160°

Shadow of the Colossus Director Named

The PlayStation 2's magnum opus is taking a step closer to hitting the big screen.

Josh Trank, whose previous credits include Chronicle, is taking the helm of the Sony Pictures backed movie. Whether Shadow of the Colossus makes any further moves towards theatres or fades away into obscurity (as so many video game movies have done in the past) remains to be seen. Trank is currently working on a reboot of the Fantastic Four and on a Venom spinoff so it may be some time before we get any concrete details for photography or even a script.

Read Full Story >>
addicted-gamers.com
Agent Smith4784d ago

Not a bad director. Loved Chronicle a lot more than I thought I would

h311rais3r4783d ago

Chronicle was surprisingly good. It was funny had good effects and believable characters. A little clIche but hey what isn't these days :/

fantasygamer4784d ago

Cool hopefully hes a fan of the game and doesn't try turning it into something different.

user54670074784d ago (Edited 4784d ago )

No offense but the guys done one film and did some stuff for The Kill Point

I don't understand how Sony can take a chance with something highly rated as Shadow of the Colossus with a no name director who lets be honest got lucky with Chronicle...it was good but not that good, but when it comes to the Uncharted movie they can't even take that kind of chance and give Nolan, Emily and Richard their parts...hell not even let Amy Hennig write the film or at least rewrite the game script for Uncharted Drakes Fortune to suit the big screen

Come on Sony

Agent Smith4783d ago

What's the problem with him doing one film? David O. Russell was on board to direct the Uncharted film and he's made many great films like Three Kings and The FIghter, and yet everyone was tearing him apart.

Warner Bros. let Christopher Nolan take the chance to reboot Batman with Batman Begins even though he was only known for his cult classic movie Momento, but now every movie he makes are all well received.

user54670074783d ago

and...

David O Russel didn't have the interest for the film thats why no one liked his vision for Uncharted. He's an arsehole

Warner Bros didn't give him the chance, they give him the job to do it since he seemed like the best. He prooved himself

I'm just saying Sony are so quick to take a chance for this guy and yet people like Nolan who have been with them for years is a big no no

Hardly fair...

PirateThom4784d ago

He doesn't have enough experience.

Bigbangbing4784d ago

No one does for a SotC movie..

Because there shouldn't be one, SotC is a game, a gem, it tells a story not by dialog, but through an experience that only a game could provide. Wonder if Ueda is involved in this..

Just imagine, Wander chit-chatting with the colossi. Please don't ruin such a masterpiece..

Hicken4784d ago

Depending on who does it, they may well do it like the game: almost no dialogue. It would be like Wall-e: the best part was the first half, when there was virtually no talking.

I think SotC lends itself to the big screen easily, provided the studio stays VERY close to the source material. That means not a lot of talking, not a bunch of stuff added, minimal deviations from the original. Done right, it can fill 90 minutes, at least.

smashcrashbash4784d ago (Edited 4784d ago )

Well for it to be a movie they have to change it at least a little. Watching a movie with no talking and just slowly searching for a Colossus one at a time may not exactly be an attraction for everyone. They are going to have to spice it up at least a little.

@ MikeCosgrove.I think you are being overly harsh. How is Chronicle just getting lucky? Why couldn't to be he had a good idea and executed it properly? Do you also think the people who made their first movie were also lucky that it worked? Everyone was a 'no named director' at some point in their life.Besides with the notorious way game movies always end up do you really believe that they could get any high end director to do this.

Show all comments (21)
130°

10 Legendary Games That Still Absolutely Crush It in 2025

Discover 10 timeless video games from the past that remain absolutely playable today. From Chrono Trigger to DOOM, these classics have aged like fine wine!

Read Full Story >>
gamegeeked.com
anast49d ago

Simon's Quest is better than Symphony.

djl348548d ago

If you're gonna troll, at least make a legitimate attempt.

Levii_9249d ago

Hot damn that's a good list. The only one i never played is AOE2 and i never finshed Chrono Trigger but it was damn good.

Speaking of what's old but holds up amazingly well and plays like a dream.. i played Symphony of the Night for the first time in 2019.. yep that's right. It became one of my favourite games of all time that i replay almost every year. I couldn't believe how good it was. That is almost impossible for me with newer games let alone older ones. Truly a special gem.

LG_Fox_Brazil48d ago

That's a pretty fucking great list

__y2jb48d ago (Edited 48d ago )

The only one I’d disagree with is doom. It shows its age badly I think. After 5 minutes of play these days you put it down.

Show all comments (8)
110°

PS2 Games That Hold Up Brilliantly

The PS2 is one of the most celebrated consoles of all time, and what makes it better is that a lot of its games have managed to age better than most.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
badboyz09209d ago

Wayyy to many games to list but the first 3 that popped in my head.
1.Okami
2.ESPN NFL 2K5
3.GTA San Andreas

DarXyde209d ago

Good list, but I would replace Onimusha with a Onimusha 2.

Amplitude209d ago

Amplitude still holds up brilliantly

Agent75209d ago

I'd say Onimisha 2 and Turismo 4 was better. Maximo, Auto Modellista, Shox, Wipeout Fusion and pulse, Virtua Fighter 4 Evolution to name a few.

piroh215d ago

There's too many games to choose from

No Metal geat solid 1,2,3,4?
No Resident evil?
No Silent hill?
No Midnight club 3?
No NfS Underground 2?
No Final Fantasy?
No Burnout 3?
No Dragon quest 8?
No Days gone?
No Ace combat?
No Tekken/Soul calibur?......
just from the top of my head

PS1 era was full of great RPGs, PS2 was racing generation i would pick top 200 and even that would be just a fraction.

FinalFantasyFanatic215d ago

30 is way too low over the entire history of Playstation, I just wouldn't be able to narrow it down that much, I would pick 100 at least.

Storm23215d ago

Yeah...really odd list. I get that it is personal preference and I love most of the games listed, but my list would definitely be different. I agree though, it would be incredibly difficult to come up with just 30.

lockedongamer1215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

I only picked first-party titles. Otherwise, I agree!

EDIT: Except for Days Gone, I don't get the love for it but you do you!

Chocoburger205d ago

I didn't like Days Gone either, it doesn't deserve to be on any best of list.

215d ago
214d ago
53d ago