550°

Phil Spencer talks Focus on Xbox One/Windows 10 Gamers; Comments on Quantum Break’s PC Announcement

Today’s announcement of Quantum Break‘s release on PC caused mixed feelings among hardcore Xbox fans, and Xbox Division head honcho Phil Spencer took to Twitter to respond to questions.

Read Full Story >>
dualshockers.com
Herbalistic2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

I hope Phil Spencer doesn't let some upset fanboys on social forums get in the way of supporting Windows..There are idiots claiming to have canceled their pre orders over the news of QB coming to Windows 10.

Abriael2993d ago

I think Phil won't let anyone get in the way of his vision. It's pretty obvioius that he knows what he's doing, and he'll keep on that path.

AngelicIceDiamond2993d ago

X1 fans are happy and PC fans are happy that's all that matters.

DemonChicken2993d ago

@ herb

Too late - https://twitter.com/XboxP3/...

a idiot and a racist (he is seriously)

BitbyDeath2993d ago

This is likely Satyas vision more so than Phil.
Windows is the top dog and MS need to back it to try get Windows store off the ground.

2pacalypsenow2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

@DemonChicken

Lol he said playing on PC is for weird people? lmao

darthv722993d ago

It honestly would not surprise me in the least if at this years E3 they announce a 1 and Done deal. Meaning if you buy the physical or digital release of a game it will work on both the XB1 and Windows 10 PC.

It's a direction things are heading towards. Might as well be a big software company leading the charge. Consoles (currently) are so close in specs and are virtually cheaper PC's so why not capitalize on the same idea that PC games have. One copy that can adjust for differing hardware so the consumer doesnt have to buy multiple copies. It could even work for other platforms.

within time we will see one product on the shelf and it will say "Compatible with the following platforms...".

GameNameFame2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

Problem is that his vision is PC. As a PC gamer, that is great news, but for Xbox One users maybe not.

jb2272993d ago

I think putting QB on Win10 is a great move for sure, but the nature of the reveal coming so late after they spent the Holidays selling people on a lineup that can only be played on the XBO, QB in particular, is just a bit shady to me. The move is good but I'm genuinely curious as to how people can trust Spencer & the rest of the execs when they obfuscate the truth like this in order to trick gamers into buying a box specifically for a game they could've feasibly already had the setup for. That outlook list they released only a month or so ago again reiterated the XBO exclusive release when they knew the information was false.

At this point the upfront thing to do would be to reveal all of the XBO exclusives that are also being developed on PC. If MS are truly interested in catering to both platforms, then they need to not favor one over the other by deliberately keeping reveals for the last possible moment. It just casts a shadow over anything that Spencer says in all honesty, and this after he has taken strides to be an exec that is for the common gamer. All of this also raises concerns over what version we've actually been seeing all this time. Seems pretty likely to me that we haven't even actually seen the XBO version in motion yet.

darthv722993d ago

@jb227... we don't really know if there were issues with the deal or not. It's their game to reveal as much or as little info at their discretion.

to ask they come forward and present all of their games that are being developed for both, that seems a tad entitled to which you or any of us are not. It would be nice but again they don't have to reveal anything if they arent at liberty to do so.

for all we know they only within the last couple of weeks or so got the approval to do the giveaway of the PC game and alan wake. there is nothing shady about it. People who were going to buy an XB1 either bought one at the holidays or were going to get one at some point. The reveal of this game does not invalidate their decision no matter how much you think it does.

Nobody and I do mean nobody every buys a console for 1 game and 1 game only. you buy it for the library that is available and will be available later on. Those who got the XB1 can still play this game and if they also have a good gaming PC then they can get that version for free.

those who did not have an xb1 but has a gaming PC can now play this game and be happy. those who have neither well... guess their just gonna play it off like they always do. with no interest what so ever.

Why o why2993d ago

If the game is getting released simultaneously then its kinda obvious ms knew from a while back the game was heading in that direction. Do you really think that isn't even a little shady or deceitful ?

mcstorm2992d ago

This may sound daft but I wonder if TR sales on PC/Xbox one had anything to do with the change in QB being on both. For me I am all for MS supporting PC/Xbox one with the same games. Even Halo. At the end of the day we all know MS will make more from a game on PC and Xbox one than they will just on one console.
I think this is the start of the Xbox/PC becoming close and if MS can push out by the game on one platform you get it on the other free this could work wonders for the xbox brand.

Plus it also puts MS in a good position to get more exclusives on the xbox one and also pc. One thing said a lot out the xbox is the lack of various gores on it will opening it up like this could help developers port pc games to the xbox one. Also for me having Halo, Forza Gears and more on the PC will mean more players online to as also gives gamers more choice in terms of buying a console or pc for gaming.

Killz4Twinkies2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

I think that it's great for Microsoft, PC, and XB gamers. Regardless of the vocal minority, truth is the majority of people who buy games are either console OR pc with the exception of a small percentage (likely on the forums).

It's good for MS b/c they sell more games. Good for PC gamers as they are supported as they should be. Good for XB owners b/c it is still console exclusive to MS and this allows publishers/developer to make more money who in turn (we hope) put it back into making more and better games

See no issue, with this

**** The story should be how MS is allowing cross buy between PC and XB

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2992d ago
2pacalypsenow2993d ago

Those "Fanboys" are the ones buying Xbox 1's and games

Herbalistic2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

I'm sure they are plenty of 'gamer's who support Xbox that just like to play games and not cry on forums.Its real childish to cancel a pre order over news of Microsoft wanting to support their other platform[Win10} too.

2pacalypsenow2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

Some people are very Loyal and for a game to go to another platform could anger them, some people don't care that "others" can play the game too, they want exclusive on the Xbox and Xbox only. Its like you winning something and then sharing it with someone else so they can also experience the win some people don't want that.

I think they should of done what Sony does an Announce right at the beginning that its coming on PlayStation and PC instead of having people believe they can only play it if they buy an Xbox 1, I know a few friends who have powerful gaming pc's and bought Xbox 1's to play this game, now they are returning it.

slate912993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

Oh, its you again, in an xbox article.

2pacalypsenow2993d ago

Yes its me an Xbox one owner so I'm commenting on an article about a Console that I own and play.

AngelicIceDiamond2993d ago

"some people don't care that "others" can play the game too, they want exclusive on the Xbox and Xbox only. Its like you winning something and then sharing it with someone else so they can also experience the win some people don't want that."

Well those ppl need to grow up then.

darthv722993d ago

"loyalty" really has no place in gaming. It's an entertainment medium not a marriage. the only places you should have loyalty is the military, marriage, workplace but not to things such as game platform or even (dare i say it) a sports team.

you can be a fan but at the end of the day those other things have no bearing on the outcome of your life. The key points above, however... do.

freshslicepizza2993d ago

@2pacalypsenow
"Those "Fanboys" are the ones buying Xbox 1's and games"

you mean like this guy,

"Rick @rickl420
If I knew @Microsoft was going to phase out Xbox. I would have went PS. I'm not a ******* pc gamer. I'm a console gamer."

he makes no sense at all. it is still coming to the xbox one.

Utalkin2me2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

@Herbalistic

It's childish to stand up for what you believe in? Wow, some people have morals and try to live by those morals. I would be upset too, if MS kept selling me over the holidays "Greatest Xbox lineup ever and can only be played on Xbox". Some people would probably feel slapped in the face if they owned a gaming PC, after they went out and bought a Xbox1 during holiday season.

So yes their opinions should be heard. You might not agree with it, which is totally fine.

Utalkin2me2992d ago

@darthv72

While i can kind of see your point. Really doesn't make much sense to me. It's human nature to support in what you believe in. I believe in Sony and Nintendo in gaming consoles, and thats who i will support. Until they do something to make me personally lose my support, then im going to be loyal to those console companies.

joeorc2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

@Herbalistic + 17h ago
I'm sure they are plenty of 'gamer's who support Xbox that just like to play games and not cry on forums.Its real childish to cancel a pre order over news of Microsoft wanting to support their other platform[Win10} too.

Its pretty upfront exactly why some gamers are upset. Is Microsoft really into the console market to make a console grow, or really develop under their company, or is it now Microsoft just again trying to turn the console market into another direct "Windows OS" extension to keep consumers tied to again windows.

No problem than, that's the companies goal, its the companies goal.

But why have a Console and try to call it a console, when its being viewed as just another "Windows OS" extender to their own admission Microsoft's view their OS is more Important to their bottom line over their own Quote: " console " its not a console, its a Media center PC.

This is the big problem, its not the fact they are making and proactive in making games for Xbox one & PC at the same time.

No that's not the problem.

Its the fact that turning the Xbox as a platform into just another "PC" platform defeats the whole purpose of making a console market.

What Microsoft is trying to do is turn the console market into just another duplicate of their already Monopoly in the PC market for gaming as that Microsoft already has in the PC market through their Operating System.

The real truth to it all is like the "one OS" for everyone being now "one console for everyone" now again all three Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft all three want as many consumers under their Eco system as they can, but if many consumers want competition. Than how is gaming on PC competition vs' having any other Operating system other than having to have a Windows OS for gaming on PC's.

What many see is Microsoft trying to do the same thing as is already in the PC market into the game console market.

"Is this the "console market or the PC market" many gamers stated right here have stated they could envision "one box" and all games going to one box, that in of itself is not the problem its the anticompetitive in basic nature, be that Nintendo, Microsoft or Sony having the single box gateway for all things gaming must go through. It would not bolster competition it stifles it.

We have pretty much seen the resulting outcome for that very point other than Windows OS no other OS has many games made for that OS. Just Windows.

Many Gamers do not want the console market to end up exactly like the PC market where one single company is the controlling gate keeper for all things gaming with no real alternative to such for choice other than one company's offering.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2992d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris2993d ago

Marketing Quantum Break as an Xbox One exclusive for 3 years only to make it launch the same day on PC is insulting. Putting the big name Xbox one games on PC diminishes the console.

PhucSeeker2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

What does this move insult exactly ? Your love for Xbone ? Your superiority of owing an Xbone ? It launches on Windows 10 fgs, you know, the one M$ trying to push into everyone home.

And you can get both ver (+ Alan Wake). One hell of a deal for 60$.

Sciurus_vulgaris2993d ago

@PhucSeeker They were marketing the game as Xbox One only a few weeks ago.

I already have Alan Wake, I wil likely give away my code.

Joe9132993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

I see how it can be viewed as shady but this is business and business is shady. MS did not sell enough XBO so it has to make up some how on the software so now they can make money off people who only have xbo and people who only have gaming pc the people who have both are the real winners lol. Lets say xbo only sold like 10 to 20 million no way is every xbo owner going to buy this game so if 10 million consoles are out there probably only 5 to 8 million will buy that is good sales to some but if you now put that same game on pc you can double that number so why not plus they trying to push windows 10 so it really is killing 2 birds with one stone.

joeorc2992d ago

@PhucSeeker + 9h ago
What does this move insult exactly ? Your love for Xbone ? Your superiority of owing an Xbone ? It launches on Windows 10 fgs, you know, the one M$ trying to push into everyone home.

And you can get both ver (+ Alan Wake). One hell of a deal for 60$.

The point being again is it a console or is it about the PC. No its about the Windows OS.

Their goal has never been about making a console to grow the console market. Its about and has always been about getting their "operating system" to be the main gateway for all things entertainment in computing to go through the Operating system they make. Now nothing wring with that, they would not be the company they are today if they did not try to do that.

But this move is like it always have Microsoft is not making a console market to grow the console market its to dilutes the very reason for having a console market at all.

Microsoft's goal has been very clear from the get go, to make windows OS the only real entertainment OS for the living room like it already is in the PC market.

It again should be expected, but the fact is Media center PC's development was to void the entire reason for consoles existance. And for over 30 years that is not how its worked out that way. But many companies do not want a repeat of how the PC market turned out.

This is the exact reason console market was made, and has been a direction to make a play to take over the living room like Microsoft took the PC market.

None of the core gaming company's want to share, its their nature, but one company being able to dominate a single market to where no other companies product has a chance to compete is never good for competition.

That goes for even if it was just Sony, or Nintendo or Microsoft's being the only real choice it stifled competition in the PC market for gaming on Operating systems. Other than Windows.

Many are in Question is this the PC market or Console market.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2992d ago
AngelicIceDiamond2993d ago

I'll continue to say this on these QB threads MS said they're supporting PC 2 to 3 years ago. After MS was a running joke trying to support PC 360 generation. Now that they're doing it people ar...who is really hurt by this? Who are the ones salty by this I wanna know.

BitbyDeath2993d ago

Everyone on Phils Twitter. They're coming out of the woodwork.

UltraNova2993d ago

And most of them are xb1 owners...go figure.

Christopher2993d ago

I'll probably get a lot of heat from this, but saying you still support something more than ever is pretty much what you expect them to say about anything up until they stop supporting it. It's got to be hard for some to just accept when they stop talking numbers and their biggest new IP goes multiplatform two months before release. I mean, they kept a third party title more exclusive than this one.

Great move for gamers, but definitely will be paying more attention to the future of the Xbox One. Perhaps this is just an overall plan to build both, but that will need to be proven with more than words.

payikick2993d ago

The guy on twitter seems to be really upset about XBL being free on pc, technically its not since in order to have it we have to buy the operating system. Thats the kind of so called "gamer" thats usually weeded out in transition between console and PC, dont get me wrong I own everything from a Neo-geo to a ps4 just from experience its a bit more mature on PC. except for the master racist LMAO...

Perjoss2992d ago

For every 1 silly fanboy crying on the internet there are 10,000 gamers who simply do not give a damn and just want to have some fun with their video games. Fanboys are the vocal minority and people who pay attention to them are making a mistake.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2992d ago
christocolus2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

I think Phil is doing a great job. The fact he even tries explaining his deceisions to the xbox community shows how passionate he is about all this. some interesting quotes in there though.

“We have more focus on Xbox at the company from the CEO down than we’ve ever had.”

I'm really happy about this. I hope we keep seeing more AAA titles down the line.

“You cancelled a pre-order for a game you want to play because someone else get’s to play the game on Windows?”

LmaoXD

“I think u know how much I respect our hardcore Xbox fans. And I understand your passion. Making Xbox great is a big priority.”

“High end PC gaming rigs aren't the price of a console. People play on console because they love that experience, same for PC.”

Totally agree with this last quote and I believe xbox and PC will co-exist side by side now and going into next gen.

Keep doing what you doing Phil.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

DarkOcelet2993d ago

I think people should be happy about this announcement because it easily mean more sales and just like Phil said..

'More players, more games, better ecosystem.'

HaydenJameSmith2993d ago ShowReplies(2)
AngelicIceDiamond2993d ago

So what does people want MS to do, pull off another 180 and not support PC gaming now?

What do ppl want from MS?

r2oB2993d ago

People want MS to be more transparent. Not market games as Xbox only, when they know it will reach other platforms.

Now we know the "polish" the game needed to be delayed for.

It's unreasonable for people to want MS to abandon PC gamers, and I don't think most people want that. It's perfectly reasonable for gamers to expect companies to be honest from the gate.

81BX2993d ago

Can see the issue here.
1. If its coming to pc... then just say that from the start. Its not going to change my mind, im still day 1 for xb1 on this game but other gamerz might want to support the pc version so having that kind of intel up front is nice.
2. If xbox 1 games that have mp come to pc as well... why should i have to have xbl?? When pc doesnt?
These are just some red flags i see. The 2nd one worries me more than the 1st. I like the way MS has turned the xb1 around. I just hope this doesnt cause us to get mad.

joeorc2992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

@AngelicIceDiamond + 17h ago
So what does people want MS to do, pull off another 180 and not support PC gaming now?

What do ppl want from MS?

Maybe it would have been better to make Xbox as a platform loadable on any PC they would want, make a Xbox OS a gamers OS.

Why make a console when what, really would have better supported the market is just another loadable OS for PC hardware.

The Answer is quite clear.
This is not about the console market with Microsoft's Actions. Its about the Operating system over the console market. again nothing wrong with that, the Operating system for what ever box you have is the control system for the system.

But many consumers now feel they are being regulated to 2nd tier for their very own box they spent investing into and now have to share 1st tier support over putting Xbox platform as a priority.

Example PC players do not have to pay for a gold sub to play online multiplayer but Xbox platform holders do?

We pay more for no exclusive time now and PC gets it the same day & supports mod's higher resolution, frame rates. Exactly is there a real good reason to invest into Xbox is if this is what I can expect in the future now?

Highlife2993d ago

The only way I could see someone being upset is if they already own a gaming rig and bought an x1 just for this game. Which is why I think ms purposely waited to announce the pc version to drive sales of x1 but that's their job.

Other than that no one should be unhappy more can enjoy the game.

Side note fanboys are crazy and would die for there system. It's crazy knowing Phil and shu play and game on other systems but someone who doesn't even work for one of these companies won't.

2993d ago
AizenSosuke2993d ago

I agree but letting too many games to PC, will make my Xbox ONE dried up and withered in term of games that's my legitimate concern here.

jaymacx2992d ago

No it won't... People act like everyone has a gaming rig... Most ppl dont... Xb1 is more user friendly for most ppl... I do undetstand your sentiment about owning both platforms but thats the downside to owning multiple systems. I have all the current platforms (xb1, ps4, wii u, pc) and sometimes some of the platforms get unused for awhile because of my focus on the current game im playing. Also sometimes the console version of a game is better than pc (Batman Arkham Knight)

freshslicepizza2993d ago

one quote kinda backfired though,

"I've said it over and over, we are focused on the best place to play for gamers, not about creating walls."

because people will bring up tomb raider. this is why i don't think he made that deal. i think that was made when don mattrick was still involved and phil said he wants to get away from those types of deals. which is great imo. people should be preaching for more people to enjoy games, not exclusivity.

Joe9132993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

If this is successful then why even make another console next gen if this plan works then MS should just make games for windows OS. I can see the problem and that is more of a announcement thing Sony announce if the game coming out for pc at the same time of announcing the game for the most part. If anything this may cause xbo sells to drop a lil bit I know if I was going to buy a xbo I would just put that money towards a gaming pc. Xbo would still sell cause you have ppl who will not play on a pc or just don't have the money to drop on one.

lastking952992d ago (Edited 2992d ago )

Money bruh, Xbox makes them money so why would they stop? That's the equivalent of saying why make laptops when there's pc or why make 3ds when you have wii. Xbox is cheaper than pc and an alternative option. Why limit your fanbase? I enjoy the xbox brand and xbox but personally im not choosing a $800+ pc with cost of maintenance,ect over a $350-$400 ps5. I'd just back to PS in a hurry.

Got my xbox one BF 2014, when it was$350 traded my 360 in for a $100 credit. I've payed a total of $50 for a total of 1yr and a half for gold. I've paid a total of $300 for XO console with gold so far. Show me a current gen pc at that price with console benefits......No matter how you slice it,there is a huge market for xbox even if all exclusives came to pc.

So for anyone that ask why choose xbox over pc or what's the point of xbox? One simple answer....it's cheaper and it's a console

Joe9132992d ago

lastking95 I get that but that is why you would buy a console over pc. If they sold as much consoles as Sony yeah I get it but they haven't it is possible for them to sell more xbo exclusives on pc because there are more out there and if that happens it could be possible they are doing this for a business reasons if people think it's strictly for the gamers then your kidding yourself same with Sony. I also see it possible because either high end pc will get cheaper for VR or more ppl will invest into high end computers because of VR.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2992d ago
Sonyslave32993d ago ShowReplies(2)
christocolus2993d ago ShowReplies(2)
2pacalypsenow2993d ago

Well Phil Spencer did hint at a PC release before, but I don't think many people expected to release simultaneously and a lot of Loyal Xbox fans wanted to use this "Another Only on xbox game, which they cant do anymore, I wonder if it had anything to do with the Delay?

Sciurus_vulgaris2993d ago

The Xbox one now currently has only 2 true exclusives for the year. If Gears of War 4 gets announced for PC the console will basically have no flag ship title. "The greatest Xbox line up in history " tag should not be used anymore.

AngelicIceDiamond2993d ago (Edited 2993d ago )

See fanboys are flip flopping again what happen to console exclusives? Fanboys were very accepting of console exclusive here http://n4g.com/comments/red... I called it its so easy to predict the actions of this site, honestly.

BtW nice try the only reason why ppl like you wanna deem that is to make it seem like Xbox fans have nothing to truly play. Like saying "Well Xbox fans ONLY have Gears and Crackdown to look forward to now this year." Like those are the games they're allowed to play or look forward to now. They're console excluives. And I'm still looking forward to Fable Legends, Sea Of Thieves, Recore, Phantom Dust, Gears 4, Crackdown, Scalebound probably even FH3 weather they hit PC or not.

Nice forced assumption and underhanded goal post of what Xbox fans should look forward to and get excited about.

Show all comments (119)
340°

2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer

Xbox has been lagging behind PlayStation in terms of 1st party content, but 2024 offers the platform and Phil Spencer a chance at redemption.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
isarai17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Nah, that time has passed for many, and with their words on future plans, i really don't see it ever happening.

shinoff218317d ago

It's a wrap. Now is the time they are slowly going to move on as to not to kill the base as is. Titles will slowly drip onto ps and Nintendo consoles, etc. Those 4 already had to of been in development for awhile already cause two of them released really soon after the announcement

VenomUK17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

There is no ‘last chance redemption’ for Phil Spencer - he’s going straight to hell for tanking the Xbox console platform.

_SilverHawk_17d ago

"2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer"

I thought that was supposed to be a decade ago

Ironmike16d ago

U do rel7se ps5 is at thr moment only getting g those titles that were mentioned nothing else as of yet

Obscure_Observer17d ago

"Nah, that time has passed for many, and with their words on future plans, i really don't see it ever happening."

Xbox has PLENTY of first party games this year while Playstation has none!

There´s more first party games from Xbox Games Studios on PS5 this year than Playstation Studios own games.

Those are the *facts* and if those facts is not something to Sony be ashamed of, they can´t feel shame at all.

VersusDMC17d ago

Granblue Fantasy versus, FF7REBIRTH, Helldivers 2, Rise of the Ronin and Stellar Blade will have launched on PS5 and not on Xbox by the time Hellblade 2 launches.

This only first party games count is cope.

And as a bonus meme...Microsoft will have published 3 first party games on PS5 (Hifi rush, Grounded and sea of thieves) before their first for the year on Xbox(hellblade 2). Glad they have their priorities straight...

lodossrage17d ago

It's funny when people like to say xbox has more games coming to playstation this year than sony does.

YET, they leave out the context that Microsoft literally bought the biggest (Activision) third party publisher and Bethesday (another big one). So congrats on having to buy giants in order to compete?

On topic, wasn't Starfield the "last chance" for redemption?

Am I to assume that if the games they have coming this year don't get positive, feedback then 2025 will be the year of redemption?

Obscure_Observer17d ago

@VersusDMC

"Granblue Fantasy versus, FF7REBIRTH, Helldivers 2, Rise of the Ronin and Stellar Blade will have launched on PS5 and not on Xbox by the time Hellblade 2 launches."

None of the games you mentioned are first party. None. There´re more Xbox first party games on PS5 this year then Playstation´s own first party games, undeniable fact!

The real bonus meme is Sea of Thieves a game which PS fanboys used to sh!t on

"And as a bonus meme...Microsoft will have published 3 first party games on PS5 (Hifi rush, Grounded and sea of thieves) before their first for the year on Xbox(hellblade 2). Glad they have their priorities straight..."

Imo, the real meme is Sea of Thieves, a 6 year Xbox first party game which diehard fanboys used to mock and sh!t on, making to the top of the most pre-ordered game at PS Store in a year where Playstation has zero first party games.

https://twitter.com/BenjiSa...

Markusb3317d ago

and all will end up on playstation, and nintendo, if xbox was doing amazing they would not need ps or nintendo, if gp was amazing they wouldnt need pc. PS has multiple first party games in development that we dont know about. Look at how halo was treated, look at redfall, and look at starfield. Its fine to be loyal and prefer one platoform but to be wilfully ignorant about it just ridiculas.

badz14917d ago

LOL se we are moving from "exclusives" to "console exclusives" to now only "1st party exclusives" matters just after MS has bought 2 publishers for $77B??

Moving goalpost to always favor MS i. Your argument is getting tiring! Exclusives are exclusives! 1st or 3rd party, they are still exclusives. You do remember the PS2 literally killed the Dreamcast, Gamecube and the first xbox due to mostly 3rd party exclusives, right?

InUrFoxHole17d ago

Observe is actually correct. Sony paid to play. But we don't mention when they do it. When they do it we're totally cool with it. N4G 4lyfe!

Skuletor17d ago

Are they still counted as first party though?

fr0sty17d ago

“This notion that Xbox can only be this one device that plugs into a television isn’t something we see in the Gen Z research. Because nothing else is like that for them.

Some of them will have an iPhone, some will have an Android, but all the games and everything is the same. I can still get to TikTok on both of them, at least for now." - Phil Spencer

Read it and weep... all Xbox games are coming to as many platforms as they can put them on, and this is the first step towards them getting out of hardware entirely, just like Sega did.

Xbox has been Dreamcast out of the industry. You can deny it all you like, but it's happening.

northpaws17d ago

@Obscure_Observer

You certainly have more faith in Xbox than Phil Spencer does, I will give you that.

rpvenom17d ago

It's actually quite impressive watching you defend xbox. I respect the loyalty

wiz719117d ago

@VersusDMC here yall Sony fans go moving the goalpost again lol now this only first party things is a cope when yall was the one who started that crap in the first place. When Sony had all the first party games and Xbox was relying on third party , yall was shouting they had no first party games. Now the tables turn and suddenly it’s a cope. lol

wiz719117d ago

@lodossrage and so it’s also funny that the majority of Xbox first party games this year aren’t coming from any of those big studios lol except for Indy .. the biggest one this year is coming from a studio that Sony left and almost let that studio die after releasing two big exclusives on their console first. Now MS swoop in and saved them , then here they are with the best looking game this generation. Now that’s ironic , but you mention buying studios like Sony biggest studios weren’t BOUGHT my brother.

Yall need to be more worried about Sony closing studio after studio , the PSVR 2 dying , Sony losing billions , and the fact that yall biggest game this year as in Stellar Blade was once being developed as a multi platform game until Sony paid for them to be a second party studio. lol but you want to mention things being bought , your delusional

Crows9017d ago

Shame in the competitor buying up tons of dev teams in order to make that a reality? Yeah...there's no shame in that on the PlayStation side....

andy8517d ago

So now you're shifting the goal posts so only first party exclusives count. Amazing 😂

Profchaos17d ago

There's probably tons of games exclusive to Xbox that won't be on PS because of their early access clause.

However list the games that count helldivers 2 I'd argue has done more for gaming this year than any other title will.
It could be their only game and it would still be a great year because it was that unexpectedly good even haters of love service games are playing it

TheTony31617d ago

Still at it? Doesn't matter at this point. The games will eventually launch on PS5.

mkis00716d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I see you ignored his" only first party games count" line as if preordained. Is it on xbox? No...then it is ammunition. Meanwhile sony gets to passively soak up 30% of all ms game studios sales.

1Victor16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

@obscured: “There´s more first party games from Xbox Games Studios on PS5 this year than Playstation Studios own games.

Those are the *facts* and if those facts is not something to Sony be ashamed of, they can´t feel shame at all.”
That says more about Xbox than PlayStation that they have to release games on rival consoles to stay afloat, Microsoft and YOU SHOULD NOT BE ASHAMED OF THAT FACT.

Edit After thought: it took Microsoft 6 years to finally fix their sea of bugs just in time to release it on PlayStation 🤷🏿

S2Killinit16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

On topic:
MS’s last chance was Starfield…
How many last chances are there?

@Osbscure
You’re moving the goal posts into places that have no basis in reality anymore.

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 16d ago
darthv7217d ago

Life is too short to hold onto grudges. Grudges against a console, game or company is just petty.

isarai17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Has nothing to do with a grudge. Ive been waiting 12yrs for them to get back to their greatness, im done waiting and have moved onto just watching that ship sink as i play on literally every other platform

darthv7217d ago

^^... I still play on it, as well as the other platforms. Which is why I am not someone who dwells on the negativity like others do. there is always something for me to enjoy in this hobby.

isarai17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

@darth

Again, not dwelling on negativity, they legit haven't made anything i want to play since like gears 3 and halo reach. I did play Crackdown 3 and gears 5 cause i had hope given i was a huge fan of the older games, but that was a dud on both cases.

You're thinking it's way deeper than it is 🤣 make something worth playing and ill play it, i was hoping starfield would be that but again, dud.

darthv7217d ago

^^...I never said YOU were doing that... but its obvious others (here) do. Its all they seem to do is dwell on negativity, especially if its XB related. all im saying is there is more to enjoy than there is to complain about. And this is exactly why I play all the platforms instead of just one. You say you do the same... so just enjoy it.

neomahi17d ago

It's fanbots making their last stand in an attempt to save the Xbox, what more can one expect that the most optimism they've ever had. Xbox can't get a lock in Japan, still, and Europe is about to abandon it as well. What're you gonna do? And what happens IF Japanese generates interest? They'll see Europe losing interest and decide it's not worth it either. And it's not just Xbox, Microsoft as a whole is losing their footing. They've backed on subscriptions with everything they have to offer and it's tanking. Xbox needs to port to PlayStation and Nintendo while they can stay relevant and try to stay relevant, the longer they delay, we could see a complete Microsoft nose dive

S2Killinit16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

And you think MS fans are just dandy? Besides, is it a grudge if MS continues to give reasons for people to despise them?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 16d ago
Markusb3317d ago

when you cant make enough from your own platform and pc and you have to go to ps and nintendo you know its a slow transition to 3rd party publishing, and that is fine. Xb never had the thurst or ambition after the 360

JackBNimble17d ago

The second they decided to put exclusives on the ps5 they blew any chance of redemption

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16d ago
-Foxtrot17d ago

Even if they managed to get a win this year it dosent overthrow 10 years of mostly disappointments from Phil’s leadership.

RaidenBlack17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Then this way, no company can redeem themselves. The very concept of redemption arc becomes impossible if the past is refused to be forgiven, even if the company manages to better themselves.
Then the now popular redemption arc of No Mans Sky or Phantom Liberty wouldn't exist in the gaming community if the same logic is also applied there.
Not defending anyone here but I want gaming to improve, companies to better themselves and most importantly competition to exist so that we get offered the best products to enjoy.
(I know in typical N4G fashion, this comment will be downvoted to oblivion, but I want good games offered from every studios irrespective of publishers.)

staticall17d ago

@RaidenBlack
IMO, what @-Foxtrot means, one years doesn't mean much. It's a start, yes, but they need more, much more.

Look at your own example, No Mans Sky - they didn't just release one patch and everyone started praising them, no. They've been doing this consistently. If Microsoft will start releasing good games consistently, that'll be great, no ifs and/or buts! But hyping them up in advance (no worthy releases yet is what i mean) - dunno, i might be wrong, but i don't think it's healthy or helps anyone.

rippermcrip17d ago

Your analogies are terrible. A company releasing a single game that failed to meet expectations.

Isn't the same as Phil Spencer making mistake after mistake after mistake after mistake, telling lie after lie after lie after lie for 10+ years.

isarai17d ago

Your whole comparison makes no sense. It literally took years for both of those to "redeem" themselves in the container of a single game. MS has been lacking for 12yrs starting with the halo/gears/forza criticism begining in the latter half of the 360. So even by YOUR logic, he's right, it's gonna take a lot more than one game to be redeemed ESPECIALLY after fumbling what many were already holding as their chance at redemption with starfield

Chevalier17d ago

It's not Playstation or Nintendos fault that Xbox poses no competition. They've had more support and more money behind them than Playstation and Nintendo combined!

You say you aren't defending Xbox, but, you kind of are. Xbox has been completely mediocre for decades. The last time Xbox was competitive was the 360 era. My 360 collection absolutely demolishes my Xbox One collection and so far Series X hasn't had much reason for me to jump to a purchase.

Can you honestly say Xbox is 'competitive'?! I would say not even close.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 17d ago
Silly Mammo17d ago

With the gaming media, Xbox is always just one game away from redemption and success. It's willful ignorance that they think there's a 'magic bullet' that will somehow erase all the moves by Phil & the gang of the last 2 console generations.

"Well there's always next year!" Should be the official Xbox slogan

Chocoburger16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

100% this Mammo!

They've been screwing up for over a decade! Even if they release a game that's of the highest quality, that's nothing in the grand scheme things.

It also doesn't un-do Kinect (with lies based advertising).

Or Kinect 2 (forcing people to spend $100 extra for something they didn't even want!).

Or releasing two consoles with nothing noteworthy twice in a row (One X, Series S|X).

Or releasing unpolished games such as Re:Core, Sea of Thieves, Halo: MCC, Halo Infinite, Redfall, and Starfield.

Let's not forget canceling games as well such as Scalebound,Project Spark, and the Phantom Dust remake.

Finally let's remember the broken promises of vaporware games, languishing in development Hell, such as Perfect Dark, Fable, Everwild, what else am I forgetting?

Redemption is far far FAR AWAY for Microsoft. It'll take a full decade of only making smart pro-consumer decisions and releasing plenty of amazing games in order to make up for it all.

2024? It ain't gonna do squat on its own.

Rols17d ago

It was the same old story in 2020, 2021,2022 and 2023. XBox has never delivered this gen.

Brazz17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Xbox360, the last time they delivered the goods, over 10 years Ago.

Skuletor17d ago

This headline just reminds me of the "wait 'til E3" comments we'd hear every year, before it was cancelled.

LG_Fox_Brazil17d ago

I wonder if the 2025's version of this article is already written, probably I would say

lodossrage17d ago

That's the same point I was trying to convey when I replied to Obscure

Hofstaderman17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

#wait till e3 2024

Aloymetal17d ago

''2024 Is A Chance At Redemption For Xbox & Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer''
We've been hearing and reading the same crap since the xbone launch, these shills/journos need to come up with something new. Good thing is most gamers know this is all BS, they all read ''"Step right up folks and hold out your money or sub to our service. You don't know what you are going to get, but like always, take our word for it" Signed Lord Phil.

Show all comments (88)
580°

Phil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes.

Spencer said publicly traded companies have to show constant growth or else nobody will give them money. "I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business"

LG_Fox_Brazil22d ago

I don't know Phil... You've being running, and some will say ruining, the Xbox brand for 10 years now, you know?

Profchaos22d ago

I'd say he'sade the best out of a tremendous cluster fk of a situation he was thrown into after Don tanked the Xbox brand from Kinect to the launch of the X1.

The only reason Xbox isn't in the Ms graveyard right now is because of Phil.

So I don't agree with everything he's done but I can see why these drastic pivots and moves have been made

VenomUK22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

You don’t hear Nintendo CEO Shuntaro Furukawa blame capitalism for the phenomenal success of the Switch.

You don’t hear now-departed PlayStation CEO Jim Ryan blame capitalism for the roaring success of the PS5.

Cockney21d ago

He was head of games back in don mattricks day so he should be held accountable for his involvement, the back half of the 360 gen and start of xbone lack of games was all him

Rynxie21d ago

The reason Xbox is not in the Ms graveyard is because of the money they are throwing around to keep the brand alive. Don was just a yes man, the stupidity of the Xbox one was MS doing.

romulus2321d ago

We are well past Don Mattrick at this point, people need to stop using that tired excsue. The issues with xbox for nearly the last ten years have been solely on Phil.

Plague-Doctor2721d ago

The PS3 tanked Sony and they recovered during the same generation. The Wii U tanked Nintendo and they delivered a record setting console only a few years later. At the launch of X1 it was keeping pace with the PS4 and in the US was occasionally beating it.

jwillj2k421d ago (Edited 21d ago )

All he had to do was say “the way forward is to make great games.”, drop the mic and make it happen by any means necessary. If you listen to the interview he gave after redfall came out, you’ll hear him say he thought the game was good to go and the internal team rated the game 85 out of 100. 85!! This shows how out of touch he is. He’s literally an empty vessel just collecting his check, running the division off of data-driven analytics, he doesn’t care about xbox and now pulls a Trump, blaming the clouds for his failures.

Cacabunga21d ago

Says the biggest capitalist company.. this moron should stop talking

sinspirit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

No.. Phil was in charge of European studios and Kinect implementation since 2008. Those European studios he was in charge of were then full time Kinect developers as he was now in charge of all XBox game studios in 2010. This is why game quality has sucked ever since he was in charge and directly why the legendary Lionhead and the actual Rare devs are not there anymore. Phil is actually more to blame than anyone for the bad game quality and the Kinect push. And especially for the terrible XBox One launch.

He was the spearhead implemented employee for Kinect and Microsoft's new vision. The others were the talking heads appointed by XBox. And, honestly watching some of those old interviews it seemed like those XBox employees were possibly maliciously complient by telling exactly what Microsoft's new agenda was with Kinect and always online without dressing it up.

And directly on topic. No, Phil. Capitalism is voting with your wallet. XBox doing bad financially is in fact because of bad products, disappointments, failed deadlines, and especially lying, misleading, and broken promises for products. If you just released really good games and tried to innovate then you'd had a lot of sales.. oh and GamePass is losing out on a ton of sales which can not be recovered from a few microtransaction purchases, monthly sub costs, or even whales. The math is simple when you could have sold a $70 game 5 million times but instead maybe sold 1 million tops and now have to recoup a quarter billion of revenue from lost sales potential of the one title alone. But now you also don't want to release a lot of first party titles because of the direct loss in sales revenue from day 1 GamePass, and you don't want them to release really good games that take a little more time and money to make because you want them to be cost effective for GamePass release. So you intentionally plan to release a lot of AAA shortcomings at this point because the AAA badge is needed but you can't do it too well or GamePass will never actually profit. Even though they had said GamePass is profitable, it is absolutely not by much and never will be. And, they said that Zune was profitable a long time ago but they combined it with an entire category of products when Zune itself was bleeding money. They lose far too many direct sales that even the most generous math can not see how they could be making much money if any at all to make up for this business practice. This is what happens when marketing and trend chasing fool a business into pursuing the wrong thing to stay relevant when the clear answer all along was that they always did good when they just supported developers making genuinely full and good games.

Babadook721d ago (Edited 21d ago )

I kind of agree with you, but Phil is partly to blame.

I blame Peter Moore (for leaving). Everything went to pot soon after.

PapaBop21d ago

How many years ago was this now? I'll give him some credit for what he inherited but lets be honest, he hasn't exactly done anything praise worthy and has done a terrible job managing the studios Microsoft owns.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
Eonjay22d ago

I thought he said it was Gen Z. I can't keep up.

Hofstaderman22d ago

Its Gen Z who are extremely capitilist. Lol, Phil is a clown of note.

21d ago
fr0sty21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

He's kinda right, shareholders expect constant growth, which is unsustainable, but it is what they expect nonetheless. That's why, even though the games industry is healthy as it has ever been, because it isn't growing, everyone in the industry is panicking. Even though we're still selling just as many consoles as ever, they expect each generation to just keep on growing and growing, and when that doesn't happen, they start to freak out.

This is true of any industry, and it's why anytime a company goes public, their products usually end up going to shit. The shareholders expect more and more and more growth, cuz they want that stock price to keep climbing, and so eventually corners start getting cut, wages start getting cut, employees start getting cut, they start cutting away everywhere they can to try to squeeze a little bit more money out of the product, until they ruin it, and then they move on to the next product.

buffig21d ago

Yeah, but everyone knows how capitalism works. This part didn't need explaining. The problem is that they bought massive plublishers for a gazillion dollars, to the detriment of the industry and now he's acting like he has no choice but to fire thousands of people because he just found out about nasty capitalism

TheEnigma31321d ago

Why I'm glad companies like Valve stayed private.

SyntheticForm21d ago

He'd never blame himself, so he's trying to score points with the kids by blaming capitalism. One of the biggest capitalists is blaming capitalism for his and Xbox's failure.

fr0sty20d ago

I agree with you, which is why I said he's "kinda" right... he's right in the fact that capitalism is behind a lot of investors freaking out that the games industry, while still healthy, is not continually growing unsustainably, but he's also being hypocritical in the same breath after buying half the industry and then laying off thousands of them, and using his own business practices as an excuse to cover for his failures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
mandf22d ago

It won't be until halo and gears are on playstation that xbox fans see phil for who he is. A snake fighting only for himself. The video game industry means nothing to him just his paycheck to those who believe phil is passionate and loves video games you are part of the problem. You never hold ms accountable.

Minute Man 72122d ago

Halo and Gears only when Microsoft drops outta the console market

-Foxtrot22d ago

They don't need to drop out of the market for that to happen

They will always have some kind of console going forward but Halo and Gears could only be a few years away at this rate.

Next gen might look completely different

Tacoboto22d ago

I'd actually hope for Halo to come to PS and Nintendo at this point.

The community rejected a mictotransaction option so MCC is no longer maintained - no new revenue streams and Microsoft listened. Infinite is on Content Updates now instead of Seasons - dwindling playerbase and less excitement. If MS wants the franchise to thrive, that's free money and the same could essentially be said for Gears bringing them abroad.

FinalFantasyFanatic22d ago

@Tacoboto,
To be fair, Halo Infinite had a rocky start to begin with, I think they improved for a while, but fell behind again.

shinoff218321d ago

The writings on the all in huge fking letters. Just read it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 21d ago
phoenixwing22d ago

I don't blame Phil for that in the slightest. If you were offered to be an executive of a company 9 out of 10 ppl would take the job for the salary and give little crap about how they feel about any given product they sell. He's not wrong that capitalism drives greedy companies but you have to take the good with the bad.

staticall22d ago

@phoenixwing
But the person is doing a bad job and the company (including customers) are suffering because of that, how can you not blame him? The reason for high paying is the decisions you make and the responsibility you take for your actions steering the company in the right direction (if company is doing bad, it's your fault; if company is doing good, it's because of your decisions).

It reminds me of that South Park Bill Owens parody ("Follow that egg" episode), a governor who wants all the money and recognition/respect, but doesn't want to take any responsibility, how backwards is that?!

Petebloodyonion21d ago

@Staticall
Agree but what are your metrics for doing a bad job?
Is Microsoft's share value tanking due to its decision?
Is brand awareness worse than in 2016?

As someone who works in investment, this is how I see it and why Spencer's still around.
1) Grow the Xbox brand awareness by including PC and Gamepass making it a stronger brand by name versus 2015.
2) Showed a plan to evolve profitability by having multiple sources of recurrent income with Gamepass, PC gaming, streaming, and now other platforms
3) made new market integration possible via PC and cloud.
4) Can make hard decisions for the good of the company like cutting jobs.

staticall21d ago

@Petebloodyonion
I would say, we shouldn't look at Microsoft themselves, they have a ton of revenue streams - Windows sales, hardware sales, Office sales, Azure, government contracts, certification programs, etc. We need to look at Xbox - hardware sales are in decline (Xbox 360 > Xbox One > Xbox Series S + X combined). GamePass subscribers aren't growing enough and, according to the Microsoft docs, are at plateau. Games sales are abysmal (both physical and digital, thanks to "Day one on GamePass"). Xbox exclusives doesn't exist anymore (every game is coming to PC). And it didn't start yesterday, this was happening for a long-long time.

In my eyes, brand recognition doesn't mean much, if it doesn't translate to console sales, because Phil took away every reason to buy Xbox console for a regular customer (i used to own Xbox 360 and saw 0 reasons to own Xbox One or Xbox Series).

I would also argue that he didn't make any hard decisions, at least when it comes to games: Crackdown 3, Redfall, Halo Infinite - he was saying that those games are looking fine only to be laughed at on presentation/release. But i would consider that a low blow, because he did cut some jobs. But not from top management (who are responsible for the decisions).

In my eyes, as a console owner/gamer, doing good job as a platform holder = supporting your console with high quality exclusive games (like Nintendo and Sony are doing). I'm fine with releasing the games afterwards on PC, but not right away (otherwise, what's the point of a console?!). Extra services are fine (like PS+ or GamePass, or cloud stuff), but they wouldn't be a reason to buy a console for me. Phil is overfocusing on extra services, not on games. And it doesn't work out and haven't worked out for what, 10 years already? Sorry, i feel like i'm rambling at this point.

Nooderus21d ago

He's a Microsoft executive. Duh

S2Killinit21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Agree except I think the real snake is MS itself. They are a terrible company. This clown is just the hired man for the job.

phoenixwing21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Thats basically what I'm trying to say and if you really want to get down to it. It's the board of directors for the company who makes this stuff happen.

jznrpg21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

@Phoenixeing it’s his job as the head of the division to tell those people I think you are wrong and for success we need to this - that’s literally his job. MS motto is a big problem and Phil going a long with it is also his fault. He’s the one guy who can say something.

Abear2121d ago

Agreed they are the problem.

M$ doesn’t care about the quality of the game, they care about the profitability of the game.

When you work for a Co. like M$ you know this. It’s all about money—not the “art” or what’s healthy in the industry for devs and/or the consumers.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 21d ago
M3talDiamond22d ago

First its Gen Z now its capitalism but we can all agree that it definitely isn't Phil

JackBNimble21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

If it wasn't for capitalism there would be no xbox or Microsoft for that matter. But as the head of xbox division it is his responsibility no matter good or bad .... that's what it means to be the boss. If that's to much for him, then he needs to resign.

-Foxtrot22d ago

Kind of funny because when it comes to capitalism Microsoft is one of those great big American companies that just screams it.

They spent billions on Minecraft, Zenimax and Activision yet couldn't afford to save all those jobs they cut. With the money they make within a year they could have, someway.

PhillyDonJawn22d ago ShowReplies(3)
FinalFantasyFanatic22d ago

They've been swallowing up a lot of AI companies too and spending big on that area.

S2Killinit21d ago

If MS gets into AI they will cause the end of humanity the way they are causing the end of console gaming.

FinalFantasyFanatic20d ago

@S2Killinit,

It's between Microsoft and Google, the chances are one of those two will take the AI crown considering the amount of cash they're throwing at that sector. I suppose Microsoft might be the worst out of the two, but Google hasn't been exactly great compared to the old days when they threw around their old adage of "do no evil".

Silly Mammo21d ago

MS is making millions of dollars annually with the Xbox brand. Unfortunately, they're spending billions on acquisitions too

8bitAssassin21d ago

Game Pass games are not free.

Christopher21d ago

He also blames his bank account balance on capitalism.

PhillyDonJawn21d ago

I don't think it work like that. MS is the parent company. The branch has its own budget to maintain.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 20d ago
thorstein22d ago

Making millions, taking million dollar salaries and bonuses but it's the dev in the chair that's preventing profit?

Yeah okay, Phil.

Show all comments (146)
320°

Phil Spencer, long cast as Xbox's saviour, may be remembered as the man who killed it

Nathan Brown: "Phil Spencer spoke to the press at GDC last week, offering some context/spin on Microsoft’s recent manoeuvres, while dropping a few now-customary hints about the Xbox division’s future plans. I take one issue with this: I am no longer sure Xbox has much of a future to speak of. Moreover: I think Phil Spencer, for so long cast as Xbox’s saviour, may ultimately be remembered as the man who killed it."

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
24d ago
gold_drake24d ago

his decisions over the years were definitely questionable at best.

but MS let him be the head of xbox for this long, so they either dont have anyone else for the job or .. we'll i dont rly know any other reason haha.

-Foxtrot24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Basically when we had that awful Xbox One reveal in 2013 and Don Mattrick was thrown under the bus as the companies scape goat Phil was pretty much the only one they had who wasn't a typical looking "corporate suit".

Despite the fact him being the head of Microsoft Game Studios and gladly going along with the lack of games nearing the end of the Xbox 360 life where it was basically Kinect, Sports, TV along with the same 3-4 IPs like Halo or Gears he was the best person they had for the job.

They didn't have anyone else basically and from that day onward he was seen as good guy Phil turning the studio around when all he was doing was reversing the silly decisions made and going along with whatever the higher ups or the board wanted for Xbox. Didn't make a difference in the end because everything they "reversed" with the awful Xbox One reveal ended up being implemented in small different ways surgically in recent years with Gamepass.

The guy apparently is such a huge gamer yet played Crackdown 3 and Redfall, thought they were good and released them anyway in those states.

PapaBop24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Not a typical looking corporate suit? The guy straight up looks like a used car salesman lol. To be fair, after Mattrick, I think anyone with half a brain could succeed him and look semi decent, whenever I think of his name, I immediately remember that "this is how to share your games" video from Sony.

S2Killinit24d ago

when I look at him, its cringe. The guy dresses casually to fool people. But he is as corporate as it gets.

fr0sty23d ago

His cocky smirk I've always found to be incredibly annoying...

MrDead23d ago

I would say his "why bother making games when others are already" decision is what has lead them here. MS does this, but they just buy companies that they want to do a thing then asset strip it and dump it, you can't do that in gaming.

Tody_ZA23d ago

He's the head of Xbox because Microsoft isn't a gaming company and they haven't done anything for gaming in more than a decade. They're a parent company looking to buy more kids to raise as investments. They will profit off ownership, off their games releasing on other platforms, because they can't create anything themselves. Slowly they'll make Xbox as a console completely irrelevant under the mantra of play anywhere. That's why Phil is still there. He shares their corporate vision of making bucks and doing nothing for the gaming industry.

SubtilizZer24d ago

“If they don’t have a story these days they’ll make one”
Drake.

RhinoGamer8824d ago

Phil's top skill is keeping his job, growing his net worth to over $25million, all while underperforming...

SeTTriP24d ago

Gotta respect it, he went from a gaming studio head to making 70billion dollar deals...he is the main character I gotta admit.he looks fun to hang around too.

MrDead23d ago

...why do I feel like I need a shower after reading that? One of the grossest thing I've heard, S tier blowing bubbles grovelling.

jznrpg23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I don’t respect moves that make gaming worse long term

XBManiac23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

(Phil 'wait for next year' Spencer)
Microsoft made the 71,933 millions deal because it was already started and, with Microsoft, it is not possible to go back and stop it. Does anybody think that deal would be an option in 2023 or 2024, with the nowadays sitiation of the industry? And in 2022? No, nobody would pay that money for Activision-blizzard-king... because it would not be recovered in more than 20 years of really hard and good work. Everybody are selling for less, not buying for more (Embracer, Tencent...). But bad decisions in a company like Microsoft are impossible to fix. It is like a very big Ministery, where if something starts, it can't be stopped. It happened before and Microsoft will do the same again, as they have enough money to burn... well... I hope, because if Microsoft dies... it will be the end of our known world. What could substitute it?

_Decadent_Descent23d ago

I mean, that does take a certain skill. lol

FinalFantasyFanatic23d ago

I guess he has skill as a salesman, look how long he managed to get people to wait on Xbox.

Show all comments (54)