300°

Top Developers This Gen

This generation's been packed with heavy hitting games from top-tier developers. We've been on plenty of trips with Nathan Drake, courtesy of Naughty Dog. And we've saved both Ferelden and the galaxy because of the games Bioware have created. There's no doubt that this gen, developers have pushed themselves and the consoles to the max. But which developers have consistently delivered on hard-hitting, big name titles that kept us hooked until the very end?

Read Full Story >>
passionforgames.net
InactiveUser4770d ago

Out of those five I'd drop Bioware and bump Valve up.

omi25p4770d ago

id take out valve. Not because they dont make great games (they do)

But because the whole business with Half Life is just BS

guitarded774770d ago

One serious omission is That Game Company.

ExCest4770d ago

@omi25p

wow. Valve isn't a Top 5 dev because HL3 isn't coming out? Personally, I'd rather them spend more time on it to make it better. Not to push it out early and become unpolished and "crap".

da_2pacalypse4770d ago

Not sure what Bioware is doing here. Their game quality has dropped ever since they were bought out by EA.

omi25p4769d ago

No Not because Half Life isnt out. But because they havent said anything about it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4769d ago
Drake1174770d ago

For me i would just take out valve since i'm not a huge portal fan(but i know alot of ppl are) and i love the living hell out of half life 2 but that was mostly made last gen. I would add Bungie in its place.

Baka-akaB4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

Wonder why however , even if obviously to each their own ?

Most of the list added something truly outstanding , innovative this gen and/or technological marvels .

While halo might be great and successful , its novelty was last gen on the first xbox , and it did nothing impressive tech wise . Keep in mind i'm only talking about this one particular gen .

Meanwhile Portal is definitively innovative , and pushed another boundary is storytelling as well .

Ducky4770d ago

Don't have to be a fan of portal to be a fan of Valve.

They also made L4D and TF2... and HalfLife2's episodes were this gen too.

Baka-akaB4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

Indeed , but even by only counting portal , i dont see bungie being on top , ever .
He's entitled his opinion again , i just dont agree

Drake1174770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

For me L4D and TF2 aren't that big of a deal. I own both portals and they are prob the most unique games by a big dev this gen by far and away, but for some reason i can't really beat them more than once, its just kind of a one and done thing for me. I guess it all just depends on how you define a top developer. There's no doubt that the crew at Bungie has tremendous talent and they have constantly delivered big name titles that score well with the reviewers. Now if some how Valve shows up at E3 and says HL2 ep 3 is coming out early next year then i can easily say they should be in that top 5(for me).
Honestly a list of the top 5 devs this gen is a pretty tight squeeze since you could make a strong case for a lot of studios(such as Sony Santa Monica or Irrational Games) to also be on that list. I'm honestly not bothered at all by Valve being on that list and for most people they prob are top 5.

MaxXAttaxX4770d ago

Halo 1 and 2 were last gen as well. Just like Half Life 2.

So why would you put Bungie in Valve's place, when their best work was from last gen?

Drake1174769d ago

Halo 3 and reach are still good games...

MaxXAttaxX4769d ago

They are good.
But Halo 3 really wasn't much of a next-gen game compared to Halo 2.
I said their best work was Halo 1 and 2. Not that 3 or Reach weren't any good.

Shepherd 2144769d ago

Bungie is one of the top devs this gen. They added very refined features to Halo 3, such as map editing and a theater mode way before FPSs like black ops started doing it. Bungie.net also had extremely specific stat tracking and integration features for players of Halo 3 and Reach, such as heatmaps and easy render to video. These are things they didn't even have to do.

Add to that that Bungie remained extremely close to their fanbase by putting weekly news updates called the Bungie Weekly Update, weekly playlist updates to keep the gametypes fresh, a steady stream of game patches and map packs, and weekly contests and replies to fan outcries on a consistent basis. Again, things they didn't have to do and something most devs don't bother to do and if they do, not as frequently as Bungie has done it.

Bungie has spoiled me and countless other fans because I have never played another game where i felt as comfortable as I did with Bungie. Even if Bungie made a decision I didn't agree with, I knew that Bungie was at least being fair and attentive. There is no reason why Bungie shouldn't be in the top five.

humbleopinion4769d ago

Halo 3 was not only a good game, but pretty much revolutionized what games are about this generation: single player, mutliplayer full fledged campaign co-op, score metagame, full game replays and clip editing in theater mode, co-op level editing while fighting between two teams in forge mode, sharing game types, maps, movies, screenshots inside the online community, integrating the game with full fledged online statistics: from individual, to cumulative, to heatmaps, highly customizable multiplayer game settings down to the scoring policy: Halo 3 is one of the earliest and richest example of how much content a game should offer and how it should integrate with its innovative community online system.

Many developers have followed suit at least partially, and some have even topped them in specific offerings. But even today there aren't many games that are capable of delivering the same amount of content Halo 3 already delivered 5 years ago. Compared to how innovative Halo 3 was, even Halo Reach was only a marginal improvement.

Drake117 is actually right in some aspects: Half Life 2 is indeed a last gen game (released at the same time as Halo 2 and even available for the original Xbox), and even (the awesome) Left 4 Dead which people mention here was actually developed by Turtle Rock Studios - so the credit should go to them. Valve themselves should be thanked mostly for the portal games (which are kind of a very strong point on their own) and the newer Orange box components (TF2, EP2).

Both companies should appear on such a list, probaby instead of Rockstar because counting their games (GTA, RDR and Max Payned 3) is basically ignoring the fact that there are multiple different studios under the Rockstar Umbrella, so that's not really a fair count.

I also find it weird how Epic isn't mentioned here: not only did the revolutionize the third-person shooter this gen with one of the most highly critically acclaimed trilogies, but they also did a tremendous step forward with their Unreal engine, which became something much more than just running Unreal Tournament and other few games: Mass Effect, Batman, Bioshock, Gears of War, Borderlands, Mirrors Edge, Lost Oddysey, Mortal Kombat, Shadow Complex, Rainbow 6 Vegas, Tribes Ascend and countless others in various genres are running on top of Unreal Engine, so we should at least partially thank Epic for all of these games.

Shepherd 2144769d ago

humbleopinion said it way better than I did, and he is especially right about Epic.

Everyone misunderstand "best developer" and "best game". People want to praise Santa Montica simply because they're game had good graphics and was a good game, but that can have little to do with the developers personality. Did they dev innovate? Did they pack all of their games with content? Were they close and responsive to their fanbase? These are questions that you need to ask when choosing a top dev, otherwise it would be yet another "top five games" list. A game can blow you away with story or graphics but if you don't hear from the developer for months at a time, that should tell you something.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4769d ago
ATi_Elite4770d ago

Nintendo - Mario Zelda Metroid but Nintendo brought motion control and innovation to gaming that we haven't seen in a while. You can NEVER leave Nintendo of a top Dev list.

Blizzard - WoW expansions, Starcraft 2, Diablo III, HUGE Pro-Gaming Sponsor and Blizzard makes a Billion dollars yearly even though only a lousy 10.8 million (down from 12.5m) people play WoW!!

Naughty Dogg - Uncharted series has brought a level of quality to consoles that NO ONE can deny. ND just does some many thing right with this series that you CAN NOT DENY it!

Bioware - Mass Effect alone has Bioware on the list but add in Dragon Age and The Old Republic plus Jade Empire and Bioware has been all the rage this Gen

Rockstar - Too much quality Too much diversity too many Big name titles. Rockstar pushes the boundaries every time out!!

Valve - There still is NO such thing as "a Bad Valve Game". Between the games themselves and the all the Mods I could play on the Source engine all year and never play the same game twice. In the Gen of the FPS NO ONE has consistently done it better and with more innovation and diversity than Valve.

Not on the List
Bethesda - Bugthesda has quality issues but makes OUTSTANDING games.

GSC Game World - STALKER series my personnel favorite and greatest innovative game this gen but they have the Bug issue too.

SilentNegotiator4769d ago

Rockstar? Blech. A bunch of over-rated games with clunky controls, boring worlds, and not a single like-able character in sight.

Ducky4769d ago (Edited 4769d ago )

The controls being clunky is something that I can agree with... but Rockstar has some of the most human characters around. Being like-able is based on personal taste, but most of the characters were characterized pretty well.

RDR brought the wild west to life, and the GTA series has done a consistent job of creating a breathing world. I don't really see many devs topping them on those areas.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4769d ago
jamesensor4769d ago (Edited 4769d ago )

Not many games launched but they do improve their few games to the best. It should be on the list by all means. Better a perfected game than a shallow and buggy one released one after the other to engross numbers. (Enhanced Editions of The Witcher that they released for example, shows care and perfectionism)

AnotherProGamer4770d ago

I'm sorry but Bethesda doesn't deserve that title. their games are not up to the polish of games made rockstar, valve, or Naughty Dog.

GamingPerson4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

My top 10 not in order.
R*.
Nuaghty Dog.
Valve(portal 2 = 35,000+ puzzles).
CD Projeckt Red.
BioWare.
Creative Assembly.
The original Infinity Ward.
Frictional Games - indie true horror games.

Btehesda - buggy game but offers unlimited replay value on pc(85,000 mods) & anyone completely mad at them is a ps3 only player so I can't speak on that since I don't have ps3 version. I stop playing R* games after 2 months & will be playing skyrim maybe for a year or 2 years after graphics mods.

Arena Net - loved Guild Wars 2 beta.

I am sure to get thumbs down for the ps3 part though I play on ps3 and am a pc & ps3 fanboy. lol :(

Also nothing from MS.

Lilioups4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

so u played ONE freaking beta for lets say 8hours and u now you say arenanet is one of the best studios THIS GEN ????

a whole beta in a whole freaking gen ???

this guy is funny lol

ExCest4770d ago

@Lilioups

Opinions, bro. Besides, Guild Wars is a really good game. And Arena Net is one of those companies that makes MMOs that aren't pay-to-win. So credit goes to them. (But I personally don't think they are worthy of my top 10.)

dark-hollow4770d ago

or maybe because their games are bigger than gta iv, uncharted and portal combined.

4770d ago
InTheLab4770d ago

Define bigger? Because the world of Skyrim is sparsely populated compared to a GTA or even a Assassin's Creed. Add that to how long it takes to get from point A to B and sure, Skyrim seems enormous. But you can walk for an hour and never see a soul.

There's also a distinct lack of variety with items. On Daedric axe enchanted with Fire looks exactly like the one enchanted with Soul Eater...and named that named axe dropped in that cave from some boss. Same thing with all weapons and armor. There's no variety to weapons or armor and I know this because I have them all via console commands on PC.

There's only a handful of voice actors as the same dude that's giving you a quest to save his chickens sounds exactly like the Jarl of Whiterun who sounds like the shop owner who sounds like the Blacksmith.

Skyrim is less than 5 gigs of data while those games you listed are twice that amount. Kingdoms Of Amalur is also a big game and it's no where close to being as buggy as Skyrim. I've played 40+ hours of Kingdoms and never had to worry about saving every 5 minutes. Same thing with the Witcher

Having a big game is no excuse for being a sloppy developer..

Ducky4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

^ Neither GTA nor Assassins Creed have a comparably large numbers of NPCs that you can talk/interact with compared against TES/Fallout.

When you say there's no variety in items, what other game are you comparing it to? Certainly not GTA/AC I hope.

The sound cast is small compared to the number of NPCs, but their newer games have improved that. It's par for the course for an open-world game. (Skyrim has like 80 voice actors?)

Amount of data is mostly a meaningless point because it doesn't have a direct link with anything. RAGE is over 20gb in size, yet it doesn't have a whole lot to do in its world.

On consoles, Bethesda is one of the few developers that make these large games where you can explore a large map, interact with many NPCs, complete quests using different approaches, all while keeping track of all the changes that you make to the game world. A 'sloppy developer' wouldn't be able to do those things.

On PC, Bethesda is one of the few devs to still offer SDK. I'm happy with that.

european_cannon4770d ago

Naughty Dog makes interactive movies now, not games, like Bethesda. And ND can't even tell a story right as Uncharted 3 was a complete mess, not to mention a complete bore to play through.

Bethesda is eaisly the best Dev this gen even with bugs, followed by Valve and Rockstar.

Lilioups4770d ago

hate more plz here have some cookies....

naughty dog do great G.A.M.E.S

eat that..accept the facts that they are the top 3 studios this gen and go take a walk stupid hater

Hicken4769d ago

Bugs make them HORRIBLE devs; that should be as easy to see as it should be to spell "easily."

thatgamecompany is my #1 They've only done three games, but they showed me a side of gaming in those three titles that no one else has even come close to. Up until this point, Valkyria Chronicles has been my favorite game this generation, but the more I think about it, the more Journey deserves that position.

After them, I'd probably say Naughty Dog is number two... and then it'd be a toss-up for any companies after them.

smashcrashbash4769d ago (Edited 4769d ago )

Oh please don't even start. Bethesda doesn't get a free pass for making buggy, glitchy games. At least ND makes games that don't need a million patches to fix it. And the long overblown things that Bethesda makes that you call 'story' is a joke.

And the characters with the creepy staring eyes that barely look human. At least ND knows how to animate a characters and make them look like something besides lifeless dummies. People where concerned about Drake and the crew.Who were the characters in Bethesda's games? Did anyone even care about what was happening while they were out picking daisies, doing stupid tasks for lazy peasants and searching for plants?

They make huge worlds and can't even make you care about what was happening to the world or the fact that it was being destroyed. Stop the ND makes movies BS for the love of god. Just because your head is so far up Bethesda's @$$ that you can't see how careless and half @$$ed they do their games doesn't mean we all are.

Nimblest-Assassin4768d ago

So Bethesda gets a free pass for releasing buggy games, and can be called the best dev's for releasing an unfinished product? What a world

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4768d ago
Chitown712914770d ago

Yea definitely Rockstar and Naughty Dog for me....

Waddy1014770d ago

My Top Developers this Gen are in no particular order:
Valve
Bungie
Naughty Dog
Rockstar
Bioware

Bungie deserve that spot more than Bethesda, Bungie are one of the best developers out there for listening to fan feedback.

MrMister4770d ago (Edited 4770d ago )

Ah yes Bungie--whoring out the Halo franchise so much that they had to finally leave MS because of the franchise abuse. I mean look at COD: Fan feedback is the reason why games like that never evolve. Developers need to innovate and the fans need to either accept it, or move on. Anything is better than conformity and a stale lack of innovation/creativity.

Waddy1014769d ago

I'm sorry but how did Bungie "Whore out" the Halo franchise? They released 5 games in 10 years.
They didn't leave MS because of franchise abuse, they decided to stop making Halo games because they wanted to move onto something different.

Show all comments (92)
140°

More Read Dead Voice Actors Hint at a Big Announcement

The voice actors for Arthur Morgan and Charles Smith have vaguely confirmed a claim by Rob Wiethoff (voice of John Marston) that big news related to the Red Dead franchise will be coming "before Friday."

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
lukasmain17h ago

I hope it's a remake of the 1st game. But it's probably just the PS5 version of Red Dead Redemption 2

OtterX13h ago

I hope a PS5 upgrade launches on the same day as announcement & it costs no more than $10. I already bought the Ultimate Edition once, they got good money from me.

I stopped playing completely 2 years ago until they did 60fps. I really didn't expect it would take this long & I didn't want to start completely over on PC.

dmonee2h ago

My wish is that its optimized for current gen machines, with some sort of story expansion. Undead nightmare 2! My 2nd wish is that it just shadow drops on the day of the announcement!.

Lionsguard2h ago

Give me my RDR2 Undead Nightmare already.

Show all comments (7)
220°

John Marston Voice Actor Teases "Exciting" Red Dead Redemption News

During a livestream on his personal Twitch channel, Rob Wiethoff (who voices John Marston in the Red Dead Redemption series) hinted at "exciting news" to be revealed next week. According to Wiethoff, the news will be announced "before Friday".

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
jznrpg2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

PS5/Pro/Switch 2 version of RDR2 seems most likely. I’d love a RDR3 but that seems years away

Cacabunga1d 22h ago

Id be happy for just a 60fps patch

OmegaSoldati1d 21h ago (Edited 1d 21h ago )

Agreed, but at the same time RD2 came out in 2018. Could it be a remake of Red Dead 1?

Spoiler:

Marston died in the end of Red Dead and Red Dead 2 is set before that. Im curious now. What news could it be?

mkis0071d 14h ago

I'm pretty sure the next game will be another prequel as the story really has no where to go as far as being a western after red dead redemption. The next game will end with the ferry boat incident.

Profchaos1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Their contracts are iron clas if they leak anything legit they are threatened with immense legal action.

My hopes for what this is are minimal its probably a meet and greet with the cast

I dont see why they would be involved in a upgraded version of rdr2 when the dialogue hasn't changed

thorstein1d 20h ago

He seems to have been cleared to do this as he purposely picked up the game, streamed it, and made the announcement.

140°

50 Best PS3 Games of All Time

The PlayStation 3 is Sony’s most interesting home console ever, but what’s most interesting of all is trying to nail down the very best games on a console with hundreds of incredible games. Let’s give it a shot.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
darthv72106d ago

Personally, I'd rank Pacific Rift in my top 10. It's the best of the series.

badz149106d ago

We desperately need Motorstorm back. Evolution is no more though and this makes me sad

Cacabunga106d ago

Sly Thieves in Time
Stay the Party
Portal 2
Dj Hero
Demon’s Souls
God of war Ascension

rudero105d ago

2 of those games got railed through the “gaming media” during release.
Sly and god of war.
Both of which were fantastic games.

Cacabunga105d ago

Ascension is VERY underrated. Remake please!

Venoxn4g106d ago

Decent list.. I would put the Castle Crashers as well..

1Victor106d ago

Yes it’s a decent list of popular games with a heavy hand on FPS and no Warhawk or Starhawk 2 of the best games (not sale wise) on ps3.
I would buy a Starhawk again even if it didn’t have a graphics upgrade hell I would even take a new one with micro transactions 😱🤯

Profchaos106d ago

I've noticed a recent nostalgia for the PS3 and I don't get it for me it's been my least favourite generation to date and I've been gaming since the NES I just feel like the ambition of the developers outweighed the capabilities of the consoles so I remember lots of games running in the lower end of 20fps range and I remember for the first time ever actually disliking the duelshock 3 and it's curved triggers

Sure there were some standouts and great games but that's the only gen I switched entirely to PC gaming

darthv72106d ago

Maybe the recent nostalgia is because pretty much all of its games are trapped on that console. People want to play them on more modern hardware. hell... if XB can do it then so can Sony. there are competent emulators out there that can run on PS4/5 hardware but Sony just wont let them become official... why is that?

If we are talking least favorite generations (personally) then this one is certainly mine. i had more fun playing 8th, 7th and 6th gen stuff than 9th. And it isnt like i dont have access to do so... the heavy hitters just havent shown up anywhere close to those previous gens. The few here and there just doesnt cut it compared to the likes of constant good games that showed up in 6th, 7th and 8th gen. hell.... I'll even throw in 5th gen has been better than this one.

Profchaos106d ago

I tend to agree there's lots of amazing games locked to the PS3 like GTA IV or mgs 4 but then again my issue was never with the content the PS3 had but rather it's performance many other people have said the PS3 felt like it couldn't walk and chew bubblegum at the same time using PSN and downloading a game could take a few minutes to just start a download.

I typically don't worry all that much about performance I've never had a problem with games that run at 30 but games like crysis 2, Skyrim are good examples where the performance was so unstable you would never even touch the top of the frame cap and the hitching was worse than say Goldeneye on the n64

I think emulation is more than possible on the ps5 though it's just that Sony has no incentive to rush it's development it will likely be a ps6 feature if it ever happens at all.

But yeah the 9th gen has been so bad from a content perspective thats a given I see constant articles where people are frequently expressing their disappointment around the industry as a whole right now to much live service competition that sinks longstanding studios and consumes Devs time less ambition and games cost so much to make they have to play it safe.

The 5th gen was easily better than the 9th we had some all time greats crash, Spyro, Tony hawk, mgs, Mario,64, Goldeneye, Mario kart 64 the list goes on. The 5th gave us a new dimension and I remember being blown away by how much more open gaming had become the 4th gen with the mega drive and SNES was great and very easy to still revisit some of the greatest games of all time came out like earthbound, secret of mana, sonic , Mario world etc but saving our games was still not a standard function or a given so gaming was still evolving but it was very impressive to see some of the tricks Devs used like dithering to give us new experiences those earlier gens limitations bred innovation.

Michiel1989105d ago

if XB can do it so can sony? I didn't know xbox had a cell processor in their older consoles, that's the reason why ps3 was so cool, but also the reason why games are hostage there and no, xbox did nothing similar even though their backward compatbility is good, they always had a similar architecture to their consoles.

darthv72105d ago

Sorry Michael... I guess you missed the obvious part where i said there are already emulators out that do this. and that is what XB is doing... emulators for OG and 360 games. Its why the full slate is not BC on XBO/Series.

coolbeans105d ago (Edited 105d ago )

The list is missing Folklore.

Show all comments (16)