Approvals 11/3 ▼
Abriael (4) - 3359d ago Cancel
antbolton89 (2) - 3359d ago Cancel
360ICE (1) - 3359d ago Cancel
chrish1990 (2) - 3359d ago Cancel
HotMess (2) - 3359d ago Cancel
400°

You can now upgrade your sub account to a master account

I'm happy to announce the introduction of a long requested feature to your PlayStation experience.

SEN sub account holders who are over 18 can now upgrade their existing account to a master account!

Read Full Story >>
community.eu.playstation.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
No ! in the title unless part of an official game name, please remove. + When copying text from the source article make sure you read over the text and edit it if necessary. A good example is when a site writes "We" or "I" , as this should then be replaced with the site's or person's name, or you can quote the source.
Emilio_Estevez3359d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community3359d ago
Changed: title
Iltapalanyymi3359d ago
Fro_xoxo3359d ago (Edited 3359d ago )

Almost over a decade later ..

At the very least, it is now done..

Up next..

Let people change names, and region.

These features will probably not see the light of day till PS5.

JimmyHACK3359d ago

HAHA!! I just knew the first comment would be complaining about name changing.

StormLegend3359d ago

I would love to change my name, but that's meh to me. I'm alright with what I picked. You guys should be the same. I don't want everyone on my friends list changing their names.

Joda3358d ago

You damn straight it is. $50 a year and I can't even do something simple like change my gamer Id?? It's bad enough watching an enemy die before the bullet hits them in the ps versions of call of duty but I can't change my damn name!?! That's just plain dumb.

Even steam can change it........REPETEDLY, and they're a free service. Xbox charges but hey sony could to. I just don't understand the reasoning. So primitive. Stuff like that make me avoid psn. I have 21 platinums sony but I wanna change my name sushi yoshida! Lay off a couple of free indies and give me at least ONE name change, and not that Facebookcrap.

DanielGearSolid3359d ago

You have to chill!

We're making progress!

MegaRay3359d ago

I dont think it would be PS5 in 2025. More like PS6 or PS now right now

Christopher3359d ago

Only 8 years since inception, but, yeah, very long overdue.

I'm not sure they'll ever do name changes. I think that's why they implemented the "real name" feature on PS4. I think it's too much of a security risk for them that they don't want to manage the possibility of someone hacking and changing someone's name, let alone other information, and then deal with someone trying to get the account back.

ipach3359d ago

has that an issue on Steam and XBL?

Christopher3359d ago

@ipach: I know, but I'm just trying to think of it from Sony's perspective. I don't agree with it, but I think they're more concerned with doing it and then dealing with any issues like that happening. There could be some old technology issue, but I can't think of it. I'm just not sure. But, if it hasn't happened yet, I'm not sure it ever will.

ifistbrowni3358d ago

Wait, wha...?

You think its less of a security risk to reveal you full name to online strangers than to change an online gamertag?

Your PSN_ID has nothing to do with logging in. When you log into the PSN anywhere (website, vita, ps3, ps4) it never asks for your psn_ID. It asks for your email and password.

So, if someone hijacked your account, changing your PSN_ID wouldn't do anything. Your account would still be attached to your email/password until the "hacker" changed that information.

So, yeah. That's no defense to why Sony shouldn't implement name changes.

Christopher3358d ago

***You think its less of a security risk to reveal you full name to online strangers than to change an online gamertag?
***

Considering it's a secondary attribute and you control who sees it, yes.

Though, nowhere did I say anything about that being secure or not. I said it was an option that showed a sign that they weren't going allow name changes anytime soon.

***Your PSN_ID has nothing to do with logging in.***

Knowing which count to access when your account has been hacked and the e-mail changed does make your PSN_ID a valuable tool to track. It prevents your account from being completely wiped and you unable to determine what happened to it at all. Since e-mail and passwords can change, the fact that PSN ID can't is the sole way that a person has to track what has happened to their account.

***So, if someone hijacked your account, changing your PSN_ID wouldn't do anything. ***

It would completely erase it from your ability to ever retrieve the account.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3358d ago
+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3358d ago
ZerobyZero3359d ago

Awesome I always wante to upgrade to master account.

IrisHeart3359d ago

I didn't even know there were sub accounts...

Palitera3359d ago

Can someone please explain what they are?

IrisHeart3359d ago

I think they are like parental controlled accounts?

GameSpawn3359d ago

Sub accounts are "child" accounts to the Master account. They share a wallet with the Master account and any and all purchases are shared between the Master account and all sub-accounts. The Master account has complete control over the wallet and can set spending limits or block spending altogether.

Sub-accounts that are elevated to Master accounts with this new program will retain any purchases that the sub-account had made, though they will loose access to all the shared purchases made by other sub-accounts and the master account (this makes sense as they didn't make those purchases and aren't entitled to keep them). The Master account also looses access to the elevated sub-account's purchases for the same reason.

ipach3359d ago (Edited 3359d ago )

they should've called them 'child accounts' in the first place. i mistakenly created a subaccount and used it primarily just thinking it was a way to make another PSN name. stupid me didn't realize i can't fund my wallet directly, can't use the share button properly, can't be real name friends with anyone... but alas, hope is in the air

ENSABAHNUR3359d ago

Damn I wish I knew about these sub accounts etc, it would've saved me from having 3 diff profiles ( due to various reasons).... Oh well I'ma stay where I'm at I guess... This all could've been avoided by letting us change user names but hey not everything is as we want... Back to playing games

ipach3359d ago

oh man, i thought the day would never come. FINALLY. today is a good day, friends. I think Sony should just start considering making February the official month of #Greatness or something... there is hope, people. The Order might actually be a good game! Bloodborne might restore the Japanese home console market. BobbyB00BC0CKs might finally get to change his PSN name. People sitting next to me on the plane might stop calling my Vita a gameboy. The Last Guardian. Anything is possible!!

Show all comments (29)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community19d ago
ChasterMies20d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken19d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga19d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken19d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6419d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long19d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197219d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
DivineHand12519d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91319d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer19d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91319d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit19d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19d ago
Christopher19d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6919d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit19d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher19d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken19d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197219d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic19d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2319d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218319d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder19d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts19d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)
80°

Sony May Soon Let You Decide How Much NPCs Talk In Games

Sony has patented to add multiple dialogue modes to let players switch between how many conversations with NPCs they want in the game.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community25d ago
blackblades25d ago

Sony is like the only ones outta the 3 that has atuff like like this pop up changing thing in ways.

just_looken25d ago

Sony in the past has always been first at bat with new ideas/tech but in the end never fully use it or just toss it away.

blackblades25d ago

I think they did use some but yeah most usually never happened but at least they thought about it. Sony seeks things like this and other, Nintendo seek different ways of playing going by there different controler designs and console designs.

just_looken25d ago (Edited 25d ago )

some of the other stuff sony want's/owns never used
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://gamerant.com/sony-p...
https://www.eurogamer.net/s...
https://metro.co.uk/2023/03...
https://decrypt.co/114754/s...

monitor/adjust game difficultly as you play
https://www.techradar.com/g...

Sony nfts
https://www.theblock.co/pos...

Pay ai to play the game for you
https://thebusinessofesport...

Oh all the above last 12 months

I just imagine a evil scientist with test subjects when it comes down to sony recent patent reports.

Kaii25d ago

Will we get dialogue options that won't spoil puzzles in a matter of seconds? :p

280°

Judge rules in PlayStation's favour in $500m patent infringement lawsuit

Genuine Enabling Technology was seeking damages, claiming the tech allowing PlayStation consoles and controllers to communicate infringes its rights.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community27d ago
Changed: content
S2Killinit27d ago

Big victory for Sony. And a long time coming.

DarXyde27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Crazy to think the savings from this lawsuit allows them to develop one AAA game.

Make it Bloodborne 2, please and thank you.

27d ago
Profchaos27d ago

Sounds like patent trolling they tried the same thing against Nintendo with the same pattern.

Motion and control input traversing over higher and lower frequencies seperate from each other allowing the controller to do both

Pyrofire9527d ago

Patents suck. Most of them are complete garbage.

Knightofelemia27d ago

So to recoup the money Genuine is going to take on Nintendo or Microsoft next. I hate patent lawyers they are some of the worst bottom feeders out there.

Show all comments (13)