750°

Star Wars: Battlefront 2 Xbox One X vs PC graphics comparison will blow you away

YouTuber DEE BATCH loaded Star Wars: Battlefront 2 up on the Xbox One X and PC in 4K and the results are pretty stunning. The PC is running in 4K with ultra setting on and using a Vega 64 graphics card and the Xbox One X is running in 4K.

Read Full Story >>
gamezone.com
4Sh0w2353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

Damm its pretty amazing what X is capable of. Its standing toe to toe with a much more expensive pc....hell I'll say it>>>>X looks better.

lol, honestly I can't tell.

Fishy Fingers2353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

Agreed (not that it looks better but), considering the GPU alone costs more than the X. Roughly speaking his system costs around £1200 and then OCed.

Of course you can do much more with a PC, but sticking to the subject at hand, very impressive and s*** the game is pretty.

GamingIVfun2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

Xbox One X version is pretty close but not better than the PC version, theres draw in and the shadows aren't as good as the PC version and the frame rate is probably better on PC, more consistent. For a five hundred dollar machine the game looks pretty darn good though. I have a really good PC but I may buy this game for Xbox One X.

Have to say I'm enjoying my Xbox One X, the improvements to 360 games alone are crazy good let alone what it does for xbox One games, for me it is well worth it. The improved user interface on Xbox One Is great also. Microsoft are making good steps toward making Xbox better, but they still need to improve in some other areas.

thekhurg2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

Hardcore PC gamers get Intel and Nvidia. That is not a high end PC. That's a budget rig slapped together by someone going out of their way to make it seem like this console is equal to a high end machine.

Arnon2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

Wouldn't this comparison have more to do with the game itself, rather than the hardware it's running on? I mean, if you optimize the game to have a "max setting" - where such a setting 'X' is capped at using a certain amount of resources - then how do you compare the actual raw horsepower of the devices outside of the "max setting"?

If a PC has a higher clock speed on the CPU/GPU, more memory and storage than the XBOX One X, then clearly the PC is going to be more powerful than the console, but that doesn't mean you'll see this performance difference if the program you're running it on cannot take advantage of it.

Running an actual stress test using the same program (such as 'Heaven Benchmark') would be a far greater test of the devices' capabilities.

NewMonday2352d ago

this is not the best GPU, it compares to the GTX1070 and not the standard top end GTX1080.

2352d ago
2352d ago
thekhurg2352d ago

Gummy

The Vega is 30-40% worse performing than a 1080Ti. Later champ.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2352d ago
gamer78042353d ago

the PC seems to suffer from more frame rate issues it looks like

King Nezz2353d ago

Seeing these kinds of comparisons makes me even happier that I decided to purchase the X. While visuals are not the most important part of a game to me (I prefer performance), it helps immerse you more in the experience.

starchild2352d ago

Amazing looking game either way. It's crazy how far game graphics have come in my lifetime.

vivid832352d ago

Lol I remember playing games from cassette tapes .......spectrum zx

spreadlove2352d ago

The power of X delivers again. #FeelTruePower #XboxOneX

ProjectVulcan2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

I can tell, although youtube compression never helps here with smaller details. PC is running higher settings going off the game play portions. Higher quality motion blur. Looks like slightly better ambient occlusion quality, but it's difficult to confirm on the variety of (or lack thereof) footage here. It also has better specular mapping seen in the reflected lights. You can see this on the shiny floors indoors and the weapons outside.

Most prominently it has waaaaaaaaaaaaay less detail pop in and better shadow quality that resolves further away. You easily notice this in the forest section where the console version has notable texture pop in quite close up. PC clearly has a lot more texture filtering as seen on the leafy floors of the forest, detail is retained much further away.

From about 6:47 look at the floor and foliage as you walk towards it on X1X, then compare to the PC version. Even with this video compression you can see it resolving in slowly on the console version but it's all there on PC.

Look at 7:24 the rocks on the left for further evidence, all the detail pops in suddenly around 7:29 on X1X.

I really wouldn't know what settings X1X compares to, but it's not the highest on PC shown here. Whether it actually manages native 4K resolution on X!X, the compression makes it impossible to say. Have to wait for a comparison from Digital Foundry for further information on that.

ProjectVulcan2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

Right, I just watched it on a decent 4K screen again and even with the youtube video compression the X1X version does not look native 4K in the more demanding outdoor scenes. It's a ways below that.

The game must use a dynamic resolution like the other console versions, and not always be hitting native 4K. Whereas the PC version is always native 4K as far as I saw.

This is eyes on a youtube video, but I'm confident of my eyes! If I can see it in a youtube video, it'll only be more obvious in front of you.

starchild2352d ago

I agree with you. I noticed a lot of the same differences.

ProjectVulcan2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

You have to skip the cutscenes and go to the game play, especially outdoors where most of the game is played. It's easy to see quite noticeable things then. As soon as I saw it on a 4K screen it was also clear it's not native 4K on X1X in those woodlands. Dynamic resolution. Most likely 1800p or so, maybe a bit less.

So probably somewhat below max PC settings and around 70 percent of native 4K resolution.

Obscure_Observer2352d ago

Jesus Christ! Why do i need to be a PC gamer? I´m glad i quit with PC gamming and my X alongside my OG PS4 is just another proof that i did the right choice by sticking with consoles!

morganfell2352d ago

You are intentionally forgetful of all the PC games that are not on any console.

2352d ago
Obscure_Observer2352d ago

@morganfell

"You are intentionally forgetful of all the PC games that are not on any console."

No i´m not. Didn´t say nothing about exclusives. I said i´m done with PC gaming! I have a respectable collection of games on my steam library and physical copies of PC games. I´m a old gamer and been gaming on PC since the Wing Commander days. And that´s one of the reasons i´ve stick with the PC for so long. Been waiting for Star Citizen for too long till i had enough. By the time that game actually sees a official release date (if ever) the consoles will be more than capable to run that game with max settings.

So yeah, i´m better off without PC gaming in my life. I´ll be missing on AoE, Divinity II and a few others PC exclusives that i liked and that´s unfortunate, but; as a multi console owner, i got too many games on my "backlog" as it is. If you´re a PC gamer, more power to you.

2352d ago
MagicBeanz2352d ago

How do you know the price of the PC that was used in the comparison?

2352d ago
+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2352d ago
Kribwalker2353d ago

played it last night. the game looks bloody amazing in 4k with HDR. the explosions look awesome

Gaming4Life19812352d ago

Same here the game looks so good that I can't stop playing.

Bigpappy2352d ago

It looks great, but I have to wait until next week to receive my pre-ordered X from the west coast. It shipped ground and I am in the NE U.S.

2352d ago Replies(2)
Jinger2353d ago

Played it last night on my X, looks and plays great! Sounds even better also with some headphones and that new Dolby Atmos app! Glad to see the X giving PC a run for its money.

NoPeace_Walker2353d ago (Edited 2353d ago )

In the article, a ResetEra user did a rough spec of the YouTuber's PC and revealed that the $500 Xbox One X is likely keeping up with a $1,400 PC. The X is just Beastly powerful and cost almost $1000 less for almost the same performance as a expensive Giant PC.

N4G needs an article titled "Here is what you can buy on your XB1X instead of spending money on a $1400 PC" as well. LOL

kevnb2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

A pc is so much more than just a games machine, who doesn’t want to have a good pc anyway? Also unlike Xbox pc has exclusive games.

Lennoxb632352d ago

@kevnb

PC has thousands of exclusive games yet people still buy consoles. If exclusives were the only reason people play games, everyone would be on PC and there'd be no market for consoles.

NoPeace_Walker2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

"who doesn’t want to have a good pc anyway?"

My small portable laptop is all the PC I'll ever need. Sleek, light, portable, can surf and comment on N4G at Starbucks. Why would I ever need a stationary giant tower taking up real estate at home when a sleek, cheaper black box than can perform the same game function at beastly quality underneath my 4K TV?

My work has a good desktop PC for work and surfing N4G. I am all good with the Beast, man.

2352d ago
NoPeace_Walker2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

"Yea so ac orgins fake 4k 20 fps is keepong up with higj end pc?"

Huhhh? I don't have a PS4 Pro. You must've mistaken me for another person.

MagicBeanz2352d ago

"is likely", oh well there you have it folks, any more propaganda?

NatFanBoyRestricted2352d ago

Funny that Sony built the Pro with intentions of keeping people on their platform instead of going the PC route.

thisismyaccount2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

at Kenvb

So are console these days ... i can stream via one button click (you pc can´t), we can edit videos onthe fly (albeit not as good as with NLE on PC), we can stream anything, we can listen to music since the PS1 days. We can surf the web for fun, we "were allowed" to use our console as PC (like the PS2) and have both environments.

What we can not do, is install steam and play all those shitty-greenlit-scamware F2P crap that´s filling up the store. Oh and we can not use excel, but who cares about that. In theory a console user could do anything a PC could, if let´s say Sony allowed us to install a Linux onto our PS4 (like some did and have installed steam onto it).

At Lennoxb63

How many times are PC people going to throw that "pc has more exclusive" doctrine around the web? Seriously ... like you said, if they had any .. most would be playing on the PC. Listing 25 year old games like point&click as an exclusive just shows how precarious their situation really is... pc sukced balls during the amiga,amstrad days .. it sucking since the PS1, SS, N64 days and will still sukc after the PS4/XB1 have perished.

The only reason why they´re still around is due that 2008 F2P Boom in Asia that´s finally taking over the western culture with their shitty mentality and/or gaming taste. 90% pc market-revenue stem from F2P, of which China alone generates about 20$bill. every year of the 36$bill. they make annually.

AAA market on PC is dead, just look at Destiny 2 ... and every other EA, Ubi or Acti. game ... they only get a copy, because the consolero buys those games day1 at full price aka financing their pc copy.. has been like this since the PS3 days.

Here a PC exclusive list, that got shared around the pc fans .. what a terrible selection.
https://docs.google.com/doc...

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2352d ago
Mkai282352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

I have Dolby Atmos on PC, is that a one time payment purchase or is it a monthly subscription?

Jinger2352d ago

Pretty sure it's a one time, but don't quote me on that.

MegamanXXX2352d ago

I also have it on PC and a lot more

MattE2352d ago

One time for the headphone integration but the home cinema side is free I think

Kryptix2352d ago

It's a one time payment, but it's a hefty price and you could just use the built in Windows Sonic for free which by many comparisons, it's really good.

There's also Viper4Windows if you want to customize the sound experience yourself

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2352d ago
Liqu1d2353d ago

"Dee Batch"

The same guy who said AC Origins would have a 1080p 60fps mode on the One X. Not exactly known for honesty.

Gazondaily2353d ago

So you're saying that he faked the video?

PFFT2352d ago

Im sure that is exactly what he is saying. Fanboys just cant seem to accept the fact that the Xbox One X is a freaking monster of a machine. And its going to be like that till Sony launches the Ps5 sometime in 2020.

Gazondaily2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

I wonder why he can't answer the question. If he does think it's fake then he should man up and say so. Not a biggie; who knows, maybe he's right?

I'll just wait on Digital Foundry for confirmation of the beastage

2352d ago
Obscure_Observer2352d ago

@Liqu1d

Keep living on denial! XD

2352d ago
Liqu1d2352d ago

What denial? That he lied about a 1080p 60fps mode in AC Origins? That's a fact.

http://n4g.com/news/2097227...

I even said at the time that Dee Batch is a known liar and to take his statements with a bucketload of salt. You can see true denial in the article below.

http://n4g.com/news/2097979...

Obscure_Observer2352d ago

@Liqu1d

Dude, nobody is saying that the X version is the better version. It´s CLOSE to a high end PC. That means that more than 90% of ALL PC gamers doesn´t have a PC that matches the X´s performance!

Razzer2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

If this guy were a known liar promoting PS4 Pro, you would be all over those lies, Obscure. And you know it. How dare we question the source, though, when it is an Xbox One fanboy.

You know what conclusions you can draw from this comparison video? The difference between jack and shit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2352d ago
Razzer2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

From original poster of the video

“Alright folks, OP here, I can admit when I'm wrong. It doesn't appear to have parity. Before I posted, I browsed through the video for a few minutes, looking for texture detail/aliasing/lighting/resol ution/etc... and they looked identical to me. Upon looking more closely though, you can definitely see that the XB1X has lower resolution shadows, a lower FOV, and I'm sure some other deficiencies that I I haven't noticed yet.

Still, extremely impressive to me that it gets so close, and frankly it seems to keep a more stable framerate than the Vega 64 it's put up against.”

https://www.resetera.com/po...

Obscure_Observer2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

A little box costing 500 bucks which stands tall alongside HIGH END PCs worth 1400k!

https://media.giphy.com/med...

Razzer2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

At lower settings apparently. So the video lies about PC being on Max Settings. And it is 1.4k or 1400. Not 1400k.

Obscure_Observer2352d ago (Edited 2352d ago )

@Razzer

The guy has a high end PC AND an Xbox One X. You, on the other hand, has you beffy PC and nothing else but your baseless assumptions. You´re entitled to your opinion like everyone else, but, if you want to expose someone calling he/her a liar over this comparisson, you might consider and make a better more accurate comparisson yourself!

Razzer2352d ago

Does the video not say max settings? Does he not admit that isn’t the case? How delusional are you?

Obscure_Observer2352d ago

@Razzer

"Does the video not say max settings? Does he not admit that isn’t the case? How delusional are you?"

How many times i have to repeat myself till you understand? Xbox One X is console done right! It stands tall alongside high end PCs and i don´t care how you feel about it. I could care less about you PC pride crap! You and Shadowknight are about to have some unpleasent surprises because, it´s not about X vs Pro anymore. It´s about bang for your bucks! X vs PC! Xbox One X exposes more than 90% of gaming PCs to shame! Deal it!

I rather take Digital Foundry´s opinion on the matter over yours any day!

By Richard Leadbetter

"From what I've seen so far, there is some evidence that Scorpio's true 4K performance could pose a challenge to the likes of Nvidia's GTX 1070 and AMD's Fury X-class hardware.

If Scorpio's GPU can hold native 4K and hand in results on PAR or BETTER than GTX 1070, this is a seriously good result for a console."

Suck it up!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2352d ago
Show all comments (156)
120°

Star Wars Battlefront 2 Expanded Mod: A Whole New Galaxy to Explore

The Star Wars Battlefront 2 Expanded Mod adds over 23 new heroes, 20 reinforcements, and 2 new vehicles to the game, providing players with a wealth of new options and gameplay experiences. Download it today and experience a whole new version of Star Wars Battlefront 2!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
110°

Battlefront 2 grew into the best Star Wars game we've had in years

PCGamer: DICE managed to turn things around, and I'm sad that it's over.

1450d ago Replies(1)
Xaevi1450d ago (Edited 1450d ago )

Imagine if it were this good from the get go, then grew into something even greater. Good on DICE for supporting the game for as long as it did, but people seem to forgive and forget too fast. I would never blindly praise any game that took years to get to a point where it's actually worth playing AFTER I payed full price on release day. Also Fallen Order says hello

170°

Battlefield Game Coming in 2021, Star Wars: Battlefront 2 Content Updates to Stop

We'll be getting a new Battlefield game next year, but Battlefront 2 won't be getting more free content.

CertifiedGamer1451d ago

Frostbite 6 hopefully with fully destructible environments, and a free to play battle royal mode.

Majin-vegeta1451d ago

Good luck..with most Dice vets gone now BF will he a shit Show

-Foxtrot1451d ago (Edited 1451d ago )

Well...it already was a shit show, even with its improvements it was still meh

If they made it play like the old BF games which were less generic I could get behind the next one

Xenial1451d ago

Oh boy, we'll see how this goes.

silenthillstrangler1451d ago

Cant wait to see what it looks like and what next gen features it'll bring.

janus2251451d ago

Dont forget Vince Zampella managing DICE now! And sure this guy know to create GEMS (Titanfall, Apex, Star Wars...)

Yi-Long1451d ago

I really just want Battlefield to be Battlefield again, so focused on Conquest-mode, with well-balanced maps that will allow you to play in the role you please, where you're not hopelessly reliant on squads and vehicles.

These devs seemed intent on having as big a map as possible, with as many people on that map as possible, and basically forcing you to group up and use vehicles, and in the end that just diminishes the role you as a single player have in it, thus you feel less special for accomplishing something cool/good.

I remember in 1943 just successfully defending a flag as a single sniper, and taking out tanks with my mines.

In BF1 and BF5, especially with kill-cam giving away your position, that ability to kinda go on your own and do your sneaky thing and making a difference, has been killed somewhat. Of course, with team-communications you're always going to be at a disadvantage against squads who can quickly communicate your location to each other, but the kill-cam has made it far too easy for the opponents to figure out your location and consequently deal with it ...