The early access model has attracted a lot of game developers trying to get their projects off the ground, but sometimes players end up paying the price. Does early access really help a game and developer? Enrique of Gamer Assault Weekly takes a look at the issues with Early Access games.
Get the scoop on Comedy Central's exciting new cartoon show inspired by the iconic Golden Axe video game
Golden Axe is a great game I enjoyed it on the SMS, Genesis and in the arcade. Great game but it truly was a quarter eater back in the day. I wish Sega could get the rights to the arcade port of Moonwalker another great arcade game I enjoyed. Collect so many monkeys and become Robo Michael lol.
GB: "With this feature, we will be taking a look at 15 of the best games from the PlayStation 2's vast library."
Toyohashi, Japan is set to host a large-scale Monster Hunter event to celebrate the franchise's 20th anniversary, complete with themed hotel accommodations.
For me personally, I enjoy having early access because it gives me the opportunity to check out a game without making a commitment, but I can see how a bad experience could deter some from making the final purchase.
I enjoy the early access experience, without it I would've avoided Destiny. It's a good peek into what you're getting into. I think that early access players should also get some form of a trial access of the final product, that way my previous assumptions of the said "bad experience" could be wiped clean with this fresh finished experience. Early access with titanfall left me wanting more, but the final product was identical to the beta (at launch) which left me a bit salty over that purchase. Same thing with the war z/infestation survival stories experience...
I don't like early access. It's just buying an incomplete game with no garentee the game will ever be completed. I can understand if it was a complete game that will add more in later on, but there are too many games that will launch on early access that will be missing core parts of a game only to be promised to be added later. What ever happened to free demos to get the hype for a game up? Or even free betas to see consumer response to it. Paying full price for a skeleton of a game is bad.
I've had some really endearing early access moments which you just don't get with traditionally published games. Maybe it's more down to the openness of the individual developers, but the fact that they are there listening/responding to good and bad feedback where player ideas can be put into a game is commendable.
I'm not paying to test out a beta game. And according to Valve, the developers don't have to complete the early access game