660°

‘Battlefield 5’ Release Date, News And Updates: EA Says Fifth Sequel Will Return To Its Roots

With the upcoming "Battlefield: Hardline" focusing on cops and robbers gameplay, EA reveals that the installment in the "Battlefield" series will return to its original roots. "Battlefield 5" will be exciting and all-out military action upon the release date.

Read Full Story >>
franchiseherald.com
-Foxtrot3439d ago

"Will Return To Its Roots"

I really feel this has become the go to line when trying to lure back fans.

Why don't they just do Bad Company 3.

Pandamobile3439d ago

Because Bad Company 2, as fun as it was, was just a stepping stone to BF3.

I want Battlefield 2143 more than anything, but that might step on the toes of Battlefront 3.

Play2Win3438d ago

BC 2 was amazing. played it every freaking day on 360. I played far more than I visited university.

DoomeDx3438d ago

I was about to say.. battlefront 3 will most likely be a Battlefield 2143 in a star wars skin.

HaveSumNuts3438d ago

Most of my friends that played BF3 never played BF2 and thought it was amazing. Those that played BC2 will understand it's true tactical destruction made for some of the best multiplayer FPS battles ever experienced.

InTheZoneAC3438d ago

it's just weird how the destruction regressed in BF3 when pretty much everything could be destroyed in BC2, the best one in the series.

PONTIAC08G8GT3438d ago

I do miss being able to level every building in the game. The most disappointing thing in BF4 is that so many things are indestructible. Majority of the buildings cant even be damaged. Not to mention the bullet lag was atrocious. Someone shoots at you, you run behind something for cover, and die 5 seconds later. And I don't remember it taking so many bullets to kill someone, this isn't COD.

I really need a new Rainbow Six

Sevir3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

Isn't DICE in Stockholm already working on Battlefront 3 and Mirror's Edge 2? When on earth would they have time to do a Full on BF5 with their hands so full with Battlefront 3 being the next game set to release in their pipeline from their studio? Since Visceral is working on Hardline and The Star wars 3rd person action game that just Leaves DICE LA, which worked on MOH:W as Danger Close. Do we really want DICE LA working on BF5 after the crap they did on MOH:Warfighter?

SolidStoner3438d ago

For me Battlefield roots means Vietnam and 1942.. and thats what I want to see!

AliTheSnake13438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

But what is Battlefield's roots ?
It's just a name, Battlefield 5 or Bad company 3 both are Battlefield. I still don't understand the different some people try to talk about.
It's gonna end up being the same game whether they decide to call it battlefield 5 or bad company 3

BeefCurtains3438d ago

Hmmmm... The picture for the article is Battlefield IV (4)... That's funny right there.

morganfell3438d ago

Return to its roots could mean in terms of gameplay in which case such remarks are meaningless. 5 companies a day claim some sequel is a return to the original's roots. And with EA's documented history of lies and deception such a statement is doubly worthless.

However, a return to it's roots could mean a WWII setting in which case I would welcome it as the current/modern/future battle setting is becoming somewhat worn.

kryteris3438d ago

I keep hoping that they will release it again, updated, fine tuned, as a standalone dlc. That or someone actually take the concept that they did, and improve upon them but yet seen a game release that wasnt a copycat of the same old bs modes.

KwietStorm_BLM3438d ago

BF3 was a step back from BC2 in a lot of ways.

awi59513438d ago

Lets not go back to 2142 that game was a flop. That's the only battlefield i didnt play for hours and hours. Well BF 3 also because i felt it was trying to be COD with all the Funneling players into gun fire. When all other Bf games you would just go around and kill them from behind because those game maps were open.

Alsybub3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

Pandamobile is 100% correct. Bad Company was a bridge between console shooters and the traditional Battlefield games on PC. Once console gamers had acclimatised to a more PC style game they were able to make Battlefield 3 for PC and console. If they had just jumped straight to console with BF3 I doubt those games would have been as well received.

Having been a PC Battlefield player before console, I always longed for a true Battlefield experience on Xbox or Playstation and with BC and BC2 we were getting closer to that. I suppose if I had never played the PC games I may be missing BC now but those games were cross-over titles. As Pandamobile said 'a stepping stone'.

As far as destruction, it regressed in BF3 because of the more demanding graphics engine. I would have loved to have had that kind of destruction but the visuals and other bells and whistles make up for it. Here's hoping that BF5 can be the full package.

Utalkin2me3437d ago

I think when the say " return to it's roots". I think that means a working game on day one.

XBLSkull3437d ago

Oh man I hope by return to its roots means return to World War II! That would be sick, its been far too long since a decent WWII title came out.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 3437d ago
DanielGearSolid3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

They said the same thing with NBA Live didnt they?

lsujester3438d ago

It did return to it's basketball roots. It plays a lot like a group of unathletic college kids throwing a ball into a peach basket.

oof463438d ago

A developer that makes first person shooters tried to make a basketball game? No wonder it was horrible!

DanielGearSolid3438d ago

when I say "They" i mean EA

XtraTrstrL3438d ago

Unless they go back to not charging for PvP map packs like they use to in past BFs and Bad Companies - I want nothing to do with it. They became COD wannabes overnight with BF3, from mechanics to the similar style Premium season pass type subscription to nonstop overpriced packs. They have a lot to prove, firstly that they won't rush a buggy non-playable game out the door just to make time budgets.

ThatOneGuyThere3438d ago

you realize that battlefield was selling expansion packs way before call of duty was a thing, right?

XtraTrstrL3438d ago

@ThatOneGuyThere

Yeah, they were selling little packs, but they weren't splitting up the community by charging for map packs. That's a huge difference.

tee_bag2423438d ago

What are you talking about. They've been selling expansion packs since 1942. That had 3 seperate add-ons.
Anyway this genre bores me to tears now.

Alsybub3438d ago

I thought that Battlefield had those things first.

I'll admit that they did start to introduce some tighter maps to appeal to CoD players.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3438d ago
ThatOneGuyThere3438d ago

I want a new version of BF1942. everything EXACTLY like the original, but with updated graphics. literally the same map layouts, etc. if dice wants to "return to their roots", they should actually do it.

DoomeDx3438d ago

Haha they used the same line before BF3 and BF4 came out.

skulz73438d ago

They are too scared to do Bad Company 3, they even admitted it.

Whilst I really want it, I only want it (like other fans) if they make it right, but the way the Battlefield series has changed (into a mainstream cash grab for EA), I don't think it will happen anytime soon.

Hopefully one day though!

Findingcrybabies3438d ago

yeah its the same PR bs they always spew. Not that I care because I refuse to buy DICE games ever again. I refuse to pay money to be a glorified beta tester ever again...especially when its the cost of a full game.

Paprika3438d ago

The dev needs to create the game properly. The title might hold significance, but if its poor it won't matter. An fps called shooting daisy storm... but built well could be epic, yet bad company 3, following a downward trend in quality will suck!

WillGuitarGuy3438d ago

Last I heard DICE weren't going to do Bad Company 3, but another studio would.

cyclindk3438d ago

Which "roots" now? The original BF roots or the BF with destruction roots.... because they are really gimping on the destructibility "roots" these days...

Pandamobile3438d ago

Battlefield would still be Battlefield without the destruction. It's core is large-scale team battle. Destruction is just one of the design pillars.

Andreas-Sword3438d ago

I hope EA and DICE make BAD COMPANY 3 !!!
I do not want Battlefield 5 !!!

ramiuk13438d ago

which one was it that released at launch of xb360?
modern combat? used to love that,but they should go back to bad company/modern combat because although at times it looks nice i miss the destruction they had.

rashada073437d ago

Perhaps "roots" refers to a working game at launch.

Kidmyst3437d ago

Bubble up for you sir!

Kidmyst3437d ago

I'm curious when they say back to it's roots. Do you mean more open world like campaigns like BF 1942 where you play a campaign and capture points using any vehicle and means necessary? VS a linear and very short campaign with an average story line? I personally wouldn't mind that, I enjoyed those old campaigns, gave more freedom.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 3437d ago
Psychotica3438d ago

Oh so it will have LAN play with bots? That would be returning to it's roots, at least part of it.

WeAreLegion3438d ago

Yes, it would. My friends and I still do 1942 and BF2 at LAN parties. Such excellent games.

Paprika3438d ago

No, dlc first called "fat chance"... then it will work!

Tru_Blu3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

Burnt me last time, I'll give it a few months before I even think about getting anything from DICE again.

angelsx3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

Please bring back WW2.Will be epic with Frostabite 4

ThatOneGuyThere3438d ago

i think this is what needs to happen.

MajorGecko3438d ago

i have been asking for that to. the ww2 mission in BC2 is intense. make it happen EA.

Paprika3438d ago

PS2 gen it was whored to death.... now, its time to bring it back. Would look epic now. Imagine those beach raids!!

The93Sting3438d ago (Edited 3438d ago )

F%*k Yeah. Next gen graphics, WWII Setting, cool looking WWII weaponry.? I'm sold, im F sold bro!

lawgone3437d ago (Edited 3437d ago )

I've been saying COD and BF need to bring back WW2 for awhile now. I liked when they would alternate between WW2 and a modern game - with the modern one being realistic without bullshit futuristic stuff. Why can't I have a game with a list of present day weapons that are actually available and in use today with true to life mechanics, design and sound. Same can be said for WW2. There's so much that can be done there if someone takes the time to do it right. For example, if I'm wondering through the streets of a town in France and walk into a wine cellar, show labels of actual wines from that time. Make it realistic as fuck so you are drawn into the story. Find actual WW2 documents. Stuff like that.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3437d ago
Software_Lover3438d ago

Man, it took forever for Battlefield 3 to get here, now we are on 5 so soon. Just seems as if things are getting rushed.

Neixus3438d ago

BF4 - 2013

BF5- 2016

Rushed? :S
This is not the same DICE that creates Battlefield:Hardline btw.

annoyedgamer3438d ago

And BF4 somehow ceases to exist? Its hard to justify what EA has done to the BF series.

Neixus3438d ago

Annoyedgamer, that's unrelated to this.

Sevir3438d ago

DICE LA is working on Hardline in conjunction with Visceral Games.

Show all comments (109)
110°

Battlefield V now broken on Steam Deck / Linux with EA anticheat live

That's all folks. EA anticheat has now been added into Battlefield V, so it's the end of being able to play it on Steam Deck and other Linux systems.

This joins the likes of Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare 2: Deluxe Edition, EA SPORTS FC 24, EA SPORTS FIFA 23, Battlefield 2042 and Madden NFL 24 that all have EA's own homegrown anti-cheat that make them simply unplayable on systems running Linux.

Now if you try to run it, you'll be greeted with an error. A shame to see a game that's multiple years old get broken like this and no doubt EA will continue to use their own EA anticheat in future online games. Battlefield 1 is still okay, and Apex Legends is also still running but perhaps it's only a matter of time before EA force it onto those too?

Read Full Story >>
gamingonlinux.com
just_looken14d ago

more comments here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/St...
https://steamcommunity.com/...

47 comments in hours bf5 won't launch anymore ea is saying meh not my prob bitch tosses a faq
https://answers.ea.com/t5/B...

Yes counter cheating that is good but when the ea app on pc is still totally broken and these cheaters are on 2042 same anti cheat this is just putting scotch tape on trumps file cabinet to prevent leaks its nothing more than a stop gap.

I mention ea app as for 4years it was in beta then tossed out with 3 year old issues and i still cant not get the products that i purchased on origin yeah i purchased digital but guess what there is no dvd games on pc anymore.

Philaroni14d ago

Likewise, I'm about to do some games with some friends here but if you wish to PM me I could share my Discord if you like to talk further. Oddly you bring up THQ that I did some work for in the past.

Also for Starfield I have just a Stock GTX 1080. Not even the 1080i version on an ultra wide and with some Ini, changes and other weird things I know I got it working at Series X frame rate. Sure not the the fancy graphics options. I know Bethesda games have always been more CPU then GPU limiting. A good application I don't see many using is Process lasso. It helps with may CPU heavy games on PC. (Battletech is the main one I use it for) Can find it here if you like. https://bitsum.com/

""Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.""

Going to combine me response here. You are right, MS and I do feel like what they do with not just Froza and also the tech they use in Flight Sim. Is not given enough credit. If I am correct the next Fable game is going to be using a mix of things from the Turn 10 Team, maybe Unreal? Hard to say at this point, But MS along with Sony both own a full License of the tech (Days Gone for Sony) I agree with you on the talent and passion part, games have become too much, at least AAA games the 'Milk, butter, eggs and toast" to support places now days. Innovations in gameplay and such has fell lower and lower. I still don't see mechanics and ways of playing games like I did so many years back, its a bummer.

For MS maybe the end as even though they might have a massive advantage in software and services (I use to work in Azure) They can kind of do some things at cost but seem to fail at it a lot. The cloud gaming push I don't think is going to have the effect so many hope for (Not sure why anyone wants that) I still want MS to have a chance but, if I sit here with my magic dice and roll it on MS games over the last forever, it could land on Crackdown 3 (Remember that?) The cloud powered game... and now they are trying to do it again with Kojima some what. As an engineer, its not happening now, tomorrow or anything in the next 24 years. I remember back on this interview with John,

https://www.reddit.com/r/nv...

We are not even at that point yet. So hope we get there and I hope MS is still a player but I do feel you are right in many ways, they are already trying to slowly retreat just by the rhetoric alone.

Ether way again PM me and we should talk more, would love to do so.

Philaroni14d ago

The rough part of all of this is that for those of us on PC mostly be it Windows or Linux based, the anti-cheat sucks up a lot of resources. It kind of reminds me of the conversation between, security and freedom. Too much of ether is both good if managed well or very bad. We just as gamers keep seeing this pop up over and over again. Wish I had some magic wand to stop cheaters... but I don't... hell we just seen what happened with Apex at a high level event.. getting that kind of access and such is not good... but at the same time. Can anyone, one person provide me an example where Anti Cheat has even like a hit rate above 50? I know I'm pulling numbers out of my ass, but it seems the cheaters beat the systems in place time and time again. Where there is a lock, and a smith to make it. We always will have a thief that breaks it.

just_looken14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

I can

Sense everyone seems to have brain rot and forgot the ps3 that is the solution.

The ps3 for its first half had systems that would only launch the game if it saw you had a ps3 controller along with a inhouse operating system and a real gpu/cpu it was way harder to run cheats off of along with the ability to make custom rooms.

Yes there were p2p lag switching then later on thanks to that dev kit leak cheat menus but for years games like killzone/mag had dedicated servers that were hard to crack a operating system/cpu those in public had 0 knowledge how to make stuff on them.

Right now if they put all mp files on the server so we just stream the game that would be a huge step or make the multiplayer run in a sanboxed mode separate on the system.

Philaroni14d ago

I'm glad you brought that up that Killzone had Dedicated servers. I remember the Yellow Dog Linux days of PS3, as well. EA use to do more Dedicated Servers for games but as time went on they would 'rent them out' and slowly the official servers would die down.

P2P Lag always had that magical thing (Gears 2 (Aak the shot gun) and Halo 2,3) fans know as host advantage. That alone allowed for lags switches, booting of others from games. ECT. (Though I admit, was the most fun I had when our team could beat cheaters. Man was that a good time)

I fully agree with you, the fact so much is working how it is has in a hard way compromised network/client security issue. I'll pick on COD for example where some assets are local and other are on server, between games and between even evolutions/iterations of the engines used.

just_looken14d ago

@phil

Thank you for the reply i am glad others on here remember

Now back to the series x having games with the same frame rate as a 2005 xbox 360 but the masses thinking that is fine and next gen.

Starfield on series x native 780ishp fallout 3 xbox 360 720p both 30fps gaming has "grown so much"

Sadly we are not in large numbers and see mp/sp tech wise/cheater wise has gotten worse not better.

Philaroni14d ago

I hate to say it about Starfield I'd have too look at reports from way back when. I swear to god they said it was going to launch with Creation Kit 2 (I worked with 1 alot in Skyrim mods in the block based aka cell based structure) Back then it was great, but for the life of me I don't know how a Studio like Obsidian can make a game same as Bethesda but with less bugs and bull shit. (Fallout Veg and Outer Worlds) Not that it was with out bugs but when a 3rd party does better with your own tech... I find an issue... with it all.

Frame rate stuff I only understand from two points, design and marketing. On the Design part yes back in the day 30FPS was I swear almost more common then now days. It was not a design compromise to keep it at 30 as the hardware and the way the game was being 'displayed' (Key thing there) was as impactful. Now days I feel the Marketing side wants a 4K trailer running likely rendered on a Xbox or PS system with little text saying (Oh wit was on a PC that no one is able to afford... of course teasing there a bit.)

I do understand that Starfield is a 'simulated world' where like every item you drop is there, for like forever... cool, that is not too new now days and design wise, is kind of a dumb thing.... who cares how many carrots you can collect... is it cool sure, makes for good PR in some ways. Lack of tangible game play is the issue. I can't take credit for this but a buddy of mine worked in advertising and I shit you not at Fast food. They would make wax and even 3D print now and then post render foods you would get, just for you as the client at a Burger King to not be given as you where sold on. (((( He did not work for them FYI.. but others)))

Issue with gaming as you are saying is too much is on the 'presentation.' It does not sell like it use too, that type of advertising. Most of it is word of mouth, who my friends tell me is a good game or not, what my friends are playing. Then comes the reviews.

Its dumb that our next gen systems feel like we gone all but up a step that we already went down two to three on. Take Uncharted 4 for example 30FPS SP and 60 MP. That I can deal with, and that was a PS4 game.

I do at times dis Xbox a lot, but come on, they still have yet to make there own damn game engine. Slipstream failed heavily, where Sony and most of their own studios have tech they made for the games they are trying to build. I am unsure how Xbox is again now saying the 'next' system will be the best ever. Sure it will be duh? Tech changes and grows, but I never seen a system use it so poorly. (I blame alot on the bloated Xbox OS FYI)

just_looken14d ago

@phil

You can have both presentation and framerate pc's have been doing both for decades now 4k ray tracing bla bla yeah that is different but starfield is no maxed out minecraft with its seed tech with ray tracing minecraft uses seeds also with huge buildings but for years pc's can do 60fps on that.

I mentioned 30fps because back in the day we had hd consoles alot of users had sd tv's just getting into hd tv's so i get the graphics difference but we are talking about 20years of hardware difference.

A real hardware console 6700 3700x 16gb of ram can run starfield at 60fps not maxed out but its possible this was pre performance patches:
https://youtu.be/hNM488QIKO...

Remember the apu/igpu tablet crap the consoles are using are based off of the 6700

The xbox operating system has always been windows based from windows 2000/xp xbox-xbox 360 the tail end of the 360 using vista/7 then to the series x using windows 10 that is why backwards compatibility works great its all direct x based with the same bc as a window's pc. What we see today is just the change from needing games to survive to making games as a product m$ makes more money in a week than what sony can make in months.

Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.

The new cod is making bank yes users hated it but the sales show the masses that do not post love it sadly

Heck did you see that wow has limited time store items now with hundreds online defending it because they think the store its what's need to keep the game online despite the $15 a month payment and m4 ownership.

I find in the end of this generation Microsoft will go the way of sega they might also just buy sony as everything sony except music/games is not making money they are a cheap buy for microsoft right now so we would just have 2 companies fighting in the gaming ring with papa os watching from the sidelines.

Great chatting 2 you may i recommend looking at rpgm games? they are out there even though i have a i9 4090 custom rig right now along with a ps5 i have been playing 4yr old games or rpgm stuff this year. Its funny i remember being a 2360/ps3 owner stacks of adventures now i am like well time to see what is in the past.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
80°

EA anticheat and Battlefield

Battlefield V, getting easy anticheat

We're pleased to share that EA Anticheat will be extended to #BattlefieldV this Wednesday, April 3rd at 08:00 UTC.

You will need to restart your game to benefit from the changes of this Client Update.

Learn more via our updated EA Anticheat Blog:

just_looken23d ago

Other sources from battlefield official accounts.

https://twitter.com/Battlef...

https://www.reddit.com/r/Ba...

So steamdeck might have issues and those out there that are anti kernal drm will get a surprise. Depending on your setup you also might get new issues as i know rgb software likes to fight with easy anti cheat.

220°

EA Hopes to Use Generative AI to Drive Monetization and Make Development 30% More Efficient

Today Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson provided a look into his ideas for the use of generative AI in the company's development processes.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
thorstein44d ago

I wonder what the next buzz word they'll slap in front of AI to make it sound exciting next? "Generative" as if it's creating its own content. Lol.

Cacabunga43d ago

EA is already dying a painful death..

peppeaccardo43d ago

i have a better idea .. why the whole exec team doesn't get replaced by chat bots ?

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree the ai thing is already in other forms of media there have been ai translations/scripts/voice over and even full ai commercials aired on tv. Ubisoft has created a ai game creator story/vo/music except the building of the game

The new unreal engine has auto terrain creation tools

In the world of greed in which it is winning without any major blow back ai is our future.

everyone want's biden dead on the mic or a criminal instead of a woman and now we are getting ai everything because no one will stop watching/playing ai created media.

GamerRN43d ago

Maybe they should just focus on making good games?

Just a thought...

Kiryu199242d ago

Exactly EA are just pure evil. When they are beating Bank of America to be voted the worst company to work for that’s saying a lot

Good thing I don’t buy their games day one and wait for deep deep sale years after launch (the select few games I am actually interested in)

Gaming is making so much money yet the greed of these companies is never ending

CEO’s and people on board making millions yet cutting jobs to those who are actually making the products

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
Knightofelemia44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

EA is still a shady shitty company even with or without the help of Skynet. All they will use AI for is new ways to milk loot boxes and come up with the same sports title with a different year on the label. They are one company I truly do hate with a passion. They single handedly ruined some great franchise with their death touch. ME, Dead Space, Alice Returns, Dante's Inferno.

Stuart575643d ago

EA layoffs followed by 'Generative AI to Drive Monetization'

I knew it. Wonder what AI salary looks like? Nothing.

ChasterMies43d ago

I having a feeling that most of the layoffs in the industry are based on the idea that AI will do the same job for less.

DarXyde42d ago

Very likely, yes.

Made worse by the fact that the execs aren't changing their compensations.

My deepest fear at this point is that we are now in the capitalism endgame.

At this point, we really should just burn AI to the ground. Executives cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
How are those people expected to support families if everything gets automated?

Barlos43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

And take away creativity, and people's jobs as we've been seeing. Got it.

No thanks. I want my games created by people, not AI.

CobraKai43d ago

Exactly. If or when games start becoming more AI than people, im done with gaming. AI and companies like EA can suck donkey d***k.

just_looken43d ago

Though i agree remember this is no ps3/360 era were we got up to 3 games in one generation from on developer like gears/halo/bioware/sony/ms

The people today are pro esg/sweet baby for the most part AAA gaming is imploding right now.

We should be stepping back re evaluate everything as a whole this year xmen 97 written/directed by a woman that is nuts and its also being made by a group reshaping bodies to be less sexual like wtf. A dam famous cartoon from the 90's is being rebuilt with millions spent to be worse in everyway.

Gaming/movies/tv shows made today are worse than what we had 7years ago ai won't change this but that ai is also being made by these groups so either way we are screwed.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Eonjay43d ago

Don't be of afraid of women. Sexy characters in games and movies still exist. Got my Stellar Blade on preorder!!! Everything all the time doesn't need to be sexual...that's stupid, childish and dull.

Chocoburger43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

EA doesn't want to lose their title of worst gaming company ever, always trying their best to remain the champs!
What's sad is that they have so much potential to be a decent publisher.

SSX Tricky / SSX 3
Def Jam Vendetta / Fight for New York
NBA Street
NFL Steet
Mirror's Edge
Bad Company
Burnout 3 / 4 / 5

Remember when EA used to be awesome? It's all over with now. Unpolished, if not out-right broken games these days. Endless monetization and gambling in their sports games, and let's not forget wasting hours of your life trying to unlock characters or equipment using "surprise boxes!"

Show all comments (37)