230°

Should Critics Re-Review Assassin's Creed Unity?

Now that Ubisoft has issued multiple patches that fixed many of the glaring issues in Assassin’s Creed Unity, should critics offer a second analysis?

SpiralTear3428d ago

No, they shouldn't, and for multiple reasons.

Firstly, Ubisoft lifted the review embargo till after the game was out. That means that this wasn't a case of outlets reviewing the game under unrealistically accommodating conditions like what happens with a lot of online-focused games like SimCity or Titanfall. They reviewed the exact product that consumers got. Hell, livestreams of retail copies of the game bought by regular folks were airing BEFORE the reviews were even out.

Secondly and most importantly, Ubisoft delivered this game in this state and the reviewers reviewed it as such. Ubisoft should not get a second chance here. They willingly released a buggy and broken game to meet a rushed holiday date. Ubisoft management didn't release it against their will. I'm sure there were people on the dev team who knew this game was unfinished and were unhappy with it, but the publisher suits wanted this game done to meet the holiday rush, so the devs couldn't argue against it without losing their jobs.

Ubisoft messed up here and the reviews should continue to stand as proof of their mess-up. No do-overs.

NerdStar73428d ago

I couldn't agree with you less.

Kingthrash3603427d ago

Why...I feel that a game should be reviewed at launch. And that's it.
No second review.
True they've patched the game and that's great but it doesn't count when you know they know they've released a incomplete game. If anything they should have delayed it. Period.. Yeah gamers would have raged but at least would have had a finished product.
Second review no......if so then why not re-review every patched game then? Halo and drive club had bad online launches....but at least the single player worked...not many 2nd reviews for them...I say release a working game period. DC and hao had online problems but were in noway broken. This game was released fully broken....the bad reviews should stand.

bauer0073427d ago

You think a buggy game deserves to be reviewed again when its been patched? Pathetic!

HaveSumNuts3427d ago

According to digital foundry this game is still a mess. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

SpiralTear3427d ago

Absolutely. Re-reviewing it would mean nothing.

starchild3427d ago

It hasn't been a mess for me. Especially after the patches it's a pretty solid game. I haven't had any real issues with it. Glitchy NPCs at times, but that's about it.

Oh, I'm playing the PC version. But I've also played the PS4 version and that didn't seem like a mess either. The framerate can get a little wonky in places, but that is par for the course with most Assassin's Creed games on consoles.

bixxel3427d ago

Re reviewing could make the game worse.They'd say the game is bad even after 3 successive patches.So it could get lesser scores.This is better.

Summons753427d ago

That second statement can easily be argued with Halo MCC and CODAW both were released in broken and buggy states but they got 10s. Why does this get trashed on because of bugs (which is reasonable) but those games get a free pass. No they shouldn't change reviews because a review is an unbiased review of the game, if the game is broken or buggy to the point it hinders gameplay than it is going to reflect as a bad game.

pompombrum3427d ago

Difference I see between this and MCC at least is that 343 at least have plausible excuse in that all the problems were matchmaking side and it's almost impossible to accurately simulate matchmaking for 1000s of people at the same time. Ubi on the other hand knew with 100% accuracy just how bad AC was at launch and released it anyway.

Both are bad and imho, put a huge downer on an already disappointing year.

ABizzel13427d ago

Online aspects having problems, is not equal to an entire game being a buggy mess.

Many people marked Halo: MCC lower for it's online issues, however, it's 4 single player campaigns were still fine. Unity was a mess all around.

Now tell me is this equal.

Game 1: Online matchmaking issues.

vs.

Game 2: Players falling through the game world, rendering glitches causing faces to distort and look skeletal, consistent framerate drops, players getting locked in animation loops, the game freezing forcing players to hard reset, co-op matches are broken, players have reported dying in a co-op mission and being stuck out of the entire match and framerate crawling into single digits, and that's only the stuff I can think of off the top of my head.

This game was a broken mess, and it should not be rewarded with a second chance, because it teaches developers it's okay to releases broken games and simply patch them later.

Somebody3427d ago

Unless these re-reviews turned into an industry-wide practice that encompass every game, then no. What's the point of giving one game a re-review when other games, especially those that don't bring a lot of viewers, don't get a chance?

While the media is calling for re-reviews, a similar system is already present with user reviews like in Steam's customer reviews. Most recent example of how useful this feature is is during Steam' Exploration Sale. Battlestation Pacific is in my wishlist and it was discounted heavily but a quick glance at the the most recent customer review below mentioned it is unplayable now because of the dead GFWL. Another would be Fallout 3 that have always warned potential buyers that it is not compatible with Windows 7 and 8 but the latest user review gave posted a quick fix to those crashing problems.

FullmetalRoyale3427d ago

As an owner of a digital copy of Unity, your first point is enough to merit an "agree."

100% this^ brother.

I played it the week between when it came out, and GTA/Inquisition released, and have been waiting for my fellow consumers to tell me that it is in acceptable working order, before I play it again.

tee_bag2423427d ago

Well said. They can't have it both ways.

Yetter3427d ago

Don't you think the review should reflect the product you may be interested in buying in its current state?

SpiralTear3427d ago

If that's the case, we should re-review every game currently on the market, judging them by their current incarnations. Also, every new patch means that a game would need to be reviewed again.

Scenarist3427d ago

Suppose I were in a position where I had no internet and had to purchase this game @ retail, I would be SUPER MAD!
I hope future Ubisoft products reflect this bs in its sales. -1 here

Gamer19823427d ago

A game should be slated day 1 by reviewers if buggy as hell in fact I don't think reviewers are harsh enough on devs about bugs and glitches. I think gamers need to know about these things the unity bugs and glitches are the sole reason I didn't buy this game. Was really looking forward to the game as love co-op games and instead bought FIFA with the money I saved up for assassins creed. I refuse to pay devs who release a game in this state and other gamers should too.

Whoever bought it should be ashamed of themselves. Your encouraging devs to keep doing stuff like this and it's wrong and it's us gamers who lose out in the end. Stand up for this crap and do it with your wallet dammit.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3427d ago
Chuk53428d ago

No. Ubisoft deserve no quarter.

staticjoe3427d ago

Better title: Should publishers get paid for releasing obviously buggy games?

matrixman923427d ago

this is the best AC since 2, so yeah

starchild3427d ago

Agreed. I'm sure some people legitimately are having issues, but I haven't had any problems playing the game, other than some glitchy NPCs. It's one of the best games in the series in my opinion. I've honestly had more issues with Far Cry 4 and Dragon Age Inquisition on PC than with AC Unity.

ironfist923427d ago

Unfortunately people dont care about gamers who actually dont have bugs in the game

Quick to hate Ubisoft and blinded by it too, they think all of them are shit.

kevnb3427d ago

Does it really make that much difference? I think it came out before it was ready since they had to meet the deadline for the Xbox one bundle, which also might be why they focused a little more on the Xbox one version.

cutthroatslim3427d ago

Hmm, me thinks you has a point...

Show all comments (54)
80°

I Played Assassin’s Creed Unity Almost 10 Years Later. It’s (Kinda) Spectacular

Shaz from GL writes: "Assassin’s Creed Unity is looked at as one of the worst in Ubisoft’s iconic franchise. But playing it nearly 10 years later reveals it may just be the best"

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
Skuletor37d ago

Do the NPCs still randomly levitate every now and then? Even years later I noticed they hadn't patched that out

andy8537d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Honestly I loved the PS4 ACs. I'd love next gen ports of Black Flag, Unity and Syndicate

70°

Five small but brilliant maps in games

Small video game maps that are packed with things to do are better than huge but empty maps. Here are five small but brilliant maps in games.

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
leahcim491d ago

I am playing the Batman Vita game, it is amazing really.

160°

Why Assassin’s Creed Unity remains one of the best games in the series

GF365: "Since the first Assassin’s Creed game, there have been entries up until now. There are more than a few titles that are far from an ideal stealth game. Let’s discuss why 2014’s Assassin’s Creed Unity is one of the best games in the series."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
isarai516d ago

Glitchy as hell and flat story, nah this aint it. AC2, brotherhood and 4 were amazing games in every respective

Furesis516d ago

Yeah i would say brotherhood and 4 were the best for me. I have not played the new ones and Unity was my last one. Seems like i made a good choice.

DarXyde515d ago

I gave up after Revelations. Just couldn't bring myself to care anymore and I got burned out of the gameplay.

Definitely agree on 2 and Brotherhood though. Great games.

YourMommySpoils515d ago

A Ubisoft AC game that's not glitchy? That will be the day.

Knightofelemia516d ago

After constant glitches Arno being boring nah I am good I skipped Unity. I will always like the Ezio trilogy, Black Flag, Rogue, Odyssey, Syndicate. I use to love the franchise but now it feels stale and boring. But my list of favorite entries into the franchise will vary from other players favorite entries.

RaidenBlack516d ago

Odyssey is a really well-made RPG game ... but it ain't a proper AC game, even though its part of the lore

ToddlerBrain516d ago

It’s funny because, at launch, it was universally panned for being unplayable. It’s a great game that holds up today. I’m glad they fixed it.

staticall515d ago

The only good things i remember from Unity are pretty graphics and really good descending mechanics (even though it sometimes didn't make much sense, when your character can drop down from like 10 meter height onto a flagpole perfectly).

Game is glitchy to this day, i was playing in it years after the release date (with all the DLCs) and it's still broken. You had to reload missions too often for my taste (characters do not spawn, you fall through the floor, getting stuck in falling/sitting/aiming animation, hidden blade stop working, assassination target running away at the start of the mission). Story was meh, searching for all the treasures wasn't enjoyable at all. Coop was pretty much useless, i've beaten every coop mission in solo. Helix rifts were awful as well.

Not saying i hate this game or anything, but it got too many problems.

Assassin's Creed (i know it's a controversial opinion) and Assassin's Creed 2 are still great to this day.

anast515d ago

Unity was okay. I prefer Syndicate and Origins.

Show all comments (17)