490°

Ubisoft's Skull & Bones is Doing Everything Right That Sea of Thieves Got Wrong | COGconnected

COGconnected: At E3 2018 we had a chance to check out a 30-minute demo of Skull & Bones and needless to say it is shaping up to be a winner.

Read Full Story >>
cogconnected.com
MuddyWaters2138d ago

Visually it sure looks a lot better and the battle scenes are way more intricate. That's there the comparisons end. Sea of Thieves is more about social play and going on quests to dig up treasure, Skull and Bones is all about sea battles. I hope you can board a ship and fight but that doesn't look like the case. Maybe I'm wrong but it would be cool if you could.

UnHoly_One2138d ago

I hate that everyone keeps comparing these games.

The only thing they have it common is "Pirate."

The 10th Rider2138d ago

Well, and that you can do ship battles. But Skull and Bones is centered around ship battles while that's just one aspect of Sea of Thieves, so it would be a huge failure if Skull and Bones didn't have better sea battles.

TekoIie2138d ago

@The 10th Rider

I get it but the dynamic of these battles is very different. Skull and Bones seems to be going for a more competitive style of play, whereas Sea of Thieves is more about social play and player interaction.

BiggerBoss2138d ago

I mean, they're both big budget Pirate games. Of course they are going to be compared.

UnHoly_One2138d ago

But they are NOTHING like each other.

NOTHING.

In Sea of Thieves you control a character in first person and manipulate different parts of the ship to make it go, or make it shoot, etc... You can jump off at any time and go anywhere.

In Skull and Bones, you ARE the ship. You, by yourself, control every aspect of the ship and can't leave the ship in any way.

I mean whatever, I loved Black Flag so I'll probably get this. I'm not trying to say which game is better, it doesn't even matter.

I'm just saying it's stupid to compare them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2138d ago
spartan112g2138d ago

I completely agree. These two games have completely different goals.

Zenbaby3692137d ago

Yeah, make money, and make money. Different goals xD

DrumBeat2138d ago

Two completely different styles. Sea of Thieves' problem isn't the graphics, it's the boredom you'll endure while playing it. Skull and Bones is a lot more appealing to me for many reasons, but I'm still not sold.

Jinger2138d ago

You can't actually board ships. You hold a button to board, there is a quick scene of the AI jumping on the ship, then you just get a pop up showing what you plundered. Same with exploring islands. There is no actual gameplay off your ship, it is strictly sailing. You can stop off at ports to refill supplies and sell stuff to upgrade and customize your ship, but you can't actually explore any areas off the ship.

porkChop2138d ago

That's really, really disappointing. I was hoping the game would build on what they started with Black Flag.

Rachel_Alucard2137d ago

@porkchop

It's a new IP, I doubt they could implement that stuff in the 1st release given the deadlines, budget, etc. In a potential sequel sure, but it looks like they just focused on competitive ship battles since they couldn't add what they wanted, so they worked with what they had.

dreue2138d ago

Social play? Dude if i want to be social i have real life, come on sea of tgiefs was bare bones... Bad game overall.... Stop defending it....

MuddyWaters2137d ago

Did I say it was good? How is explaining the difference defending it. Some of you guys are sure upset about anything to do with Microsoft aren't ya.

Zeref2138d ago

it's like comparing Mario Kart to Forza.

TheRealHeisenberg2138d ago

Mario Kart is superior. I know this to be fact even though I have never played a Forza game. :/

UnHoly_One2137d ago

Those games are far more similar to each other than Sea of Thieves and Skull and Bones.

2138d ago
IamTylerDurden12137d ago

Skull n Bones looks fantastic. Unfortunately Sea of Thieves was poorly executed.

No Way2137d ago

Sid Meiers Pirates! is STILL the best pirate game, to date. I dont know why people don't take and learn from that game - and improve on it.

MuddyWaters2137d ago

That would be a great remake.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2137d ago
Auron2138d ago

Sure.... thell get the prices right too...
Standard 59.99
Deluxe ed. 79.99
Gold ed 99.99
Ultimate 119.99

How much is sea of thieves again? Oh yeah its included with game pass..
I wouldnt even say these games are similar besides the fact they have boats and ocean..

lxeasy2138d ago

Yeah these two games shouldn't really be compared. They are very different. One is centered around creating stories with friends the other is ship battles.

BiggerBoss2138d ago

"Creating stories with friends"

That's a pretty creative way of saying that there's no story and nothing to do.

No Way2137d ago

I don't take anything BiggerBoss says seriously. Not like you'd ever play the game.. you only play reviews.

TekoIie2138d ago

Similar themes, but completely different gameplay styles.

PhantomS422138d ago

Included with games pass...so $120/year if you somehow find killing the 1 skeleton in the game over and over with no rewards for the player that exciting.

Hmmm, $120/yr for contentless garbage or $60 once for a vastly better game. Not a hard choice.

lxeasy2138d ago

@phantoms42 your not paying 120$ a year for sea of thieves. Your paying 120$ a moth for the 150 plus games available on Gamepass and all future first party exclusives day one. Nice try though buddy. Maybe you should try buying an Xbox with gamepass before you have an opinion.

itsmebryan2138d ago

That's just silly. You get access to over 100 games and day one on new exclusives you can download for $120. That's a pretty good deal.

TheCommentator2137d ago

The 3 DLC packages arriving by September are content-less? I see...

BTW, no choice is hard to make when you're ignorant. You've called a game that no one will play for years "vastly better", while ignoring the two years SoT will have to release free DLC content.

jeromeface2137d ago

You can buy sea of thieves for 60 if you wish, no gamepass required.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2137d ago
OffRoadKing2137d ago

You get what you pay for, theres a reason its on game pass, surprised they dont include a free copy in every box of Captain Crunch.

Zenbaby3692137d ago (Edited 2137d ago )

Sure, Sea of Thieves is free. I know this is going to sound over the top, but in all seriousness. If I was a game tester, and Sea of Thieves was the game we were working on, I would quit my job. That is to say, you literally could not pay me to play that game again. Yes, I've played it. Yes I played with friends. And yes, even if the game is about playing with friends, it still needs content.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2137d ago
The 10th Rider2138d ago (Edited 2138d ago )

But the biggest complaint about Sea of Thieves is lack of content . . . Nothing we've seen from Skull and Bones indicates that it's any better in that regard. In fact, one big concern about S&B that I've seen is that we haven't really seen much of anything else to do besides fighting other ships.

salmonade2138d ago

and that it's completely boring with no progression

smolinsk2138d ago

And no land exploration.

Jinger2138d ago (Edited 2138d ago )

That's all skull and bones is, there is only ship battles. There is no jumping off your boat and exploring islands, the sea, actually boarding ships and fighting with swords or guns... it is strictly sailing.

And once Sea of Thieves ads in AI ships in the upcoming Cursed Sails content drop... There will be no point in Skull and Bones.

TekoIie2138d ago

Skull and Bones will probably try and emphasize a more competitive angle. Although I don't think Ubisoft has had a good track record at creating solid competitive titles so I'll hold my breath on this one. Especially so after For Honor.

Nodoze2138d ago

Skull and Bones LOOKS great....but as some have mentioned I think we are going to see a For Honor level F up with release again. I also get the sense there will be loot boxes everywhere.

MuddyWaters2138d ago

Ubisoft has a habit of releasing bare games then making them into games as a service and bringing new life back into it (which is another fair comparison to Sea of Thieves). They should just the time to build a full game first but obviously I don't know what I'm talking about because Ubisoft is making a lot of money.

spartan112g2138d ago

The comparisons start and end with the word “pirates”. These are completely different games. One is a social game while one is heavily about ship combat.

Rude-ro2138d ago

So it’s a single player game? I was under the impression that it too is a social game. Ie Co-op and pvp

aconnellan2137d ago

I see what you’re saying, but when spartan said ‘social’ he was referring to the open world online aspect of sea of thieves, where you can run around and interact with other players how you want.

Skull and Bones is only ship combat, and that’s it. Regardless of what sea of Thieves has done wrong, that doesn’t sound much better to me

Zenbaby3692137d ago

@aconnellan In all fairness, I think it's still the same type of social. Instead you roam around on the ship only, and you still interact with others how you want to. Either fighting or not fighting, which is the same thing as SoT.

Show all comments (75)
160°

Top 30 Most Disappointing Video Games

Despite all the hype, marketing, development time and resources behind them, these blockbuster titles would disappoint fans.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
solideagle6d ago

I think I platinumed it, It was awesome especially the first time you come across the horde

peppeaccardo5d ago

One of the best open world zombie game ever. Very engaging great story graphics and all.
These mofo should go back playing starfield and change phil's diaper.
GFYS!!

thorstein6d ago

The Order 1886 wasn't disappointing.

It was great.

Maybe do an article about Games Journalists Lied About. That would be a good read.

FPSRUSSIA6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I Agree The order 1886 is Great but Short to bad there wont be a Sequel since the Developers Moved on to other Platforms.

DustMan5d ago

I thought it was great while it lasted. As soon as things got interesting and the action picked up the game ended. When it was over I legit was like "that's all of it?"

jimb0j0nes6d ago

Sure, the campaign was terrible, but MW3 isn't even the top three most disappointing COD games...

anast6d ago

That's a lot of Bethesda games on that list. Where's Starfield?

TwoPicklesGood6d ago

Whole lot of Sony games with Forsaken, Days Gone, Risen of the Ronin, and The Order 1886.

anast6d ago

In reality only one of those Sony games is actually just okay, and the others are good to solid. Whereas the Bethesda ones are objectively bad.

Tacoboto6d ago

Two of those Sony games aren't Sony games and the two that actually are, Sony clearly agreed based on their cutting ties with longtime partner Ready at Dawn and their well-reported rejection of DG2.

I'd like to check out The Order someday soon and see how it holds up since that style of shorter game fits my mood lately, but Forspoken was uniformly panned and RotR is a sign that Team Ninja needs to ease off the gas a bit to focus on quality over quantity.

Tacoboto5d ago

Suicide Squad being at number 2 or even in this list seems like a freebie - its existence alone was disappointing, I don't think many people actually had positive expectations for it near release.

Not having Starfield at all feels like they're ignoring a huge conversation of last year. Even as someone that likes the game, ignoring its reception is head-in-the-sand at best and its restrictions were magnified by its release alongside Baldur's Gate 3. The disappointment many feel about it FARRRRR exceeds any disappointment people have for random third party titles like... Biomutant, and Exoprimal... Same could be said for reception around Forza Motorsport.

Show all comments (16)
90°
8.0

Skull and Bones Review: Our Verdict After 200 hours of gameplay | FinalBoss

Dive into our in-depth review of Skull and Bones, Ubisoft's latest MMORPG venture. After 200 hours of navigating tumultuous seas and engaging in naval warfare, we explore what sets this pirate adventure apart.

Read Full Story >>
finalboss.io
CrimsonWing6929d ago

How much did they pay you? I’m kidding, there’s always crazy opinions out there that can be so off the mark it’s baffling. There’s so much better games out there worth 200 hours of your time than this.

FinalBoss29d ago

Haha, if only they had paid me, right? I wish, but they did not :)
But in all seriousness, I've been playing Skull and Bones since the closed beta, as I mentioned in my review, and I genuinely enjoyed it.
It's just my personal take on it. And whenI read review with others from the gaming press, I noticed that many critics have spent far less time with the game, sometimes around just 10 hours.
If you dive into my review, you'll see I'm not shy about pointing out the game's flaws alongside its strengths. It's all about sharing diverse opinions, and I appreciate yours!

ModsDoBetter29d ago

6-7 imo.

Base games on value.
I got 80hrs out of it before I burnt out, <0.70p per hour. Can't go wrong.

FinalBoss29d ago

That's a solid way to measure a game's worth! :)

I'm glad to hear you enjoyed your time with Skull and Bones for a good 80 hours before reaching your limit. I guess it's coincide with the factory grind. Now it's much better with their last update.
Thanks for sharing your viewpoint!

Patrick228d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Wow, based on this review I wouldn't trust your opinion on any game. This game is pure unmitigated trash. Whoever wrote the plot wouldn't know a good story if it ran over them with an 18 wheeler, and the gameplay is even worse. You couldn't give me this game if you put it in a PS5 that I was being given for free. It's a sorry excuse for a pirate game or a game in general. I'd give it a 3 at best.

FinalBoss28d ago

Based on your comment, it seems you might not have had a chance to play the game yourself and are perhaps basing your opinion on what's circulating online.
Just like how some people love pineapple on pizza while others see it as blasphemy, games can evoke a wide range of reactions. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, and it's totally okay for us to have different views on what makes a game enjoyable.

200°

PS5 Best-Selling Console in the US in February, Helldivers 2 Best-Selling Game

The PlayStation 5 was the best-selling console in the US in February 2024 in terms of units sold and dollar sales, according to figures from Circana (formerly The NPD Group). Circana includes the dates for the four week period of February 4 to March 2.

Read Full Story >>
vgchartz.com
Nyxus35d ago

"Final Fantasy VII Rebirth was the #2 best-selling premium game of February, instantly becoming the 4th best-selling game of 2024 YTD. Also debuting on the chart in February was the Final Fantasy VII Remake & Rebirth Twin Pack, placing 8th in February and at #16 for the year."

https://twitter.com/MatPisc...

MrNinosan35d ago

No no no... it's a big failure according to folks around here because it sold less physical copies in Japan than FFXVI.

thorstein34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Skull & Bones was 4th / 9th so far this year.... also a big failure according to folks songs here.

Bathyj34d ago

Did people say skuil and bones was a failure or that it sucked?

34d ago
Eonjay34d ago

Congrats to Helldivers and Final Fantasy!

ApocalypseShadow34d ago

That's great. Now concentrate selling VR headsets Sony.

hiroyukisanada34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

2nd best in February off literally 1 day of February sales 😂 Feb 29th! But the Internet would have you believe it's a flop

34d ago
Bathyj34d ago

If a $40 game sold more dollar value than a $70 game it must have sold at least 75% more units. Impressive.

Show all comments (17)