230°

Microsoft will change the avatar's appearence and will adapt it for project scorpio

A new job offer tell that Microsoft wants to adapt the avatars to have a better quality and a enhance appearance and make it compatibles with Scorpio and other devices. Wants other functionalities too

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Mr Pumblechook2550d ago

Let me guess: The new Xbox avatars are going to be made less cute and more 'street' to match the Bro-Power image of the Scorpio!

2550d ago
TheCommentator2549d ago

I think they should go more in the direction of PS Home in regards to character models. We've already seen Avatars and Mii's in actual games, right? If Avatars looked realistic instead, then they could end up in realistic looking games instead of the cartoony stuff.

COD with your avatar? Your Avatar in Mass Effect, Fallout, GTA? Forza Horizon? It would be pretty sick, IMO!

TheCommentator2549d ago

I haven't even looked at my avatar since getting my XB1. MS made them practically useless. Maybe they're finally going to be doing something more meaningful with the Avatars?

meka26112549d ago

Yea like more animations lol. I feel the same; avatars are just dumb, maybe if you could edit them better to make it your own, but it's just stupid outfits now.

Concertoine2549d ago

Lol i hope Sea of thieves isnt getting held back so rare can work on avatars...,

For those that dont know Rare designed the avatar system on 360.

TheCommentator2549d ago

@ Concertoine

The article is about a job listing to hire people to work on the Avatar system, so Rare is not involved in this project.

TheColbertinator2550d ago

Hololens Lite + Project Scorpio

Ron_Danger2550d ago

= too expensive to be marketed to the masses.

TheUndertaker852549d ago

Yet Sony is attempting to sell PSVR to the masses with a dev kit costing about the same. HoloLens would further offer more possibilities for developers as they'll be able to create PC or Xbox content.

PSVR
https://www.giantbomb.com/p...

HoloLens
https://www.microsoftstore....

Ron_Danger2549d ago (Edited 2549d ago )

@undertaker

so your defensive proof that that hololense + Scorpio will be priced competitively is by linking articles where devs kits for hololense are $500 more than PSVR devs kits?

So all the MS fanboys that said PSVR was priced too high are gonna be ok with this?

Before you post knee jerk reactionary comments, take a second to think about what you're typing.

TheUndertaker852549d ago (Edited 2549d ago )

I already did. I find it awkward you chose to ignore the factor that content for HoloLens can run on more than console unlike PSVR.

For $500 more you can develop for both Scorpio and PC.

Either it's too expensive to market to the masses like PSVR or it isn't. Judging by information that can be found from factual outlets HoloLens isn't far from the competition then again, HoloLens development can be on more than one device.

Oh sorry. Did you just post a knee jerk reaction with a fanboyish perspective and influence? Looking to make the "facts" what you want them to be then ignoring published information? Better yet stating that I am providing evidence from more than just my own opinion masquerading as facts?

Ron_Danger2549d ago

You might want to reread your posts and my posts. Mine are objective to the point where I don't even mention a manufacturer until after you do. Your posts consist of defensive "Sony too" responses.

You are confusing objective questioning with fanboy questioning because it challenges your thinking.

If Scorpio and Hololense both come in priced at $400 each then that's great because then it will be priced competitively with the competition. However, MS has stated that Scorpio will be a premium device (read expensive) so they aren't targeting mass adoption rate.

You have to look at this topic objectively. Scorpio + Hololense is going to be expensive when they both finally launch, end of story.

Since you like bringing up the competition, by the time Scorpio + hololense launch, there's a realistic chance that Sony will cut the price of the PS4 and PSVR. It's not unreasonable to think that Sony could offer a PS4/ PSVR bundle for $600 this holiday season which would be a huge blow to the Scorpio launch considering people are pricing it between $400-$700.

TheCommentator2549d ago (Edited 2549d ago )

@Ron

So you think that the word premium is synonymous with expensive? Premium has a higher price tag than a standard product, obviously, but you cannot assume what that margin will be.

What we know about Scorpio suggests it won't be too expensive. It only consumes 250 watts, compared to about 350 for the Pro. It uses extensive optimization to raise efficiency, which will reduce cost vs. performance. They're using modified versions of inexpensive PC parts to maintain FC with XB1.

About the MR headsets. MS is already partnering to bring 2nd gen VR to Scorpio, but they specifically mentioned that MR would be coming to Xbox in 2018. As in MIXED REALITY... like Hololens is. There are companies developing hybrid VR/AR headsets that MS plans to utilize.

Also, your point was not objective. Your comment was a direct response to one made specifically about Scorpio. You think a comment with negative connotations towards Xbox, while ignoring the fact that Pro/PSVR are also, "...too expensive to me marketed to the masses." is being objective? lol. Yet you dog Undertaker for posting supportive links while you just blabber on about your twisted opinion and talk about MS fanboys. You're not being objective... you're being obtuse.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2549d ago
shiva12549d ago

Off topic
Somebody on twitter can you please ask Phil if we need to tune into Build conference. He has appeared in this event before making minor announcements for PC and xbox. He did play a game of FH2 in one of the builds. There would be announcements for xbox (not games but features).

"While Build is a developer event, it also features a huge amount of company news. Last year, Microsoft announced a ton of new products and feature updates.
This year, Microsoft will undoubtedly talk about Windows 10, HoloLens, Visual Studio, .NET, Azure, Xbox, and everything in between. We expect there will be a big focus on AI, mixed reality, and the cloud."

Ron_Danger2550d ago

Can't wait to see what the bottom of their shoes look like!!

XXanderXX2550d ago

About time more is done with the Avatars .

christocolus2549d ago

Agreed. Scorpio is already getting a UI upgrade thanks to the new hardware..It makes sense to upgrade the avatars too.

shiva12549d ago

Motion UI. Hope they show a glimpse of it during Build event.

omegaheat2550d ago (Edited 2550d ago )

Damn, looks like they are going all out with this console. Good times are ahead.

subtenko2549d ago

Its all the rage...everybodys doing it... :|

shiva12549d ago

Citizens of Antarctica are not doing it. Who should we complain.... Damn them penguins for not following....

Show all comments (47)
450°

Microsoft has laid off entire teams behind Virtual, Mixed Reality, and HoloLens

Windowscentral writes: "HoloLens, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality are all but dead at Microsoft."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
crazyCoconuts452d ago

Yeah last thing I'd want going to battle would be windows strapped to my head

Orchard452d ago

Lol resupply breaks would become reformat breaks. Plus windows updates mid combat.

I also can’t imagine wearing a Hololens or any other headset for hours like that. Especially when you’re already carrying all the other equipment our soldiers carry today.

Philaroni452d ago

I would suck to go in to war and get... a blue screen of death.... literally.

I want this to be the most down voted comment. Sorry for my dark sense of humor.

Orchard452d ago

@Phil Sorry to disappoint but you’re getting an upvote from me :p

shinoff2183451d ago

Damn orchard, you almost had some form of virtual to praise to the high mountains about , least for the time being you can continue to down psvr2

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 451d ago
Knushwood Butt452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

'Headaches and nausea'

I get those symptoms using Microsoft Edge.

Good-Smurf452d ago

Darn thing locked up my laptop a few times and threw a no signal bug at my external or internal screen when it tries to load certain websites.

Knushwood Butt452d ago

It's so bloated and frustrating to use. Always spamming me with pop up dialogues and stuff.

I don't use my laptop much, but yesterday made the time to set Chrome as my default.

lonewolf10452d ago

It mentions that in the article, confused slightly as to whole divisions being laid off as The Verge article makes it seem that there is a 1.2 version of the headsets in testing and MSoft have received 165 Mill to carry on with them.

Christopher452d ago

That's a different product, actually, not HoloLens. It is poorly written, but the 1.2 version they're going with is a different product they have also been testing.

1Victor452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

Well there you have it folks Microsoft officially buried its room temperature foliage on a form of VR😢.
The good news for the team they might get a job at Sony or meta for their vr departments

I feel sorry for the hardcore Xbox fans that was holding up the wish of something coming out of mixed reality/HoloLens.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 451d ago
Orchard452d ago

Not super surprising given how poorly VR and AR and all the metaverse stuff have taken off really.

Also outside of the military, you barely see or hear anything about Hololens these days.

blackblades452d ago

I remember them talking about hololens back in the day. Showing that Minecraft with it to maybe compete with VR and now it's dead like everything else.

Orchard452d ago

Yep lol, also the thing was like $5000. I wouldn’t pay $500 nevermind $5000 to play Minecraft in VR/AR.

ApocalypseShadow452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

AR is growing. Already used in cellphones. VR is growing everywhere else. It's just taking longer to integrate it in a pair of glasses.

Microsoft tried to use Hololens at E3 against VR and failed with that little window nonsense. Then, they played like they weren't pushing it for gaming when they actually were displaying games like Minecraft in it. Then, sold the tech against employee wishes to the military and failed because it's nauseating and having lights on a battlefield will get you killed. I had night vision in the army and could tell when an enemy inhaled on a cigarette. You could pop them right there. It's a good science fiction idea. But nothing replaces real battlefield awareness with your own eyes and ears in training or real war.

You're saying it failed because Microsoft is failing with Hololens. They partnered with 7 or so PC manufacturers to put out Windows VR headsets. But just like on console, they made NO GAMES for their headsets and expected others to pick up the slack. All those headsets hit fire sales and were discontinued. Microsoft's fault again for no Halo VR, no Forza VR, etc.

They failed again by not making good with their promise of high fidelity VR on Xbox One. When they have 2 TRILLION worth. Billions to buy up publishers. But not release VR because they want gamers on subscriptions and are buying up franchises to get them on game pass. But Sony is going to DELIVER high fidelity VR that Microsoft isn't.

PSVR sold at profit DAY ONE. Sony made millions in revenue on games and accessories proving that money can be made in VR and grow the market and platform. There are developers like Beat Games or even an indie making gorilla tag, can make money in VR. Sony are releasing their second one with even more potential to make more money that proves Microsoft wrong again.

Saying VR or AR is failing as a whole is FALSE. Education, automotive and building construction, real estate sales, music entertainment, medicine for PTSD help or cancer patients wanting to see things other than hospital walls, job instruction for places like Walmart... And GAMING, means they are not failing. Only in your mind.

The growth is real. You're just trying to deny it because of Microsoft. This isn't 3D TV or Wii waggle or your daddy's Kinect. VR and AR is here to stay.

Orchard452d ago

“This isn't 3D TV or Wii waggle or your daddy's Kinect.”

That awkward moment when the failed products you’re using to defend another product had far higher attach rate and sales than the one you’re trying to defend 👀💀

GamingSinceForever452d ago

“Not super surprising given how poorly VR and AR and all the metaverse stuff have taken off really for Microsoft”

Thought I’d fix that for you.

Orchard452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

So where is the VR and metaverse success story? Quest 2?

Facebooks metaverse is dead too.

452d ago Replies(1)
GamingSinceForever452d ago

Sony seems to have gotten VR right. Wouldn’t you agree?

Meta Quest is doing fairly well too.

Now I agree that MS was right in letting it go because they weren’t having much success themselves.

Orchard452d ago

No one has gotten it right yet, if by right you mean made it popular. The attach rate for PSVR is too low to call it that.

Quest is a little harder to judge since it's not attached to any device we can reasonably measure like PSVR is.

But until a good amount of gamers care, and/or it's considered mainstream, I would say VR hasn't landed.

As for MS, at the time it seemed like a risky bet, but in hindsight, they made the right decision if you look at where VR is today.

Bathyj452d ago

So Orchard you wouldn't consider VR a success unless it has a high attach rate to a parent device?

Bollocks
I consider VR a success if it gives you a good experience, an experience to can't get in any other format, and a decent amount of people use it and are happy with it regardless of attach rates.

Porsche doesn't consider themselves a failure because Toyota sell 100 times more cars.

If there's demand for a product and it makes profit then it's a viable business so get over your hangups.

And as for Microsoft making the right decision sitting back and watching because it's risky, well all that proves is they are participants in this industry, not leaders. If they had done VR and it was half-decent I can't help but think you would have a totally different opinion about it.

Orchard452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

"So Orchard you wouldn't consider VR a success unless it has a high attach rate to a parent device?"

Correct. a 4% attach rate, for a gaming accessory on a parent device that is dedicated to gaming is unsuccessful. Kinect had a higher attach rate than that, and it was considered a failure too.

"Porsche doesn't consider themselves a failure because Toyota sell 100 times more cars."

Not comparable at all. Porsche being a premium, rare product that only the very rich can afford is part of their brand, meanwhile Toyota is the cheap, mainstream, 'most people can buy one of these' brand.

PlayStation products are more Toyota than Porsche.

"well all that proves is they are participants in this industry, not leaders."

Participating in VR isn't what defines you as a leader or participant in this industry. Nintendo are blowing the PS5 and XSX away, and they are not participating in VR. VR just isn't that popular or important 🤷

Crows90452d ago

@ Orchard
"Not comparable at all. Porsche being a premium, rare product that only the very rich can afford is part of their brand, meanwhile Toyota is the cheap, mainstream, 'most people can buy one of these' brand."

Well actually within the gaming space you actually nailed it. Xbox is the toyota and Playstation is the Porsche..since it is more expensive in other parts of the world.

"Correct. a 4% attach rate, for a gaming accessory on a parent device that is dedicated to gaming is unsuccessful. Kinect had a higher attach rate than that, and it was considered a failure too."

Except nobody actually wanted kinect. It was forced onto IP and consoles with the xbox one. PSVR on the other hand is an optional device. An optional device that sold to 5million players. That is a success for a typical game and also embodies the hardcore audience. Most Playstation exclusives are guaranteed 5 million in sales. The attach rate for a non essential and expensive device shouldnt be seen in the same light as say an actual game or cheap subscription service. If it was actually a failure im pretty sure Sony wouldnt be wasting money on it.

"Participating in VR isn't what defines you as a leader or participant in this industry. Nintendo are blowing the PS5 and XSX away, and they are not participating in VR. VR just isn't that popular or important"

Thats not how it works. Sony is a leader in the VR industry regardless of popularity. Who else is doing it? So yeah. Not to mention you have to look at the games...I know...its an issue for xbox fans to dwell on whether games are actually any good but PSVR has good titles and PSVR2 doesnt look to disappoint either.

Hofstaderman452d ago

But I thought sales and attach rates do not matter to Microsoft @Orchard.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 452d ago
S2Killinit452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

VR is so much fun. One day MS will get their act together. Don't lose hope! Hope is all you have. Keep believing…

Orchard452d ago

I'd much rather MS, Nintendo and Sony all invest in traditional games instead.

Just look at PS5 in 2023, we're getting a very small handful of traditional Sony games this year because instead they've invested in appeasing ~4% of PS customers.

S2Killinit452d ago

Nah, Sony knows how to make exclusives. We are getting so much Im falling behind in my backlog. MS on the other hand cant seem to make a single proper exclusive. Promises yes, games, no. And now, seems no VR either! What are they thinking? But, dont lose hope, one day they will fix all of it.

shinoff2183451d ago

Orchy Sony can gives us traditional games and do some vr stuff. They gonna be alright. Vr is pretty dope if you'd actually try it or you can get your parents to get you one

GamingSinceForever452d ago

Orchard you can be a real character at times. If Sony felt that PSVR didn’t meet or even exceed their expectations why would they move to release PSVR2? Sony is notorious for abandoning what they feel is a failure, but it looks like they are coming on even stronger with PSVR2.

crazyCoconuts452d ago

I don't have data to prove this, but I feel like PSVR owners purchased more games and became more locked into the platform. Also more of the games were digital so no secondary market for used games. I suspect even though there weren't as many VR owners, they ended up spending a lot of money. I know I did

Orchard452d ago

"If Sony felt that PSVR didn’t meet or even exceed their expectations why would they move to release PSVR2?"

Even Kinect had two iterations. Means nothing.

"Sony is notorious for abandoning what they feel is a failure"

I wouldn't say they are any more or less notorious than Microsoft and Nintendo. Google are the ones who are really notorious for killing things.

Godmars290452d ago

The Metaverse is something the former Facebook is trying to force while having no idea how to best implement it. Trying to use the "tried and true" method of get people using it then get it working.

How long have customer driven markets vs market driven consumers been things?

frostypants451d ago (Edited 451d ago )

That is some serious cope. AR and VR are growing just fine. MS as a rule just sucks at innovation. Always has. They never see things through. Kinect was interesting but they ultimately botched that too.

Pocahontas451d ago

No one buys this narrative give up man

EazyC451d ago

I do think there has been a disappointing uptake on VR, but the reason is :

1: The upfront cost. You're literally doubling the price of the console.
2. Lack of first party support. Getting spin offs etc makes it feel like second fiddle.

I've just preordered PSVR2 for Gran Turismo 7 alone. THAT is what I want, a full blown game in VR. I don't think I'd have bothered otherwise. Until developers start making BR games from the ground up, I won't be that interested.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 451d ago
Sonic1881452d ago (Edited 452d ago )

I'm surprised that the Oculus Quest and PSVR didn't have these problems

452d ago Replies(1)
EazyC451d ago

Price alone will keep VR in the "super luxury" and "specialist" categories of gaming for a long time to come.

Abnor_Mal452d ago

Halolens as some tried to call it, R.I.P.

S2Killinit452d ago

Lol they are on the right path $:

Show all comments (67)
140°

No, Breath of the Wild Is Not Available on PC, Mobile or HoloLens

It's hard to explain how in the world this listing exists

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
bovandy1574d ago

Apple store has this all the time, I'm not clear why Microsoft would allow this.

Neonridr1574d ago

bahaha.. it's almost like they just threw in popular buzz words to show up on searches. Dear god that translation was awful.

Gridknac1573d ago

Actually you can play this on pc and run it at 4k@60fps.

Shiken1573d ago

Well in order to play it legally you still have to own the game for WiiU soooo....

specialguest1573d ago

My cousin owns it on the WiiU, but since he owes me money from 5 years ago I consider myself partial legal owner of a copy of the game

Shiken1573d ago

@specialguest

Not exactly how reality work bud lol.

Shiken1573d ago

I saw a shit mobile game advertised on facebook once that literally showed gameplay from BotW...

Like I mean really? Out of all the games to use to deceive consumers, you choose one of the biggest and most recognizable IPs in history...and from their most recent game to boot?

That is a special kind of stupid right there.

Show all comments (11)
60°

Fan-Made VR Title Brings Yu-Gi-Oh! To Life

Beta set to release later this year - but what does Pot of Greed do?

adamwparker2226d ago

YuGiOh, Magic The Gathering, Pokemon......bring them ALL TO VR!