video game character imbedded in your head;-)

rezzah4698d ago

It is possible that you will find an answer when you look at all the physical games made this gen . Compare them at their very core; FPS, TPS, RPG, Racing, Fighting, etc.

Then look at the percentage of games made for each.

It might explain why there are 97%, as you claimed, of TPS exclusives.

DigitalAnalog4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Well what else can you expect? Games are either 3rd person or 1st person. Any game other than a first person game is a 3rd person game. Katamari is a 3rd person game, Broken sword is a 3rd person game.

What exactly are you trying to pull here? That statement is "beyond scraping the bottom of the barrel."

Give me ONE game that isn't a 3rd person or a 1st person game.

xursz4698d ago

Third Person > First Person
(IMO)

I honestly prefer the experience in third-person games a lot more. Probably because the Player-Character connection feels much more genuin (again, IMO)

4698d ago
OldSnakePS34698d ago

3rd person is by far the best view for any game IMO

MySwordIsHeavenly4698d ago

Shooter of the year?

You mean Borderlands 2? That's on PS3. Not sure what you mean.

Shikoro4698d ago

Wait, what? Are you seriously complaining about the camera type in Sony's games? W.H.A.T.T.H.E.F.U.*.K?

You trolls and fanboys have fallen so low that I don't even pity you anymore. Just stop breathing in the same air that I'm breathing, OK? :(

GTRrocker6664698d ago

Killzone and resistance games have been great

cannon88004698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

@ShutUpAndTakeMyMoney

As soon as I read "But" in the start of your second sentence, I already knew you were going to get a lot of disagrees. lol

xXBlondieVanHarlowXx4698d ago

Dude the camera??? For realz?

Trolls at they're finest :/ If there was a point to your "constructive critism" i totally missed it.

ALLWRONG4698d ago

Funny most of the games posted are a sequel or has a sequel coming. The only new IP is The Last of Us.

Flewid6384698d ago

97% of PS3 games are third person.
97% of 360 games are first person.

I'll go with the third. Seeing my character in all his/her glory immerses me way more than feeling like a moving car with hands.

avengers19784698d ago

your talking about RPGs, shooters, action adventure, and platformers... they are different types of games with the same view 3rd person...
No resistance or Killzone on your list though.

miyamoto4698d ago

dude

Super Mario
Mega Man
Metroid
Zelda
Sonic the Hedgehog
Final Fantasy
Chrono Trigger
Popeye
Baseball
Tennis
Wii sports
Tetris
are all in third person

what's your question?

Zefros4697d ago

Well you got killzone, but i think that it's better this way because we have so many fps games on the market allready ( even if it's multiplat). Too bad resistance ended.

fuzzybacon264697d ago

I agree with you. If you remember they way that Xbox 360 shot off the selves was very little first party IP and stealing alot of Sony's IPs.

***PS Dark Souls is multi platform, you are thinking of Demon Souls.***

cannon88004697d ago

@xXBlondieVanHarlowXx

It's spelled Canon, not cannon. So the answer is no. I clearly wasn't trolling

@shutupandtakemymoney

But I'm not going to write an entire essay to explain myself, because I don't really care.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4697d ago
nukeitall4698d ago

I don't understand why people clamor for "new ip"?

For me, it doesn't need to be a new ip for me to enjoy. In fact, many of the games I want to play are really really old IPs often times with a reboot.

It has never been about IPs, but about games I enjoy playing!

FFXI1014698d ago

If they don't release the "new ip" How would you get an "old ip" ??

The games you are playing now were once "new ip" you do know that right?

nukeitall4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

@FFXI101:

My point is there are plenty of IPs and there is no reason to constantly chant "new ip, new ip, new ip..." all the time. I don't play game because it is a new ip, nor do I purposely look for them.

I just look for games that look interesting and something I'm likely to enjoy.

I would imagine, people would clamor for more quality games or different experiences instead of "new ip". New ips often times can have pretty stale mechanics!

I would take a new experience (or a majorly improved one) old IP over a new ip, but potentially crappy game any day!

Outside_ofthe_Box4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

***"I would imagine, people would clamor for more quality games or different experiences instead of "new ip". New ips often times can have pretty stale mechanics!"***

Is it not possible for a new IP to be of quality or provide a different experience? That is actually why people ask for new IPs.

Saying you want more quality games goes without saying. There is no reason to state the obvious. Does one have to literally state " I want a new IP of great quality" in order for you to know that they want a game of quality?

That is "why people clamor for "new ip." They want a game of quality with a refreshing different experience.

Just as a new IP can potentially be a crappy game so can the next iteration for an old IP, but of course you don't acknowledge that.

nukeitall4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

@Outside_ofthe_Box:

"Just as a new IP can potentially be a crappy game so can the next iteration for an old IP"

Isn't it obvious!? Why would I need to explicitly mention that, especially since that isn't the topic of discussion.

The point is new ip doesn't necessarily give you that "new refreshing experience" anymore than an existing franchise so why get hung up on new ip instead of "new refreshing experiences".

Why not say "I want new refreshing game experiences" instead of inaccurately saying "I want new ips"!

Personally, I just play whatever I feel like, old, new, stale and whatever as long as I enjoy it. That is why I play games like Kinect Sports, Wii Sports, Mario Party, CoD, Halo, Gears of War, Mass Effect, StarCraft, South Park: Tower Defense, Ninja Gaiden, Splinter Cell: Conviction and so on.

"but of course you don't acknowledge that."

What is that supposed to mean?

Outside_ofthe_Box4698d ago

***"The point is new ip doesn't necessarily give you that "new refreshing experience" anymore than an existing franchise so why get hung up on new ip instead of "new refreshing experiences".

Why not say "I want new refreshing game experiences" instead of inaccurately saying "I want new ips"!"***

Because that is essentially saying the same thing! Isn't it obvious!? That is my point!

Why would someone want a new IP that ISN'T a different experience from game that ALREADY exists hmmm? Why would someone want a new IP that has a similar experience to an existing one? It will only lead to people calling it a carbon copy therefore not buying it anyway!

Everyone plays what they enjoy at the end of the day. Just because people want something new doesn't mean they don't like the old stuff and vice versa!

BitbyDeath4698d ago

You know your getting old when you no longer like the new stuff. :-p

thedisagreefairy4698d ago

im guessing u pretty much play nintendo games. sorry but i had to say it.

Ben_Grimm4698d ago

Its not just about having new IP's. Its about having new IP's of interest.

Wii has a gang of new IP's and a gang of them I could care less about.

I look for the IP's that appeal to me rather it be new or old.

Hicken4698d ago

THIS GUY(nukeitall) has more bubbles than me? Someone PLEASE explain what sense that makes.

Here we have a dude who is essentially saying that he just wants to play the same old crap over and over again, and he's saying it solely for the purpose of trying to discredit Sony's dedication to new IPs. Will he lose bubbles? Doubt it.

If I'm on topic with something RELEVANT to say, but I happen to be against the 360 crowd, watch me get hit with trolling. And since guys like LevelHead have it out for me, they'll rally up and have me branded for trolling even here, in a Sony-related article.

You can't argue that new IPs are bad. YOU. CAN'T. ANY TIME someone does, they should automatically be marked for trolling. NO REAL GAMER could possibly think like that. Hell, even fanboys aren't like that; they at least argue about whose new IPs are better.

Am I the only one who sees crap like this and wonders what's wrong with this site?

BrutallyBlunt4698d ago

"If I'm on topic with something RELEVANT to say, but I happen to be against the 360 crowd, watch me get hit with trolling. And since guys like LevelHead have it out for me, they'll rally up and have me branded for trolling even here, in a Sony-related article. "

That's the thing, you can't stay on topic and stay relevant to the discussion because you're far more concerned about the battle agianst the XBOX360 and its fans.

Now tell me, why would you be hit with trolling if you respond to the topic and discuss the topic? Oh that's right, you're far more interested in battling against XBOTs.

If you believe new IP's can be released at any time then make the argument. Why keep wasting time arguing with people whom you know won't give you the results your looking for?

I myself think new IP's are great anytime. I think it's awesome The Last of Us is coming to the PS3. Let's just hope it's not delayed until the PS4 ships.

Be happy Sony supports new IP's even now like Beyond. Instead you get heartbroken and upset if people don't agree with you. The world does not revolve around you or your thinking but you can lead by your own example. Talk about the topic instead of embedding yourself with all this fluff.

Is it possible to enjoy what you want without the cost of downplaying the compatition and their fans? Doesn't seem like it.

If they are trolling mark it and move on. Don't act worse and then whine about it.

Ben_Grimm4698d ago

"THIS GUY(nukeitall) has more bubbles than me? Someone PLEASE explain what sense that makes."

Because he's not TROLLING! He is stating his opinion on why he doesn't care for new IP's for him to enjoy games.

You seem to not even fathom why you always get your bubbles snatched from you. You worked your way up from one before only to get right back down to one. Maybe you should ask yourself why and stop blaming the "360 crowd".

"If I'm on topic with something RELEVANT to say"

It's rare that you have anything relevant or on topic to say Hicken stop fooling yourself.

"You can't argue that new IPs are bad. YOU. CAN'T. ANY TIME"

He's not argueing that new IP's are bad, READING Hicken, PLEASE READ! You have to not only read but you have to UNDERSTAND. He's saying just because an IP is new doesn't automatically make it a good game.

How many IP's have we had that is just a copy of a previous experience?

Again all you see is an attack on your beloved Sony and you instantly start to bark.

nukeitall4697d ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box

"Because that is essentially saying the same thing! Isn't it obvious!? That is my point!"

No! One is simply saying I want "new ips" and that is it! It doesn't necessarily say new experience. The other explicitly states new refreshing experiences and doesn't exclude existing franchises. It is a far broader and more accurate statement!

It is obviously not the same, even if that is what you (or anyone else) intended.

"Why would someone want a new IP that ISN'T a different experience from game that ALREADY exists hmmm? Why would someone want a new IP that has a similar experience to an existing one?"

Because the story line or setting is different? For instance, WW2 doesn't appeal to me at all so CoD3 was a none starter for me, but CoD4:MW was a huge hit and so has any of the MW series been since. CoD:Black Ops 2 looks to be a good game too.

I would have loved to get a Bioshock in a different more modern setting than a 50s feel. It would have obviously most likely have been a new ip.

"Everyone plays what they enjoy at the end of the day. Just because people want something new doesn't mean they don't like the old stuff and vice versa!"

I'm not claiming that, but it just seems wrong to clamor for new ip when I get the impression they are really asking for something else like a new experience. Then ask for that specifically, instead of going in a roundabout way of saying it and assuming people will get it!

Maybe that is why we get a lot of new copycat IPs!

@Hicken:

"Here we have a dude who is essentially saying that he just wants to play the same old crap over and over again, and he's saying it solely for the purpose of trying to discredit Sony's dedication to new IPs. Will he lose bubbles? Doubt it."

I haven't said a word about PS3, nor did I discredit new IPs. Please show me exactly where I did that. I simply posted my opinion that new ip seems to be the incorrect term to use for what is essentially asking for something new.

"You can't argue that new IPs are bad. YOU. CAN'T. ANY TIME someone does, they should automatically be marked for trolling. NO REAL GAMER could possibly think like that. "

Have I said new IPs are bad? However, new ips aren't necessarily good either.

Also, there is nothing wrong with playing existing franchises. Gazillion people gladly do that every year and outnumbers the people screaming new ip all the time.

"Am I the only one who sees crap like this and wonders what's wrong with this site?"

What is wrong with this site is people like you who sit on one side of the fence and only see the other side as wrong never to reflect on the side on is on.

I suggest you learn to sit in the middle.

Outside_ofthe_Box4697d ago (Edited 4697d ago )

***"It doesn't necessarily say new experience. The other explicitly states new refreshing experiences and doesn't exclude existing franchises. It is a far broader and more accurate statement!'***

No, no, no, NO! "New IP" in itself doesn't necessarily mean a new experience, but when people ask for it, obviously they want something NEW. Just like "new IP" in itself doesn't necessarily mean a quality game, but when people ask for it, obviously they want something of quality.

Of course if Sony, MS, Nintendo, EA or Activision where to come out and say "we are about to announce a new IP" that doesn't mean the game will be good or if the game will be a new experience. BUT if I were to come out and say "I want a new IP" obviously I want something NEW and of quality or else I'll say otherwise explicitly and specifically.

For example, you just stated that you want a game similar to bioshock, but in a more modern setting. Well, saying you want a "new IP" isn't enough for anyone to know that you want that type of game. It wouldn't be crazy for a publisher or your fellow gamers to assume that you want a game that provides a refreshing experience. Whereas assuming the DaThreats(the first poster in this article) would want a bioshock game in a modern setting just because he said he likes "new IPs" is an off base assumption.

Another example would be PlayStation All-Stars: Battle Royale. PlayStation fans literally stated that they want a PlayStation brawler similar to Super Smash Brothers. They didn't say "we want a new IP" for Sony to somehow magically know that.

If people want a new IP that has a similar experience to an already existing IP they will say that specifically. Otherwise it isn't idiotic to assume that they want a new refreshing game of quality. I hope see what I'm getting at!

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4697d ago
TheTwelve4698d ago

The new IPs, pushing technology, wide variety of games --- this is why Sony is still the leader of the console game industry, resulting in why negative reports/opinions about Sony always get hits and why they were/are the target of hackers. ---12

TBM4698d ago

yea even though i have all 3 consoles my PS3 gets play more because of the variety in their portfolio, and they actually take risks releasing new IPs.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4697d ago
MultiConsoleGamer4698d ago

When it comes to new IP's, nobody tried harder this generation than Sony.

humbleopinion4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Actually that's not really true if you count the number of new IPs released this gen by each publisher. You can however argue about how successful they were - and I think that's where Sony's strength lies.

guitarded774698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

@ humbleopinion

You have a good point. It appears that both Sony and MS have contributed to the new IP pool this gen quite a bit.

Microsoft Studios
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Sony Computer Entertainment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

I play on both and have found exclusive IP's on both which are mind blowing, but Sony seems to have more mind blowing new IP's this gen... just better quality for the most part. IMO

SandWitch4698d ago

It's a shame that other companies only rehashes their old best-seller-guaranteed franchises instead of taking some risk and creating something fresh and amazing.

Hisiru4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Xenoblade? Last Story? Kid Icarus Uprising? Disaster? Excite Truck? Pandora's Tower? Fluidity? Endless Ocean? etc etc etc

Nintendo actually tried with some games but the problem is the audience on the Wii (Obviously, Kid Icarus Uprising is a 3DS game, I know that), people forgot about those new IPs and only bought Mario. What are you (as a company) going ot do? Give more mario.

They also tried on the Gamecube with Pikmin and some other titles. Actually, Nintendo always gave new IPs in each console but they need to have a better marketing for those titles.

@samson-1
Exactly! Maybe Nintendo is releasing the same IPs but they know how to manage them and both New Super Mario Bros and Super Mario Bros. Wii sold almost 20M copies. I am sure Sony would love to be in Nintendo's position.

@MikeCosgrove
Kid Icarus Uprising is a completely new game and has nothing to do with the old game.

Xenoblade, Last Story, Disaster and Excite Truck WERE supported by Nintendo just like Little Big Planet (from Media Molecule) was supported by Sony (when Media Molecule wasn't even owned by Sony yet). Stop talking about something you don't know.

@wollie
Just because you don't like it, it doesn't mean it's not good.

Xenoblade is (imo) one of the 3 best RPGs this gen. Kid Icars has an amazing single player and multiplayer experience, Last Story has gorgeous graphics (for a Wii game) and an amazing story, Disaster is a crap game indeed, but at least Nintendo tried to support something new. Excite Truck was REALLY fun, the problem is that it's not a main Nintendo game, so a lot of people never played it. Pandora's Tower also has a good story and character, the gameplay is "generic" but it's a good game.

user54670074698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

First of all Kid Icarus is an old franchise not a new one

Secondly Xenoblade, Last Story, Disaster and Excite Truck wern't really supported by Nintendo. You never really heard about those games only if you were reading sites like this, least Sony, despite not having advertising like MS, still supported new games and made them known. It's the reason why Uncharted, inFAMOUS, Heavey Rain and Heavenly Sword have so much attention on them and why people always want a new installment. When you see top 10 sequels we like to see articles you never really see any of Nintendos new IPs on the list do you.

I'm not saying their bad games just that Nintendo don't really seem arsed about them the way Sony does about their new franchises.

I mean Xenoblade and the Last Story for example didn't come to America untill a year later...shows you have much Nintendo care for them if they don't want everyone to enjoy them. People had to actually beg Nintendo to release them over in the US, if no one said anything they probably wouldn't of bothered.

Just saying

EDIT:

"Stop talking about something you don't know."

ooooooo someone is getting mad.

Kid Icarus might be a brand new game but it's still an old franchise. Would you count the new dmc as a new IP...erm nope because it's still Devil May Cry despite being a new game with a new timeline.

As I said if they really supported them why did you hardly see anything on them and why did Nintendo not bother to release them over in the US. It's not like Sony refused to sell Little Big Planet over in America.

Wii Fit oh yeah...advertising EVERYWHERE, but Xenoblade....nowhere to be seen.

wollie4698d ago

"Xenoblade? Last Story? Kid Icarus Uprising? Disaster? Excite Truck? Pandora's Tower? etc etc etc"

problem is only one of those games was any good.

Xenoblade was probably one of the best game of this gen if not all time, but those others were so bad I couldn't play more than a few hours. Its not enough to make a new IP. It also has to be good.

Hisiru4698d ago Show
4698d ago
user54670074698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

@Hisiru

Ahhh the troll card after someone has just busted some real knowledge on your ass :)

"Because Nintendo of America is full of bullshit. No surprise here"

Well you've just contradicted yourself

"Xenoblade, Last Story, Disaster and Excite Truck WERE supported by Nintendo "

If they are full of bullcrap then they obviously don't care enough about their new franchises and don't care enough about them to support their new IPs

LOL Sony fanboy....what

So praising a company who is doing something right makes you a fanboy.

Mika is a few things...but I don't think she's a Sony fanboy.

"He is always trying to downplay the 3DS, Wii, WiiU and Nintendo articles in general even if it's good news "

Downplay is the same a being worried now. I just like to offer my opinion on what Nintendo are doing. Two E3s they've had in a row and they've failed to show off what the Wii U can actually do...thats not me downplaying I'm just staing a fact. It's not like I'm saying "Nintendo sucks" am I. Are you only supposed to fill an article with possisitve comments now. :|

"He is one of the worst things in this site. "

With the comments you've just made...I think your talking about yourself.

It's a shame that people with differn't opinions get called trolls now and "haters".

<sigh>

Godchild10204698d ago

Why did you assume GynGa was talking about Nintendo? What about Sega, Microsoft, Square Enix, etc...

On topic; I love how Sony always has something new up there sleeves, but I'm also worried becuase this is also the reason why they are also losing money. Some new IPs or reboots just don't take off and hurts them, but even though it does they keep on trying. That is why I love Sony.

I'm not a fanboy, I'm a gamer that owns and plays every Current gen console.

Hisiru4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

"Ahhh the troll card after someone has just busted some real knowledge on your ass :)"

The troll card after you just busted TONS of negativity in every Nintendo article.

"Well you've just contradicted yourself"
I said NINTENDO OF AMERICA and not Nintendo of Japan.

"If they are full of bullcrap them they obviously don't care about their new franchises and don't care enough to support them "

Nintendo of America =/= Nintendo of Japan

"Downplay is the same a being worried. I never downplay anything, I just like to offer my opinion on what Nintendo are doing."

Which is always a negative opinion in every Nintendo article even with good news. lol Sometimes it's even hard to have a nice conversation in good Nintendo articles because there you are, trying to make hasty assumptions which has nothing to do with the article itself. I hope you will let Nintendo supporters have some fun in good Nintendo related articles in the future, but I don't think you will change, unfortunately. There is a guy with a Mass Effect avatar which is even worse.

"Two E3s they've had in a row and they've failed to show off what the Wii U can actually do...thats not me downplaying I'm just staing a fact. It's not like I'm saying "Nintendo sucks" am I. "

Nintendo's last year E3 was very good (they even announced good 3DS games like Kid Icarus, Monster Hunter 4, Luigi's Mansion etc) but this year's E3 is one of the worst E3 (by any company) ever, so I can undestand all the negativity. They already confirmed they don't want to talk about the other features and games to avoid being copied by Sony and Microsoft yet again. They already confirmed they will talk about everything in the next conference (which is probably September) so this conference will be what we expected from E3. They actually gave a reason for the bad E3 presentation (no, I don't accept it, but they gave a reason). I will just wait for the September conference and then I will see if the WiiU is good or not.

"With the comments you've just made...I think your talking about yourself."

Heh... yeah yeah.

"It's a shame that people with differn't opinions get called trolls now and "haters"."

People full of negativity on EVERY Nintendo article (even when it's good news) is called "troll" or "hater".

@Godchild1020
Because Microsoft doesn't have old IPs and I am sure he is talking about the big 3 companies.

And yes, I also love what Sony is doing (Uncharted, Last Guardian, Last of Us, Heavy Rain, LBP and tons of new IPs) but I also love old IPs like Mario, so I will always have a Nintendo and Sony console.

-EDIT-
I have some games to play so I will just leave you guys here with your STUPID and ignorant console war. Have fun.

VanillaBear4698d ago

@Hisiru

***People full of negativity on EVERY Nintendo article (even when it's good news) is called "troll" or "hater".***

So it's just Nintendo articles you can't be negative on. Look Nintendo don't seem to know what they are doing with the Wii U, can you blame people not having any hope for them. As Mike has stated they failed to deliver two years in a row at E3.

Anyway your the one here who is making preople go off topic. You stated some bullcrap and Mike corrected you. Your the one who called him a troll and brought the term fanboy into this.

The only troll here is you man...

***I have some games to play so I will just leave you guys here with your STUPID and ignorant console war. Have fun***

Oh my god, you started this. Just because you've lost your trying to make this argument seem stupid and pointless. You know I bet in those Nintendo articles your one of them that defends the shit out of them and bashes anyones opinions if it isn't positive.

***The troll card after you just busted TONS of negativity in every Nintendo article.***

Really, every Nintendo article. I've seen Mikes comments in some Nintendo articles but not all of them and they are not trollish. They just seem like he has a lack of hope for Nintendo and as I've said who blames him, he's just one of many who feels like this.

His first comment wasn't even trolling he just pointed out why your orignal comment was full of crap.

victorGma214698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

MikeCosgrove complaining about Nintendo as always? Give me something new N4G.

user54670074698d ago

victorGma21

What the hell man...complaining, really

Give me a break

Pointing something out which is true is not complaining. It's stating a fact

I mean you joined 40 days ago...you don't even know me lol

Are you joining the bandwagon because your friend Hisiru is being called out for his ridiculous comments. Stay out of things you don't have a clue about...

Skateboard4698d ago

MikeCosgrove is owning you pretty bad : /

MaxXAttaxX4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Sony was the actual IP owner and publisher of LBP before MM became a first-party studio. So it goes beyond just "supporting".

I get what you're saying though. Nintendo of America is pretty bullshit most of the time.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4698d ago
samson-14698d ago

other companies may not of released more exclusives but they sure as hell know how to manage them and make money. I don't think they would trade places with sony at this point. Their outlook doesn't really look that great.

LostDjinn4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

You're right! Other companies wouldn't do that. Luckily we have people like you to create multiple accounts and "Spread the word". Am I right?

Edit: "other companies may not of released more exclusives but they sure as hell know how to manage them and make money. I don't think they would trade places with sony at this point. Their outlook doesn't really look that great." - Just thought I'd quote your multi-bein'-ass to "preserve " your message.;)

majiebeast4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

Warcraft 2:New troll here.

Funny how profits of a company are now more important then games for fanboys.

Lets see the history of my console is better then yours because
-Ps3 got no games.
-360 exclusives sell better.
-multiplatform games look better on 360.
-xboxlive is better because i paid for it.
-We got kinect and it sold buttloads

And now its become about profits what happens next when that gets debunked 360 is better cause our game boxes are green?

Catoplepas4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

What a sad state of affairs we've got to where people boast about profit margins rather than actual games.

It's fucking pathetic.

Mr-Dude4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

I remember it like yesterday..

1. The silly PS3 haz no games (Xbox owners laugh)
2. The PS3 has no exclusives, it will fail (Xbox owners)
3. The Ps3 is doomed (Xbox owners)
4. PS3 has failed because of the hardware (Xbox owners)
5. Sony looses money, so PlayStation will stop to exist (Xbox owners)
6. Xbox has little games ( it's okay) it's all about making profit now... (Xbox owners)
7. New IP's are not important, profit is (Xbox owners)
8. Its not about the exclusives... but the multiplatforms... Exclusives are not important (Xbox owners)

And then Xbox owners claim Sony fanboys are the worse....

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4698d ago
Rai4698d ago

its no surprise God of war came out at the end of the PS2 life cycle as well.

brettyd4698d ago

Aaaannnddd this is why I love Sony.

Run_bare4698d ago

I agree with you, SONY been with me since the release of PS1.

Show all comments (103)
170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1Victor30d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7230d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7230d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

30d ago
S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7229d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 29d ago
drivxr30d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation30d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

30d ago
DarXyde30d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50129d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer28d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 28d ago
30d ago
30d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
CrimsonWing6930d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave30d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit30d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno30d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit30d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay30d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7230d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos30d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania30d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox30d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

30d ago
Bathyj30d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

30d ago
BeHunted30d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit30d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

30d ago
drivxr30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow130d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania30d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox30d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

30d ago
S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Lightning7730d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts30d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango30d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7730d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts30d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit29d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7730d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 29d ago
Show all comments (46)
150°

PS5 shipments top 77.8 million

PlayStation 5 has shipped 77.8 million units worldwide, Sony announced in its financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

italiangamer31d ago

Perfectly in line to reach 100 million by March 2026.

Profchaos30d ago

Theys have to clear 22.2 million to do this.
When you average out the current number over 5 years it's unlikely.

If the console was going down in price it would be possible but they have not been able to reduce the cost in fact it's gone up so this is working against them.

gta Vi has also been pushed out of the financial year and there's likely millions of GTA v players still on ps5 that have not made the jump those players would for GTA vi

The overall poor market conditions and uncertainty doesn't fill me with confidence trade war, weak yen and the ongoing cost of living crisis. We're not talking core gamers picking up a new system were talking gamers who wait for the back 9 to enter a new generation.

I think 2027 they will but 100 not this year.

italiangamer30d ago

They will reach 100 million during 2026.

S2Killinit30d ago

It might actually get a boost considering that even the PS5 PRO is currently cheaper than the series x. This will of course be over soon as Im expecting a price hike for the PRO.

Travesty30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

I know Sony said they are considering raising prices.. Well as of yesterday China and the US lifted their tariffs standoff. At least for 90 days until they can agree on a trade deal that would benefit both parties. So with manufacturing in China and shipping them to the US I’m hoping it will not affect the prices.

Although I kind of doubt Sony will top 100 million since GTA 6 will be releasing next year by March. Could be wrong and I’ll be glad to be.

Xbox shooting itself in the foot or more like nailing their own coffin with rising prices. Hopefully Sony will stay put.. Ghost of Yotei is releasing for $70 still so that’s a god sign hopefully.

senorfartcushion30d ago

Is this a good thing for someone with no shares in Sony stock?

italiangamer30d ago

More PS5 on the market = higher chance of getting even more games.
It's not rocket science.

gold_drake30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

very nice.
in almost 5 years too.
some big hitters are yet to come

badz14930d ago (Edited 30d ago )

come on...don't say that! that slogan "Greatness Awaits" is haunting me everytime someone says this and yeah...1st party output has not been a highlight this gen which is a huge bummer! personally, I would rate their 1st party output this gen 4/10!

gold_drake30d ago

to be honest, when i typed it out, it did sound like a slogan for that ha