210°

Play: Ninja Gaiden II Review 9.5/10

There are some camera difficulties, but they're infrequent and hardly major. The difficulty is pure; there is no "cheap" in this game and there is no luck, it's all fair play and it's all beatable by calculation and reaction. NG2 is the perfect fighting-action game, it is the ultimate gaming challenge for 2008, and it's one of the best looking 'gore games' ever created.

If you want to know why Master Ninja level NG players give no respect to anyone who hasn't achieved this level of action-gaming perfection, you must become one yourself.
BIoodmask - contributor
Published: 544 days 1 hour ago | Review | Xbox 360
 
 

Showing: 1 - 34 of 34 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
BIoodmask - 544 days 1 hour ago
1 - I'm pretty sure
this is the highest rating Ninja Gaiden 2 has gotten so far. I think it is a great game, but the original on the Xbox was also one of my favorites.

I just miss games that took true gaming skills to beat. It seems like a lot of developers are dumbing down the difficulty of games to suit the casual crowd.

Hopefully Itagaki can get the rights to the Ninja Gaiden and Dead or Alive IPs since Tecmo seems to be going down the toilet. Then part 3 would be just as good.
Shut this user up Let user speak
vitz3 - 544 days 1 hour ago
1.1 -
No. I hope this is the last game Itagaki makes. His perverted ass should be in the unemployment line up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GUNS N SWORDS - 544 days 1 hour ago
1.2 - having thoughts about women daily is not abnormal
you should ask your doctor.........he'll probably say, "what's a matter sone don't you get the usual symptoms when you see large knockers.........sh!t I do"
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mc Fadge - 544 days ago
1.3 - Maybe so.
But sexually harassing them is another matter entirely
Shut this user up Let user speak
Legend - 543 days 17 hours ago
1.4 - Mc Fadge...
You do know he was found innocent in a court of law, don't you?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Legend - 543 days 15 hours ago
1.5 - HA! Disagrees!
I guess I should have provided a link for you idiots. Nice to see ostriches have learned both English and how to type.

Here: http://www.1up.com/do/newsS...

And Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 544 days 1 hour ago
2 -
He won't be able to get the rights, but he said he didn't want to make NG anymore since this was supposedly the definitive one. My friend let me borrow his 360, and I'm playing this right now. It's really fun, and the gameplay is better than ever, and it's great seeing all the bodies laying there with limbs scattered all over the place, but there are some problems. Namely the camera is horrible ofc, and there's lots of little things that tend to add up like why can't the blood stick to a surface? This definitely isn't the perfect NG, and could use more work. For NG 3 I'd like to see slowed down because the eye/mind doesn't have time to comprehend the action at this speed. It's just flashes, and limbs flying everywhere. This would also help the camera out a lot, which would still need to be improved. I'd like it to be more realistic in the action I guess. Still a great game if you don't want to think a lot, and just want to have fun.

I think the meta score is pretty accurate.
Shut this user up Let user speak
1stKnighT - 544 days ago
2.1 -
"For NG 3 I'd like to see slowed down because the eye/mind doesn't have time to comprehend the action at this speed"

You noob! ;)
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 544 days ago
2.2 -
Sorry but any slower and it's no longer Ninja Gaiden.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 544 days ago
2.3 -
Sorry, but any slower, and it'd be like the last one, but I'm talking about an even slower more realistic looking NG than that, but still having Ryu take on incredible odds. I've been playing NG since the NES days, and it's changed drastically so they can do what they want with the series at this point as long as it still has Ryu, and it's an action game it will be a NG game.

It's like the bs cgi action in movies these days where it's just shaky cam jumbled flashing images, and you can't really make out what's going on. If you remembered the good old days with the special effects work where it actual looked real, and you could see everything that was happening than you'd know how much this hollywood trickery bs they've got going on these days is such a rip.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nervz - 544 days ago
3 -
The game felt rushed, the serious framerate issues (matrix style) and bad visuals makes one think that Itagaki-sun wanted it out the door really quick so he can quit the business, which he did.

Just doesn't seem polished.

honestly expected more. the Story is still bad, but as always the gameplays perfect.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DARK WITNESS - 544 days ago
3.1 -
it hurts me to say this, heart breaking, i am a big NG fan but i have to say i agree with you.

i was least impressed with the visuals, the character models are good, but the environments oh my !

please someone take the time to look round the NY stage at the beginning. look at the cars on the street, look at the lighting and buildings.

maybe i am the only one, but i just think they look horrible ! Before you slam me, go back and play it again and look carefully then give your honest opinion.

I still love the combat and action, i didn't like the story as much as the first one.

I will always hold NG above DMC in terms of gameplay.

but i really did expect more from it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
1stKnighT - 544 days ago
3.2 -
"please someone take the time to look round the NY stage at the beginning. look at the cars on the street, look at the lighting and buildings."

Who really cares on how the cars look? It's Ninja Gaiden. And from reading most of the reviews and playing the game. The gameplay is second to none. And that's what Ninja Gaiden is known for.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 544 days ago
3.3 -
It definitely could have used more time, but it some of the visuals were extremely striking especially the first level. It's certainly the best looking one yet, and all the environments are much cooler than the last one. I thought the blood was the funniest part since it doesn't attach to the environment it just stuck in mid air sometimes. Some of the bosses are a bit silly too like that corny looking metal flouting train like thing that's just poorly designed, and not even fun to fight. Then the cutscene it explodes, but doesn't even make a real explosion sound. It sounds more like a small bottle rocket going off. Just little things like that seem to add up in this game to where you can tell it was rushed, but still a quality title with still the best combat system in the genre.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DARK WITNESS - 543 days 23 hours ago
3.4 -
@ 1stKnighT

Yes its NG 2 ! Its NG 2 on the 360 ! it should look like a 360 game. The very fact that its NG2 means it should be setting a standard in every department.

Yes the gameplay is great. but there are lots of other games that have great gameplay AND great visuals !

i expected and wanted NG2 to look head and shoulders above its rivals ! sadly it didn't. i have played it and finished it on 2 of the difficulty settings.

Just because i am a NG fan, or indeed a 360 fan, does not mean i won't call out a game when it should have delivered more.

I won't lie to myself and pretend that all that matters is gameplay when it suits me just so i can block out the fact that the game looks like crap !

if the game looked great, then everyone would be praising its visuals and saying how it destroys the competition ( and it should have ) but then when its not looking great we play the " oh looks don't matter card... "

NG black on the old xbox had the gameplay And it looked way, way ahead of its time. it was by far one of the best looking xbox games ! i expected NG 2 to set the same standard all round !
Shut this user up Let user speak
ta1snake - 544 days ago
4 -
Just wondering. How many you guys are there actually beat Ninja Gaiden on elite level?^^
Shut this user up Let user speak
DARK WITNESS - 544 days ago
4.1 -
my brother has ! well, i think he has. if you want to check send a friend request to DARK PROJECT 1X and view his achievments.
4.2 poopface1 | 543 days 4 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
badkolo - 544 days ago
5 -
this is far better then the first, its more focused, seems easy and gets harder, the bosses seem really hard but all have a pattern, the tests of valor really help you get your skills in check, graphically its up there and its fast as hell, the fighting engine is superb.

The only issue is the camera and to me its not an issue at all, learn how to play and learn how to fix the camera while playing, the button is there for a reason. I would say the camera is a bother once every stage during a battle where the camera throws off its position of where you are in the fight but its fo a second while you fight or get out of the position your in..
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nervz - 544 days ago
6 - Dark witness
Can't agree more...everything felt rushed, from constant boss battles, boring and lifeless background settings, with silly looking bosses. The visuals were very bad, atleast in my opinion, i recall a review saying it looked like a PS2 game (concerning backgrounds).

the framerate would drop SOOO low that its almost unplayable. it just feels cheap and i hate to say it..cause i'm a huge NG fan.

its no doubt because itagaki was leaving the business. otherwise i couldn't come up with a better reason, bc NG1 was quality.

but like i said, the gameplay is still unmatched and very good.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DARK WITNESS - 543 days 23 hours ago
6.1 -
once again, i was kind of thinking the same thing.

correct me if am wrong on this; but wasn't NG2 only revealed at the beginning of this year. And i remember an interview in which Itagaki said the game was about 60% complete. so, if thats true then it means they finished 40% of the game in about 5 months. it came out first week June, but keep in mind they normally give a game a week or two when it goes gold. so it must have been finished in may.

now, i am no dev, but looking the normal time it takes to make a game, i would say i think it was rushed.

looking at what happened straight after, i can't help but feel maybe that had something to do with it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 543 days 23 hours ago
7 -
This game is not in anyway a 9.5 but more like an 8.2.It's a very good game and one that every action fan should buy but it has it's problems namely super terrible story, lame cutscenes and not so good a camera.Framerate is good but once it dipped on me in chapter 11 and it was almost unplayable for around 5 minutes.

But as i said it's still a great game.Graphics are good and the combat is a 10 out of 10.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 543 days 23 hours ago
7.1 -
Funny someone trying to tell me what NG stands for then goes, and complains about the story. NG has never had a deep or quality story for that matter. It's about darn time though. Hopefully for the next one.
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 543 days 23 hours ago
7.2 -
Well don't know what your getting at but if it's about my previous comment then i stand by it.I feel the speed for NG2 was perfect for a next gen adaptation of the series and please don't call NG Sigma because that was basically a port of a last gen game NG Black.The speed and the combat truly set this game apart from previous version and also other games in the genre.I doubt the combat would have felt so special without that pace.

Yes we know that NG story is always bad but even if every other aspect of the game was great i still won't give the a game a 9.5 if the story sucks.9.5 is almost perfection and a game without a reasonably good story to me does not warrant anything more than a 8.8 - 9.0.

Anyway thats just my opinion.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 543 days 22 hours ago
7.3 -
Dude if the camera can't even keep up with the gameplay then something needs to be done. It's just not cool if you can't see it. It's really as simple as that.
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 543 days 22 hours ago
7.4 -
The camera is not a big problem for me as much as the other problems are.Actually i can even go to say i only had a problem with the camera twice while having a boss fight.Maybe i am very quick at hitting the right trigger to reset camera and also my thumb is constantly adjusting the cam with the second analog.

For me the camera problem comes from the rushed production not the pace of the game.Giving extra dev time the cam could have been sorted.But it seems unlikely any extra dev time could have happened considering the problems itagaki is having with tecmo.I feel at a point he did not care and released it in order to get out of tecmo ASAP.
Shut this user up Let user speak
green - 543 days 21 hours ago
7.5 -
If they made the camera focus on the bosses instead of every other but the boss during boss battles it would have been easier.Boss battles can be a pain during boss fights due to the camera.
Shut this user up Let user speak
juuken - 543 days 21 hours ago
8 -
I have yet to play this game once I get my 360 so I'll reserve my judgment until then.
9 otherZinc | 543 days 20 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
dachiefsman - 543 days 19 hours ago
10 -
the combat is awesome, to bad the story, and camera brought this game out of the elite level.

I kind of like the framerate issues when there was a lot of enemies on screen. It was awesome seeing limbs, torsos, and heads fly in slo-mo.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lord Vader - 543 days 19 hours ago
11 -
I do think it was a big mistake not to improve the camera this time around. 75% of the time I take a hit is from some d!ck off camera I cannot even see (like all the other NG's). I'd rather have a better camera then even better graphics or storyline in NG's case (does anyone care about the story in a NG action game ?).

But yeah, the weapons & gameplay are unmatched & obviously what makes the game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mad_Rhetoric - 541 days 15 hours ago
12 - its the game engines fault really
They were using the old last gen engine ftom NG1 I think, If they would have used a nex gen engine built for the 360 this game would have turned out much better, and I really hope they do make another NG game with it(I know Itagaki said he wouldn't but still)
Shut this user up Let user speak
name - 541 days 15 hours ago
13 -
Play gives everything at least a 9/10. Even lair =/
14 poopface1 | 541 days 2 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News